• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Gallup: Drop in U.S. Religiosity Among Largest in World

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
7,469
3,405
45
San jacinto
✟222,440.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is not public information, as it is for charities.
That's true, and at a certain size I see no reason to object to 990s but I'm not sure how many churches have the administrative capabilities of filing those kinds of forms. So perhaps if some threshold was established, or even only requiring it of denominations rather than local church bodies. Though I'm still not sure how it would fly with the free exercise clause.
 
Upvote 0

CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN

My dad died 1/12/2023. I'm still devastated.
Jul 1, 2007
18,110
5,628
Native Land
✟403,513.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
To some moderate extent that's true, but even so, it doesn't mean we should work and pray that Democrats will regain the presidency, congress and senate so we can turn this thing into a Chinese Democracy.
I don't vote to turn America into Chinese Democracy. I vote for better education for everyone, medical care , more programs to help the poor, kids and people in need. I worked with kids and noticed programs get shutdown, because of Bush. I have seen the same patterns since.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
44,246
47,251
Los Angeles Area
✟1,054,148.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
So are we just allowed to make little adjustments and that’s allowed?

Well, that clears it up completely...

OK Sportsballfan, I think the answer to your question is in this part of the site rules

Profanity or foul language is not allowed. This includes using punctuation, symbols, or acronyms to bypass the profanity filter.

So certain ways of 'hiding' profanity are NOT allowed, but changing the word to a non-profane near-synonym is okay. Saying cowpoo may make you feel durned silly, but it's allowed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sportsballfan
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
23,167
17,227
55
USA
✟436,137.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
That's true, and at a certain size I see no reason to object to 990s but I'm not sure how many churches have the administrative capabilities of filing those kinds of forms. So perhaps if some threshold was established, or even only requiring it of denominations rather than local church bodies. Though I'm still not sure how it would fly with the free exercise clause.
The last I checked, the "small organization" threshold to not file for non-churches was $5 or 10 thousand in revenue.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
7,469
3,405
45
San jacinto
✟222,440.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The last I checked, the "small organization" threshold to not file for non-churches was $5 or 10 thousand in revenue
monthly? annually? and given the constitutional protections for religious exercise that doesnt exist for general charities I dont know if a 1 to 1 comparison is apt.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
29,270
16,594
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟467,027.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
I'm more thinking metaphysical grounding, rather than developmental.
What? Metaphysical groundings can come from those things too.

It only makes sense. Everything else can be at odds, but if we can agree to be peacemakers and show the love of God our allegiance will be clear.
Yeah. Frankly, I was really struggling with how to figure that out for a while and a well timed sermon on those Fruits radically simplified and clarified and simple it is

Of course, there are complicating factors. There are some "personality types" that have great, great difficultly following along with a few fruits.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
23,167
17,227
55
USA
✟436,137.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
monthly? annually?
How do you usually file forms to the IRS?
and given the constitutional protections for religious exercise that doesnt exist for general charities I dont know if a 1 to 1 comparison is apt.
Filing a tax form does not inhibit "free exercise" (and neither would property taxes).
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
7,469
3,405
45
San jacinto
✟222,440.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What? Metaphysical groundings can come from those things too.
How so? In light of the is-ought problem, I don't really see a basis for metaphysical grounding outside of an objective moral agent.
Yeah. Frankly, I was really struggling with how to figure that out for a while and a well timed sermon on those Fruits radically simplified and clarified and simple it is
Yeah, it took supernatural intervention to open my eyes.
Of course, there are complicating factors. There are some "personality types" that have great, great difficultly following along with a few fruits.
Yeah, that's why I don't make a habit of sorting "Christian" and "non-Christian" outside of broad generalities. God knows the heart, and some people are being brought along slowly.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
7,469
3,405
45
San jacinto
✟222,440.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
29,270
16,594
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟467,027.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
How so? In light of the is-ought problem, I don't really see a basis for metaphysical grounding outside of an objective moral agent.
And yet.....

They exist.

So what's next?
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
7,469
3,405
45
San jacinto
✟222,440.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And yet.....

They exist.

So what's next?
I'm game to hear you defend this, but we're getting a little off topic. So if you're up to it, PM me because I've never encountered one. In fact, most moral philosophy has abandoned the idea of grounded morality entirely and shifted to more practical questions.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
29,270
16,594
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟467,027.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
It has an inhibitory effect that could easily qualify as a restriction on free exercise.
I disagree.

IT's not like the early churches had salaries or major expenses. House churches were common. These were legitimate ways to freely exercise your rights.

I don't see how a tax could inhibit me practicing my religion. I can't think of a single "requirement of the faith" that requires any kind of significant expenditure...or frankly any expenditure except for a bit of wine and bread.
And I'm not trying to be facetious or anything now...... is there?.

It costs me nothing to meet with my friends in our houses. To sing and worship and have fun together for a while.

Just because a church building would get taxed, doesn't mean I can't practice my religion as a privately owned physical building is also no real requirement to the faith.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
7,469
3,405
45
San jacinto
✟222,440.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I disagree.

IT's not like the early churches had salaries or major expenses. House churches were common. These were legitimate ways to freely exercise your rights.

I don't see how a tax could inhibit me practicing my religion. I can't think of a single "requirement of the faith" that requires any kind of significant expenditure...or frankly any expenditure except for a bit of wine and bread.
And I'm not trying to be facetious or anything now...... is there?.

It costs me nothing to meet with my friends in our houses. To sing and worship and have fun together for a while.

Just because a church building would get taxed, doesn't mean I can't practice my religion as a privately owned physical building is also no real requirement to the faith.
The early churches did have salaries, as we know from Paul refusing to take his. And one of the complicating factors over taxation is that the judiciary has affirmed that the power to tax is the power to destroy, so subjecting churches to taxes runs the risk of not only free exercise complications but also establishment risks. There is also an extreme financial element to Christianity given the extent of Christ's focus on financial issues, and religious reasons for secretive charitable giving(do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing) that such government enforced transparancy may lead to the violation of a person's religious conscience. So it does serve to have an inhibitory effect, even if you personally don't feel inhibited by it.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
23,167
17,227
55
USA
✟436,137.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I'm not sure how tax burdens are determined, quarterly?
You file taxes quarterly? (and we're not talking about any tax burden. Just an annual form of accounts.
It has an inhibitory effect that could easily qualify as a restriction on free exercise.
It isn't.
 
Upvote 0