A Christian woman cannot be the head over her own husband so how can she be the head over other womens husbands within the Church?.
In what sense do you believe clergy to be "head" over anyone? Our Minister - and other Ministers/vicars that I've known - have never been so.
They do not tell, and have not told, us what to do, where to live, what church to attend, what job to have, who to marry, how much to give to the church or even what to believe. If I was worried, confused or depressed, I might want to talk to my Minister - as someone who could not only give a listening ear, but pray with me afterwards. But I have never been told what to do and, if any Minister tried to tell me, I would not be obliged to obey them. I can change churches if I do not like/agree with my Minister.
My minister is not my husband. He is someone who has a calling to pastorally care for, and nurture, a congregation/s. Ministers - and I include vicars, Pastors and priests in that - are called by God to their role, definitely - but they are also paid to do what they do. They may have one or more churches or be moved to different churches, (in Methodism, anyway), be promoted, be disciplined, be sacked or retire; my husband can't do those things, unless he were to divorce me.
Women are not to have authority over men, Scripture makes this very clear.
Except that Deborah had authority, and ruled over, the entire nation of Israel.
And when Josiah wanted a word from the Lord, the male priests that he sent chose to consult the prophetess, Huldah. The king listened to the word that God gave to her and there was a revival.
GOD has all authority, and he chooses to whom he will give it. Jesus deliberately chose a woman to be the first witness to the resurrection - and told her to go into a room full of men to give them a message. Similarly with the woman at the well - she told the men she had found the Messiah, they went to see for themselves and believed.
The reason why is because Eve was decieved and sinned first, we bear this brunt now.
No, Eve being deceived and the first to sin is a good reason for allowing women to learn - as Paul says at the beginning of that passage, "Let women learn", 1 Timothy 2:11.
Otherwise, men would have to be excluded form being ordained because Adam had heard God's command for himself, and disobeyed. Who wants a Minister./vicar who knows what God wants, or is saying, and does the opposite?
Paul says in Romans 5 that sin came into the world through Adam, not Eve. Eve was deceived; she didn't fully know/remember God's command so she got it wrong when repeating it to the serpent.
Again, "let the women learn" - so that they will not be deceived.
As a result of Eve's sin, - God set men over women to be in positions of authority within His church, and that means teaching His Word as a leader in the Church.
No, he didn't.
Part of Eve's punishment was that her husband would rule over her - husband and wife relationship, not Minister/congregation relationship.
And it was not like that in the beginning - men and women were both created by God, in his image and to be equals.