• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
5,252
6,261
New Jersey
✟411,271.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
So help me understand how and WHY empathy is bad.

I don't know for sure what Mr. Kirk intended, but there have been some recent books by conservative Evangelicals on the topic of empathy: "The Sin of Empathy: Compassion and its Counterfeits", by Joe Rigney, and "Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion", by Allie Beth Stuckey. I suspect Kirk may have had one or both of them in mind. I'm not going to be able to summarize their viewpoint fairly (I know I will end up caricaturing them, so I will refrain), but here are two relevant articles.

1) Albert Mohler interviews Joe Rigney. Note that both are favorable to the anti-empathy point of view.

2) An article from the AP, posted on PBS's website. This author is more impartial, but I think the writer is trying to be fair.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,701
16,222
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟455,910.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
I don't know for sure what Mr. Kirk intended, but there have been some recent books by conservative Evangelicals on the topic of empathy: "The Sin of Empathy: Compassion and its Counterfeits", by Joe Rigney, and "Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion", by Allie Beth Stuckey. I suspect Kirk may have had one or both of them in mind. I'm not going to be able to summarize their viewpoint fairly (I know I will end up caricaturing them, so I will refrain), but here are two relevant articles.

1) Albert Mohler interviews Joe Rigney. Note that both are favorable to the anti-empathy point of view.

2) An article from the AP, posted on PBS's website. This author is more impartial, but I think the writer is trying to be fair.
Thanks to trump there are Christians who don't even follow the teachings of Jesus because "it just doesn't work anymore".

So I'm sure there is space for almost anything now. I'm not making space for it...
 
Upvote 0

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
22,620
19,092
USA
✟1,108,359.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Thanks to trump there are Christians who don't even follow the teachings of Jesus because "it just doesn't work anymore".

So I'm sure there is space for almost anything now. I'm not making space for it...

You can’t blame him for that. Religion is a placeholder for some. If we heed the promptings of the Holy Spirit we won’t be deceived. My affinity with conservatives ended during his first term and we became apolitical and never looked back.

For it would have been better for them not to have [personally] known the way of righteousness, than to have known it and then to have turned back from the holy commandment [verbally] handed on to them.

~bella
 
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
28,172
45,808
69
✟3,147,674.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
If he really was a christian he must have meant something else.
Hello Godcrazy, you make a very important point. How can we possibly know what Charlie Kirk meant (or what any other person means, for that matter) from a single sentence or two taken out-of-context :scratch:

Of course, if we knew the context and understood what he really meant (& why he said what he did in the way that he did) that would all but eliminate the opportunity for conjecturing and judgmentalism, etc., and what fun would that be ;)

God bless you!!

--David

edit - here's a Snopes article about the OP quote. It includes a bit of context, though more would have been helpful (see the typed quote in the larger yellow box towards the bottom). However, I think that it's enough to understand that his comment about empathy was specific, rather than general in nature (as it concerns political discourse).

The little quote of his from "X" just below it may be helpful, as well (I believe they were both made on the same day in 2022), but again, more context would be nice.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: Godcrazy
Upvote 0

Servus

<><
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
28,916
15,598
Washington
✟1,004,649.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The left goes on and on about empathy and how much empathy they have, and yet displayed a complete and total lack of empathy and compassion over the assassination of Charlie Kirk. We got a good look at who they really are.
 
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
Jul 14, 2015
15,081
9,226
52
✟392,754.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I cannot understand why a person would have a problem with empathy.
Because you might accidentally help someone on the ‘to be hated list’. And we can’t have that.
 
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
Jul 14, 2015
15,081
9,226
52
✟392,754.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
From this additionally: Could it be that in Charlie Kirk's conception of empathy, he allocates it by principles rather than by personal feelings to those whom he thinks are the most victimized human beings, and that due to this difference of allocation, we may have a difficult time understanding his working definition because it reorganizes and reprioritizes the categories and principles any of us tend to use to classify "who" is a victim and under what circumstance our felt empathy (and sympathy) is to be given to that victim? [See one of a number of textbooks on Ethics, such as Ethics: An Introduction to Theories and Problems by William S. Sahakian. ] And this is before we even bring in personal differences of neuroscience and psychology. Not everyone who sounds like a sociopath actually is. Sometimes, they just work from a different Ethic and a difference set of emotional attachments to certain moral categories.
I dunno whether it’s a sign to the end times but I agree with you on this.

It does have an interesting implication for Kirk’s psychology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

NBB

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2013
4,036
1,923
46
Uruguay
✟660,437.00
Country
Uruguay
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The left goes on and on about empathy and how much empathy they have, and yet displayed a complete and total lack of empathy and compassion over the assassination of Charlie Kirk. We got a good look at who they really are.

The people supposedly with 'empathy' and 'tolerance' wishing death and celebrating it, because they had different opinions, hey is not that being hateful and not having empathy was bad?.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Servus
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

1 Cor. 13:13
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
25,049
11,767
Space Mountain!
✟1,387,034.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I dunno whether it’s a sign to the end times but I agree with you on this.

It does have an interesting implication for Kirk’s psychology.

Yes, it does. Which is why I place most of my intellectual and academic eggs into the baskets of Epistemology, Hermeneutics, History and Neuroscience in order to attempt to gain an understanding of the mental mechanisms within another person's perspective.

All of us can do better to try to understand each other, but it will require much more than simply a 'free space' in which to debate. Not that I need to tell you, the Therapist, this. ;)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Larniavc
Upvote 0

o_mlly

“Behold, I make all things new.”
May 20, 2021
3,226
588
Private
✟129,122.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
No it isn’t.
Thank you for your in-depth response.

empathy(n.)​

1908, modeled on German Einfühlung (from ein "in" + Fühlung "feeling"), which was coined 1858 by German philosopher Rudolf Lotze (1817-1881) as a translation of Greek empatheia "passion, state of emotion," from assimilated form of en "in" (see en- (2)) + pathos "feeling" (from PIE root *kwent(h)- "to suffer").
So, is empathy a passion? Yes, it is.
Like I said earlier... When it comes to emotional empathy, I have a hard time believing those higher on the sadomasochistic spectrum do not have an significant edge.
Perhaps I am missing your point but it seems that you propose that one with a disordered attitude on human relations is at an advantage to be empathetic. I would argue the contrary; they have a propensity to be narcissistic.

Sadomasochistic persons embrace a psychological defense mechanism that allows individuals to escape feelings of isolation and powerlessness by submitting to others. Do not all sadomasochistic persons have a reciprocal masochistic person with whom they willingly participate in a cycle of control and dependence?

The opposite pole to narcissism is objectivity; it is the faculty to see other people and things as they are, objectively. The faculty to think objectively is reason; the emotional attitude behind reason is that of humility. To be objective, to use one's reason, is possible only if one has achieved an attitude of humility. (Romans 3:23.)
 
  • Useful
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
Jul 14, 2015
15,081
9,226
52
✟392,754.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Which is why I place most of my intellectual and academic eggs in the baskets of Epistemology, Hermeneutics, History and Neuroscience in order to attempt to gain an understanding of the mental mechanisms within another person's perspective.
Hm. You’ve given me something to think about, there.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

o_mlly

“Behold, I make all things new.”
May 20, 2021
3,226
588
Private
✟129,122.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Don’t be silly.
For, e'en though vanquished, he could argue still,
While words of learned length and thundering sound
Amazed the gazing rustics ranged around;
And still they gazed, and still the wonder grew
That one small head could carry all he knew.

The Village Schoolmaster by Oliver Goldsmith

 
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
Jul 14, 2015
15,081
9,226
52
✟392,754.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
For, e'en though vanquished, he could argue still,
While words of learned length and thundering sound
Amazed the gazing rustics ranged around;
And still they gazed, and still the wonder grew
That one small head could carry all he knew.

The Village Schoolmaster by Oliver Goldsmith

Once again with feeling: don’t be silly.
 
Upvote 0

Freth

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 11, 2020
1,711
2,060
Midwest, USA
✟588,717.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
From what I gather, Charlie was talking about empathy being used as a political tool. Selective empathy. Only having empathy for those on your side of the political spectrum, but no empathy for those on the other side.

I also see it being used as a weapon. Show empathy or face the consequences. You can't demand empathy.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: St_Worm2
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,701
16,222
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟455,910.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
The left goes on and on about empathy and how much empathy they have, and yet displayed a complete and total lack of empathy and compassion over the assassination of Charlie Kirk. We got a good look at who they really are.
I don't feel empathy for Charlie cause he's dead.

I did clearly expressed empathy for his family because that was awful for them to be there.

But frankly I don't idol worship our political figures like the right so I can't really be the kind of empathetic you may need.

I'm sorry i let you down like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bèlla
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,701
16,222
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟455,910.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
From what I gather, Charlie was talking about empathy being used as a political tool. Selective empathy. Only having empathy for those on your side of the political spectrum, but no empathy for those on the other side.
What is the evidence that you rhink he's talking about it in that manner?
I also see it being used as a weapon. Show empathy or face the consequences. You can't demand empathy.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,701
16,222
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟455,910.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
I don't know for sure what Mr. Kirk intended, but there have been some recent books by conservative Evangelicals on the topic of empathy: "The Sin of Empathy: Compassion and its Counterfeits", by Joe Rigney, and "Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion", by Allie Beth Stuckey. I suspect Kirk may have had one or both of them in mind. I'm not going to be able to summarize their viewpoint fairly (I know I will end up caricaturing them, so I will refrain), but here are two relevant articles.

1) Albert Mohler interviews Joe Rigney. Note that both are favorable to the anti-empathy point of view.

2) An article from the AP, posted on PBS's website. This author is more impartial, but I think the writer is trying to be fair.
I think the idea of "hate the sin love the sinner" gets a lot more complex if you think empathy if a sin.

Frankly I don't quite understand it. I've always thought secular gay folk really dont care too much if conservatives think being gay is a sin. I think the peoblem is that they've always thought that they deserved equal rights under the law and want to be treated with respect. We can be empathetic to them in so much as many people treat them as lesser becsuse Christians have felt that way before.

Empathy does not necessarily mean condoning anything.
 
Upvote 0