Using your reasoning, though, Jesus said He'd completed all the work before the Cross. So just as you attribute the Destruction of Jerusalem as being the "Coming of Titus" instead of the "Coming of the Son of Man". .....the Cross must've been "the Roman's work" (following the same reasoning) because Jesus said He had completed His work already.He had, up until then. But He was long gone when the NT writers summed up the cross-work as the completion of our salvation.
The NT authors mentioned "salvation being near" AFTER the Cross.
.
Upvote
0