expos4ever
Well-Known Member
- Oct 22, 2008
- 10,661
- 5,770
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
....and of no consequence whatsoever.Opinions are free!
Upvote
0
....and of no consequence whatsoever.Opinions are free!
....and of no consequence whatsoever.
Again, you have no evidence to support your claim - this statement has about as much legitimacy as me claiming that there 2,435,676,789 ducks in the world: it is pure speculation.As are curated "facts" from people whose livelihoods depend on towing the party line.
How does the irony of your statement escape you? While it may not have been you, some denier posted a clip from Prager - an outfit with known ties to the petroleum industry! These people have a clear financial motive to deny global warming.As are curated "facts" from people whose livelihoods depend on towing the party line.
Ah, American (I presume) high schools.....
Partial pressure should have been taught to you at the high school level. In fairness, perhaps for you, like me, high school was a long time ago.
Ah, American (I presume) high schools.....
Partial pressure should have been taught to you at the high school level. In fairness, perhaps for you, like me, high school was a long time ago.
How does the irony of your statement escape you? While it may not have been you, some denier posted a clip from Prager - an outfit with known ties to the petroleum industry! These people have a clear financial motive to deny global warming.
Yet it is you - a denier - who brings up the role of money in distorting research. And yet you have provided zero evidence for this. Do you not see the problem? Thus far, at least, the only evidence we have seen in this thread is evidence that at least one denier source has a financial motive to bend the truth.
And yet it is you guys - the deniers - who are the ones who keep harping on this issue.
Are you serious? The amount of water vapor the air can hold depends on the temperature. Elementary school science!
Wow.
Let's review. You posted this:
The push behind "climate crisis" is enormous and well funded.
You made this up - it is an invention of your own imagination. Or, you heard it from someone and uncritically accepted it as truth. Either way, it is an untruth, a falsehood, a lie.
Seriously, do you not realize that Mars is farther than the Earth from the Sun, and thus receives less sunlight?
partial pressure has to do with the amount of gas in a mixture .Partial pressure of C02 is only relevant to capillaries in the blood stream. Please explain what this has to do with climate change.
For the science illiterates on this post . Water vapor is just water in a gaseous state. It’s lighter than regular air so it rises . In cooler temperatures it forms clouds and if the air in a cloud gets saturated it falls as some type of precipitation - rain, sleet ,snow ,hail etc. global warming can increase precipitation because warmer air evaporates more water. Specifically, this is why you can get these record breaking snowfalls with global warming .
Nothing alleged about. Co2 is a greenhouse gas demonstrated over a century ago in repeatable and observable tests.Yup. But if C02 had the effect its detractors claim, Mars should be on fire. It's an alleged greenhouse gas after all.
dNothing alleged about. Co2 is a greenhouse gas demonstrated over a century ago in repeatable and observable tests.
And once again Mars has less than 1% ok f the air pressure if earth and is further away from the sun than earth.
Please stop knowingly and deliberately repeating falsehoods.
Partial pressure gives you the molar concentration of a gas. Many physical properties,including the absorption of infrared energy, are proportional to the molar concentration not a weight percentage. Yes "molar" is a real thing.Partial pressure of C02 is only relevant to capillaries in the blood stream. Please explain what this has to do with climate change.
I don’t take the Bible as a literal history and inaccurate pseudoscience ideas will just get ignoredGenesis 2:5-6 ?
Partial pressure gives you the molar concentration of a gas. Many physical properties,including the absorption of infrared energy, are proportional to the molar concentration not a weight percentage. Yes "molar" is a real thing.
I don’t take the Bible as a literal history and inaccurate pseudoscience ideas will just get ignored
Again, you have no evidence to support your claim - this statement has about as much legitimacy as me claiming that there 2,435,676,789 ducks in the world: it is pure speculation.