My Jesus Challenge

Is the Biblical Jesus Christ a man-made invention?


  • Total voters
    18
  • Poll closed .

TheOldWays

Candidate
May 28, 2014
825
745
✟125,030.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Such was the case when Klebold & Harris' realities clashed with their fellow students' respective realities.

A tragedy. But what's that have to do with my reality?

And what about the Burning Monk?

Did he get tired of "living in the present moment" and decide to create a legacy?

An example of one who was caught up in an egregore. So? What's that to do with you or me? Obviously not one living a life of unattachment if he felt the urge to immolate himself. Although I won't pretend to know their situation.

If so, then it's not all about living in the present moment, is it?

As I said, I create my own reality, how others choose to live out their reality is another matter.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
19,249
2,832
Oregon
✟732,924.00
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
From an evolutionary pov, what is the point of a human being conscious?
I like this question, so if you don't mine my putting into your conversation with Jane I'd like to add my 2 pennies worth. The point of Human consciousness, if a point is needed, is so that the Universe can be aware of itSelf. If we look at the Universe over time, consciousness has evolved where here on Earth it has peaked in the form of Human Beings. We are of the Universe being aware of the Universe.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jane_the_Bane
Upvote 0

the iconoclast

Atheism is weak. Yep, I said it
Feb 10, 2015
1,130
81
✟39,361.00
Country
Burkina Faso
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
I like this question, so if you don't mine my putting into your conversation with Jane I'd like to add my 2 pennies worth. The point of Human consciousness, if a point is needed, is so that the Universe can be aware of itSelf. If we look at the Universe over time, consciousness has evolved where here on Earth it has peaked in the form of Human Beings. We are of the Universe being aware of the Universe.

Hey hey my dear :)

I dont mind but im still going to be delayed replying to you. Hope you are having a wonderful day. :)
 
Upvote 0

Jane_the_Bane

Gaia's godchild
Feb 11, 2004
19,359
3,426
✟168,333.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Politics
UK-Greens
I was born in 1954.

Say someone wrote that the Priesident killed every child in America two years old and under in 1955.

Why wouldn't I come forward and pwn that guy?
A good question! You are touching upon an important point here: you'd "pwn" that guy as a fraud because you were born in the 1950s - more precisely, in an age that had established very specific journalistic and academic standards for texts making historical claims.
There were no such standards in the ancient world. Even ancient texts intended as history (and not religious literature written by believers for believers) do not measure up to our exacting demands.
In a similar vein, it was quite common to write texts and attribute them to a person who taught or inspired you - and no one would point a finger at you screaming "FORGERY!"

Those were very different times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zoness
Upvote 0

the iconoclast

Atheism is weak. Yep, I said it
Feb 10, 2015
1,130
81
✟39,361.00
Country
Burkina Faso
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
Do you want a re-phrasing of the dilemma and the theodicy problem?

- Preventable evil exists.

- Therefore, any deity that exists is either a) not all-powerful and all-knowing, or b) not all-good.

Hey hey the bane. :)

Im all good, i wanted to see exactly what you meant. :) Essentially why does God allow suffering and even more so, a good God would not allow evil to exist.

Now, this is quite a huge subject in itself and you will need to know some basic Christian info. We are discussing the Christian God in relation to Christianity.

Are you familiar with the parable of the harvest mat 13:24-30

"Another parable he put before them, saying, ‘The kingdom of heaven may be compared to a man who sowed good seed in his field; but while men were sleeping, his enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and went away. So when the plants came up and bore grain, then the weeds appeared also. And the servants of the householder came and said to him, ‘Sir, did you not sow good seed in your field? How then has it weeds?’ He said to them, ‘An enemy has done this.’ The servants said to him,’Then do you want us to go and gather them?’ But he said, ‘No; lest in gathering the weeds you root up the wheat along with them. Let both grow together until the harvest; and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, Gather the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn.’" Matthew 13:24-30


Here is the explanation of that parable. :)


And his disciples came to him, saying, ‘Explain to us the parable of the weeds of the field.’ He answered, ‘He who sows the good seed is the Son of man; the field is the world, and the good seed means the sons of the kingdom; the weeds are the sons of the evil one, and the enemy who sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the close of the age. The Son of man will send his angels, and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all evildoers, and throw them into the furnace of fire; there men will weep and gnash their teeth. Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. He who has an ear let him hear." Matthew 13:36-43

This life on Earth is a test. Earth is s testing ground.

Peter 1:7
Pure gold put in the fire comes out of it proved pure; genuine faith put through this suffering comes out proved genuine. When Jesus wraps this all up, it's your faith, not your gold, that God will have on display as evidence of his victory.

Jeremiah 9:7
Therefore thus says the LORD of hosts, "Behold, I will refine them and assay them"

Isaiah 48:10
"Behold, I have refined you, but not as silver; I have tested you in the furnace of affliction.

God has planted a harvest. He wants a yield and He knows the more seeds He plants the bigger the harvest. He knows the result of the harvest - ie good fruit - is worth the chance of bad fruit or weeds.

It is worthwhile to God as he has plans ie the new Jerusalem. You are offered a chance, you could be apart of something bigger than you, we, the world or the universe.

Ask me more - in relation to this subject - as i feel like we need a bit of back and forth. :)

Well, it goes further than that, by asking: "Does God do good because it's just, or is it good because God does it?"

1 John 1:5
5 This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all.

1 John 1:9
9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.

1 John 4:8
8 Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.

This what we know of God. God is love and light. God would do good because He has all the data and can judge accordingly. God does what He wants to do based on His mortality and princples. He is the absolute authority!

The problem of evil is not the only thing that makes literal, personal deities an astronomically unlikely possibility in my book,

A pose a question to you. How do you know what qualifies as beautiful if you had no comparison to ugliness?

but it certainly does not help that any attempt at reconciling the world as-is with the image of an all-powerful, benign deity takes more special pleading and exceptional rationalisations

What special pleading do you speak of? What is an example of an exceptional rationale that you would have to believe in the Christian God?

than mapping the planetary orbits under the assumption that the Earth is at the centre of everything.

How do you know that Earth is not the centre of everything - In the beginning God created the heaven and the Earth. What is at the centre of everything?

An expanding singularity kick-started the space-time-continuum as we know it. Since space and time are inextricably linked, there was neither a "before" nor an "elsewhere".

The bane - "and I would say concluding that things are NOT run by an invisible superbeing just makes vastly more sense and requires less mental gymnastics."

Well we have a great start. Lets kick it up a notch.

Is there something at the back of this singularity or is this a random and meaningless event?

What do you mean by a 'no before or elsewhere?

What is this singularity and how does it expand?


Of course not. That is why we've got the scientific method, because we KNOW people will mess up.

Ahhhhh.... the method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.

Who reaches the conclusion of an observation, a measurement or an experiment?

Who modifies a hypotheses?

Do you have complete trust in the thoughts and reasoning of ancient civilizations who attributed their cultural peculiarities to a deity?

It would depend. Which ancient civilization do you speak of and what example of thoughts or reasoning would you like me to have complete trust in?

Ultimately, yes, though certainly not immediately and all at once.

So in the near distant future. You have an expectation based on assumption.

How certain are you?

Evolutionary biology enables us to figure out how species evolve. Its purpose is not to assign meaning to consciousness. There's such a thing as evolutionary psychology, explaining how empathy and reciprocity are vital, favourable traits in a social species like our own, and also explaining how anti-social behaviour is requited with negative feelings, but that's a different topic.

Sounds like science and scientists are your authority? Do you have complete trust in them?

Of course not. It is a ridiculous attempt to put words into my mouth, and everybody reading this will see right through it.

Please so not be rash my friend. :)


At this point, I don't even give you the benefit of the doubt that you just misunderstood, because you could easily see what question of yours I answered here.

Please excuse me that was not my intention.

At the same time it is best not to assume where im going with anything. Just speak truthfully and honestly. :) Truth will prevail.

But for the sake of others, let's explain it once more.

Thank you :)

"Why do you consider (some depictions of) god evil if you do believe said god exists?"

"Because characters do not have to be real in order to qualify as evil. Darth Vader is not real, yet it's easy to see that he's a villain. In the same manner, gods as literary characters can qualify as good or evil even if they never existed."

Why does God qualify as evil?

With such quote mining, even Stalin would look like a saint - especially if you used propaganda written by his followers to establish this.

Quote mining (also contextomy) is the fallacious tactic of taking quotes out of context in order to make them seemingly agree with the quote miner's viewpoint or to make the comments of an opponent seem more extreme or hold positions they don't in order to make their positions easier to refute or demonize.[2] It's a way of lying.

How did i quote out of context? Do you think its fair to compare God to Stalin? R u suggesting those scriptures are lies? Would you call what you are doing an appeal to the extreme or misrepresentation? What scripture would you use to prove that position?

Deeds speak louder than words. The biblical deity as depicted in the Pentateuch is capricious, self-aggrandizing, and acts like an ancient middle-eastern king, brutally murdering thousands at the slightest whiff of suspected insubordination or disrespect.



I disagree with you, this is misrepresentation. The difference between you and i is, i accept God's right to judge and sentence.

Why do you disagree with God's right to judge?

Show me examples of these traits which you accuse God of?

If Joshua's conquest of the holy land was more than a historical myth, it would qualify as the first recorded large-scale genocide and ethnic cleansing in history. They didn't even allow LIVESTOCK to live for fear of becoming "impure".

How would it be the largest genocide? Have you considered those people where judged by God?

Here we come to a new subject matter. How is the death penalty immoral?

I take it that English is not your first language,

Well english is my mother tongue. How does that make you feel?. :)

for otherwise that would mean you intentionally used such epithets to insult and patronize me -

Dude, i do that to everyone, but if you do not wish me to call you friend, dear, treasure, diamond, gem or any nice things then i will not after this post.

for that is how such excessive flourishes come across, "my dearest sugarcake".

I'm not your anything.

That is exaggeration and not my intention. So you are not my friend?

More of a cosmopolitan. The life of a foreigner is just as valuable to me as that of a fellow countryman, and there is no such thing as a "just war" - at best, there's a regrettable necessity for self-defense in some cases.

Familiar with and at ease in many different countries and cultures. A global citizen?

What would you do if someone was adamant to kill you and no matter what you did or say, this person will not be discouraged?

Would war against stalin be just? In regards to war, is the life of a foreign fighter just as valuable as your countrymen?

Cheers
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jane_the_Bane

Gaia's godchild
Feb 11, 2004
19,359
3,426
✟168,333.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Politics
UK-Greens
The Iconoclast, let's make this simple:

Do you think there is any scenario where the command "kill every last one , including non-combatants, children and infants to preserve your ritual purity" qualify as anything other than atrocity?
Do you think supreme power conveys the right to do whatever you see fit and call it "justice"?
Would the Holocaust qualify as a just and good act if it had been commanded by YHVH instead of the NSDAP? Would the people operating the gas chambers filled with screaming children be heroes instead of villains if backed by divine command?

As you might suspect, my answer to all of these is a resounding: "No!" If there was such a deity , I would feel compelled to oppose it with every fibre of my being, even if it was so powerful that every attempt at stopping it was bound to fail.

Ethics are relational and intersubjective, but they are not *random*.
If there was a vastly superior race of extraterrestrials who was as far removed from our intellectual powers as we are from cattle, they might indeed conclude that they can treat us just like we treat farm animals. From their vantage point, it would be acceptable behaviour. But *to us*, it would always be an atrocity, and we would react to it accordingly. Relationshipwise , we could not do anything other than to regard them as evil/mortal enemies.
 
Upvote 0

the iconoclast

Atheism is weak. Yep, I said it
Feb 10, 2015
1,130
81
✟39,361.00
Country
Burkina Faso
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
The Iconoclast, let's make this simple:

Hey hey jane the bane :)

Thank you, simple is good for me.

Do you think there is any scenario where the command "kill every last one , including non-combatants, children and infants to preserve your ritual purity" qualify as anything other than atrocity?

Atrocity, as in an extremely wicked or cruel act, typically one involving physical violence or injury.

This was a judgement on these people. Lets take sides and continue here, you make your case for why this is an immoral or extremely wicked act and ill take the other side - to argue that this was a death penalty?

Do you think supreme power conveys the right to do whatever you see fit and call it "justice"?

He will do what He believes is necessary, He has all the data. ;)

Its called absolute morality, where as you apply your standard of morality to God. You believe your standard of morality is higher than God. Give me an appeal to your authority, why should i listen to you? What or who is your authority on morality?

Would the Holocaust qualify as a just and good act if it had been commanded by YHVH instead of the NSDAP?

Now here is a free one for you. What you a guilty of is called a loaded question.

Your logical fallacy is loaded question
loaded question
You asked a question that had a presumption built into it so that it couldn't be answered without appearing guilty

If i say yes then you will apply your standard of morality and continue to misrepresent God. If i say no then you will try to use that response as a precedent.

Please excuse me. I cannot answer such a question. :)

What u think?

Ps
By the way you do realise the holocaust was sponsered by atheisism and paganism?

Would the people operating the gas chambers filled with screaming children be heroes instead of villains if backed by divine command?

Please excuse me. I cannot answer this question for the say reason i mentioned above.

As you might suspect, my answer to all of these is a resounding: "No!" If there was such a deity , I would feel compelled to oppose it with every fibre of my being, even if it was so powerful that every attempt at stopping it was bound to fail.

Do you see how you 'framed' God?

1. What you have done is painted a picture of God. (persuade yourself something false is the truth).
2.You said to your self this is God (misrepresentation and accusation).
3. Said to yourself "i do not like THIS God" (convinced yourself).
4. Then proceeded to throw away the picture. (removed God from consideration.)

What u think?

Ethics are relational and intersubjective, but they are not *random*.

The moral correctness of specified conduct is relational ( .eg concerning the way in which two or more people or things are connected.) Relational to what?

The moral correctness of specified conduct exists between conscious minds; shared by more than one conscious mind? How so?

Im in anticipation to see where we go with this!

If there was a vastly superior race of extraterrestrials who was as far removed from our intellectual powers as we are from cattle, they might indeed conclude that they can treat us just like we treat farm animals.

Would you say that this was an idea that is taken to be true on the basis of probability?


From their vantage point, it would be acceptable behaviour. But *to us*, it would always be an atrocity, and we would react to it accordingly.

Who is us?

Relationshipwise , we could not do anything other than to regard them as evil/mortal enemies.

Why do you deem them as evil or mortal enemies?

Who is them?

Cheers you. I look forward to your reply :)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

the iconoclast

Atheism is weak. Yep, I said it
Feb 10, 2015
1,130
81
✟39,361.00
Country
Burkina Faso
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
The most important experience has been this: by practicing the Buddhist Eightfold Path, I have substantially reduced my experience of suffering. I am not aware of any Christian who have followed the Christian path and have experienced an increase in lifespan.

Hey hey ananda :) sorry my friend, i had a back log..thank you for your patience.:)

John 3:16
For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

1 John 5:13-14
I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God so that you may know that you have eternal life. This is the confidence we have in approaching God: that if we ask anything according to his will, he hears us.

1 John 5:13-14
I write these things to you who believe in the name of the Son of God so that you may know that you have eternal life. This is the confidence we have in approaching God: that if we ask anything according to his will, he hears us.

For those who find me find life
and receive favor from the Lord.
Proverbs 8:35

And the God of all grace, who called you to his eternal glory in Christ, after you have suffered a little while, will himself restore you and make you strong, firm and steadfast.
1 Peter 5:10

The world and its desires pass away, but whoever does the will of God lives forever.
1 John 2:17

What say you my friend?

Also how do you know you have increased your life span?

Im curious. Are you aware of anyone who hasnincreased their life span?

In Buddhism, conscious intention is said to power all stratas of reality.

What are stratas of reality? Could you give me an example?

I don't know either way. If your intuition knows that you heard from an infinite being, then that is personal knowledge. Others cannot know if your experience originated from a powerful yet limited being, or an infinite being. I'm merely giving an alternate explanation for such experiences.

Excellant, then we know it was from the Christian God as you cannot supply an alternative.

It was acheived using the Christian formula, at church (but doesnt always have to be), while i was being prayed for by 2 Spirit filled Christian women and while i was focusing my attention to God in deep prayer. :)

How & why does anyone interact with anyone else?

How? You can enage someone, dont pay a bill, randomly hug someone, seek out someone or just plan talk to them.

Why? Interest, curiousity, attraction, anoyance, desperation, loneliness, pity, boredom, hunger, thirst, protection, jealousy. That was 10 seconds worth

My friend, you can start your relationship with God at any time.

What benefit is it for you to become nothing - dont say less suffering - give me something else?

Do we normally interact with lesser beings, like bacteria?

So you cannot interact with a deva. See you just proved there was no alternative for my experiences. :)

That question is irrelevant, as we cannot know the answer; speculation is irrelevant. The far more important question is "what is suffering & what is its cessation?", as the Buddha rightly taught.

Why is that question irrelevant?

What is suffering and what is its cessation?

If belief is based on personal communication from/with your deity, then evangelism, faith, and scripture becomes irrelevant.

Why does evangelism, faith and scripture become irrelevant?

The conscious awareness experiences the results of its kamma. It may experience heavenly states, the human state, hellish states, etc.

What kamma do i need to experience a human state?

Apparently they can be known, through certain practices prescribed by the Buddha. The Buddha describes how individuals, after cultivating a meditative jhanic state, experienced a Brahma deity,

But they are lesser beings like bacteria. How can we know them?

and then believed they've contacted the Creator and Father God:

Brahma is lesser than bacteria. You are greater than he, how could he create the world?

"Now, there is the possibility, monks, that a certain being, having fallen from that company, comes to this world. Having come to this world, he goes forth from the home life into homelessness. Having gone forth from the home life into homelessness, he—through ardency, through exertion, through commitment, through heedfulness, through right attention—touches an awareness- concentration such that in his concentrated mind he recollects that former life, but nothing prior to that.

A thing that may happen or be the case. Sounds like someone is not certain.

He says, ‘We were created by Brahmā, the Great Brahmā, the Conqueror, the Unconquered, the All-Seeing, All-Powerful, the Sovereign Lord, the Maker, Creator, Chief, Appointer and Ruler, Father of All That Have Been and Shall Be. He is constant, permanent, eternal, not subject to change, and will remain just like that for eternity. But we who have been created by him—inconstant, impermanent, short-lived, subject to falling—have come to this world.’" (DN1)

So the earth was created by a lesser being called brahma. Why was it irrelevant before?

I don't know this yet, I was simply describing what I understood Buddhism teaches.

Fair enough

There is no expiration date.

Is it true, If im bad kamma may dictates
i could be a coakroach in my next life? How does one judge a cockroach as bad?

Good kamma includes skillful intentions & choices through the body, speech, or mind and involves non-greed, non-aversion, and non-delusion.

What does it mean 'to blow out the candle' or 'to blow away'?

Cheers you
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,156
51,516
Guam
✟4,910,519.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Do you think there is any scenario where the command "kill every last one , including non-combatants, children and infants to preserve your ritual purity" qualify as anything other than atrocity?
Their failure to do so led to their downfall.
 
Upvote 0

Zoness

667, neighbor of the beast
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2008
8,384
1,654
Illinois
✟468,399.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
The Bible can be used to justify the same sort of extreme violence that the Quran is used for. Luckily, Western thought has largely stamped that out of Christianity but it could always resurge, especially in the global South with Christianity is growing. Presently we're contesting it with the Islamic world and it'll take generations to change but I'm hopeful over a long enough timescale it will.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,156
51,516
Guam
✟4,910,519.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The Bible can be used to justify the same sort of extreme violence that the Quran is used for.
No, It can't.

And anyone attempting to do so would be attempting to do so in spite of the Bible, not with respect to It.

They might justify it to YOU, but those who actually know their Bible won't be fooled.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Other scholars got to me before you did!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,213
9,975
The Void!
✟1,134,467.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Is the Biblical Jesus Christ a man-made invention?

That's the quintessential question, isn't it? "...but who do you say that I AM?"

Man, there really is nothing new under the Sun, or under the Son.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,156
51,516
Guam
✟4,910,519.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That's the quintessential question, isn't it? "...but who do you say that I AM?"

Man, there really is nothing new under the Sun, or under the Son.
Now THAT'S a winner!

Sidebar: Who is that in your pic?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,156
51,516
Guam
✟4,910,519.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
....it's Quicksilver, a character from the X-men! ...he's kind of like the Flash and so does things like this:
That's far out!

Thanks for sharing it.

I was always a DC man, myself, and didn't care much for MARVEL.

The Green Lantern is my favorite [comic book] super hero.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Other scholars got to me before you did!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
21,213
9,975
The Void!
✟1,134,467.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That's far out!

Thanks for sharing it.

I was always a DC man, myself, and didn't care much for MARVEL.

The Green Lantern is my favorite [comic book] super hero.

Yeah, the Green Lantern is cool, too! ............but as far as Jewishly created superheroes are concerned, Jesus is the Coolest of them all, most particularly because He's the only real superhero. :cool:
 
  • Winner
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,156
51,516
Guam
✟4,910,519.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yeah, the Green Lantern is cool, too! ............but as far as Jewishly created superheroes are concerned, Jesus is the Coolest of them all, most particularly because He's the only real superhero. :cool:
Aaaaaand there's another WINNER! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Jane_the_Bane

Gaia's godchild
Feb 11, 2004
19,359
3,426
✟168,333.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Politics
UK-Greens
Atrocity, as in an extremely wicked or cruel act, typically one involving physical violence or injury.

This was a judgement on these people. Lets take sides and continue here, you make your case for why this is an immoral or extremely wicked act and ill take the other side - to argue that this was a death penalty?
A death penalty that is extended to newborn infants, toddlers, children, youths, innocent bystanders, their pets and their livestock? How did they exactly qualify for this punishment? Do you think there is a reason why courts do not punish uninvolved family members for crimes committed by their next of kin? When was the last time we jailed (or executed) a toddler for being the child of a murderer?

And while we are at it, the death penalty is a relic from more primitive times: reciprocity taken down a dark road, socially accepted revenge that achieves nothing apart from adding further bloodshed and injury.

Its [sic] called absolute morality, where as you apply your standard of morality to God.
No, an example of absolute morality is: ethnic cleansing and genocide are wrong, regardless of who orders or performs them. What you describe here is more of an athoritarian morality: whether an act is right or wrong is determined by the status of the perpetrator, NOT the act itself.

By the way you do realise the holocaust was sponsered by atheisism and paganism?
Several high-ranking nazis were occultists who believed in restoring the "Germanic ur-religion" and casting out the "corrupting Jewish influence" of Christianity, yes. Himmler in particular.
Others were German Christians or simply Protestants who seized upon similar ideas, emphasizing the anti-semitic writings of Martin Luther and other reformers (which read like a roadmap for the holocaust) along with roughly a millennium's worth of anti-semitic tradition within European Christianity.
Judging by the demographics of the time (Christianity was ubiquitous in Germany back then, in contrast to today), roughly 99% of the people staffing the death camps, working for the Gestapo or otherwise becoming involved in the genocide were Christians, many of them active churchgoers who attended service every sunday, once their shift in the gas chambers was done.

The moral correctness of specified conduct is relational ( .eg concerning the way in which two or more people or things are connected.) Relational to what?
People.

The moral correctness of specified conduct exists between conscious minds; shared by more than one conscious mind? How so?
Communication and interaction.

Why do you deem them as evil or mortal enemies?
Because the extraterrestrials in this hypothetical example intend to farm and eat us like poultry, and virtually every last one of us except for the openly suicidal or deluded would regard that as a horrible thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zoness
Upvote 0