- Jan 7, 2024
- 9,309
- 1,249
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
You still referring to the fictional lost diary of Admiral Byrd?
Yes - what makes you think it is fictional ?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You still referring to the fictional lost diary of Admiral Byrd?
Well there is this:Yes - what makes you think it is fictional ?
Well there is this:
Primary sources contain no such statements. Byrd’s expedition logs, radio transmissions, and official reports from his 1926 flight over the Arctic and his later Antarctic expeditions contain no references to hollow Earth entrances, polar openings, hidden civilizations, or unexpected warm areas.
• The infamous “secret diary” is not authentic. A text often cited as Byrd’s suppressed personal account, describing flying into an inner world or meeting non-human beings, surfaced decades after his death and is demonstrably not in Byrd’s hand, tone, or known writing style. There is no archival trail for its origin.
• Misinterpretation of a 1947 remark. Byrd made public comments in the late 1940s about the strategic significance of the polar regions, describing them as potential avenues for military attack or rapid travel. A key phrase—often quoted as him saying there was “a land beyond the Pole”—referred to the geographical and geopolitical importance of the Arctic basin, not a literal landmass.
• Operational records show the expected Arctic environment. Meteorological notes, flight logs, and scientific observations from Byrd and his contemporaries match what is now well-established about the polar climate and geography. No anomalous warm regions, hidden valleys, or unexplored continents appear in the data.
• No corroboration from other explorers. Amundsen, Nobile, Ellsworth, MacMillan, and later Arctic researchers crossed the same regions by air and ice, producing detailed maps and measurements that leave no room for the extraordinary features attributed to Byrd’s accounts.
• Fringe interpretations arise from later authors. Most extraordinary claims first appear in 1950s–1980s hollow-Earth or esoteric literature that used Byrd as an authority figure but provided no primary documentation.
Summary by ChatGpt. I shall expand on any of these to which you offer an evidenced refutation.
Apart from what @Ophiolite has already posted, there is the minor detail of the hollow earth 'ambassador' bringing up the nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which happened in 1945, more than a decade after Admiral Byrd's fictional encounter with the hollow earthers. It demonstrates that the fictional diary wasn't written until after World War I.Yes - what makes you think it is fictional ?
Apart from what @Ophiolite has already posted, there is the minor detail of the hollow earth 'ambassador' bringing up the nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which happened in 1945, more than a decade after Admiral Byrd's fictional encounter with the hollow earthers. It demonstrates that the fictional diary wasn't written until after World War I.
"The Final Experiment" already dealt with that.I don't buy that. That is argument for 3rd grade of elementary school. ^^
Average Joe can't go to Antarctica cause truth would be revealed.![]()
AhemGood point here, never looked at it like this.![]()
The problem you have is that the 'lost diary' was brought to your attention by Dean Odle which in your mind gives it an automatic pass since you appear to consider him to be nearly infallible.
Santy Claus
Defense Lawyer: Your honor, I move that the case against my client be dismissed on grounds of the Sanity Clause.
Judge: Motion denied. Everybody knows there ain't no Sanity Clause!
Your really strain the requirement to respect other forum members when, in response to a clear refutation of the forged Byrd document, you continue to declare your belief in unevidenced nonsense. You don't even make an effort to challenge any of the points I made, but double down on claims that, if your opinion was of any value, would be offensive to any of Byrd's descendants. Seriously, would you be OK with people making up fairy stories about you after you were gone?I believe their extraordinary story.
That isn't the only conclusion to be drawn from your experience, since both of you missed the clear evidence that demonstrates it is a work of fiction.This does show that we both think on the same lines so he can't be all that wrong![]()
Seriously, would you be OK with people making up fairy stories about you after you were gone?