createdtoworship
In the grip of grace
- Mar 13, 2004
- 18,941
- 1,758
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
I know that. They were not saying you tube fact checks should not happen, they were put on restricted mode. You tube was actually making prager U video's restricted. And that was unconstitutional. So you tube put fact checks on it. Which is fine, but prager you simply has to re fact check the fact check. Did you know that there was a new site I am not sure if it was by snopes or not, but it was fact checking snopes. The process is endless. But because something is fact checked does not mean the latest rebuttal is correct. It just means that they had the last statement on the air. Wait for a comment from the other party before seeing what was right. Besides I watch both prager U vidoes' one was from a philosopher who utterly destroyed the 97% consensus myth, and the other was a climatologist who disagreed with "global warming alarmism>" but didn't disagree with global warming. So the point is global warming is a proven fact, but it's litterally 1.8%. And Co2 is 5% of that 1.8%. So that is minimal, that is why people are saying not to be alarmed by warming. Besides it's nearly impossible to prove that it's the .05% of Co2 in the atmosphere causing the 1.8% warming, over the 75% water vapor in the atmosphere. It's all just about funding environomental policy not about facts.Prager U is your source? You have to be kidding - you are making this far too easy.
Do you realize that in August 2018, PragerU criticized YouTube for adding fact-checks to YouTube videos which cover climate change.
This is basically an admission that they are lying.
Upvote
0