The Kurds didn’t help in WW2 or during D-Day..

Jonathan Walkerin

Well-Known Member
Feb 12, 2019
3,720
2,772
44
Stockholm
✟72,396.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
The Kurds aren't even a state, which in itself precludes them from being an ally. Whereas Turkey is actual state and a member of NATO too boot, for what it's worth...

Definition of an ally does not necessarily mean state or nation. Nor does being formally allied mean someone is in fact an ally in any real sense.

As US well knows, treaties are just words on the paper that can be shredded easily enough when convenient.

Like Saudi Arabia, an ally, while being fundamentalist ultra nuts who hate most of the values US is supposed to stand for.
 
Upvote 0

Aryeh Jay

Gone and hopefully forgotten.
Site Supporter
Jul 19, 2012
15,312
14,322
MI - Michigan
✟520,644.00
Country
United States
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
This man is a fool and the lack of right wing responses in this thread says a lot.

What do we need to say? Did the disloyal Kurds help us at Normandy or WW2? NO! They didn’t!

Trump is right (as always); we don’t need these people that left us to defeat Germany, Italy, and Japan by ourselves and make the world free and safe.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Allandavid
Upvote 0

cow451

Standing with Ukraine.
Site Supporter
May 29, 2012
41,108
24,128
Hot and Humid
✟1,120,276.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Come on now, where were the Kurds during the War of Northern Aggression? They hung Lee out to dry but expect support now? BAD PEOPLE!
They cut and ran during Sherman’s retreat to the sea. They took the first plane out when Yankee troops got close to Atlanta.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kentonio
Upvote 0

SoldierOfTheKing

Christian Spenglerian
Jan 6, 2006
9,230
3,041
Kenmore, WA
✟278,566.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
My, my...how quickly things change. As long as they were licking Trump’s boots, not a word of criticism for them...

Of the three you mentioned, only Little Marco even voted Trump.

And what of people like Will Hurd, Adam Kinzinger, Liz Cheney, John Shimkus, H.R.McMaster, Pat McCrory, Mike Huckabee...all have been scathing in their criticism of Trump’s abandonment of his Kurdish allies. Are we to ignore them also...?

DBell_20181220_Syria-small.jpg
 
Upvote 0

Kentonio

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2018
7,467
10,458
48
Lyon
✟266,564.00
Country
France
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Of the three you mentioned, only Little Marco even voted Trump.

Lindsay Graham has been one of Trump’s biggest sycophants for a long time now. Hilarious to see how quickly you all throw him under the bus, just like you did Jeff Sessions.
 
Upvote 0

SoldierOfTheKing

Christian Spenglerian
Jan 6, 2006
9,230
3,041
Kenmore, WA
✟278,566.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Definition of an ally does not necessarily mean state or nation. Nor does being formally allied mean someone is in fact an ally in any real sense.

This is a no true Scotsman fallacy. If you're going to contest a commonly accepted definition, you need spell out precisely what definition you are using and explain why you think that definition is better than the commonly accepted one. The fact remains that for better or for worse, we at least have a mutual defense treaty with Turkey. We have no such treaty with the Kurds. In fact, we can't for the simple reason that there is no Kurdish state with which to sign such a treaty.

As US well knows, treaties are just words on the paper that can be shredded easily enough when convenient.

Sometimes treaties need to be changed, or even renounced all together, whether due to changing political realities, or perhaps the treaty was ill-considered to begin with.

Like Saudi Arabia, an ally, while being fundamentalist ultra nuts who hate most of the values US is supposed to stand for.

Because that has absolutely zero to do with the commonly accepted definition of an ally.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sdowney717

Newbie
Apr 20, 2013
8,712
2,022
✟102,598.00
Faith
Christian
The Kurds were one of our most effective allies in the fight against ISIS. To allow the Turks to destroy them is idiotic and unforgivable.
20% of Turkey's population is Kurdish, and half of all Kurds live in Turkey, so no Turkey is not destroying the Kurds. Turkey is no friend of ISIS either. Turkey is doing this why? they say because of border security problems. Turkey considers the Kurds south of the border as potential enemies of Turkey and a radicalization threat to other Kurds living in Turkey. I imagine kurds have left Turkey to join with this other group of Kurds in Syria. Radicalization cuts many different ways in the middle east.

Turkey is also our Nato ally. Maybe that ought to mean something to some people.
Should Turkey be an ally in Nato, with a joint defense forces treaty in place?
And if no, then why not?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2012
25,305
24,216
Baltimore
✟558,303.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Come on now, where were the Kurds during the War of Northern Aggression? They hung Lee out to dry but expect support now? BAD PEOPLE!

Why do you think the Yankees love curds so much? Everybody know the best curds are in the north.

large_6a518fd8-00c1-40b0-89fd-8979c12cfb29.jpg


Also, in case anybody doubted whether the correct side won - I just discovered that we have goat cheese curds:

Vermont Goat Cheddar Curds
 
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
80
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,295.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Sometimes treaties need to be changed, or even renounced all together, whether due to changing political realities, or perhaps the treaty was ill-considered to begin with.

The USA has broken nearly every treaty made with the Indian nations. Few if any were actually revoked --- they were simply ignored.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
38,083
17,554
Finger Lakes
✟12,499.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
  • Haha
Reactions: Allandavid
Upvote 0

Nithavela

our world is happy and mundane
Apr 14, 2007
28,134
19,582
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟493,675.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
  • Agree
Reactions: Allandavid
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,319
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
The bold is by me -
Iraq Levies - Wikipedia

By 1942, the Iraq Levies consisted of a Headquarters, a Depot, Specialist Assyrian companies, 40 service companies and the 1st Parachute Company, which consisted of 75% Assyrian and 25% Kurd. The new Iraq Levies Disciplinary Code was based largely on the Indian Army Act.

By 1943 the Iraq Levies strength stood at 166 British officers controlling 44 companies; 22 Assyrian, five Mixed Assyrian/Yizidi, ten Kurdish, four Marsh Arabs, and three Baluchi. Eleven Assyrian companies served in Palestine and another four served in Cyprus. The Parachute Company was attached to the Royal Marine Commando and were active in Albania, Italy and Greece. In 1943/1944 the Iraq Levies were renamed the Royal Air Force Levies.

In 1945, after the Second World War, the Levies were reduced to 60 British officers and 1,900 other ranks. The RAF Regiment took over command of the Levies and Army personnel were gradually replaced by RAF personnel. During October 1946 the Levies battalions were redesignated as wings and squadrons to conform to the RAF Regiment procedure. In December the Kurdish Squadrons in Cyprus and the Persian Gulf were returned to Iran.

Education is a wise thing to obtain.

And as a follow up, Turkey was neutral in WWII up until February of 1945, where they joined the allies in name only -- no Turkish troops ever saw combat.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: FreeinChrist
Upvote 0

Aryeh Jay

Gone and hopefully forgotten.
Site Supporter
Jul 19, 2012
15,312
14,322
MI - Michigan
✟520,644.00
Country
United States
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
And as a follow up, Turkey was neutral in WWII up until February of 1945, where they joined the allies in name only -- no Turkish troops ever saw combat.

But they joined the winning side! Hurrah for Turkey!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: cow451
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
145,032
17,405
USA
✟1,750,789.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
And as a follow up, Turkey was neutral in WWII up until February of 1945, where they joined the allies in name only -- no Turkish troops ever saw combat.
Interesting. It is like Russia joining the war against Japan after the bomb dropped in Hiroshima, but then expected the US to 'split' Japan' like was done with Germany. Gen. MacArthur told the Russians what they can do with that idea! They didn't have any troops involved against Japan.
 
Upvote 0