Check the video interview in post #48So you claim.
NASA hasn’t take a trillion dollars in their entire history.
Upvote
0
Check the video interview in post #48So you claim.
NASA hasn’t take a trillion dollars in their entire history.
Is tNo, it’s not.
Of course it is.Irrelevant.
Sure... ok.Again, if you don’t know, just say it.
This tap dancing isn’t needed.
First off, you said multiple astronauts said they didn’t encounter the belts. That is one, and he’s just relaying one experience.Check the video interview in post #48
We’re not talking about models for those things.Of course it is.
The fact that there are thousands of things in this world that are mysteries to us.... is "irrelevant" but the one thing that you are focused on "is" relevant?
That's not what they sayIt is really quite simple. The moon mission was just a matter of days while a Mars mission will take months. If there is a major solar flare during that time period the radiation hazard could be quite severe. Some way of protecting the crew will need to be worked out.
That's not what they say
And..............not one bit of input from yourself... all chirp at the FE'er or encouragement for the globe view... not ever in the game, just on the sidelines telling everyone how it should be done.
How do people arguing a moon landing and the solar model not understand you need an electromagnetic (plasma) shield in order to go outside of the Van Allen belts (or, through them really) alone - not to mention in the vacuum of space with plasma flux? These particles penetrate metal very easily; the amount of radiation exposure would be fatal.
There is no going to mars, the moon or high orbit unless the vehicle has a protective electromagnetic shield to deflect the charged particles showering the planet at a tenth of the speed of light or higher.
All right, let’s try something easier, Jack.
How do the seasons work on a flat earth?
That`s because there is not a lot of radiation in on a movie set.The moon landings 50 years ago were accomplished not only safely but also with no long term side effects.
As the year passes, the moon and sun move around in a smaller more northern circle about the north pole. At the end of June, they are in their tightest circuit and gradually start moving outward as the summer goes by. In December, around the 21st, they are in their largest circuit.All right, let’s try something easier, Jack.
How do the seasons work on a flat earth?
As the year passes, the moon and sun move around in a smaller more northern circle about the north pole. At the end of June, they are in their tightest circuit and gradually start moving outward as the summer goes by. In December, around the 21st, they are in their largest circuit.
1/ Why do the sun and moon travel in the exact same path, across the sky, as the seasons change, if one orbits us and is totally disconnected from the other, while the other is orbited by us ait's position, during the seasons, is as a result of the tilt of the earth?
2/ They are the exact same size, in our view from earth.
3/ Is it not odd that we never see the other side of the moon? Does it not seem odd that it is spinning at just the right rate to never show us it's other side?
How did those biological entities known as humans survive the radiations flux and belts two times (re/entry) without a plasma shield, or some electromagnetic repellent? The sun still existed 50 years ago. The radiation penetrates the metal shell (and human tissue).
There you go thinking for yourself.... perfect... you are correct.Then why does the Sun’s speed never change?
If it’s traveling a shorter circuit, it should take a shorter time to get a day, meaning the Sun would have to slow down to maintain 24 hour days. If it’s traveling a longer circuit, it should take a longer time, meaning the Sun has to speed up to maintain 24 hour days.
Actually, from our point of observation, the distance it travels will always be 15 degrees. Even if it is changing its speed. This is due to the distance it travels on it's path is different.This is not what we observe. The sun - and the stars - moves about 15 degrees every hour. Consistently. It doesn’t move faster or slower depending on the seasons.
Also, if what you say is true, the Sun and Moon should change size depending on the time of the year and where you are. When it’s in the shorter circuit and you’re in the northern hemisphere, it should appear bigger than it does in the Southern Hemisphere, and vice versus. That never happens. They appear the same size no matter where you are on the earth. If they’re small and close, that doesn’t make sense. If they’re big and far away, it does make sense. While the Earth’s proximity to the Sun does change, it doesn’t vary enough to make a change that you could see with the naked eye. It’s like taking ten steps closer to a mountain that’s ten miles away.
Also also, I’d love to see you explain how this works with the 24/7 sunlight we see at certain times and places.
Where did I say that? The temperature is determined by the amount of daylight hours. Not distance.Also also also, you seem to be implying that this small sun of yours gets hotter the closer you are to it, and there are SO MANY PROBLEMS with that.
Also also also also, why would the Moon be changing its circuit? It has jack-all to do with the seasons. And come to think of it, why is the Moon traveling at a completely different speed and direction than the Sun and Stars - except for the planets, which are also traveling at different speeds and directions?
Because they’re very far away, and tilt isn’t going to make their apparent path change to any noticeable degree.
Do you understand why the Earth’s tilt causes seasons?
If I hold my thumb up just right, it appears to be the same size as my house. So what?
Why do you get a bonus? Anyway, it’s called tidal locking. You’re not going to accept it, because it involves gravity, but it’s not a mystery.
Fun Fact: It’s not the only heavenly body that does this. If you ever bother to look at it, you might notice that Mercury isn’t turning much, either. That’s the reason why.
If we examine our local universe there are a number of observations that must be consistently explained:
Good question. Finally someone asking a question that I also have about the FE.1. tidal effects on earth
This phenomenon is not proof of either model. It's a fact, but both models can easily explain some reason. The state of the earth model is not affected.2. moon's near side "locked' to earth
Again, the phases of the moon work the same on both models. It's not proof of or contradiction of either.3. phases of the moon
4. retardation of the moon's 'rising'
5. seasons of the earth
6. seasonal 24 hour days and nights in the arctic and antarctic
Coriolis is a hoax. I have watched several documentaries on military specialists describing long range ballistics. They talk about many variables that affect the accuracy of their respective projectiles... not once do they mention the direction, in relation to the compass, in their calculations and not once did they mention "Coriolis".7. coreolis effects on earth
Not proven to be relative to any rotation of the earth. Sometimes moves backward during eclipses, and, needs constant force to keep it swinging.8. Foucault's pendulum
Never heard of this. Will have to look this up.9. precession of the earth's axis
Explained, very well, by both models.10. apparent daily rotation of the "fixed stars" about the pole star
Laughable... all heavenly bodies move east to west... all over the globe. except some planets in retrograde.11. this rotation being in opposite directions at the two poles
Not a determinant in the shape of the earth. Explained by both models.12. motion of the "wandering stars" (planets) including retrograde motion
Again, something for me to investigate, not familiar with this concept.13. earth-moon centre of gravity orbits
Solar eclipse is simple, in both models.14. eclipses of the sun, moon and planets
Not a factor in the shape of the earth. Both can have this phenomenon.15. northern and southern lights
Yes, I agree, good question.16. meteors, asteroids and comets
Has nothing to do with the shape of earth.... totally no connection.17. moons and/or rings around other planets
Simple optical fact of view point. Easily explained by both models.18. people in the southern hemisphere observe the moon "upside down" relative to those in the northern hemisphere
OK?19. there are certainly other effects that I have missed
We use all of the physical laws as tools for things on this earth. From magnetism, to pressure, to boiling points....There is only one self consistent model/theory that explains all of these observations and that is the present cosmology of our solar system. This does not explain why these objects behave as they do, it only provides a very refined model that accounts for all the observed effects.
Now add into this the experimentally verified non-relativistic laws of motion and of gravity, known as Newtonian or classical mechanics, and we now have the why that explains the model in a near perfect manner. It is so successful that it has enabled us to send people into earth and moon orbits, to the moon itself and return to earth. We have been able to navigate probes to all the planets and beyond. People have stood on our moon and observed our planet rotating in front of them in real time. Any other cosmology finds it necessary to suspend known laws of science, hypothesize supernatural intervention and invoke a conspiracy theory extending over centuries involving tens of millions of people a great many of whom are Christian.
There you go thinking for yourself.... perfect... you are correct.
Actually, from our point of observation, the distance it travels will always be 15 degrees. Even if it is changing its speed. This is due to the distance it travels on it's path is different.
Tie a ball to the end of a rope. Fix another one half way down the rope. swing the rope around parallel to the ground. You will observe both balls in perfect line while the outer ball travels farther and faster.
This is not true. The distance to the sun and moon is very short in the FE model and the size difference is not noticeable.
When the sun is in it's smallest circuit, it's light covers the north and center of the flat earth, almost continually.
Where did I say that? The temperature is determined by the amount of daylight hours.
You do realize that, on the globe model, supposedly, we are closer to the sun.... or so someone told me.
Firstly, why IS the moon changing it's circuit, just as the sun.. when, as you said, it has nothing to do with the seasons....
Yet, there it is, following the same path as the sun, changing it's angle to the earth, as the sun does? And, don't forget, it orbits us while we orbit the sun...meanwhile, they travel as if they are both orbiting us.
This does not explain why something that we orbit travels exactly the same path of something that orbits us. Do you realize the odds of that happening.... especially given their supposedly different sizes and distances?
Yep, and you can adjust the position of your arm.... you can make your house much bigger, or, much smaller... yet we see the sun and moon exactly the same size everywhere on the earth. To me, that's some coincidence.
Tidal locking... very convenient. If gravity is that strong, why are we not tidal locked to the sun?