"the kind of church that Jesus came to create"

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,196
9,204
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,159,252.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What is the real Church like?

This sermon...probably won't fit any pigeonhole.

Just was listening to this sermon from a preacher I had not heard before.

You may be encouraged or get interested in just the first few minutes -- but it's only getting started, and won't all be stuff you can predict.

But very soon, even in the first 5, 7 minutes, you will likely be learning some wonderful unexpected, and hear such encouraging things, and powerful.

The Kingdom of God is a Party
 

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,196
9,204
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,159,252.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The unregistered churches in China, I think would be like the church Christ was wanting to see.
ah, you're going to like what's near the end of this sermon above, if you hear that part. :)
 
Upvote 0

GodLovesCats

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2019
7,401
1,329
47
Florida
✟117,927.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Jesus certainly would create a church where people worship like Pentecostals (singing, dancing, chanting, yelling, praying aloud, and speaking in tongues spontaneously) and baptism and Communion are only for beilevers. However, Jesus would not create a church where hairstyles and dress codes matter or want the Communion to be with grape juice, so Pentecostal churches are not a perfect match. And He would create a universal church, not autonomous churches where people disagree on leadership and doctrines.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,196
9,204
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,159,252.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus certainly would create a church where people worship like Pentecostals (singing, dancing, chanting, yelling, praying aloud, and speaking in tongues spontaneously) and baptism and Communion are only for beilevers. However, Jesus would not create a church where hairstyles and dress codes matter or want the Communion to be with grape juice, so Pentecostal churches are not a perfect match. And He would create a universal church, not autonomous churches where people disagree on leadership and doctrines.
I agree.

I believe this universal Church has always been since the beginning, that our Lord's prayer in John chapter 17 was answered, and is answered, and has been all along therefore.

That means in particular that the outward label on a church isn't the key thing. Instead the true, real Body of Christ, the Church, is all who truly believe in Him, Christ risen. A very useful summary of this what faith is in the Apostle's Creed.

"I believe in God, the Father almighty,
creator of heaven and earth.
I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord.
He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit
and born of the virgin Mary.
He suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, died, and was buried.
He descended to the dead.
On the third day he rose again.
He ascended into heaven,
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again to judge the living and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Spirit,
the holy catholic Church,
the communion of the saints,
the forgiveness of sins,
the resurrection of the body,
and the life everlasting."

Apostles' Creed

-------
(Here to me 'catholic' means universal, as it did originally. And specifically to me that we accept and embrace all fellow believers -- that we recognize all of His are in our Church with us in the ultimate or real sense.
the 'communion of saints' just means to me that when a believer passes on, they are still part of the Body of Christ, with us, in communion together with us)
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,196
9,204
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,159,252.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If you believe "universal church" means the Catholic church, you totally disagree with me on every count.
It's not possible to misread it that way is it? Did you not read it through? I feel if you just read it, it cannot seem that way, but maybe somehow it could be taken that way? That's actually almost the opposite of what I was saying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Albion
Upvote 0

GodLovesCats

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2019
7,401
1,329
47
Florida
✟117,927.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I believe this universal church has always been since the beginning, that our Lord's prayer in John chapter 17 was answered, and is answered, and has been all along therefore.

That means in particular that the outward label on a church isn't the key thing. Instead the true, real Body of Christ, the Church, is all who truly believe in Him, Christ risen. A very useful summary of this what faith is in the Apostle's Creed.

(Here to me 'Catholic' means universal, as it did originally. And specifically to me that we accept and embrace all fellow believers -- that we recognize all of His are in our Church with us in the ultimate or real sense. The "Communion of Saints" just means to me that when a believer passes on, they are still part of the Body of Christ, with us, in communion together with us).

The bold text, when put together, shows me a common Catholic bias that because Catholicism, despite being the first and most popular denomination, is the only church God would want. The reality is Catholic churches made up their own doctrines through the Pope and bishops, so God does not necessarily support Catholic churches just because they are the first. He wants all His children to follow Him, not the sinners who make up rules for themselves that may not be based on the truth. This includes saints, who are also sinners like us.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,196
9,204
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,159,252.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Let's try this again. I did read your entire post, but parts of it implied you believe only Catholic churches are what Jesus would want as a universal church.
I'm happy to admit I didn't write clearly enough. When I write "catholic" with a small c, as I wrote above, I didn't explain extensively or clearly enough, just assumed people would get what I meant: catholic with a small c does not mean the Catholic church, but instead 'catholic' means 'universal' -- all Christian believers that believe in Christ risen, as in the Apostles' creed.

These believers are in all sorts of mere denominations, Orthodox, Baptist, you-name-it: those denominational labels don't control whether individual believers are His.

His Church -- capital C here, meaning the real thing, the entire Body of Christ, all of us, the universal Church -- is all who believe in Him, as stated helpfully in the Apostles' Creed, that we believe He came here, took on a human body, died on the cross, and rose again, and will return, and will judge the living and the dead.

When I say I believe His prayer to the Father in John chapter 17 was fully answered, and the Church has been One generally, I mean that all through the years, regardless of whatever controversies and splits on the surface, that in all churches (most all) are individual sheep which are His, and together all of them, as a whole, are the Church. And it's 'catholic' (notice small c!) meaning universal for all of humanity and that those in this Church (capital C) all accept each other as brothers and sisters in Christ.


Also, it may be this note about "catholic" from Christian Forums will help at the bottom of the sitewide creed (look for Notes section at bottom):

Statement of Faith
The Nicene Creed
We believe in (Romans 10:8-10; 1John 4:15)
ONE God, (Deuteronomy 6:4, Ephesians 4:6)
the Father (Matthew 6:9)
Almighty, (Exodus 6:3)
Maker of Heaven and Earth, (Genesis 1:1)
and of all things visible and invisible. (Colossians 1:15-16)
And in ONE Lord Jesus Christ, (Acts 11:17)
the Son of God, (Mathew 14:33; 16:16)
the Only-Begotten, (John 1:18; 3:16)
Begotten of the Father before all ages. (John 1:2)
Light of Light; (Psalm 27:1; John 8:12; Matthew 17:2,5)
True God of True God; (John 17:1-5)
Begotten, not made; (John 1:18)
of one essence with the Father (John 10:30)
by whom all things were made; (Hebrews 1:1-2)
Who for us men and for our salvation (1Timothy 2:4-5)
came down from Heaven, (John 6:33,35)
and was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary, (Luke 1:35)
and became man. (John 1:14)
And was crucified for us (Mark 15:25; 1Cointhians 15:3)
under Pontius Pilate, (John 19:6)
and suffered, (Mark 8:31)
and was buried. (Luke 23:53; 1Corinthians 15:4)
And the third day He rose again, according to the Scriptures. (Luke 24:1 1Corinthians 15:4)
And ascended into Heaven, (Luke 24:51; Acts 1:10)
and sits at the right hand of the Father. (Mark 16:19; Acts 7:55)
And He shall come again with glory (Matthew 24:27)
to judge the living and the dead; (Acts 10:42; 2Timothy 4:1)
whose Kingdom shall have no end. (2 Peter 1:11)
And in the Holy Spirit, (John 14:26)
the Lord, (Acts 5:3-4)
the Giver of Life, (Genesis 1:2)
Who proceeds from the Father; (John 15:26)
Who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified; (Matthew 3:16-17)
Who spoke through the prophets. (1 Samuel 19:20 ; Ezekiel 11:5,13) In one, (Matthew 16: 18)
holy, (1 Peter 2:5,9)
catholic*, (Mark 16:15)
and apostolic Church. (Acts 2:42; Ephesians 2:19-22)
I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins**. (Ephesians 4:5; Acts 2:38)
I look for the resurrection of the dead, (John 11:24; 1Corinthians 15:12-49; Hebrews 6:2; Revelation 20:5)
and the life of the world to come. (Mark 10:29-30)
AMEN. (Psalm 106:48)

Notes
* The word "catholic" (literally, "complete," "universal," or "according to the whole") refers to the universal church of the Lord Jesus Christ and not necessarily or exclusively to any particular visible denomination, institution, or doctrine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Albion
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,196
9,204
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,159,252.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus certainly would create a church where people worship like Pentecostals (singing, dancing, chanting, yelling, praying aloud, and speaking in tongues spontaneously) and baptism and Communion are only for beilevers. However, Jesus would not create a church where hairstyles and dress codes matter or want the Communion to be with grape juice, so Pentecostal churches are not a perfect match. And He would create a universal church, not autonomous churches where people disagree on leadership and doctrines.
Hopefully having cleared up the misunderstanding above now (and hopefully making it clear that I meant practically the opposite about that)...

As I say, "It's not men or a church that has a monopoly on Christ, but instead it's Christ that has the monopoly! On us!"

Did you get a chance to hear that entire wonderful sermon? It was something, a jewel.
 
Upvote 0

GodLovesCats

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2019
7,401
1,329
47
Florida
✟117,927.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Thanks for your explanation. Because most people don't care about typos (which drives me crazy) when I see stuff like that I assume it needs to be corrected. I have never heard the word Catholic is not meant to be capitalized every time.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0

Jonaitis

Soli Deo Gloria
Jan 4, 2019
5,225
4,212
Wyoming
✟123,651.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Jesus certainly would create a church where people worship like Pentecostals (singing, dancing, chanting, yelling, praying aloud, and speaking in tongues spontaneously)...

I think many Christians today mistake "good vibes" and an "emotional stirring" for biblical worship. I could not see our Lord desiring a church that cares more about our feelings than anything else. It seems very disorderly for a church to be speaking in tongues spontaneously (1 Corinthians 14:23), as well as yelling and dancing. We must show reverence in our worship to God, that also means in our words, in our actions, in our behavior, in our relation with each other, not turn the sanctuary into some moshpit or dance-floor as if we are hanging out and having fun at a get-together, or turning our sermons into an inspirational speech. Our worship should be found holy and set apart from every day activity, and based on what Scripture commands only.

The Roman Catholic Church may worship different than the Protestant Churches in many ways, but they still know how to separate the holy from the common in it.
 
Upvote 0

public hermit

social troglodyte
Site Supporter
Aug 20, 2019
10,988
12,078
East Coast
✟840,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I think many Christians today mistake "good vibes" and an "emotional stirring" for biblical worship

As you may know, Jonathan Edwards struggled with understanding emotionalism and true worship. The 1st Great awakening pretty much started with his lectures and preaching. People were falling out in his church, overcome with emotion. Initially there was a great "awakening" that spread pretty quickly within a year. But, as he observed, moral rectitude was a problem. He eventually came to the conclusion that true worship was not in the emotions, but the fruit of the Spirit. Hence his "A Treatise Concerning Religious Affections," were he concludes that the spiritual person is the one who exhibits the virtues of the "Lamb of God."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0

Jonaitis

Soli Deo Gloria
Jan 4, 2019
5,225
4,212
Wyoming
✟123,651.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
As you may know, Jonathan Edwards struggled with understanding emotionalism and true worship. The 1st Great awakening pretty much started with his lectures and preaching. People were falling out in his church, overcome with emotion. Initially there was a great "awakening" that spread pretty quickly within a year. But, as he observed, moral rectitude was a problem. He eventually came to the conclusion that true worship was not in the emotions, but the fruit of the Spirit. Hence his "A Treatise Concerning Religious Affections," were he concludes that the spiritual person is the one who exhibits the virtues of the "Lamb of God."

I wouldn't say he struggled to see the fine line between emotionalism and true worship, but rather that worship isn't and should not be entirely devoid of our affections. In his day, worship was nothing but cold, dead orthodoxy that did not reach the heart. The problem of moral rectitude is found in the heart, and our heart should be right in our worship. If you read his letters, there was change in the lives of many young people during that "awakening." There was whole villages and towns that converted to God, and the worship was deeply emotional in a biblical way. So much so that he once related a time where he visited a service where hardly one soul there that did not shed a tear during the faithful preaching of the word. He described it as if he walked into the early churches that the apostles had planted, so alive and awe-some.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

public hermit

social troglodyte
Site Supporter
Aug 20, 2019
10,988
12,078
East Coast
✟840,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I wouldn't say he struggled to see the fine line between emotionalism and true worship, but rather that worship isn't and should not be entirely devoid of our affections. In his day, worship was nothing but cold, dead orthodoxy that did not reach the heart. The problem of moral rectitude is found in the heart, and our heart should be right in our worship. If you read his letters, there was change in the lives of many young people during that "awakening." There was whole villages and towns that converted to God, and the worship was deeply emotional in a biblical way. So much so that he once related a time where he visited a service where hardly one soul there that did not shed a tear during the faithful preaching of the word. He described it as if he walked into the early churches that the apostles had planted, so alive and awe-some.

Yes, no doubt there were changes in the young people. And, for the good. That being said, it was conflict with the young people that got him kicked out of that church. More importantly, I disagree that the worship that occurred during that period was particularly "biblical." He had the ability to bring people to despair in their fear of condemnation, and that was to prepare them to receive the good news of the gospel (Think "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God). But, one of his own relatives was unable to get past the despair and took his own life (his uncle, maybe). Edwards could create the situation for despair, but couldn't guarantee relief. Some people despaired, but found no relief. It's not enough to say it was their own fault for not receiving the grace John was preaching. He had a responsibility. Bringing people to that point of despair was intentional in his preaching. It was designed to create that particular emotion. And, it got out of hand. The reality was, as far as I can tell, Edward's himself became disillusioned with the emotion that took place. Hence, "Religious Affections." He came to understand that the point was not the emotion of conversion, but the fruit of the Spirit. That was the goal. I may be wrong in this reading of Edwards, but I am pretty familiar.
 
Upvote 0

public hermit

social troglodyte
Site Supporter
Aug 20, 2019
10,988
12,078
East Coast
✟840,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Have either of you fine gentlemen heard the sermon in the OP post above? It's why i began this thread.

Good point. I'm listening...

Yes Sir, it's a fine sermon. I came across a transcript of this sermon at some point. Particularly, the part about throwing the birthday party for the prostitute. Joy as evidence of discipleship, good stuff.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0