Another look at the moon landing.

[Strong in Him]

No Dean is not more important than my beliefs, he confirms my beliefs & if Dean had gone to Antarctica and confirm the earth was a globe, I'm not sure whether I would have believed him or not. Probably not

Maybe.
But at the time you said that you would believe whatever Dean told you.

as my beliefs in a level earth are pretty strong.

Not that strong - a year ago you said it was a load of nonsense.

 

[Apple Sky]

But at the time you said that you would believe whatever Dean told you.

Looking back now, I don't reckon I would have.

Not that strong - a year ago you said it was a load of nonsense.

I don't know where my mind must have been at.

 

[Strong in Him]

I don't know where my mind must have been at.

You were genuinely moved because you had watched Charles Duke's testimony. The one where he said that walking on the moon lasted 3 days; walking with Jesus lasts for a lifetime. You can't go back in time and change that reaction either; that is how you felt when you heard Charles talking about Jesus

It was a beautiful response to a lovely Christian testimony. Several of us said you showed courage and humility. You were pleased that this astronaut had found Jesus - the same Jesus that you worship.

Alas, that reaction didn't last and you have gone back to calling him, and others, liars and fakers.

 

[prodromos]

Only science blinded people see a moon that is 200,000+mile out in the darkness of space. When they see a moon out in daylight during the daytime.​

View attachment 370766​

The only reason the sky isn't black during daylight is due to Rayleigh scattering

 

[prodromos]

In the 1960"s man was to supposed to ride in a rocket 200,000+ miles away from earth. But yet they could not even go 6 miles deep in the ocean.

How Deep Has Man Gone in the Ocean? - The Institute for Environmental Research and Education
The deepest that a human has ventured into the ocean is 10,925 meters (35,843 feet), achieved by Victor Vescovo in the Challenger Deep of the Mariana Trench. This solo dive, conducted in 2019, surpasses previous records and highlights the incredible engineering feats required to withstand the immense pressure of the deepest ocean environments.

A spacecraft only has to deal with 1 atmosphere of pressure compared to 1000 atmospheres at the bottom of the ocean.

 

[prodromos]

So what Rob proved was the lack of curvature

How exactly did he do that? Please explain how the city was mostly hidden from the bottom up when they started, and as they got closer more of the city became visible.
What Rob documented is 100% consistent with what is predicted by the globe model, so he absolutely did confirm the earth's curvature.

 

[Apple Sky]

You were genuinely moved because you had watched Charles Duke's testimony. The one where he said that walking on the moon lasted 3 days; walking with Jesus lasts for a lifetime. You can't go back in time and change that reaction either; that is how you felt when you heard Charles talking about Jesus

It was a beautiful response to a lovely Christian testimony. Several of us said you showed courage and humility. You were pleased that this astronaut had found Jesus - the same Jesus that you worship.

Alas, that reaction didn't last and you have gone back to calling him, and others, liars and fakers.

What can I say, I can only state what I truly believe in.

 

[Apple Sky]

How exactly did he do that? Please explain how the city was mostly hidden from the bottom up when they started, and as they got closer more of the city became visible.
What Rob documented is 100% consistent with what is predicted by the globe model, so he absolutely did confirm the earth's curvature.

Wrong- And Rob has certainly never stated this

This is not a mirage.

 

[Hentenza]

Sorry - But this proves nothing.

Sure it does unless you want to call me a liar and that would not be nice of you. You wouldn’t call a brother in Christ a liar would you?

I commend you for this but it still doesn't convince me.

Because you are so entrenched in your conspiracy theory that you wouldn’t know the truth even if it bit you in the.……..you know where. You need to pray about it and read about what scriptures have to say about false teachers. You can’t fool me, I was there. Your buddies are fooling you and they were not even there. Go figure.

 

[prodromos]

Wrong

Incorrect. Everything I have stated regarding his observations and their consistency with the globe model is 100% correct

And Rob has certainly never stated this

Well duh Rob was a flat earther. He would never say that his observations contradict his belief.

View attachment 370800

This is not a mirage.

And the shoreline and the bottoms of the buildings are hidden by the earth's curvature. Bravo!

 

[Apple Sky]

You can’t fool me, I was there.

So you've been to the moon ?

 

[Apple Sky]

And the shoreline and the bottoms of the buildings are hidden by the earth's curvature. Bravo!

No that is due to atmospheric's.

 

[d taylor]

No that is due to atmospheric's.

-
​

Actually the atmosphere my play a small part. But the real reason is that at a distance closer objects are larger than objects further away. So I can take a 3x3" square cube and cover up a two story house in photographing these two objects if the 3x3" square cube is a foot or two from me and the two story home is several hundred feet away.

I post an example of this on a flat earth thread several years ago, but i can not remember which thread it was (it has been shut down.

So if a person is trying to photograph at a long distance, say the other side of a lake. The lake will basically have to have very little or no wave motion at all.

 

[prodromos]

No that is due to atmospheric's.

And now Apple Sky throws a magic buzzword into the discussion with no understanding of what it actually is supposed to mean, then tries to cover that by implying its a no brainer with the "doh" emoji.

 

[prodromos]

Actually the atmosphere my play a small part. But the real reason is that at a distance closer objects are larger than objects further away. So I can take a 3x3 square cube and cover up a two story house in photographing these two objects if the 3x3 square cube is a foot or two from me and the two story home is several hundred feet away.

Not if the photographer is taller than the 3x3 square cube.

I post an example of this on a flat earth thread several years ago, but i can not remember which thread it was (it has been shut down.

I'm sure it was debunked then too.

So if a person is trying to photograph at a long distance, say the other side of a lake. The lake will basically have to have very little or no wave motion at all.

There could be 3m waves, but if the photographer is 1.8m tall standing on the deck of a boat which is 1.5m above the water, then nothing in the distance will be obscured by waves. Waves further away will not have any impact since they also appear smaller the further away they are. The most that can be obscured is 3m at the distant shore, not tens of meters as demonstrated by Rob Skiba's observations.

My response is for the benefit of others, since d taylor obviously has me on his ignore list.

 

[Apple Sky]

And now Apple Sky throws a magic buzzword into the discussion with no understanding of what it actually is supposed to mean, then tries to cover that by implying its a no brainer with the "doh" emoji.

I was forgetting the motion of the wave impact as mentioned by @d taylor , he is absolutely right.

 

[Strong in Him]

What can I say, I can only state what I truly believe in.

My point is that you may truly believe in this now - but then, only a year/several months ago, you didn't.
THEN, that "true belief" was challenged - to the point where you asked God to help you to stick with it.
NOW, you've said 'sorry' to God for having said 'sorry' and asked for his help and have reverted to trashing the reputations of his children.

What was so important on that YouTube video that you would trust IT over God?

 

[Strong in Him]

I was forgetting the motion of the wave impact as mentioned by @d taylor , he is absolutely right.

Well firstly, how can you understand things like "wave impact" when you say that you "can't get your head around" science and have previously asked the most ridiculous questions, like "is Australia upside down on a globe earth?"
I seem to remember this has happened before - months and months of ridiculous comments, pointless questions and mocking emojis and then you come up with something so profound that people think you have copied it out of a science textbook.
Secondly, why did you mark his post as "informative", instead of agreeing with it?

 

[Apple Sky]

My point is that you may truly believe in this now - but then, only a year/several months ago, you didn't.
THEN, that "true belief" was challenged - to the point where you asked God to help you to stick with it.
NOW, you've said 'sorry' to God for having said 'sorry' and asked for his help and have reverted to trashing the reputations of his children.

I Know but it really in the end went against my true beliefs.
Once a flat earther always a flat earther.

BTW Happy Birthday

 

[Apple Sky]

Well firstly, how can you understand things like "wave impact" when you say that you "can't get your head around" science and have previously asked the most ridiculous questions, like "is Australia upside down on a globe earth?"

Well it is on globe