So Jesus wasn't telling us to eat bread and drink wine, must just using metaphors for His body and blood. After all if He was just making a metaphor, like where He says "I am the vine" or where John says "Behold the Lamb of God", we don't have actual vines and lambs involved, "vine" and "lamb" are word-pictures here as part of the metaphor. Thus no concrete bread or wine here, Jesus was making a metaphor speaking of His body as bread and His blood as wine.
Since I neither believe in transubstantiation or consubstantiation I can't speak for either. But that the claim is physical isn't falsified, because the comparison between "I am the vine" and "This is My body broken for you" is non-existant. It's a false comparison--regardless of "word order". Jesus wasn't offering a metaphor to describe His body as bread, He took bread, broke it, distributed it to His followers and said "This is My body broken for you". And then Paul, in 1 Corinthians 10, says "The bread that we break, is it not a sharing in the body of Christ? Because there is one bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread. Consider the people of Israel; are not those who eat the sacrifices partners in the altar?" And again the Apostle says, "Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be answerable for the body and blood of the Lord."
This is more than just some colorful metaphor, it's the body and blood of Jesus Christ.
-CryptoLutheran