President Signs Climate Change Bill

expos4ever · Jan 18, 2020

GOD Shines Forth! said:
Opinions are free!

....and of no consequence whatsoever.

GOD Shines Forth! · Jan 18, 2020

expos4ever said:
....and of no consequence whatsoever.

As are curated "facts" from people whose livelihoods depend on towing the party line.

expos4ever · Jan 18, 2020

GOD Shines Forth! said:
As are curated "facts" from people whose livelihoods depend on towing the party line.

Again, you have no evidence to support your claim - this statement has about as much legitimacy as me claiming that there 2,435,676,789 ducks in the world: it is pure speculation.

expos4ever · Jan 18, 2020

GOD Shines Forth! said:
As are curated "facts" from people whose livelihoods depend on towing the party line.

How does the irony of your statement escape you? While it may not have been you, some denier posted a clip from Prager - an outfit with known ties to the petroleum industry! These people have a clear financial motive to deny global warming.

Yet it is you - a denier - who brings up the role of money in distorting research. And yet you have provided zero evidence for this. Do you not see the problem? Thus far, at least, the only evidence we have seen in this thread is evidence that at least one denier source has a financial motive to bend the truth.

And yet it is you guys - the deniers - who are the ones who keep harping on this issue.

keith99 · Jan 18, 2020

expos4ever said:
Ah, American (I presume) high schools.....

Partial pressure should have been taught to you at the high school level. In fairness, perhaps for you, like me, high school was a long time ago.

It was a long time ago for me also, but I remember. And I am American. However Physics was not a required class. Nor was Chemistry which also touched on that.

Even money he was home schooled.

Al Touthentop · Jan 18, 2020

expos4ever said:
Ah, American (I presume) high schools.....

Partial pressure should have been taught to you at the high school level. In fairness, perhaps for you, like me, high school was a long time ago.

Partial pressure of C02 is only relevant to capillaries in the blood stream. Please explain what this has to do with climate change.

Al Touthentop · Jan 18, 2020

expos4ever said:
How does the irony of your statement escape you? While it may not have been you, some denier posted a clip from Prager - an outfit with known ties to the petroleum industry! These people have a clear financial motive to deny global warming.

Yet it is you - a denier - who brings up the role of money in distorting research. And yet you have provided zero evidence for this. Do you not see the problem? Thus far, at least, the only evidence we have seen in this thread is evidence that at least one denier source has a financial motive to bend the truth.

And yet it is you guys - the deniers - who are the ones who keep harping on this issue.

How many times are you going to post this logical fallacy? Attacking the source of information has no bearing on the accuracy of the information.

Robban · Jan 18, 2020

Brightmoon said:
Are you serious? The amount of water vapor the air can hold depends on the temperature. Elementary school science!

What is meant by water vapor?

Is it like steam?

A mist?

Do we not give off vapor when we breath?

The world population is increasing.

I am asking because I do not know.

But cleaning glass by breathing on it will create a mist.

Maybe we should all stop breathing, haha.

Al Touthentop · Jan 18, 2020

expos4ever said:
Wow.

Let's review. You posted this:

The push behind "climate crisis" is enormous and well funded.

You made this up - it is an invention of your own imagination. Or, you heard it from someone and uncritically accepted it as truth. Either way, it is an untruth, a falsehood, a lie.

Try a google search instead of making yourself look foolish.

Blood And Gore: Making A Killing On Anti-Carbon Investment Hype

Al Touthentop · Jan 18, 2020

sesquiterpene said:
Seriously, do you not realize that Mars is farther than the Earth from the Sun, and thus receives less sunlight?

Yup. But if C02 had the effect its detractors claim, Mars should be on fire. It's an alleged greenhouse gas after all.

Brightmoon · Jan 18, 2020

For the science illiterates on this post . Water vapor is just water in a gaseous state. It’s lighter than regular air so it rises . In cooler temperatures it forms clouds and if the air in a cloud gets saturated it falls as some type of precipitation - rain, sleet ,snow ,hail etc. global warming can increase precipitation because warmer air evaporates more water. Specifically, this is why you can get these record breaking snowfalls with global warming .

Brightmoon · Jan 18, 2020

Al Touthentop said:
Partial pressure of C02 is only relevant to capillaries in the blood stream. Please explain what this has to do with climate change.

partial pressure has to do with the amount of gas in a mixture .

Robban · Jan 18, 2020

Brightmoon said:
For the science illiterates on this post . Water vapor is just water in a gaseous state. It’s lighter than regular air so it rises . In cooler temperatures it forms clouds and if the air in a cloud gets saturated it falls as some type of precipitation - rain, sleet ,snow ,hail etc. global warming can increase precipitation because warmer air evaporates more water. Specifically, this is why you can get these record breaking snowfalls with global warming .

Genesis 2:5-6 ?

Goonie · Jan 18, 2020

Al Touthentop said:
Yup. But if C02 had the effect its detractors claim, Mars should be on fire. It's an alleged greenhouse gas after all.

Nothing alleged about. Co2 is a greenhouse gas demonstrated over a century ago in repeatable and observable tests.

And once again Mars has less than 1% ok f the air pressure if earth and is further away from the sun than earth.

Please stop knowingly and deliberately repeating falsehoods.

Al Touthentop · Jan 18, 2020

Goonie said:
Nothing alleged about. Co2 is a greenhouse gas demonstrated over a century ago in repeatable and observable tests.

And once again Mars has less than 1% ok f the air pressure if earth and is further away from the sun than earth.

Please stop knowingly and deliberately repeating falsehoods.

d

In closed tests, a 100% atmosphere of C02 only shows a 4 degree Celsius rise in temperature as compared to plain old air from the atmosphere. Water vapor has more effect.

sesquiterpene · Jan 18, 2020

Al Touthentop said:
Partial pressure of C02 is only relevant to capillaries in the blood stream. Please explain what this has to do with climate change.

Partial pressure gives you the molar concentration of a gas. Many physical properties,including the absorption of infrared energy, are proportional to the molar concentration not a weight percentage. Yes "molar" is a real thing.

Please explain why your knowledge of physics is so abysmal.

Brightmoon · Jan 18, 2020

Robban said:
Genesis 2:5-6 ?

I don’t take the Bible as a literal history and inaccurate pseudoscience ideas will just get ignored

Al Touthentop · Jan 18, 2020

sesquiterpene said:
Partial pressure gives you the molar concentration of a gas. Many physical properties,including the absorption of infrared energy, are proportional to the molar concentration not a weight percentage. Yes "molar" is a real thing.

What does this have to do with climate change? Can you point me to any climate study that even references this as relevant in the context of C02's alleged causal effects on temperatures?

Al Touthentop · Jan 18, 2020

Brightmoon said:
I don’t take the Bible as a literal history and inaccurate pseudoscience ideas will just get ignored

You don't take the bible seriously at all. You follow false prophets who have been predicting catastrophic global climate change for as long as I've been alive.

22 As long as the earth endures, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night shall never cease.”

GOD Shines Forth! · Jan 18, 2020

expos4ever said:
Again, you have no evidence to support your claim - this statement has about as much legitimacy as me claiming that there 2,435,676,789 ducks in the world: it is pure speculation.

Or as when 97% (hehe) of scientists tell us "50 million years ago...." blah blah blah. Who can prove the negative of that kind of speculation?

President Signs Climate Change Bill

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

sola dosis facit venenum

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

-----------

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Apes and humans are all in family Hominidae.

Apes and humans are all in family Hominidae.

-----------

Not so Mystic Mog.

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Apes and humans are all in family Hominidae.

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads