And I will continue to point out its irrelevant nature.Feel free to report the post for being off topic, but I will continue to post whatever I feel is relevant.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And I will continue to point out its irrelevant nature.Feel free to report the post for being off topic, but I will continue to post whatever I feel is relevant.
Which is?Of course, the above statement may simply be cover for Hegseth's true objective.....
That’s a fair question—but let’s not pretend there’s a shortage of examples.
When I say cartels use terrorism tactics to intimidate or coerce, that’s not rhetorical flourish—it’s fact. Take Culiacán, 2019, when the Sinaloa Cartel unleashed a full-scale urban assault after Mexican forces captured Ovidio Guzmán López, son of El Chapo. They didn’t just resist arrest—they turned a major city into a war zone, blocking roads, burning vehicles, and terrorizing civilians until the government surrendered and released him. The message wasn’t only for Mexico. It was for Washington too: interfere with us, extradite us, or touch our leadership—and we’ll bring chaos to your doorstep.
Or, go back furherto 2010, when Los Zetas ambushed and killed U.S. ICE agent Jaime Zapata. That was a targeted execution of a U.S. federal officer. If deliberately killing American agents to discourage enforcement isn’t “intimidating a government,” I’m not sure what is.
Now as for national security: fentanyl alone settles that question. Over 80,000 Americans die every year from cartel-supplied synthetic opioids. That’s not a “law enforcement issue”—that’s a mass-casualty event repeated annually. No foreign power in modern history has killed more Americans on U.S. soil than the Sinaloa and CJNG cartels have through their chemical warfare. And make no mistake: it is warfare—intentional, systematic, and profit-driven.
The FBI ain't ordering the military to do anything. You know that.
Which is?
Your guess is a good as mine.
Why do you think the US is amassing an armada of Navy ships that includes Marines and Special Forces? To interdict fishing boats?
As part of that armada, yes, fishing boats with the occasional semi submersible, and nothing else.
I dont understand what you are trying to communicate.![]()
Obama’s Final Drone Strike Data
As Donald Trump assumes office today, he inherits a targeted killing program that has been the cornerstone of U.S. counterterrorism strategy over the past eight years. On January 23, 2009, just three…www.cfr.org
You brought up the point that maybe the FBI could.I didn't say they were. You seem to have missed the point.
...to date.
Or maybe it's Trump's version of gun boat diplomacy.
Cause they aren't fishing boats. They are drug dealers bringing in poison to kill Americans. A fishing boat would just be out fishing, instead if being run by na4co terrorists.Your guess is a good as mine.
Why do you think the US is amassing an armada of Navy ships that includes Marines and Special Forces? To interdict fishing boats?
Cause they aren't fishing boats. They are drug dealers bringing in poison to kill Americans. A fishing boat would just be out fishing, instead if being run by na4co terrorists.
...are these fishing boats loaded with drugs a threat to Coast Guard resources?
Why has Trump assembled a Naval armada, including an aircraft carrier group, off the coast of Venezuela?