A Millennium Full Of Sacrificial Blood?

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
which is why I'm asking you to support your assumption. If you can't support it, at least admit it's only your theory and not a fact.

These are not theories, these are theological issues that must be answered in order for your interpretations to work.

I gave you verse and chapter (numbers 29:12-40) about the sin offering requirements of the feast of tabernacles. I provided scripture (Matthew 5:18) that shows that not one jot or iota of the law will not change until heaven and earth pass away. So let's break it down:

The feast of Tabernacles, as stated in Numbers 29:12-40, requires a sin offering for each day of the festival.

And

Jesus states not one iota or jot will change from the law until heaven and earth have passed away, (Matthew 5:18)

Therefore

the way that the feast of tabernacles and animal sacrifices ( including SIN OFFERINGs) can be celebrated cannot be different until heaven and earth pass away.


However,
You are saying that the sacrifice during the feast of tabernacles will have a different purpose in the future literal 1000 year reign of Christ, meaning it will no longer be a sin offering. The burden of proof is on you, as you made the claim that it will be different than what scripture says the original feast of tabernacles is about. you, as well as other posters, have provided no evidence that the purpose of future animal sacrifices will change. You have also not provided evidence that this new purpose will be for the remembrance of Christ.


So, will the earthly 1000 year literal millennial kingdom take place during the old heavens and earth, or new heavens and earth?

As far as when it is, let's read the surrounding context to find out:

Verses 2 and 3. Has the Lord gather the armies against Jerusalem then Himself go out and fight, conquering those armies? Nope.

Verse 4. Has the Lord planted His feet on the Mount of Olives yet, splitting it into two yet. Nope.

Verse 8. Are there waters flowing out of Jerusalem yet, half to the east and half to the west yet? Nope. Is the summer there the same weather as the winter? Nope.

Verse 10. Has the whole land surrounding Jerusalem been lowered to the level of a great plain yet? Nope.

Verse 11. Has Jerusalem come to a point where it will live in a perpetual state of security forever? Nope.

Verse 16. Do all the families of the nations go up to Jerusalem each year to celebrate the Feast of Booths yet? Nope.

Seems yet to be fulfilled to me.

Many old testament prophecies use apocalyptic language which should not always be interpreted literally.
 
Upvote 0

Tolworth John

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 10, 2017
8,278
4,678
68
Tolworth
✟369,679.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Again, not the proper question. First, the New Jerusalem isn't the earthly Jerusalem. It's like saying the city of York is invalid because it doesn't have a Times Square like New York does. They aren't the same location.

Second, The scripture tells us plainly in Zechariah 6:12-13, "Thus says the LORD of hosts, “Behold, the man whose name is the Branch: for he shall branch out from his place, and he shall build the temple of the LORD. It is he who shall build the temple of the LORD and shall bear royal honor, and shall sit and rule on his throne." Then we are told in verse 15, "And those who are far off shall come and help to build the temple of the LORD."

The Lord builds it, and other come to help. And then notice he sits in the temple he build and rules from a throne. The proper question is really, do we believe what it says or not. I really think trying to explain this stuff away as some on here long to do, really shows either ignorance or distrust in what the text states. They simply think it needs to bow to their own understanding, rather than their understanding bowing to it.

Asuming, that is, that your understanding of scripture is correct.
No one has the ability to say , 'I'm right in this understanding of the 2nd coming!'

About that all we know with 100% accuracy, is that Jesus is coming again. Everything else is speculation.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And

Jesus states not one iota or jot will change from the law until heaven and earth have passed away, (Matthew 5:18)

Therefore

the way that the feast of tabernacles and animal sacrifices ( including SIN OFFERINGs) can be celebrated cannot be different until heaven and earth pass away.


You run into problems with your interpretation of Matthew 5:18 in Galatians chapter 3.
In Galatians 3:16-29 Paul reveals that the law was "added" 430 years "after" the promise made to Abraham "until" the seed could come to whom the promise was made.
The Sinai Covenant was a temporary covenant.


In Jeremiah 31:31-34 we find a New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah to replace the covenant Israel had broken. It is found fulfilled to the letter in Hebrews 8:6-13.

In Galatians chapter 4 Paul compares the Sinai Covenant to "bondage" and compels the Galatian believes to "cast out" the Sinai Covenant.
He says our inheritance does not come from the covenant of "bondage".


In Colossians 2:16-17 Paul says you are wrong about the feasts and Sabbaths, which were but a shadow of Christ.

In Hebrews 8:13 we find that the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant "obsolete".

This is confirmed in Hebrews 12:18-24 where we find that we are not come to the mountain that burns with fire, but instead to Mount Zion and the heavenly Jerusalem.


When a carpenter completes a house the house is "finished" and the contract to build that house has become "obsolete".
The Master carpenter has built us a New House out of two pieces of wood and a handful of nails.
It is now waiting on us, as found in Hebrews 11:15-16.


.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: claninja
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You run into problems with your interpretation of Matthew 5:18 in Galatians chapter 3.
In Galatians 3:16-29 Paul reveals that the law was "added" 430 years "after" the promise made to Abraham "until" the seed could come to whom the promise was made.
The Sinai Covenant was a temporary covenant.


In Jeremiah 31:31-34 we find a New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah to replace the covenant Israel had broken. It is found fulfilled to the letter in Hebrews 8:6-13.

In Galatians chapter 4 Paul compares the Sinai Covenant to "bondage" and compels the Galatian believes to "cast out" the Sinai Covenant.
He says our inheritance does not come from the covenant of "bondage".


In Colossians 2:16-17 Paul says you are wrong about the feasts and Sabbaths, which were but a shadow of Christ.

In Hebrews 8:13 we find that the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant "obsolete".

This is confirmed in Hebrews 12:18-24 where we find that we are not come to the mountain that burns with fire, but instead to Mount Zion and the heavenly Jerusalem.


When a carpenter completes a house the house is "finished" and the contract to build that house has become "obsolete".
The Master carpenter has built us a New House out of two pieces of wood and a handful of nails.
It is now waiting on us, as found in Hebrews 11:15-16.


.
I agree with you. I’m using that verse for argument sake. I believe the passing of heaven and earth refers to the old covenant. However, let’s see if we can get a dispensationalist to admit that. Just using a literal interpretation against a literalist
 
Upvote 0

God bless Joshua

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2017
614
283
Sabah
✟19,493.00
Country
Malaysia
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
this directly conflicts with the work of Christ, who was the final sin offering.

We should not wearing the eyeglasses of the "Church Age" when we look at the Millennium sacrifice because it would be all wrong.

The Holy Spirit gifts which is used to build up the present church shall be removed from the Millennium people :

1 Cor 12:8 To some people the Spirit gives a message of wisdom. To others the same Spirit gives a message of knowledge. 9 To others the same Spirit gives faith. To others that one Spirit gives gifts of healing. 10 To others he gives the power to do miracles. To others he gives the ability to prophesy. To others he gives the ability to tell the spirits apart. To others he gives the ability to speak in different kinds of languages they had not known before. And to still others he gives the ability to explain what was said in those languages.

Even the Holy Spirit baptism will be no more in the Millennium of Jesus because that will be until the day of redemption.
Ephesians 4:30 says, "Do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption" (rapture)

No more people filled with the Holy Spirit in the Millennium.
Acts 2:4 And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them.

Because The Holy Spirit is testifying the work of Jesus until He is removed (2 Thessalonians 2:6 the Restrainer is removed)


So the world will "somehow" returns to the OT world where Almighty God rule with His fierce Hands. He needs people to be aware of their inherited sins and teach them animal sacrifice to warn them that punishment of sin is death if they do not repent. So people will have the obligation to offer something to God as a token of repentance instead of just asking forgiveness in Jesus name (the Lamb of God) and then go away.

In the Millennium, Jesus will not be coming as the Lamb of God to be sacrificed for the Church Age anymore. He will dash nations to pieces like pottery.
Ps 2:5-9 You will rule them with an iron scepter; you will dash them to pieces like pottery”
 
Upvote 0

God bless Joshua

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2017
614
283
Sabah
✟19,493.00
Country
Malaysia
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Numbers 28:6 It is a CONTINUAL BURNT OFFERING, which was ordained in mount Sinai for a sweet savour, a sacrifice made by fire unto the Lord.

Everything belongs to God so when people come to Him with offerings, He gives something that already belong to God.

But at least that is to show repentance, respect and thanks to Almighty God the Creator of Universe, instead of consuming millions of tons of meat every day for their stomach, spare a few to God who owns it.

God doesnt eat any meat, what pleases Him is the obedience of the people.
The sacrificed meat finally ends up at the stomach of the people.

Very funny mankind 'questioning' the animal sacrifice that already belongs to Him and very Merciful Gracious Almighty God Jehova who gave all this abundant world to us.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So the world will "somehow" returns to the OT world where Almighty God rule with His fierce Hands.

No.

The New Covenant has made the Old Covenant "obsolete" in Hebrews 8:13 and the New Covenant is "everlasting" in Hebrews 13:20.
How long is "everlasting"?


God is not going back to an obsolete covenant with Moses as the Mediator, instead of Christ during a future time.

The only way you can make your idea work is by cutting the Book of Hebrews out or your Bible.

It is one of the greatest errors of modern Dispensational Theology.

.
 
Upvote 0

God bless Joshua

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2017
614
283
Sabah
✟19,493.00
Country
Malaysia
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
No.

The New Covenant has made the Old Covenant "obsolete" in Hebrews 8:13 and the New Covenant is "everlasting" in Hebrews 13:20.
How long is "everlasting"?


God is not going back to an obsolete covenant with Moses as the Mediator, instead of Christ during a future time.

The only way you can make your idea work is by cutting the Book of Hebrews out or your Bible.

It is one of the greatest errors of modern Dispensational Theology..
We should not wearing the eyeglasses of the "Church Age" to look into this Millennial sacrifice. The church age will be gone at the Millennium, Holy Spirit is taken away.

What are you trying to say regarding this Millennial sacrifice ?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We should not wearing the eyeglasses of the "Church Age" to look into this Millennial sacrifice. The church age will be gone at the Millennium, Holy Spirit is taken away.

Show me where in the New Testament that it clearly speaks of future sacrifices in a future temple in earthly Jerusalem, after the Second Coming of Christ.

Show me a text which clearly says the Holy Spirit is taken away in the future.

If the New Covenant is "everlasting" in Hebrews 13:20, when do you expect it to come to an end?

If the Old Covenant has been made "obsolete" by the New Covenant in Hebrews 8:13, when do you expect the Old Covenant to come back into effect?
Why do you think Paul called the Sinai Covenant a covenant of "bondage" in Galatians chapter 4?
Why did he compel the Galatian believers to "cast out" the covenant of bondage?


No Christian should ever remove the eyeglasses of the "Church Age", since the New Covenant foretold in Jeremiah 31:31-34 is "everlasting".
On the road to Emmaus Christ said that the whole Old Testament is about Him.


.
 
Upvote 0

SeventyOne

Well-Known Member
May 2, 2015
4,675
3,188
✟167,098.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Marital Status
Married
These are not theories, these are theological issues that must be answered in order for your interpretations to work.

I gave you verse and chapter (numbers 29:12-40) about the sin offering requirements of the feast of tabernacles. I provided scripture (Matthew 5:18) that shows that not one jot or iota of the law will not change until heaven and earth pass away. So let's break it down:

The feast of Tabernacles, as stated in Numbers 29:12-40, requires a sin offering for each day of the festival.

And

Jesus states not one iota or jot will change from the law until heaven and earth have passed away, (Matthew 5:18)

Therefore

the way that the feast of tabernacles and animal sacrifices ( including SIN OFFERINGs) can be celebrated cannot be different until heaven and earth pass away.


However,
You are saying that the sacrifice during the feast of tabernacles will have a different purpose in the future literal 1000 year reign of Christ, meaning it will no longer be a sin offering. The burden of proof is on you, as you made the claim that it will be different than what scripture says the original feast of tabernacles is about. you, as well as other posters, have provided no evidence that the purpose of future animal sacrifices will change. You have also not provided evidence that this new purpose will be for the remembrance of Christ.

The only claim I've made is the sacrifices are re-instituted. I've made no claim as to their purpose. That's what you are doing. I understand that you are unable to back up your claim of their purpose and are deflecting.


So, will the earthly 1000 year literal millennial kingdom take place during the old heavens and earth, or new heavens and earth?


Makes no difference to this discussion. I'd rather not derail this thought.


Many old testament prophecies use apocalyptic language which should not always be interpreted literally.

As far as "apocalyptic language, feel free to take the verses I cited in their context as accompanying events and describe their "apocalyptic" meaning. But I think you'll find them quite literal. I find this comment to be a common method for those who just want to quickly dismiss something that they find disagreeable.
 
Upvote 0

SeventyOne

Well-Known Member
May 2, 2015
4,675
3,188
✟167,098.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Marital Status
Married
Asuming, that is, that your understanding of scripture is correct.
No one has the ability to say , 'I'm right in this understanding of the 2nd coming!'

About that all we know with 100% accuracy, is that Jesus is coming again. Everything else is speculation.

So all the other details about that time that He added for us in the scriptures are completely not understandable or knowable?

Wow. What a complete waste of His time (and ours).
 
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The only claim I've made is the sacrifices are re-instituted. I've made no claim as to their purpose.

You are correct, I made an assumption, as that is what most premillenialists believe about the sacrifice. So if you don't believe the purpose of the sacrifice is remember Christ, what you you believe is the purpose?

I understand that you are unable to back up your claim of their purpose

What is it about the scriptures I provided that doesn't back it up? There are even more verses about sin offerings.

1. Numbers 29:12-40 : for every day of the feast of tabernacles a sin offering must be made
2. Ezekiel 44:27-29 : priests will be making sin offerings in the future Ezekiel temple
3. Matthew 5:18 : Jesus said not one jot or iota would change about the law until heaven and earth pass away.

You have provided no scripture that states the purpose of the sacrifice will change.

are deflecting.
This is not deflecting. this is how a debate works. I provide scripture for my intended purpose and you for yours. yet you still have provided no scripture that the purpose of the sacrifice will be different in the millennial reign.

Makes no difference to this discussion. I'd rather not derail this thought.

Actually it makes a huge difference to your beliefs on future animal sacrifices. You know that if you answer one or the other it will show the contradiction in your beliefs. Hence, you stay silent and say it will derail the thought. However, if you can answer that would be appreciated.

Matthew 22: 45-46
45So if David calls Him Lord, how can He be David’s son?”

46No one was able to answer a word, and from that day on no one dared to question Him any further.

As far as "apocalyptic language, feel free to take the verses I cited in their context as accompanying events and describe their "apocalyptic" meaning.

Sure I’ll take a look and get back to you on it
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Tayla

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 30, 2017
1,694
801
USA
✟147,315.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Many falsely teach there will be a future millennial kingdom on this earth, where a Jewish priest will sacrifice animals in a temple in Jerusalem.
In my view, all passages used to describe conditions in a yet-future 1,000 year millennium are actually referring to the eternal utopian new heavens and new earth. There will not be a yet-future 1,000 year millennium, nor a rapture. All verses used to support the rapture are actually referring to the yet-future second coming of Christ.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Truth7t7
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I will honestly admit, this is a very difficult passage. If read literally, it would make it way easier. You will probably disagree with how I view it, but none the less, you asked for me to respond to, so I will.

I will also be honest about assumptions on these verses. There are several assumptions that I made below. There are several non assumptions (AKA living waters = holy spirit, heavenly Jerusalem)

Verses 2 and 3. Has the Lord gather the armies against Jerusalem then Himself go out and fight, conquering those armies? Nope.

The Lord has gathered armies against Jerusalem multiple times (Assyria, Babylon, Seleucids....), the final destruction of Jerusalem under the old covenant took place from 66-70 AD by the Romans.

If we read literally that the Lord will go forth and fight, then yes you are correct, God himself must come down from heaven to literally fight other armies.

However, then we must read Micah 1:3-5 literally That the Lord came literally to destroy Israel along with the Assyrians.

Micah 1:3-5
Judgment Against Samaria and Jerusalem
3Look! The Lord is coming from his dwelling place;
he comes down and treads on the heights of the earth. 4The mountains melt beneath him
and the valleys split apart, like wax before the fire, like water rushing down a slope. 5All this is because of Jacob’s transgression, because of the sins of the people of Israel. What is Jacob’s transgression? Is it not Samaria? What is Judah’s high place? Is it not Jerusalem?

Verse 4. Has the Lord planted His feet on the Mount of Olives yet, splitting it into two yet. Nope.

This one I will admit, is harder to understand, as there are multiple non-literal interpretations on it.

So I will just leave a quote from Eusbius
“And the words, ‘And his feet shall stand in that day on the Mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem to the eastward,’ what else can they mean than that the Lord God, that is to say the Word of God Himself, will stand, and stand firm, upon His Church, which is here metaphorically called the Mount of Olives?”

“That the Mount of Olives shall be divided, half of it to the east and towards the sea, a very great chasm and half of it shall lean towards the north, and half of it towards the south,” it possibly shews the expression of the Church throughout the whole inhabited world, for it has filled the east, and the western and eastern nations; it stretches to the western sea, and the isles therein; yea, it has reached to west and south, and to north and north-east. On all sides and everywhere the Church figuratively called the Olive of the Lord is planted.[5]


Verse 8. Are there waters flowing out of Jerusalem yet, half to the east and half to the west yet? Nope. Is the summer there the same weather as the winter? Nope.

Understand that verse 8 talks about living waters flowing from Jerusalem. We know living water is the Spirit.

John 7:38-39 Whoever believes in me, asf the Scripture has said, ‘Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.’” 39Now this he said about the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were to receive, for as yet the Spirit had not been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.

Verse 10. Has the whole land surrounding Jerusalem been lowered to the level of a great plain yet? Nope.
Verse 11. Has Jerusalem come to a point where it will live in a perpetual state of security forever? Nope.

Earthly Jerusalem can be destroyed, but not the heavenly Jerusalem.

Galatians 4:25-26
Now Hagar stands for Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present city of Jerusalem, because she is in slavery with her children. 26But the Jerusalem that is above is free, and she is our mother

Hebrews 12:22
But you have come to Mount Zion, to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem.

Verse 16. Do all the families of the nations go up to Jerusalem each year to celebrate the Feast of Booths yet? Nope.

Zechariah is using OT Law language to show a future spiritual truth. Christ is the fulfillment of the festivals. The truth being shown here is that people from all nations will come to the heavenly Jerusalem and worship the true God, even those form Eygpt (how had enslaved Israel).

Additionally, when understanding that there is no need for animal sacrifice because of Jesus, we can see the spiritual truth in this verse.

Colossians 2:16
16Therefore let no one judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a festival, a New Moon, or a Sabbath. 17These are a shadow of the things to come, but the body that casts it belongs to Christ.

All these are fulfilled in Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Tolworth John

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 10, 2017
8,278
4,678
68
Tolworth
✟369,679.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
So all the other details about that time that He added for us in the scriptures are completely not understandable or knowable?

Wow. What a complete waste of His time (and ours).
If you think God wasted his time in speaking to us then you know far less about God or his revealed word than you claim.
 
Upvote 0

SeventyOne

Well-Known Member
May 2, 2015
4,675
3,188
✟167,098.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Marital Status
Married
I will honestly admit, this is a very difficult passage. If read literally, it would make it way easier. You will probably disagree with how I view it, but none the less, you asked for me to respond to, so I will.

I will also be honest about assumptions on these verses. There are several assumptions that I made below. There are several non assumptions (AKA living waters = holy spirit, heavenly Jerusalem)



The Lord has gathered armies against Jerusalem multiple times (Assyria, Babylon, Seleucids....), the final destruction of Jerusalem under the old covenant took place from 66-70 AD by the Romans.

If we read literally that the Lord will go forth and fight, then yes you are correct, God himself must come down from heaven to literally fight other armies.

However, then we must read Micah 1:3-5 literally That the Lord came literally to destroy Israel along with the Assyrians.

Micah 1:3-5
Judgment Against Samaria and Jerusalem
3Look! The Lord is coming from his dwelling place;
he comes down and treads on the heights of the earth. 4The mountains melt beneath him
and the valleys split apart, like wax before the fire, like water rushing down a slope. 5All this is because of Jacob’s transgression, because of the sins of the people of Israel. What is Jacob’s transgression? Is it not Samaria? What is Judah’s high place? Is it not Jerusalem?



This one I will admit, is harder to understand, as there are multiple non-literal interpretations on it.

So I will just leave a quote from Eusbius
“And the words, ‘And his feet shall stand in that day on the Mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem to the eastward,’ what else can they mean than that the Lord God, that is to say the Word of God Himself, will stand, and stand firm, upon His Church, which is here metaphorically called the Mount of Olives?”

“That the Mount of Olives shall be divided, half of it to the east and towards the sea, a very great chasm and half of it shall lean towards the north, and half of it towards the south,” it possibly shews the expression of the Church throughout the whole inhabited world, for it has filled the east, and the western and eastern nations; it stretches to the western sea, and the isles therein; yea, it has reached to west and south, and to north and north-east. On all sides and everywhere the Church figuratively called the Olive of the Lord is planted.[5]




Understand that verse 8 talks about living waters flowing from Jerusalem. We know living water is the Spirit.

John 7:38-39 Whoever believes in me, asf the Scripture has said, ‘Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.’” 39Now this he said about the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were to receive, for as yet the Spirit had not been given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.



Earthly Jerusalem can be destroyed, but not the heavenly Jerusalem.

Galatians 4:25-26
Now Hagar stands for Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present city of Jerusalem, because she is in slavery with her children. 26But the Jerusalem that is above is free, and she is our mother

Hebrews 12:22
But you have come to Mount Zion, to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem.



Zechariah is using OT Law language to show a future spiritual truth. Christ is the fulfillment of the festivals. The truth being shown here is that people from all nations will come to the heavenly Jerusalem and worship the true God, even those form Eygpt (how had enslaved Israel).

Additionally, when understanding that there is no need for animal sacrifice because of Jesus, we can see the spiritual truth in this verse.

Colossians 2:16
16Therefore let no one judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a festival, a New Moon, or a Sabbath. 17These are a shadow of the things to come, but the body that casts it belongs to Christ.

All these are fulfilled in Christ.

Thanks. Seeing all the guessing involved in wanting literal passages to be figurative is quite telling. As far as Eusebius is concerned, the church is never called an olive or the Mount of Olives. That's mental gymnastics on his part. The closest it gets is the gentiles called wild olive branches in contrast to the Jews being called cultivated olive branches in Romans 11. He even adds in other directions in that quote that was not in the text demonstrating he was off in his own imagination.

If you look up living water, you'll find it used in both a literal and figurative sense in scripture. In Zechariah, it's flowing from a literal specific location to two other literal specific locations. Makes it really hard to take it figuratively.

Zechariah isn't using OT law language to get his point across. He is speaking the words of the Lord which is evident in 14:2 where the Lord refers to Himself in the first person. It's the Lord stating the feast will be instituted. There is no interpretation of Zechariah imposed on the text.

As far as that battle depicted already taking place, did that day have the characteristics of having no day, or night, or light, or cold, or frost (v6). And on that day was the Lord made king over the whole earth (v9)? (And it does say 'on that day'. Which means the day before the battle, He was not king over the earth. It's a very specific result.) Was the entire land surrounding Jerusalem lowered that day into a great plain (v 10). No, none of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riberra
Upvote 0

SeventyOne

Well-Known Member
May 2, 2015
4,675
3,188
✟167,098.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvary Chapel
Marital Status
Married
If you think God wasted his time in speaking to us then you know far less about God or his revealed word than you claim.

On the contrary, I'm not the one claiming it isn't understandable. I don't think He wasted anything as I disagree with you that He made it too confusing to be understood.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Thanks. Seeing all the guessing involved in wanting literal passages to be figurative is quite telling. As far as Eusebius is concerned, the church is never called an olive or the Mount of Olives. That's mental gymnastics on his part. The closest it gets is the gentiles called wild olive branches in contrast to the Jews being called cultivated olive branches in Romans 11. He even adds in other directions in that quote that was not in the text demonstrating he was off in his own imagination.

If you look up living water, you'll find it used in both a literal and figurative sense in scripture. In Zechariah, it's flowing from a literal specific location to two other literal specific locations. Makes it really hard to take it figuratively.

Zechariah isn't using OT law language to get his point across. He is speaking the words of the Lord which is evident in 14:2 where the Lord refers to Himself in the first person. It's the Lord stating the feast will be instituted. There is no interpretation of Zechariah imposed on the text.

As far as that battle depicted already taking place, did that day have the characteristics of having no day, or night, or light, or cold, or frost (v6). And on that day was the Lord made king over the whole earth (v9)? (And it does say 'on that day'. Which means the day before the battle, He was not king over the earth. It's a very specific result.) Was the entire land surrounding Jerusalem lowered that day into a great plain (v 10). No, none of that.

You make great points here. I don't claim to know all the meaning of scripture, if I did, I would be a liar. Zechariah 14 is a hard passage. BUT we have to take that with the context of the NT.

I can totally see why the Jews didn't want to stop following the old testament law, especially with verses like this about the feast of tabernacles and sacrifices

If it is to be taken literally, then we have an apparent issue. Will the new covenant end?

If nothing was wrong with the old covenant, then the new covenant would not have be made (Hebrew 8:7). Under this new covenant, there is no longer a need for sacrifices or festivals, as Christ fulfills them (Colossians 2:16, Hebrews 10:9-10). The old order has been done away in order to establish the second.


If feasts and sacrifices must be reinstated in the future, a 3rd covenant will have to be put in place with new rules and regulations. God will have to give us another revelation as to how this works. This means that there must be something wrong with the covenant we are currently in.
 
Upvote 0