In that case, as @Hans Blaster explained in #17, 'scientific evolution' would be the appropriate term.Not if a distinction is required.
Upvote
0
In that case, as @Hans Blaster explained in #17, 'scientific evolution' would be the appropriate term.Not if a distinction is required.
For whom?In that case, as @Hans Blaster explained in #17, 'scientific evolution' would be the appropriate term.
Okay, I stopped here.
Have a nice day and all.
Yes, I did.
I promise you I did.
Are you talking about my challenge threads?If you long for people to embrace the faith, why put up unnecessary obstacles?
Are you talking about my challenge threads?
I was sighing at Post 10, not your post.Your "sigh" indicated that you might be just that sort, but if I'm off target, I'll relent.
I was sighing at Post 10, not your post.
For those of you who know your history, please put the following list in chronological order and give me the name of someone whom you think should be the poster child for each one.
It wasn't Lucretius but Locutus.Atheistic Evolution Epicurus/Lucretius
The theory of the evolution is science. I can’t figure out what “atheistic” and “theistic” has to do with itI'll agree that it has all the requirements of a theory.I think it would show good conversational maturity though to at least use the term as a jargon for the sake of Occam's razor.
Kinda like "sunrise" or "sunset" or "moonshine."
Employing the term "atheistic evolution" distinguishes it from "theistic evolution."
There are a few differences between theistic evolution and the ToE. The main ones are the ToE is silent about anything that has to do with God or Adam and Eve. Josh Swamidass' book the Gemological Adam & Eve was an attempt to bridge the gap at least for A&E and his book did receive endorsements from several atheists and theologians.The theory of the evolution is science. I can’t figure out what “atheistic” and “theistic” has to do with it
Okay.The theory of the evolution is science.
Atheistic evolution (a.k.a., evolution) is evolution as it is taught in secular science.ruthiesea said:I can’t figure out what “atheistic” and “theistic” has to do with it
Okay.Atheistic evolution (a.k.a., evolution) is evolution as it is taught in secular science.
Theistic evolution (a.k.a., guided evolution) is evolution as it is taught in religious science.
Flat Earthism Ogg the Trogg
Geocentrism Ptolemy
Atheistic Evolution Epicurus/Lucretius
Gap Theory Origen of Alexandria / Scofield Reference Bible
Day-Age Theory Saint Augustine / William Jennings Bryan
Theistic Evolution Thomas Aquinas / Leibniz
Progressive Creation Cuvier / Agassiz
Bonus: Omphalos Gosse
Young Earth Creationism McCready Price / Henry Morris
And elbow macaroni is just macaroni.Secular science is just science.
And elbow macaroni is just macaroni.
I suppose you're right -- to a point.Macaroni can be straight, but science can only be secular.