- Dec 26, 2013
- 5,201
- 651
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Hi Douggg,Hi Marilyn,
Your graphic is blurry.
To make my charts and illustrations I use Corel Paintshop Pro. It costs between $50-$70 from places like Amazon. You can buy the download version and have it instantaneously.
Once you get used to the basics, which is not that hard, you can make charts which is nothing more than a bunch of rectangular "cutouts" colored and arranged together. Even the connecting lines are rectangular "cutouts" that you can squeeze thin to make them look like a line. You can stretch cutouts longer or shorter. Move them around.
If you get that program, I can help you with the basics.
Yes, that one is much sharper. How are you going about in making your charts/diagrams ?Hi Douggg,
That is so kind of you, and very thoughtful. From one chart maker to another. I scanned a better chart, so how is that?
Marilyn.
If words alone are "inadequate to convey comprehensive bible prophecy", then why were charts not the tool Christ recommended for understanding? "Whoso READETH let him understand" was Christ's recommended tool in Matthew 24:15. That first-century generation to whom Christ was speaking had no charts or graphics, yet Christ said that a reading of Daniel was sufficient for them to understand.Similarly, numbers in bible prophecy, especially when many are given regarding certain events - words alone are inadequate to convey comprehensive bible prophecy. Charts are better for that purpose.
The charts and graphics are based on words, text, of the bible.I'm not saying that employing charts and graphics is a wrong method. However, when you say that charts and graphics are superior to words alone, then by implication you are saying that our generation is far more stupid than the first-century generation, and requires more help than the written words of Daniel that God provided and preserved for us.
That's like asking why did not Jesus recommend that we communicate with each other over the internet.If words alone are "inadequate to convey comprehensive bible prophecy", then why were charts not the tool Christ recommended for understanding?
I am using my new computer and its programs that have good capabilities for graphics. Any old diagrams I scan these and they seem to come up very good. I appreciate you pointing out the other chart as it was an old photocopy from my old computer, (1990`s).Yes, that one is much sharper. How are you going about in making your charts/diagrams ?
So, what extra do you think my chart should say or not have included.Hi Marilyn,
When we take note of all that information what are we to do with it ?
Back in high school, in math class, they presented math not as words, i.e as sentences such as - two plus three equals five divided by five equals one. Instead, digits and symbols are used because that language is easier to convey math.
Similarly, numbers in bible prophecy, especially when many are given regarding certain events - words alone are inadequate to convey comprehensive bible prophecy. Charts are better for that purpose.
But to make charts, it requires the means in the form of some graphics (don't let the word graphics intimidate you) program. And after a person gets acclimated to the program, then it becomes the same processes over and over - make cutouts, move them around, type in some text.
The title - OVERVIEW OF THE TRIBULATION (by chapters)So, what extra do you think my chart should say or not have included.
The title - OVERVIEW OF THE TRIBULATION (by chapters)
"The Tribulation" I don't get it. Where is the term "The Tribulation" coming from ?
There is a book in the bible called Revelation. And within Revelation, a sealed book that Jesus took from the hand of God the Father in Revelation 5:7.
It was not a scroll, nor called a "legal document"
_________________________________________________________________________
Marilyn, I think if you need to work on the visual presentation, i.e. arrangement of chapter blocks in your organizational chart to all align with the left margin. Also re-title your organizational chart.
Overview, Revelation 6-19
chapter 6-7
chapter 8-9
chapter 10-13
chapter 14-16
chapter 17-18
chapter 19
If you retitle to "Overview, Revelation 6-19", everyone is going to know what you are talking about and there won't be any controversy like "the tribulation".Thank you Douggg, for taking the time to give me some suggestions. My thoughts -
Tribulation - Matt. 24: 29.
The sealed book, or scroll, Gk. `biblion` - a roll, book, scroll, writing.
It is sealed with seven seals. Seven meaning complete. God is the legal authority to whatever is written there. Thus, it is a legal document.
The chapters are in relation to the timing in the trib.
Yes, I do think the title could do with some more work.
Marilyn.
Thank you very much for taking the time to help me, Douggg. That is very gracious of you.If you retitle to "Overview, Revelation 6-19", everyone is going to know what you are talking about and there won't be any controversy like "the tribulation".
Matthew 24:29 is "the tribulation of those days" not just "the tribulation". The tribulation of those days begin when the abomination of desolation statue image is standing in the holy place, Matthew 24:15.
Exactly. His obsession with charts and the way he acts like we can't understand the timing of things written about in scripture without charts is just utterly ridiculous. Such an insult to those in the past who didn't have the ability to create charts like we have now. Yet, somehow, they were able to understand things just fine without them.If words alone are "inadequate to convey comprehensive bible prophecy", then why were charts not the tool Christ recommended for understanding? "Whoso READETH let him understand" was Christ's recommended tool in Matthew 24:15. That first-century generation to whom Christ was speaking had no charts or graphics, yet Christ said that a reading of Daniel was sufficient for them to understand.
I'm not saying that employing charts and graphics is a wrong method. However, when you say that charts and graphics are superior to words alone, then by implication you are saying that our generation is far more stupid than the first-century generation, and requires more help than the written words of Daniel that God provided and preserved for us.
Daniel himself said he did not understand. The understanding does not take place until the time of end.Exactly. His obsession with charts and the way he acts like we can't understand the timing of things written about in scripture without charts is just utterly ridiculous. Such an insult to those in the past who didn't have the ability to create charts like we have now. Yet, somehow, they were able to understand things just fine without them.
That is a personal attack and should not be for, we are discussing scripture.Exactly. His obsession with charts and the way he acts like we can't understand the timing of things written about in scripture without charts is just utterly ridiculous. Such an insult to those in the past who didn't have the ability to create charts like we have now. Yet, somehow, they were able to understand things just fine without them.