• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Assisted Suicide

partinobodycular

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
2,570
1,036
partinowherecular
✟131,559.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Where in the Bible, even one line, is there a hint of approval?

King Saul committed suicide. Nowhere in the bible do I see him being chastised for it in any way whatsoever.
 
Upvote 0

partinobodycular

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
2,570
1,036
partinowherecular
✟131,559.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Well I have a living will and if I get cancer or something I can think of several painless way to go that I would use.

I've always thought that 'Death by Hibachi' would be a fairly peaceful way to go.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,301
19,325
Flyoverland
✟1,293,738.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
King Saul committed suicide. Nowhere in the bible do I see him being chastised for it in any way whatsoever.
OK then. There you go. Suicide is moral! Proof positive. :scratch:
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
41,612
22,295
US
✟1,686,416.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
King Saul committed suicide. Nowhere in the bible do I see him being chastised for it in any way whatsoever.
King Saul was considered broadly in moral turpitude, so the fact that one particular thing was not specified is not any indication that particular act was moral.

Edit: It more points to a presumption that everything he did was immoral.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

QueenOfTheUnknown

Active Member
Nov 13, 2023
30
21
34
In my house
✟16,373.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I can see how some may see it as muder but if the person is so sick that they can't do simple things but understand that what is happening I feel it's okay. And if they have it in their living will, they HAVE to do it. Right?
 
Upvote 0

QueenOfTheUnknown

Active Member
Nov 13, 2023
30
21
34
In my house
✟16,373.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I can see how some may see it as muder but if the person is so sick that they can't do simple things but understand that what is happening I feel it's okay. And if they have it in their living will, they HAVE to do it. Right?
*murder
 
Upvote 0

partinobodycular

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
2,570
1,036
partinowherecular
✟131,559.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
King Saul was considered broadly in moral turpitude, so the fact that one particular thing was not specified is any indication that particular act was moral.

It wasn't my intent to interpret the morality of Saul's actions, I'm not at all qualified. I was simply pointing out the bible's silence on the matter. Its morality is for someone else to decide, they always do.
 
Upvote 0

Reluctant Theologian

אַבְרָהָם
Jul 13, 2021
701
533
QLD
✟121,175.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I object to the conflation of assisted suicide with "euthanasia." That can have pernicious consequences. "Euthanasia" is when someone else decides your life is not worth living and kills you, with or without your consent...it is not the same thing as "assisted suicide." We euthanize animals.

But if the laws are written to conflate the two, we wind up with laws permitting something people didn't intend.
Oh certainly that is a good suggestion; clear terminology where of course it's essential to be able to make the distinction between deciding about your own life or deciding about someone else's life ... ! Please read 'assisted suicide' in all places where I used the term 'euthanasia'.
 
Upvote 0

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
7,540
3,793
✟283,587.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I guess if there is no line in the Bible against it you will just have to try it and see what happens. Do a little experiment. But if you are wrong, and one of the ten commandments, the one against murder, applies to murdering yourself after all, then it's a bit late to reverse the experiment.
Of course this actually is in the Bible. Biblically, the blood is seen as the seat of life, and it belongs to God and God alone. This is why, for example, Hebrews are not permitted to consume blood (e.g. Leviticus 17), and why the blood was so important in the sacrificial offerings. It is also why it is Abel's blood that "cries out to God from the ground." So in the Biblical sense it is precisely the spilling of human blood that is prohibited, and all exceptions are explicit (e.g. Genesis 9:6). It doesn't matter whether the blood one is spilling is their own or someone else's. Either way it belongs to God, and it is not permitted.

(As for the claim in post #21 that Saul's suicide reflects no judgment by the Biblical author, this is just an ignorant reading of the text and a failure to understand Hebrew literature.)
 
Upvote 0

partinobodycular

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
2,570
1,036
partinowherecular
✟131,559.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
(As for the claim in post #21 that Saul's suicide reflects no judgment by the Biblical author, this is just an ignorant reading of the text and a failure to understand Hebrew literature.)

The fact still remains, Saul committed suicide, and neither he nor anyone else seems to have given it a second thought. But what's really, really strange is that his armor-bearer steadfastly refused to kill Saul, but had absolutely no qualms about killing himself. Which would seem to indicate that he understood that there was a very clear difference between the two acts... one was permissible, the other one wasn't.

But I'm probably just too ignorant to be able to understand the 'mysterious' inner meanings of the bible, available only to enlightened people such as yourself. So please forgive my ignorance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Desk trauma
Upvote 0

partinobodycular

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
2,570
1,036
partinowherecular
✟131,559.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I guess if there is no line in the Bible against it you will just have to try it and see what happens.

When the time comes I have every intention of doing just that. Then again I'm a stubborn old cuss, to paraphrase a popular NRA adage, "you can have my life when you pry it from my cold, dead hands". So who knows, what will be, will be... but I'm pretty sure that God isn't going to have a problem with how I happen to come to die. Me and J.C. ... we be cool.
 
Upvote 0

partinobodycular

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
2,570
1,036
partinowherecular
✟131,559.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
You pay your money and you take your chances.

Kinda like life... pay your money and take your chances. I came into this life not knowing what was going to happen, and I'll gladly go into the next one the same way. As I said... what will be, will be. If I'm there... awesome, if I'm not... it probably won't bother me much.
 
Upvote 0

Reluctant Theologian

אַבְרָהָם
Jul 13, 2021
701
533
QLD
✟121,175.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Of course this actually is in the Bible. Biblically, the blood is seen as the seat of life, and it belongs to God and God alone. This is why, for example, Hebrews are not permitted to consume blood (e.g. Leviticus 17), and why the blood was so important in the sacrificial offerings. It is also why it is Abel's blood that "cries out to God from the ground." So in the Biblical sense it is precisely the spilling of human blood that is prohibited, and all exceptions are explicit (e.g. Genesis 9:6). It doesn't matter whether the blood one is spilling is their own or someone else's. Either way it belongs to God, and it is not permitted.

(As for the claim in post #21 that Saul's suicide reflects no judgment by the Biblical author, this is just an ignorant reading of the text and a failure to understand Hebrew literature.)
That's not the whole story and cannot be applied literally in all cases IMHO - example:

Suppose you are captured by ISIS/HAMAS and they obviously prepare to burn you alive or kill you after being raped (so you're facing a horrible death anyway for certain) - in that case I would argue putting a bullet in your head just before the atrocities take place is not sinning given the circumstances.
 
Upvote 0

Whyayeman

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2018
4,626
3,133
Worcestershire
✟196,801.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
There is a distinction to be made between 'suicide' and 'assisted suicide'. The laws allowing a person to 'help' in suicide (in countries where they exist) generally assume that the person asking to die is incapable of performing the deed himself or herself. Such laws are designed for victims of paralysing diseases or accidents.

There is another distinction to be made between 'moral' and 'legal'. Morality is a private matter. The law is a public concern. Many sins are legal. The law permits suicide in many countries. Many religions regard it as a sin.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0

returntosender

EL ROI
Site Supporter
May 30, 2020
9,760
4,406
casa grande
✟391,964.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I give myself the right to decide. No one can take it from me.

It is my life after all.
It's not your decision if it's illegal.. i think it should be legal in the U S. Some one here in cf said you can't lose your salvation if you do it. I agree with that. I know you didn't ask that part, i just threw that in for others.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Unscrewing Romans 1:32
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,092
11,219
56
Space Mountain!
✟1,321,367.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
This is a very iffy topic. If your terminal meaning you are gonna die and your in pain and want it to in I fully understand and accept that. I also see the danger in it. I think it would have to be a case by case deal and It would need signed of by at least doctors to avoid abuse of the service. Now for the religious issue, I have never read a line in the bible that says suicide means you go to hell...if its there show me. If your terminal your already dead...its just a matter of how much your gonna suffer before you die. I do not believe god would want anyone who is dying to suffer unnecessarily.

On this issue of medical ethics, I'd think some of the central arguments hinge upon the exacting definition of "terminal" and its contraposition to the fact that "suicide" has historically been applied to those instances of self-inflicted death where that person was NOT terminal. So, when we then bring in the additional qualifier "assisted," I'm kind of thinking that most of us recognize that its relation conceptually is to the qualifier "terminal," as an antidote to prolonged suffering rather than merely being loosely thrown toward the term "suicide."

But, that's about as far on this issue as I will speak. It is, as you've said, "iffy." I think there's a lot of disambiguation of terms and qualifiers that needs to be applied on this one.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: RDKirk
Upvote 0