Split-brain patients, consciousness, and the existence of the soul.

Status
Not open for further replies.

SaintGeorge

Senior Veteran
Jul 18, 2004
2,048
216
✟19,750.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Dear Brethren,

Recent scientific studies have come to my attention that present significant challenges to our understanding of the soul, or consciousness. Below is an article that demonstrates some of my concerns.
Behavior of Split Brain Patients


Studying split brain patients' unusual behaviors has led us to discover valuable information about differences between the two hemispheres. The first of the human split-brain studies began when Michael Gazzaniga joined Roger Sperry as a graduate student at California Tech. In collaboration with neurosurgeon Joseph Bogen, they began a series of commisurotomies. The operation on their first patient, WJ, was a great success. Before the operation he integrated information between the two hemispheres freely, but after the operation he had two separate minds or mental systems, each with its own abilities to learn, remember, and experience emotion and behavior. Yet, WJ, was not completely aware of the changes in his brain. As Gazzaniga put it: "WJ lives happily in Downey, California, with no sense of the enormity of the findings or for that matter any awareness that he had changed." As previously explained (experiments), words flashed to the right field of vision of patients like WJ could be said and written with the right hand. In contrast, patients couldn't say or write words flashed to their left field of vision. Although standard experiments revealed that right hemisphere is nonverbal, it is far from incompetent. Even though the right hemisphere could not communicate to observers what stimuli it had been presented with, it did show some verbal comprehension. Even though the patient could not verbalize what word had been presented to the right hemisphere, the left hand was able to point to it within a list.

Another interesting difference between the hemispheres that these patients displayed was that the right hemisphere was distinctly superior in spatial tasks such as arranging blocks and drawing in three dimensions. Researchers showed each hemisphere a simple drawing and had the corresponding hand draw it. Even though all three of the subjects were right-handed, the left-hand drawings were clearly superior.

Because of these hemispheric differences and specializations, split-brain patients have some unusual traits. For example, they are less likely to talk about their feelings, as if they're unavailable for discussion. The patients give evidence of having two differing minds. The best example of this is patient Paul S., whom you read about on the home page. Paul's right hemisphere developed considerable language ability sometime previous to the operation. Although it is uncommon, occasionally the right hemisphere may share substantial neural circuits with, or even dominate, the left hemisphere's centers for language comprehension and production. The fact that Paul's right hemisphere was so well developed in it's verbal capacity opened a closed door for researchers. For almost all split brain patients, the thoughts and perceptions of the right hemisphere are locked away from expression. Researchers were finally able to interview both hemispheres on their views about friendship, love, hate and aspirations.

Paul's right hemisphere stated that he wanted to be an automobile racer while his left hemisphere wanted to be a draftsman. Both hemispheres were asked to write whether they liked or disliked a series of items. The study was performed during the Watergate scandal, and one of the items was Richard Nixon. Paul's right hemisphere expressed "dislike," while his left expressed "like." Most split-brain patients would not be able to express the opinions of their right hemispheres as Paul S. did, but this gives us insight on the hidden differences between the hemispheres.

These hidden differences are allowed to demonstrate themselves after a split brain operation because the two hemispheres are closer to existing independently. One hemisphere may not be able to suppress or influence differing opinions, emotions, or desires of the other because most of the communication between the two can no longer occur. As a result, conflicting hemispheric desires or opinions can cause split brain patients to exhibit some strange behaviors. One patient found his left hand struggling against his right hand when trying to pull up his pants in the morning. While the right hand tried to pull them up, the left was trying to pull them down. On another occasion, he was angry with his wife and attacked her with his left hand while simultaneously trying to protect her with his right!

Split-brain patients have also taught us about dreaming. Scientists had hypothesized that dreaming is a right hemisphere activity, but they found that split brain patients do report dreaming. They found, therefore, that the left hemisphere must have some access to dream material. What was most interesting was the actual content of the dreams of the split-brain patients. Klaus Hoppe, a psychoanalyst, analyzed the dreams of twelve patients. He found that the dreams were not like the dreams of most normal people. " The content of the dreams reflected reality, affect, and drives. even in the more elaborate dream, there was a remarkable lack of distortion of latent dream thoughts. The findings show that the left hemisphere alone is able to produce dreams...Patients after commisurotomy reveal a paucity of dreams, fantasies, and symbols. Their dreams lack the characteristics of dream work; their fantasies are unimaginative, utilitarian, and tied to reality; their symbolization is concretistic, discursive, and rigid." (Segalowitz) These studies of abnormalities of split brain patients as opposed to normal people are providing much insight on hemispheric specialization.

If the separation of the brain into two distinct parts generates two separate minds with feelings, emotions, and a consciousness of their own, it follows logically that consciousness emerges from the brain. If the brain is divided, so is consciousness: one person becomes two. Needless to say, this is very troubling to my faith. It suggests that our concept of a soul is actually just a biological function that ceases with brain death, as the brain is required for consciousness. If consciousness can be subdivided, and this is just one study of many I have read, then surely the soul, consciousness, brain, and matter are one and the same. But how does consciousness spring from mindless matter? Does information have an independent, eternal existence, or is everything a mere component or byproduct of physical processes? Needless to say, I'm worried that science may be about to deal our treasured beliefs a death blow. Is there any other reasonable explanation? And I even hear they already have theories in the works that explain consciousness on a naturalistic level. I thought I had it bad with doubts about God a few weeks ago, now I'm not even sure I exist! What a dilemma!

Anyone who wants to chime in and help, please do so.

Pax Christi,
Geoffrey
 

holyorders

Miserable Pile of Secrets
Aug 27, 2004
2,477
187
43
✟3,631.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Dear Brethren,

Recent scientific studies have come to my attention that present significant challenges to our understanding of the soul, or consciousness. Below is an article that demonstrates some of my concerns.


If the separation of the brain into two distinct parts generates two separate minds with feelings, emotions, and a consciousness of their own, it follows logically that consciousness emerges from the brain. If the brain is divided, so is consciousness: one person becomes two. Needless to say, this is very troubling to my faith. It suggests that our concept of a soul is actually just a biological function that ceases with brain death, as the brain is required for consciousness. If consciousness can be subdivided, and this is just one study of many I have read, then surely the soul, consciousness, brain, and matter are one and the same. But how does consciousness spring from mindless matter? Does information have an independent, eternal existence, or is everything a mere component or byproduct of physical processes? Needless to say, I'm worried that science may be about to deal our treasured beliefs a death blow. Is there any other reasonable explanation? And I even hear they already have theories in the works that explain consciousness on a naturalistic level. I thought I had it bad with doubts about God a few weeks ago, now I'm not even sure I exist! What a dilemma!

Anyone who wants to chime in and help, please do so.

Pax Christi,
Geoffrey
Our soul is much more than our consciousness and there is a problem when you directly equate the two. Yes our soul gives us our character and our disposition. But its main purpose is to animate or give life (anima means soul). This makes our soul distinct from every part of the body, including the brain. The soul is what makes the brain even work.

If you can artificiallly or naturally separate different parts of the brain they are still attached to one single soul. And we know well how parts of the body can work independantly of each other.

Its a bad idea to look at our body to find our soul. You really cannot find anything there. The soul is a spirit like an angel.
 
Upvote 0

SolomonVII

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2003
23,138
4,918
Vancouver
✟155,006.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
It is hard to answer this because it is very difficult to find the definition of "spirit" or "soul".

Spirt can in one instance define a non-corporeal consciousness, the animating principle behind life itself, and in another refer to one's own will, feelings and mind and emotional state.

The linkages between the brain and emotion and personality and even moral will becomes ever more well-established by scientific studies.

Yet, if our behavior is determined by our biology, then what becomes of the free will that is a necessary component of moral responsibility in the first place?

And yet, on a very practical level, the very existence of society contradicts this science out of necessity, for society itself becomes impossible if people are not held accountable for thier own actions.
That is the conundrum, isn't it? Not just faith, but the foundations of society itself take on the appearance of an illusion.
 
Upvote 0

SaintGeorge

Senior Veteran
Jul 18, 2004
2,048
216
✟19,750.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Indeed. Consciousness does equate to a soul in the classic sense. A soul is the seat of a creature's reason and will, and the source of its awareness. This is why this study poses serious questions. It seems to imply that consciousness is an illusion or biological construct that can be subdivided. However, if you are reading this message, you most likely think such a suggestion is silly. How can consciousness be divisable or illusionary? It's pretty hard to argue that consciousness doesn't exist or resides only in matter when the person arguing is himself conscious!

These split-brain patients offer us a rare glimpse into the mechanisms of the soul. Here, we have the potential to postulate how the soul and matter actually interact, and in what sense they work together to become one. I have emailed Dr. J. P. Moreland for his thoughts, as well as Lee Strobel. We might be able to create a theory of consciousness to explain all this. Furthermore, concrete knowledge about how the soul and matter interact could vastly improve the art of spiritual direction. It could open to us entirely new schools of mysticism and shed light on the actual nature and substance of original sin.
 
Upvote 0

PolskiKrol

Teemo support OP
Jun 16, 2004
1,694
114
37
✟2,437.00
Faith
Catholic
I've always thought the story about corpus callosum damage patients is fascinating.

The marriage between heaven and earth, body and soul, is a complete one- niether should monopolize the other. In any healthy relationship they should work together. Were the body in full control and not caring about the soul, we would be serverely overwieght perverts addicted to just about every kind of drug and sex magazine you can think of. But we can't have the soul running things without some dialogue with the body- the body is built to desire something its good at, because it was made for something. So for the soul to say "I want to be a priest" when really one should be a musician, biochemist, or claims adjuster, would be folly!

What the split brain study does is prove indelibly that our brains are built for something definite in mind, and that we can't just go around making decisions without paying attention to the body.
 
Upvote 0

jbarcher

ANE Social Science Researcher
Aug 25, 2003
6,989
385
Toronto, Ontario
✟10,136.00
Faith
Christian
Being an emergent dualist I don't find this troubling. I believe William Hasker is one of the top contemporary emergent dualists, so look into his writings to find out more (cf. The Emergent Self, 1999).

As someone who's done a bit of phil, I should warn you that phil of mind is relatively difficult for a layperson to get into and attain both awareness and critical ability. This isn't said to deter you, but rather to remind you that patience is required. If you researched this field through self-study, you'd find that even after five serious years there are new works you need to consider.
 
Upvote 0

Carrye

Weisenheimer
Aug 30, 2003
14,049
731
✟29,202.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Consciousness does equate to a soul in the classic sense.

Not really. Besides, if soul and consciousness were interchangeable, then a person who is unconscious would be without a soul, or at least, with a diminished portion of a soul.

We could talk about a diminished ability or perfection of the soul, but that wouldn't be directly related to any kind of grace or habit, which is problematic.

The soul is more than simple consciousness. If that were true, then a person would not receive a soul until he was conscious. Then the question would be "conscious of who or what?" Himself? Others? The world? God?

And on ...
 
Upvote 0

selfintercession

Contributor
Jan 2, 2005
6,413
518
Ottawa, Canada
✟24,175.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
CA-Liberals
Personally I believe that our soul is like the little guy controlling the big robot from his driver's seat in the robot's head :D Our soul controls our body, most likely using the brain as its conduit, but the body can have its own problems, causing all sorts of mayhem (like trying to simultaneously hit and protect a person) that might even confuse the soul. There is nothing in the story you posted that makes me believe anything other than what I already believed :)

Maybe you could try to pray and do some more reasearch (if you haven't already) or speak to a priest who is educated in this area.

Good luck with this :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: PolskiKrol
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.