• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Assisted Suicide

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
23,223
20,202
Flyoverland
✟1,420,752.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Assume the ectopic pregnancy is hepatic. There is no parallel to salpingectomy when the child embeds in its mother's liver.
OK. A very rare permutation on an uncommon situation. What would YOU do?
 
Upvote 0

o_mlly

“Behold, I make all things new.”
May 20, 2021
3,390
607
Private
✟139,013.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
OK. A very rare permutation on an uncommon situation. What would YOU do?
Dr. o_mlly would respect the mother's religious conviction: a direct abortion is always immoral. He would pray that she receives sufficient grace to endure the cross she must bear -- to save her soul she must give up her life.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
23,223
20,202
Flyoverland
✟1,420,752.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Dr. o_mlly would respect the mother's religious conviction: a direct abortion is always immoral. He would pray that she receives sufficient grace to endure the cross she must bear -- to save her soul she must give up her life.
OK. That's your opinion. And I would agree that a direct abortion is always immoral. Yet I would think liver surgery would be indicated to save the woman from a dire medical problem. You said there was no parallel to salpingectomy, and you implied there would be no treatment available. This should not be considered at all a direct abortion because first an abortion is the deliberate removal of a live baby from the womb (not any other spaces), and second because this would be treatment for another serious condition with the undesired consequence of the death of the baby. So this woman does not need (or want) an abortion. This woman needs liver surgery. If she wishes not to receive such treatment her wishes should be respected. It would not be a suicide.
 
Upvote 0

o_mlly

“Behold, I make all things new.”
May 20, 2021
3,390
607
Private
✟139,013.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
This should not be considered at all a direct abortion because first an abortion is the deliberate removal of a live baby from the womb (not any other spaces ...
No, Catholic teaching differs from your opinion. Any direct attack on the child is immoral regardless of the child's location. Salpingostomy, the surgical excision of the child from the fallopian tube, for instance, is a direct attack on the child and is immoral.
because this would be treatment for another serious condition with the undesired consequence of the death of the baby
Again, your opinion differs from Catholic teaching. The end never justifies evil means. (Third principle of the double effect: the good end intended must not proceed from the evil effect.)
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
23,223
20,202
Flyoverland
✟1,420,752.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
No, Catholic teaching differs from your opinion. Any direct attack on the child is immoral regardless of the child's location. Salpingostomy, the surgical excision of the child from the fallopian tube, for instance, is a direct attack on the child and is immoral.

Again, your opinion differs from Catholic teaching. The end never justifies evil means. (Third principle of the double effect: the good end intended must not proceed from the evil effect.)
Could you explain all of this with reference to the National Catholic Bioethics Center and/or the work of Germain Grisez?
 
Upvote 0

o_mlly

“Behold, I make all things new.”
May 20, 2021
3,390
607
Private
✟139,013.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Could you explain all of this with reference to the National Catholic Bioethics Center and/or the work of Germain Grisez?
Out of respect to the OP, a new thread is necessary to continue.
 
Upvote 0