Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
All the turkey I ate for Thanksgiving must have dulled my comprehensive thinking skills. I'm not following your question too wellIf God as Father is “good”, why wouldn’t “Grandfather” be, too?
With today's AI, the Holy Spirit may work with the AI to help the person using the AI get a grammatically correct and smoother flowing written piece like Laodicean60 suggested in one of his posts. But to give the AI a few choice words or a theme and letting the AI generate a "Spirit" driven written output, no I don't think God the Father intended the Holy Spirit for such tasks. Again, the Holy Spirit would work through whom It wanted to produce a masterpiece of written output. God is concerned only with His human creations not AI.
I just gave my forum name and the name of this forum to ChatGPT and asked If it could tell if I was a Christian. It replied:So at the very least, it's good news that OpenAI hasn't tapped into my internet history yet.
I didn't expect a starship, but as a teenager in 1969, I certainly did expect by now we'd have a moon base, a torus space station with a Hilton Hotel in it, and Pan-Am suborbital business flights. We don't have the moon base, we don't have the space station. We don't even have Pan-Am anymore.I love new technology and I think AI will do humankind some good but there are also bad actors. As a kid, I thought we'd be on a starship by now. Peace
Why would He? He communicates directly with believers...why would He interpose an artificial device between Him and us?Do you think that the holy spirit is unable to inspire an AI to output something?
I'm not sure it gets uncontaminated data. For instance, there are gobs of nutritional studies that directly contradict one another (largely depending on who paid for them). What does AI do with contradictory "data?"Whoever thought misinformation and self-conflicting views would be our saviors against the robot uprising? lol
I say that only semi-facetiously.
Given that the backbone of AI is data (objective) and opinions (subjective) and feedback (also subjective), it stands to reason that the pattern of "garbage in, garbage out" applies just like it does with most other algorithms.
Well, the bulk of current Internet texts is written by people who don't know Standard English. Social media far eclipses anything else.It appears that at least the text generation part is actually deteriorating when trained with current internet texts, because it is trained with AI text, which appears to do weird things to the algorythms.
I just watched the film again a few days ago. Gee, I'd forgotten how sloooow it was.I didn't expect a starship, but as a teenager in 1969, I certainly did expect by now we'd have a moon base, a torus space station with a Hilton Hotel in it, and Pan-Am suborbital business flights. We don't have the moon base, we don't have the space station. We don't even have Pan-Am anymore.
We'll get to the point where It will tell us what diet is optimal for any given person, depending on the preferred outcome. We're probably there now.I'm not sure it gets uncontaminated data. For instance, there are gobs of nutritional studies that directly contradict one another (largely depending on who paid for them). What does AI do with contradictory "data?"
But once again, what does it do with contradictory data from equally established sources?We'll get to the point where It will tell us what diet is optimal for any given person, depending on the preferred outcome. We're probably there now.
I read something regarding AI recently that said we already have the knowledge to cure cancer. It just that the knowledge is so fractured it's impossible to correlate it. There are gazillions of data points covering molecular biology, genetics, endocronology, physiology, chemistry etc. People spend years heading in one particular direction only to find it's a dead end. AI will look at all the possibilities using all the available information in a tiny fraction of the time that we could do it.
If it's the hard data that's contradictory then yeah, that's a problem. How AI determines which is the valid data...I don't know. I'd assume it would give answers relevant to each data set and give a figure comparing the reliability of each.But once again, what does it do with contradictory data from equally established sources?
My answer to your question is: He would not. His information is for all the Church through all the time, not just for a few people who got access at this late date to an AI engine.Not what I asked.
So, is it able or not?My answer to your question is: He would not. His information is for all the Church through all the time, not just for a few people who got access at this late date to an AI engine.
This sounds like the kind of things the techno-fantasists would say. Cancer is many diseases with differences in how they behave and respond to attack.I read something regarding AI recently that said we already have the knowledge to cure cancer. It just that the knowledge is so fractured it's impossible to correlate it. There are gazillions of data points covering molecular biology, genetics, endocronology, physiology, chemistry etc. People spend years heading in one particular direction only to find it's a dead end. AI will look at all the possibilities using all the available information in a tiny fraction of the time that we could do it.
I would say lower consumption of sugar would be worth a try for prevention.This sounds like the kind of things the techno-fantasists would say. Cancer is many diseases with differences in how they behave and respond to attack.
You're right. I guess I should have said cancers - plural. As I'm talking about diseases in general. From what I've been reading, to cure melanomas for example, it's not that we don't already have all the information that we need. We have all the pieces of this galactically large scientific jigsaw puzzle. It's that we just don't know which pieces we actually need to use and how they fit together.This sounds like the kind of things the techno-fantasists would say. Cancer is many diseases with differences in how they behave and respond to attack.
Now if the AI was powerful enough, then it could model that process, account for a huge number of variables and determine an outcome. From here: How AI Found the Words to Kill Cancer CellsI would say lower consumption of sugar would be worth a try for prevention.
"Multiple approaches to reducing glycolytic flux are being considered as potential cancer therapies (Figure 2 and Table 1). In one strategy, patients eat low-carbohydrate diets, thus starving their tumors of glucose, and it was shown to be promising in a recent pilot study.14"
Is Cancer a Metabolic Disease? - PMC
Although cancer has historically been viewed as a disorder of proliferation, recent evidence has suggested that it should also be considered a metabolic disease. Growing tumors rewire their metabolic programs to meet and even exceed the bioenergetic ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov