How Old Is The Earth

Ceallaigh

May God be with you and bless you.
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
19,647
10,220
Seattle area.
✟628,941.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I already said why - these genealogies are not to be summed, they are not literal. Trying to get even a literal age of the universe from them is absurd.
So even though many of the people in the genealogies have a role in scripture, they're mythological? I'm really having a hard time differentiating between what you're saying and what I hear atheists trying to discredit the Bible as plagiarized pagan myths say. What else is mythical? God? Jesus? The Son of God? The resurrection?
 
Upvote 0

Ceallaigh

May God be with you and bless you.
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
19,647
10,220
Seattle area.
✟628,941.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Unless you use the Septuagint version and you will get to 10,000. Ups.

No, historians do not date civilizations by summing their mythological genealogies, where did you get this idea from?
He was talking about actual genealogies. Genealogies always trace back to a point in time. Like when someone's genealogy traces back to the Mayflower landing at Plymouth Rock ie 1620.
 
Upvote 0

Mercy Shown

Active Member
Jan 18, 2019
348
118
64
Boonsboro
✟45,026.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Its useful, its testable, its predicting what will happen, it explains what we see in the world... not sure why we should scientifically reject it (the evolutionary models).
I am not suggesting that anyone should reject anything. I am just explaining why I do. For me, it destroys the credibility of the bible. If it is true, then it strikes at the following.

  1. The Ten Commandments
  2. The writings of Paul
  3. The gospel
  4. Jesus as the Son of God
  5. Every Miracle recorded in scripture
  6. The veracity of most of the books of Moses
  7. The Omnipotence and Omniscience of God
Evolution is science's black-box.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ceallaigh
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
9,700
3,824
N/A
✟156,135.00
Country
Czech Republic
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I am not suggesting that anyone should reject anything. I am just explaining why I do. For me, it destroys the credibility of the bible. If it is true, then it strikes at the following.

  1. The Ten Commandments
  2. The writings of Paul
  3. The gospel
  4. Jesus as the Son of God
  5. Every Miracle recorded in scripture
  6. The veracity of most of the books of Moses
  7. The Omnipotence and Omniscience of God
Evolution is science's black-box.
It does not work this way. Just because Jesus is not a literal door but it was just a metaphor, it does not lead to the rest you listed.

In the same way, just because Genesis is not literal, it does not lead to the rest you listed.
 
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
9,700
3,824
N/A
✟156,135.00
Country
Czech Republic
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
He was talking about actual genealogies. Genealogies always trace back to a point in time. Like when someone's genealogy traces back to the Mayflower landing at Plymouth Rock ie 1620.
Modern genealogies, i.e. genealogies since the era of Greece, more or less, are different from the mythological age genealogies. Therefore 1620 is a modern one.
 
Upvote 0

Ceallaigh

May God be with you and bless you.
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
19,647
10,220
Seattle area.
✟628,941.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Modern genealogies, i.e. genealogies since the era of Greece, more or less, are different from the mythological age genealogies. Therefore 1620 is a modern one.
Neither he nor I (nor most Christians) consider the genealogies of Jesus to be mythological. If they were that leads to rendering Jesus as the Christ being mythological.
 
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
9,700
3,824
N/A
✟156,135.00
Country
Czech Republic
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Neither he nor I (nor most Christians) consider the genealogies of Jesus to be mythological. If they were that leads to rendering Jesus as the Christ being mythological.
Still this slippery slope fallacy. If this is mythological, then everything must be.
 
Upvote 0

Ceallaigh

May God be with you and bless you.
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
19,647
10,220
Seattle area.
✟628,941.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
It does not work this way. Just because Jesus is not a literal door but it was just a metaphor, it does not lead to the rest you listed.

In the same way, just because Genesis is not literal, it does not lead to the rest you listed.
There's a line between the metaphorical and the literal. You've gone way past that line.
 
Upvote 0

Ceallaigh

May God be with you and bless you.
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
19,647
10,220
Seattle area.
✟628,941.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Still this slippery slope fallacy. If this is mythological, then everything must be.
When you start claiming accounts of Jesus are mythological, then the veracity of Jesus being the Christ starts to crumble. Maybe if you explained why Matthew and Luke wrote down mythological genealogies it would make more sense. But at this point I'm not expecting you to do that.
 
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
9,700
3,824
N/A
✟156,135.00
Country
Czech Republic
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
When you start claiming accounts of Jesus are mythological, then the veracity of Jesus being the Christ starts to crumble. Maybe if you explained why Matthew and Luke wrote down mythological genealogies it would make more sense. But at this point I'm not expecting you to do that.
Nobody knows where the genealogies in Luke or Matthew are from. The only thing we know they differ even one from another.

The symbolic/legendary part can be seen in the "nice numbers", like 14 (2*7).

Its absolutely possible and plausible for Jesus to be from the lineage of David even if these genealogies were not perfect. And the part before David is actually irrelevant for that, fully.

It seems logical that more a part in a genealogy is distant, more probably it is just guessed or filled in symbolically.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Platte

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
718
100
55
Virginia
✟26,469.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Unless you use the Septuagint version and you will get to 10,000. Ups.

No, historians do not date civilizations by summing their mythological genealogies, where did you get this idea from?
geneologies of the Egyptian kings to date Egyptian civilization.
 
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
9,700
3,824
N/A
✟156,135.00
Country
Czech Republic
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
geneologies of the Egyptian kings to date Egyptian civilization.
Its not so simple.

Egyptian civilization is dated using a combination of methods:

Predynastic Period (before 3150 BC):
Carbon-14 dating provides an important framework for dating the Predynastic period.

Dynastic Period (3150 BC - 332 BC):
Dates are determined by a combination of Egyptian traditions, written dates on monuments and documents, astronomical observations, and overlaying chronologies of kings and dynasties.

The beginning of the 26th Dynasty around 664 BC marks a point where Egyptian dates can be more precisely established by combining Egyptian evidence with foreign, primarily Greek, sources.

Before 664 BC, dates for Egyptian history are considered approximate, with some variation between different standard chronologies.

 
Upvote 0

Platte

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
718
100
55
Virginia
✟26,469.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Its not so simple.

Egyptian civilization is dated using a combination of methods:

Predynastic Period (before 3150 BC):
Carbon-14 dating provides an important framework for dating the Predynastic period.

Dynastic Period (3150 BC - 332 BC):
Dates are determined by a combination of Egyptian traditions, written dates on monuments and documents, astronomical observations, and overlaying chronologies of kings and dynasties.

The beginning of the 26th Dynasty around 664 BC marks a point where Egyptian dates can be more precisely established by combining Egyptian evidence with foreign, primarily Greek, sources.

Before 664 BC, dates for Egyptian history are considered approximate, with some variation between different standard chronologies.

The basis for dating the Egyption civiliaztion was recorded chronologies of the Kings.

Notice how recorded History and the History of Civilizations support a creation 6000 years ago. Also how the beginning of Civilization was in the Middle East region of the World - same general area as the setting of the Bible. Exactly as would be expected.
 
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
9,700
3,824
N/A
✟156,135.00
Country
Czech Republic
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The basis for dating the Egyption civiliaztion was recorded chronologies of the Kings.

Notice how recorded History and the History of Civilizations support a creation 6000 years ago. Also how the beginning of Civilization was in the Middle East region of the World - same general area as the setting of the Bible. Exactly as would be expected.
It seems you did not read the source. The predynastic period is dated primarily with C-14. The further away the history goes, the less reliable the written records are.

And the rest is dated with a combination of methods or sources, always. Just genealogies or chronologies are not reliable.

The predynastic period begins 5000 BC, which is 7,000 years now, so no, it does not support a creation 6,000 years ago. And the neolithic history of China goes back even further:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Platte

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
718
100
55
Virginia
✟26,469.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
It seems you did not read the source. The predynastic period is dated primarily with C-14. The further away the genealogies go, the less reliable they are.

And the rest is dated with a combination of methods or sources, always. Just genealogies or chronologies are not reliable.

The predynastic period begins 5000 BC, which is 7,000 years now, so no, it does not support a creation 6000 years ago.
The basis of dating the Dynastic Period, which is generall considered the beginning of Egyption Civilization was the chronologies of the Kings. Other factors were used to tweek the dates but the basis of dating were the chronologies of the Kings. The chronologies of the Kings were considered reliable however the unknown regarding overlapping Kingdoms caused challenges that required other sources. During that time period there is no better or more reliable dating method than chronologies.

Notice how recorded History and the History of Civilizations support a creation 6000 years ago. Also how the beginning of Civilization was in the Middle East region of the World - same general area as the setting of the Bible. Exactly as would be expected. You say Earth has been here for billions of years - yet recorded History is only about 5500-6000 years old....the timeline of Creation oh and the region of Creation. smh.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
9,700
3,824
N/A
✟156,135.00
Country
Czech Republic
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Notice how recorded History and the History of Civilizations support a creation 6000 years ago. Also how the beginning of Civilization was in the Middle East region of the World - same general area as the setting of the Bible. Exactly as would be expected.
Nope. The history of civilizations does not support creation 6,000 years ago. And before you will run to Septuagint and make it 10,000 years ago, still not enough:



It seems you are confusing the creation with the invention of writing, which was roughly 6,000 years ago:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Platte

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
718
100
55
Virginia
✟26,469.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Nope. The history of civilizations does not support creation 6,000 years ago. And before you will run to Septuagint and make it 10,000 years ago, still not enough:



It seems you are confusing the creation with the invention of writing, which was roughly 6,000 years ago:
The worlds first civilization is Mesopotamia 4000-3500BC - wow located in the Middle East

6 Early Human Civilizations | HISTORY

Key Components of Civilization
 
Upvote 0

Ceallaigh

May God be with you and bless you.
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
19,647
10,220
Seattle area.
✟628,941.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Nobody knows where the genealogies in Luke or Matthew are from. The only thing we know they differ even one from another.

The symbolic/legendary part can be seen in the "nice numbers", like 14 (2*7).

Its absolutely possible and plausible for Jesus to be from the lineage of David even if these genealogies were not perfect. And the part before David is actually irrelevant for that, fully.

It seems logical that more a part in a genealogy is distant, more probably it is just guessed or filled in symbolically.
That makes the gospels too dodgy. A better approach is to go with the idea that a lot of names were left out. Which happens clearly when condensed genealogies are given that just include the top patriarchs like Jesus the son of David, the son of Joseph, the son of Abraham, the son of Noah, the son of Adam.
 
Upvote 0

Diamond7

YEC, OEC, GAP, TE - Dispensationalist.
Nov 23, 2022
5,782
911
72
Akron
✟79,355.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Its nowhere near the precision of modern, scientific languages used in modern science or information technology, for example.
Yes, the Hebrew language is very precise. To bad you do not see that. Other then Jesus no one added anything to what we receive from Moses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Platte
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Mercy Shown

Active Member
Jan 18, 2019
348
118
64
Boonsboro
✟45,026.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It does not work this way. Just because Jesus is not a literal door but it was just a metaphor, it does not lead to the rest you listed.

In the same way, just because Genesis is not literal, it does not lead to the rest you listed.
Who told us that Genesis was not literal? It has metaphors and similies, as do all narratives. However, the average reader knows when they run across a metaphor or simile, and they know when the narrative is literal.

If Genesis was not literal, why did the Son of God not know that? You see, for me, it is simple. If evolution is the truth and Genesis is a myth, then a bunch of rubes wrote the New Testament.

GenesisNew Testament
Gen 1:3-4 – Then God said, “Let there be light”; and there was light. God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness.2Cor 4:6
Gen 1:27 – God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.Matt 19:4;
Mark 10:6
Gen 2:2 – By the seventh day God completed His work which He had done, and He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had doneHeb 4:4
Gen 2:7 – Then the Lord God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.1Cor 15:45
Gen 2:24 – For this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother, and be joined to his wife; and they shall become one flesh.Matt 19:5; Mark 10:7,8; 1Cor 6:16; Eph 5:31
Gen 5:2 -He created them male and female, and He blessed them and named them Man in the day when they were created.Matt 19:4; Mark 10:6
Gen 12:1 – Now the Lord said to Abram, “Go forth from your country, And from your relatives
And from your father’s house, To the land which I will show you;
Acts 7:3
Gen 12:3 – And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.”Gal 3:8;
Rev 1:7
Gen 12:7 – The Lord appeared to Abram and said, “To your descendants I will give this land.” So he built an altar there to the Lord who had appeared to him.Gal 3:16
Gen 13:15 – for all the land which you see, I will give it to you and to your descendants forever.Gal 3:16
Gen 14:18 – And Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine; now he was a priest of God Most High.Heb 7:1
Gen 15:5 – And He took him outside and said, “Now look toward the heavens, and count the stars, if you are able to count them.” And He said to him, “So shall your descendants be.”Rom 4:18
Gen 15:6 – Then he believed in the Lord; and He reckoned it to him as righteousness.Rom 4:3; Rom 4:9; Rom 4:22; Gal. 3:6;
Jas 2:23
Gen 15:13God said to Abram, “Know for certain that your descendants will be strangers in a land that is not theirs, where they will be enslaved and oppressed four hundred years. 14But I will also judge the nation whom they will serve, and afterward they will come out with many possessions.Acts 7:6-7
Gen 17:5 – “No longer shall your name be called Abram, But your name shall be Abraham; For I will make you the father of a multitude of nations.Rom 4:17
Gen 17:8 – “I will give to you and to your descendants after you, the land of your sojournings, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.”Acts 7:5,
Gal 17:8
Gen 18:10 – He said, “I will surely return to you at this time next year; and behold, Sarah your wife will have a son.” And Sarah was listening at the tent door, which was behind him.Rom 9:9
Gen 18:14 – “Is anything too difficult for the Lord? At the appointed time I will return to you, at this time next year, and Sarah will have a son.”Rom 9:9
Gen 18:18 – since Abraham will surely become a great and mighty nation, and in him all the nations of the earth will be blessed?Gal 3:8
Gen 21:10 – Therefore she said to Abraham, “Drive out this maid and her son, for the son of this maid shall not be an heir with my son Isaac.”Gal 4:30
Gen 21:12 – But God said to Abraham, “Do not be distressed because of the lad and your maid; whatever Sarah tells you, listen to her, for through Isaac your descendants shall be named.Rom 9:7; Heb 11:18
Gen 22:17 – indeed I will greatly bless you, and I will greatly multiply your seed as the stars of the heavens and as the sand which is on the seashore; and your seed shall possess the gate of their enemies.Heb 6:13-14
Genesis 22:18 – “In your seed all the nations of the earth shall be blessed, because you have obeyed My voice.”Acts 3:25;
Gal. 3:8; Gal 3:16
Gen 25:23 – The Lord said to her, “Two nations are in your womb; And two peoples will be separated from your body; And one people shall be stronger than the other; And the older shall serve the younger.”Rom 9:12
Gen 26:4 – “I will multiply your descendants as the stars of heaven, and will give your descendants all these lands; and by your descendants all the nations of the earth shall be blessed;Acts 3:25
Gen 28:12 – He had a dream, and behold, a ladder was set on the earth with its top reaching to heaven; and behold, the angels of God were ascending and descending on it.John 1:51
Gen 28:14 – “Your descendants will also be like the dust of the earth, and you will spread out to the west and to the east and to the north and to the south; and in you and in your descendants shall all the families of the earth be blessed.”Rev 1:7all the tribes of the earth
Gen 47:31- He said, “Swear to me.” So he swore to him. Then Israel bowed in worship at the head of the bed. (LXX: on the top of his staff)Heb 11:21
 
Upvote 0