God's Sabbath rest is not a weekly seventh day rest

Status
Not open for further replies.

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,024
7,364
60
Indianapolis, IN
✟549,630.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I missed whatever happened, but whatever it was, not a problem. :)
I think yeshuaslavejeff was responding to you in one of the posts I responded to. No big deal really, I was just trying to lighten things up a bit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kenny'sID
Upvote 0

bugkiller

Well-Known Member
May 16, 2015
17,773
2,634
✟80,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Yes, but God didn't stop creating, he ceased from working on the earth and the creation of life because it was finished. He also created the nation of Israel for instance. At the end of the age he will create a new heavens and a new earth, but he stopped working on the original creation because it was finished.
Uncle!

bugkiller
 
Upvote 0

Bob S

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 5, 2015
4,604
2,211
88
Union County, TN
✟662,823.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If anyone can prove that observance of any day is a salvational issue I will support your effort to take the message to all the World. If anyone can prove that the old covenant was a covenant for eternal salvation I will support your effort to take that message to all the World.

If you cannot then you are blowing into the wind, your message is for naught and there is no reason to bind ourselves to a bunch of laws that were temporary. It would be a waste of time and energy plus denying what Jesus has done for you.
 
Upvote 0

woobadooba

Legend
Sep 4, 2005
11,307
914
✟10,191.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Romans 14 explains:

Who are you to judge another's servant? To his own master he stands or falls. Indeed, he will be made to stand, for God is able to make him stand. One person esteems one day above another; another esteems every day alike. Let each be fully convinced in his own mind. He who observes the day, observes it to the Lord; and he who does not observe the day, to the Lord he does not observe it. He who eats, eats to the Lord, for he gives God thanks; and he who does not eat, to the Lord he does not eat, and gives God thanks.
-- (Romans 14:4-6).

Paul is saying that the Sabbath day, as well as food, festivals, or religious celebrations are not standards by which we judge whether a person is right or wrong, good or evil, righteous or unrighteous, sinner or saint

Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ. -- Colossians 2:16-17

Paul is saying that these religious practices only served as religious symbols pointing forward to the true reality, the true righteousness, that would come to us through faith alone in Christ alone, who alone is our standard.

Before this faith came, we were kept under guard by the law, kept until faith should be revealed. The law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith. Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law. You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus -- (Galatians 3:23-26).
Paul is saying that the seventh-day Sabbath is irrelevant to our Christian walk with Christ. He is saying the seventh-day Sabbath has no bearing on who we are in Christ. We are free to observe it and we are free not to. It does not matter either way, as mentioned in Romans 14.

He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant -- not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory...will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? -- (2 Corinthians 3:6-8)

The seventh-day law was engraved in letters on stone tablets. Paul is telling us that we are called to minister in the new covenant of the Spirit, and not in the old covenant of the letter engraved on stone, which included the seven-day law.
A Warning Against Traditions of Men

Colossians 2:16-17 (KJV) "Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.”

The word, “therefore,” tells us we need to pay attention to the verses that come before it to understand the intent of Paul’s words in Col. 2:16-17. I encourage anyone reading this post to read the entire chapter before moving on.

Having said that, Paul’s argument wasn’t against keeping a commandment of God, but rather a warning against falling victim to a legalistic system "according to the tradition of men” (Col. 2:8). It was a salvation by works theology that Paul was objecting to, not the binding nature of the fourth commandment.

Instead of looking to Jesus as the only way to salvation (John 14:6), advocates of this false gospel relied heavily on human effort to secure a place in heaven. What Jesus accomplished on the cross wasn’t good enough for them, they had to add something more to that sacrifice, as if to give the impression God needed an extra pair of hands to save the elect.

The Colossians were warned not to let such people judge them in this way, for their thoughts weren’t right with God. When the righteousness of Christ should have been the focal point of their faith, their eyes were locked on a list of rules and regulations.

I’m reminded of something Jesus said to the Pharisees: John 5:39 (NKJV) “You search the Scriptures, for in them you think you have eternal life; and these are they which testify of Me.”

Sabbaths

Regarding the word, “Sabbath” (v. 17), it appears in some translations like so. However, the underlying Greek is “sabbaton,” which can be singular or plural depending on the context. Here, it is plural. This can be seen even in the NIV, which makes use of the indefinite article, “a Sabbath day”.

The NKJV has a more accurate rendering, “sabbaths”.

I am not convinced that verse 17 is inclusive of the fourth commandment. For I see no place in Scripture where the seventh day Sabbath is called a “shadow”. Moreover, Paul was speaking out against traditions of men (v.8), not commandments of God. The Sabbath is not the byproduct of a man made tradition, but was made by God (Gen. 2:2-3). Therefore, it doesn’t seem likely Paul was referring to the fourth commandment here.

Nevertheless, I am open to the possibility that “sabbaton” is inclusive of the Sabbath here. But it will take some strong evidence to persuade me to accept this. For the context referring to traditions of men doesn’t seem to support this conclusion.

But even if it is inclusive of the fourth commandment, that doesn’t mean Paul is suggesting that God no longer requires us to keep the command. I don’t see Paul saying that the Sabbath has been done away with or changed. What I see him saying to the Colossians is that it’s our faith in Jesus that leads to salvation, not the traditions of men.

Another Matter

But now there’s another matter that needs to be discussed, which puts a twist on things.

Paul warned the Colossians not to let others judge them according to the tradition of men. But what about judgement according to the Spirit?

John 16:8 (NKJV) “And when He has come, He will convict the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment”

The Bible is clear that God expects us to keep His commandments.

1 John 2:4 (NKJV) “He who says, "I know Him," and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.”

Furthermore, we are instructed to test the spirits.

1 John 4:1 (NKJV) “Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world.”

So if God’s word tells us that we must keep His commandments, and someone who claims to be His messenger says we don’t have to keep God’s commandments, then according to the Bible, that man is a liar. Was it a tradition of man that exposed him as a liar or did we arrive at that conclusion because the Scriptures opened our eyes to the truth?

It’s not our judgment that exposed the lie, but God’s word that made it known to us.

Having said that, if keeping the Sabbath day holy is required, and I go out and tell others to keep the command, but some pastor comes along and says, "Paul said it doesn’t matter anymore.” then who is the liar? The liar is the person who twists the Scriptures in order to support a tradition of men.

It's not I who judges the man, but God's word which judges him, exposing him as a liar.

That person is no better than those whom Paul warned the Colossians of.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

bugkiller

Well-Known Member
May 16, 2015
17,773
2,634
✟80,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
What exactly are you trying to do here BK, just curious.
I might ask the same of you. I do not think I would get a real answer.

You are frustrated by my last post.

God did not create Israel. Israel is a natural linage of the human race set apart for a specific purpose. I would not deny God had His finger in (influenced) what happened. I say this in line with God creating the earth. Essentially you are denying Gen 2. The word translated rested is the same word translated cease in speaking about the sabbath. You are abusing the word rest in your post to prove God did not do as Gen 2 says. My view is you are simply arguing for the sake of arguing. The Hebrew/Chaldee word is "shabath" a verb. The primary definition is "to cease, desist." This is not a periodic thing. Legal terminology of our day would be to cease and desist as in do not do again.

The verb "shabath" is where SDA loses its argument. They argue the verse is talking about the sabbath (shabbath a noun) which does not appear in Scripture until Ex 16. I suppose you might want to say Moses did not know what he was saying. But then that would mean you do not believe the Scripture is inspired. Please notice I did not say KJV is inspired.

Then you must consider the wording of Ex 20. It KJV says specifically wherefore. Wherefore is a word denoting cause. The word is ki and is literally translated as for meaning because. It is not proof of nor admission the sabbath was in Gen 2.

The fact that God will create a new earth has nothing to do with what I am discussing. I did not say God would not create something else. That simply is not in the picture of Gen 2. In Gen 2 there is no indication God would return to work as in taking a rest break. Just is not what the words say. This same thing is also done with Mat 5:17-18 to support the OC merely being renewed. Jeremiah 31 does not allow for that. You are still having problems with your past association with adventism.

So forgive me about being short with frustration.

bugkiller
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

bugkiller

Well-Known Member
May 16, 2015
17,773
2,634
✟80,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
A Warning Against Traditions of Men

Colossians 2:16-17 (KJV) "Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.”
Forgive me about being short here. I want to know why others especially people who promote the law as a requirement are judging other because they do not keep the sabbath. The verse says in respect of meaning a particular aspect, point, or detail. This would include not keeping your version of the sabbath (holy day).

I may come back to this post tomorrow.

bugkiller
 
Upvote 0

woobadooba

Legend
Sep 4, 2005
11,307
914
✟10,191.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Forgive me about being short here. I want to know why others especially people who promote the law as a requirement are judging other because they do not keep the sabbath. The verse says in respect of meaning a particular aspect, point, or detail. This would include not keeping your version of the sabbath (holy day).

I may come back to this post tomorrow.

bugkiller
The answer I would give to your question can be found in my most recent post, under the section entitled, Another Matter.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mark kennedy

Natura non facit saltum
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2004
22,024
7,364
60
Indianapolis, IN
✟549,630.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I might ask the same of you. I do not think I would get a real answer.

Regardless of the subject matter, trust me, you will get a real answer.


I'm not frustrated, just confused what the problem is.

God did not create Israel. Israel is a natural linage of the human race set apart for a specific purpose. I would not deny God had His finger in (influenced) what happened. I say this in line with God creating the earth. Essentially you are denying Gen 2. The word translated rested is the same word translated cease in speaking about the sabbath. You are abusing the word rest in your post to prove God did not do as Gen 2 says. My view is you are simply arguing for the sake of arguing. The Hebrew/Chaldee word is "shabath" a verb. The primary definition is "to cease, desist." This is not a periodic thing. Legal terminology of our day would be to cease and desist as in do not do again.

What are you talking about? I'm not denying anything about Genesis 2, you have offered no quotes and certainly offered nothing substantive to accuse me of such a thing. The fact that 'shabath' is a verb is hardly relevent and I'm puzzled that you would think it pertains to anything having been said. It does mean to 'cease', so what? It makes no inferences as to what God would do in the future, only what he did in creation.

The verb "shabath" is where SDA loses its argument. They argue the verse is talking about the sabbath (shabbath a noun) which does not appear in Scripture until Ex 16. I suppose you might want to say Moses did not know what he was saying. But then that would mean you do not believe the Scripture is inspired. Please notice I did not say KJV is inspired.

I'm not SDA and I have no problem with the KJV. What I'm seeing is the passage in Exodus 16.

And he said unto them, This is that which the LORD hath said, To morrow is the rest of the holy sabbath unto the LORD: bake that which ye will bake to day, and seethe that ye will seethe; and that which remaineth over lay up for you to be kept until the morning. (Exodus 16:23)​

The Sabbath is mentioned in this passage, did you want to make a point with regards to grammar because your not making a lot of sense here.

Then you must consider the wording of Ex 20. It KJV says specifically wherefore. Wherefore is a word denoting cause. The word is ki and is literally translated as for meaning because. It is not proof of nor admission the sabbath was in Gen 2.

Ok this is getting nonsensical. What is the specific word, verse and how is it translated in the KJV?

The fact that God will create a new earth has nothing to do with what I am discussing. I did not say God would not create something else. That simply is not in the picture of Gen 2. In Gen 2 there is no indication God would return to work as in taking a rest break. Just is not what the words say. This same thing is also done with Mat 5:17-18 to support the OC merely being renewed. Jeremiah 31 does not allow for that. You are still having problems with your past association with adventism.

So forgive me about being short with frustration.

bugkiller
Ok now I'm annoyed, I have no past association with 'adventism', in any way shape or form. I'm not sure if I have a problem with it but this is a gross mischaracterization of me and anything I've ever posted and I've done this for years.

Clean it up, I'm getting tired of this.
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,444
593
✟77,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Something that has been clear to most everyone, Christian or Atheist for thousands of years , because it's clearly stated in the bible is now just my opinion?
But you have not shown it to be clearly stated in the Bible. You have only stated your opinion.
Folks, beware of long winded explanations that change what has always been known as truth. Don't always just dismiss it because of just that, but that can be a huge tip off that something isn't right.
Something being know as truth isn't necessarily truth, especially when you haven't demonstrated it to be biblical truth.

You are simply being critical of my explanation without actually refuting it.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,444
593
✟77,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It's clear the point you are trying to make, but I have to add, you need to reread your op.
I did.

Do you have a point?
If you do believe what you do, fine, but you did a very bad job of making your point by simply not telling the truth about the Sabbath, then arguing things that are clear in the bible aren't what the bible states on the subject.
Just more criticism without any biblical support.

It would be nice if you can post something of biblical substance, and not just unsupported criticisms that makes no sense.
 
Upvote 0

listed

are you?
May 14, 2011
9,126
1,817
✟53,797.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Regardless of the subject matter, trust me, you will get a real answer.

I'm not frustrated, just confused what the problem is.

What are you talking about? I'm not denying anything about Genesis 2, you have offered no quotes and certainly offered nothing substantive to accuse me of such a thing. The fact that 'shabath' is a verb is hardly relevent and I'm puzzled that you would think it pertains to anything having been said. It does mean to 'cease', so what? It makes no inferences as to what God would do in the future, only what he did in creation.

I'm not SDA and I have no problem with the KJV. What I'm seeing is the passage in Exodus 16.

And he said unto them, This is that which the LORD hath said, To morrow is the rest of the holy sabbath unto the LORD: bake that which ye will bake to day, and seethe that ye will seethe; and that which remaineth over lay up for you to be kept until the morning. (Exodus 16:23)​

The Sabbath is mentioned in this passage, did you want to make a point with regards to grammar because your not making a lot of sense here.

Ok this is getting nonsensical. What is the specific word, verse and how is it translated in the KJV?
Buggy is talking about the 4rh commandment in Exodus 20:8-11 and you can't find the word wherefore. What version of the Bible are you using? I'm pretty sure Buggy uses the KJV. Buggy said the word is ki translated wherefore, literally for. This (ki) is original language. Buggy also posted the definition of the word ki for support. Buggy discussed English usage of the KJV. How much more clear can he be?
Ok now I'm annoyed, I have no past association with 'adventism', in any way shape or form. I'm not sure if I have a problem with it but this is a gross mischaracterization of me and anything I've ever posted and I've done this for years.

Clean it up, I'm getting tired of this.
Calvinism doesn't teach your view. Maybe you're claiming calvinism while participating in another religious system. My bet is if your were posting calvinist beliefs Buggy would have no problem with you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bugkiller
Upvote 0

listed

are you?
May 14, 2011
9,126
1,817
✟53,797.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The idea that God commanded us to rest 1 day a week to dwell on Him sounds good too, but it has no biblical basis. It's just your opinion.

God did not rest 1 day a week, and we are commanded to rest just as God did:

There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God's rest also rests from his own works, just as God did from His. - Hebrews 4:9-10
God did no such thing. God commanded Israel only and not the world.

True about the rest we're to enter. This rest is what God said the Israelites would and couldn't enter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bugkiller
Upvote 0

listed

are you?
May 14, 2011
9,126
1,817
✟53,797.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
That's just plain wrong:

Six days ye shall gather it; but on the seventh H7637 day, which is the sabbath, in it there shall be none. (Exodus 16:26)
But the seventh H7637 day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God. (Exodus 20:10)​

The Sabbath is the seventh day, that's all there is to it.
Six days ye shall gather it; but on the seventh H7637 (shebii not shabbath) day, which is the sabbath (H7676). "Which is" is supplied indicated by the italics could change the meaning in your favor.

The verse simply says gather 6 days because there won't be any on the 7th day. Sabbath is also the 7th day. The 7th day isn't the sabbath. I understand you will disagree and argue that fact. The meaning I intend here is both aren't the same thing and the weekly sabbath for Israel occurs on the 7th day by commandment.
They all went back to work the next day, God would go on to create Israel and in Revelations there is a new creation.[/QUOTE]There's no indication of pause in Genesis 2. God didn't create Israel. God chose Israel. Lot if difference three.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,444
593
✟77,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
A Warning Against Traditions of Men

Colossians 2:16-17 (KJV) "Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.”

The word, “therefore,” tells us we need to pay attention to the verses that come before it to understand the intent of Paul’s words in Col. 2:16-17. I encourage anyone reading this post to read the entire chapter before moving on.
I did read it. This is Paul’s intent of the “therefore”:

When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins, having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; He took it away, nailing it to the cross…Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ. -- (Colossians 2)

The religious practices Paul is describing in Colossians 2 were all based on the old covenant law, the written code with its regulations, which God canceled and took away. Since these old covenant regulations, which included the Sabbath day requirement, have been canceled and taken away, they are no longer a standard by which we are to be judged.
Having said that, Paul’s argument wasn’t against keeping a commandment of God, but rather a warning against falling victim to a legalistic system "according to the tradition of men” (Col. 2:8). It was a salvation by works theology that Paul was objecting to, not the binding nature of the fourth commandment.
It is true that Paul is not against Sabbath keeping, but he is certainly against Sabbath-day observance being binding on Christians. Paul made it clear that observing days is not a standard by which a Christian is to be judged:

Who are you to judge another's servant? To his own master he stands or falls. Indeed, he will be made to stand, for God is able to make him stand. One person esteems one day above another; another esteems every day alike. Let each be fully convinced in his own mind. He who observes the day, observes it to the Lord; and he who does not observe the day, to the Lord he does not observe it. -- (Romans 14:4-6).

We can choose to observe the Sabbath day to the Lord, or we can choose not to observe the Sabbath day to the Lord. We will still continue to be accepted by God either way, because God is able to make us stand.
Instead of looking to Jesus as the only way to salvation (John 14:6), advocates of this false gospel relied heavily on human effort to secure a place in heaven. What Jesus accomplished on the cross wasn’t good enough for them, they had to add something more to that sacrifice, as if to give the impression God needed an extra pair of hands to save the elect.
Sabbath-day requirement is indeed a human effort, indicating that what Jesus accomplished on the cross wasn’t good enough. We are saved by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, no Sabbath-day observance required:

For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast. -- (Ephesians 2:8-9).

Sabbath-day observance is a work that is not required by Christians.
The Colossians were warned not to let such people judge them in this way, for their thoughts weren’t right with God. When the righteousness of Christ should have been the focal point of their faith, their eyes were locked on a list of rules and regulations.
Sabbath-day observance is a rule or regulation by which we are not to be judged.
I’m reminded of something Jesus said to the Pharisees: John 5:39 (NKJV) “You search the Scriptures, for in them you think you have eternal life; and these are they which testify of Me.”
That’s correct, the Sabbath-day rest was only a temporary reminder of the eternal Sabbath-rest we now have in Christ. The religious laws given to the Jews by God all pointed to Christ in whom we now find true rest:

“Come to Me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest…and you will find rest for your souls.” -- (Matthew 11:28-29).
Sabbaths

Regarding the word, “Sabbath” (v. 17), it appears in some translations like so. However, the underlying Greek is “sabbaton,” which can be singular or plural depending on the context. Here, it is plural. This can be seen even in the NIV, which makes use of the indefinite article, “a Sabbath day”.

The NKJV has a more accurate rendering, “sabbaths”.
That's true. The Jews were commanded by God to observe about eight different Sabbath days during the year, including the seventh-day Sabbath.
I am not convinced that verse 17 is inclusive of the fourth commandment.
Paul did not make any distinction, and neither should we.
For I see no place in Scripture where the seventh day Sabbath is called a “shadow”.
The entire old covenant law, which included the seventh-day Sabbath, was called a shadow:

The law is only a shadow of the good things that are coming, and not the realities themselves. -- (Hebrews 10:1).

All the rules and regulations of the old covenant law are shadows pointing to the realities that are found only in Christ.
Moreover, Paul was speaking out against traditions of men (v.8), not commandments of God. The Sabbath is not the byproduct of a man made tradition, but was made by God (Gen. 2:2-3). Therefore, it doesn’t seem likely Paul was referring to the fourth commandment here.
Actually, Paul was speaking out against religious practices that are based on the old covenant law given by God to the Jews. He was not merely talking about man-made laws:

Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ. -- (Colossians 2:16-17).

Paul is talking about the religious practices intended to remind the Jaws of the realities that are now found in Christ. This old covenant law, which included the seventh-day rest, is no longer binding because we now find true rest in Christ:

The law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith. Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law. -- (Galatians 3:23-26).
Nevertheless, I am open to the possibility that “sabbaton” is inclusive of the Sabbath here. But it will take some strong evidence to persuade me to accept this. For the context referring to traditions of men doesn’t seem to support this conclusion.
They are called traditions of men because the Jewish law is no longer binding. It is only practiced as a tradition, and not as a requirement. The seventh-day Sabbath can still be observed as a tradition without being a requirement.
But even if it is inclusive of the fourth commandment, that doesn’t mean Paul is suggesting that God no longer requires us to keep the command. I don’t see Paul saying that the Sabbath has been done away with or changed.
The entire old covenant law, which included the seventh-day Sabbath, is done away with:

He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant -- not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory...will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? -- (2 Corinthians 3:6-8).

The seventh-day rest was engraved in letter on stone and given to Moses for the Jews to observe, but is now done away with as a requirement for Christians.
What I see him saying to the Colossians is that it’s our faith in Jesus that leads to salvation, not the traditions of men.
That’s correct, the seventh-day Sabbath has no bearing on our salvation. It’s now only observed as a tradition.
Another Matter

But now there’s another matter that needs to be discussed, which puts a twist on things.

Paul warned the Colossians not to let others judge them according to the tradition of men. But what about judgement according to the Spirit?

John 16:8 (NKJV) “And when He has come, He will convict the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment”

The Bible is clear that God expects us to keep His commandments.

1 John 2:4 (NKJV) “He who says, "I know Him," and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him.”
Notice the verse does not say keep the “Ten Commandments”. It says keep "His commandments". You are simply assuming the verse refers to the “Ten Commandments”.

God’s commandments is every command that proceeds from the mouth of God, and not merely ten commandments that were written on stone tablets:

“Man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.” -- (Matthew 4:4).

Man does not live by ten commandments alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.
Furthermore, we are instructed to test the spirits.

1 John 4:1 (NKJV) “Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world.”

So if God’s word tells us that we must keep His commandments, and someone who claims to be His messenger says we don’t have to keep God’s commandments, then according to the Bible, that man is a liar. Was it a tradition of man that exposed him as a liar or did we arrive at that conclusion because the Scriptures opened our eyes to the truth?

It’s not our judgment that exposed the lie, but God’s word that made it known to us.
Again, God’s word is not a mere ten commandments. Every word that proceeds from the mouth of God is God’s commandments.
Having said that, if keeping the Sabbath day holy is required, and I go out and tell others to keep the command, but some pastor comes along and says, "Paul said it doesn’t matter anymore.” then who is the liar? The liar is the person who twists the Scriptures in order to support a tradition of men.
If keeping the Sabbath day holy is required, then you would be correct. But if keeping the Sabbath day holy is not required, then you would be incorrect.
It's not I who judges the man, but God's word which judges him, exposing him as a liar.

That person is no better than those whom Paul warned the Colossians of.
Paul is indeed warning the Colossians against liars, he is warning against those who promote unnecessary religious practices as a requirement for Christians, which includes the Sabbath day tradition:

Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ. -- (Colossians 2:16-17).
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,444
593
✟77,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
God did no such thing.
Actually, He did.
Yes, God commanded Israel only and not the world.
God commanded Israel only to observe the seventh-day rest, but God commanded all people everywhere to find true rest in Christ:

“Come to Me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest…and you will find rest for your souls.” -- (Matthew 11:28-29).
True about the rest we're to enter. This rest is what God said the Israelites would and couldn't enter.
Yes, Christ died to bring true rest to the entire world, a rest which the Israelites rejected.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,185
7,003
69
USA
✟585,394.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You are simply being critical of my explanation without actually refuting it.

You've been refuted several times by myself and others. We've all seen it happen before, and when people refuse to see what's right in front of them, there isn't much sense in trying to force them.

Do you have a point?

Of course I do, and it's included in the post you are replying to...what an odd question.

Best to read the full post before you reply.
 
Upvote 0

Doveaman

Re-Created, Not Evolved.
Mar 4, 2009
8,444
593
✟77,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You've been refuted several times by myself and others.
Where? :scratch:

I see five posts by you, but no refute.

Any refute must be supported by scriptures, otherwise it's just an opinion.

An opinion is not a refute.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: listed
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.