This was one of the things that opened my eyes.

Kira Light

Shinigami love apples
Oct 16, 2009
529
16
✟15,777.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
If I stood in a forest and said I saw 20 trees would you call me a liar once you discovered on your own the forest had hundreds or thousands of trees. If all I can see is 20 trees why would you doubt that I saw them? I don't think the purpose of God's visions are meant to be an astronomy lesson. She described what she saw, as would any of us. If she named the moons and got the names wrong, or said something about green cheese, that may be concerning. But here it doesn't even sound like she names the planets she is seeing; she only describes them. Elder Bates guesses what planets they are she is sees based on the description.

The same mistake is made when people look at the bible and point out apparent scientific errors. For example the anatomy of insects, or the smallest seeds, or that a firmament is not a scientifically accurate description of the sky. Have you not heard any of these then check out some Atheist websites, this is the same thing you are doing here. The bible also is not meant to be a scientific manual any more than Mrs.White vision was.

Ellen White is supposedly flying through space in this vision and counting the moons of each planet. She is not off by just 1 or 2 moons. In the case of Jupiter, she is off by at least 60 moons. By some incredible coincidence, she sees exactly the number of moons that were known by astronomers to exist at that time.

Did God show her a false vision in order to help her convince Bates to come on board? Maybe, but I like to think God could think of a better way to convince Bates of EGW's gift of prophecy. After all, wouldn't God know that this vision would damage her credibility many years down the road? It doesn't add up.

Imagine she had actually seen the correct number of moons. Today we would have almost no way to second-guess her prophetic gift if she was the first person on record saying Jupiter has 64 moons. It might have been hard to believe at the time, but today it would be unbelievably powerful.

Sadly, the simplest explanation is that she heard about how many moons each planet had somewhere and pretended to make the discovery in this "vision". She certainly had the means, motive, and opportunity.
 
Upvote 0
S

Stan Tei

Guest
Kira, There will always be enough information to dredge up for anyone to hang their doubts on. It is obvious that the vision given to Ellen about the planets was for the time and circumstances of the vision. It is not for the purpose of establishing that she was a prophet. Even the Bible records visions by kings, who were not prophets, but God sent the visions and dreams. There have been also several Catholics and popes that have had visions from God. God is no respector of persons and does not wait until the last 160 years to give present truth to His people. Neither does God give only dreams and visions to His core people. He did give us one key bit of advice: DO NOT DESPISE PROPHESYING! If you put the wrong test on one, and determine it is false by your own faulty sense of judgment, you might surely lose your way and no longer be given any more new light.
 
Upvote 0

Princessdi

Regular Member
Oct 13, 2005
488
15
66
✟15,713.00
Faith
Christian
Ok so, I have been looking at this thread for a while, and it is not rare, but I believe I am missing something.......before I comment. I'd like to ask this: EGW Went int vision regarding space, stars, planets, etc., right? And without any prior knowledge, she described them according to what science knew then and well enough for Cap. Baates to recognized the planets., etc., right?
 
Upvote 0

Kira Light

Shinigami love apples
Oct 16, 2009
529
16
✟15,777.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Ok so, I have been looking at this thread for a while, and it is not rare, but I believe I am missing something.......before I comment. I'd like to ask this: EGW Went int vision regarding space, stars, planets, etc., right? And without any prior knowledge, she described them according to what science knew then and well enough for Cap. Baates to recognized the planets., etc., right?

Sounds like you got it. The part about her having no prior knowledge we are just taking her word for. Ellen White needed Bates for financial support at the time and he was still not convinced of her prophetic gift. This vision was probably the turning point.

One other interesting point is Ellen White also didn't mention the rings around Uranus or Jupiter, mostly likely because astronomers hadn't discovered them yet.
 
Upvote 0

Princessdi

Regular Member
Oct 13, 2005
488
15
66
✟15,713.00
Faith
Christian
Ok so what is the problem? The question of is she might have had prior knowledge? The good Captain was in doubt, can we view it as God usint God EGW to persuade him. Also, I am almost sure that God realizes that "spreading the Gospel" here on earth takes money. In fact, we count it a blessing when money comes through for one evangelistic effort or another. whether it is a street ministry or mission trip to a foreign land. What would be different about this. I believe one's overall feelings regarding EGW clearly dictates how they interpret an account of this sort.
 
Upvote 0

Kira Light

Shinigami love apples
Oct 16, 2009
529
16
✟15,777.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Ok so what is the problem? The question of is she might have had prior knowledge? The good Captain was in doubt, can we view it as God usint God EGW to persuade him. Also, I am almost sure that God realizes that "spreading the Gospel" here on earth takes money. In fact, we count it a blessing when money comes through for one evangelistic effort or another. whether it is a street ministry or mission trip to a foreign land. What would be different about this. I believe one's overall feelings regarding EGW clearly dictates how they interpret an account of this sort.

You can view it that way and I am sure many Adventists do.

This vision just doesn't sit well with me.

1) You have God giving false information in a vision. Is there another time that He has done that? He would have had to show Ellen planets with far fewer moons and missing their rings in some cases.

2) Does God ever use visions like this anywhere else? To convince a person who has money to give it to a church? It seems like visions in the Bible were not over such trivial stuff. A fake space tour for money?

3) Did God give visions on demand to people in the Bible? Were they able to sit down with someone and launch into vision? My perception of them is they come out of the blue and are of great importance.

I admit my overall feelings are probably influencing my perceptions. I am certainly not without bias. I just identified this as one of my breaking points and wondered how it might look to other people.
 
Upvote 0

EastCoastRemnant

I Must Decrease That He May Increase
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2010
7,665
1,505
Nova Scotia
✟188,109.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You can view it that way and I am sure many Adventists do.

This vision just doesn't sit well with me.

1) You have God giving false information in a vision. Is there another time that He has done that? He would have had to show Ellen planets with far fewer moons and missing their rings in some cases.

2) Does God ever use visions like this anywhere else? To convince a person who has money to give it to a church? It seems like visions in the Bible were not over such trivial stuff. A fake space tour for money?

3) Did God give visions on demand to people in the Bible? Were they able to sit down with someone and launch into vision? My perception of them is they come out of the blue and are of great importance.

I admit my overall feelings are probably influencing my perceptions. I am certainly not without bias. I just identified this as one of my breaking points and wondered how it might look to other people.

God gives prophets visions and they convey them in a way that is in accordance with the accepted knowledge of the time. Do you think that whatever Ezekiel was shown that he described as a flaming chariot was really a flaming chariot? It was what he understood and would be accepted at the time he spoke/wrote it. What about the imagery in Revelation?

Remember, God was establishing Ellen White as a prophet for her day, so to give her the correct number of moons and rings and whatever else would not have done that, it would have cast doubt on her prophetic abilities. Yes, we could have looked at the correct vision today and recognized her for her prohetic gift but she (and the Advent movement) would have been discredited by Bates had been shown what we know today.
 
Upvote 0
S

Stan Tei

Guest
Like I said before, you can hang your doubts on anything you choose. God chose to show Ellen White to see what she saw. Call it False???? Let's assume He chose to show her EVERYTHING about the planets.... Then what? NOBODY in earshot of her voice would think she was telling the truth. God's showing her what He chose her to see DOES NOT EXCLUDE THE FACT THAT THERE WAS MORE THAT COULD BE SEEN! Ellen White's vision did not have to include EVERYTHING! The vision wasn't given to appease YOU!

It has more to do with HOW GOD COMMUNICATES with mankind, in the HERE AND NOW. It served GOD'S PURPOSE and THAT is what matters!

I knew about this mis-numbered list of planets years ago. Without anyone else's debate. I simply accept it as God's means of communicating what He wanted to.
 
Upvote 0

Castaway57

Born Twice
Mar 29, 2012
1,882
27
69
✟18,579.00
Country
Canada
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Private
It seems like God filled Ellen White's head with a lot of meaningless information. Why was it necessary to show her the golden keycards that the angels use to enter and exit heaven? Why give her wings and fly her to the planets to count their moons? Why show her the very tall beings on some random planet out there somewhere? Why tell her Adam was twice as tall as men are today?
I think that somehow you missed the main point of the "astronomy visions" Ellen White had. The main subject was not how many moons she saw, but what kind of moons she saw. This was very significant, because in subsequent years, science has shown as Bates did concur, that her descriptions of the various moons were infact accurate. Not because of how many she saw, but because of what kind of moons she saw. She described what they looked like perfectly.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums