- Oct 10, 2020
- 12,744
- 6,117
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
Please no personal attacks.He said it at an inappropriate time, but he isn’t saying that you yourself haven’t said.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Please no personal attacks.He said it at an inappropriate time, but he isn’t saying that you yourself haven’t said.
I’m not…?Please no personal attacks.
So this isn’t you commenting after the assassinations in Minnesota…?Please no personal attacks.
Sure, Jan.Early reports say weapon has been recovered with clues showing that trans ideology may be a factor. Time will tell.
I was wondering what that meant and now I'm still wondering, but I see you didn't make this up or necessarily get it from a whacko source.Early reports say weapon has been recovered with clues showing that trans ideology may be a factor. Time will tell.
They have recently.Curious though, do cartridges often have ideological wording on them? Genuine question.
They have?![]()
BREAKING: Matthew Dowd Fired from MSNBC For Vile Comments Blaming Charlie Kirk For Assassination | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
MSNBC fired far-left political commentator Matthew Dowd on Wednesday evening for his vile comments about Charlie Kirk.www.thegatewaypundit.com
...Conservatives have been urging people to pull back on the hatred and violent rhetoric.
No one said it was only on one side. But the majority of it is on one side, some are beginning to wake up and take action:They have?
Or they have only been urging people on the left?
Cause I think there's been more than a few conservatives hoping for Civil War...if we are to believe their tweets.
I WILL say that the left wing parts of the internet I attend to have really turned me off how they've reacted. I still political align with them, but their attitude about this is not one I share.No one said it was only on one side. But the majority of it is on one side, some are beginning to wake up and take action:
Is this one of those cases of Freedom of Speech and Acedemic repression the right has been talking about so much?"Wednesday morning, Texas Scorecard, a conservative outlet, posted a recording of the history professor discussing the importance of organized resistance, saying 'without organization, how can anyone expect to overthrow the most bloodthirsty, profit-driven, mad organization in the history of the world, that of the U.S. government?'"
![]()
Texas State University president fires professor for remarks 'advocating violence'
The decision by Texas State University marks the second termination of a Texas public university professor for views unpopular to conservatives after direct political pressure to do so.www.yahoo.com
It was a Republican who shot Hortman and her husband. A Republican that shot at Trump. A Republican that was waiting to shoot Trump. It was Republicans of a certain stripe who stormed the Capitol to - unsuccessfully - overturn an election, hang Mike Pence and shoot Nancy Pelosi.No one said it was only on one side. But the majority of it is on one side, some are beginning to wake up and take action:
Cancel culture?"Wednesday morning, Texas Scorecard, a conservative outlet, posted a recording of the history professor discussing the importance of organized resistance, saying 'without organization, how can anyone expect to overthrow the most bloodthirsty, profit-driven, mad organization in the history of the world, that of the U.S. government?'"
![]()
Texas State University president fires professor for remarks 'advocating violence'
The decision by Texas State University marks the second termination of a Texas public university professor for views unpopular to conservatives after direct political pressure to do so.www.yahoo.com
The big difference is that the pure hatred coming out of these college students and many other people on the Democrat liberal left have been documented and seen by millions of people to be using terroristic speech. So, the statement that Democrats support terrorism is believable. I have not seen ANY evidence that Zaha Torte has made any form of terroristic threats to anyone. So, your claim that Zaha Torte makes terroristic claims is false and falls on deaf ears.I'll answer that with a question: where's the hatred and violence in saying that @Zaha Torte encourages and supports terrorism?
No one said it was only on one side.
Interesting. When I first read this, my eyes happened to skip over the part where it gave the venue for these comments (I assumed it was in a classroom), and I landed on this:But the majority of it is on one side, some are beginning to wake up and take action:
"Wednesday morning, Texas Scorecard, a conservative outlet, posted a recording of the history professor discussing the importance of organized resistance, saying 'without organization, how can anyone expect to overthrow the most bloodthirsty, profit-driven, mad organization in the history of the world, that of the U.S. government?'"
![]()
Texas State University president fires professor for remarks 'advocating violence'
The decision by Texas State University marks the second termination of a Texas public university professor for views unpopular to conservatives after direct political pressure to do so.www.yahoo.com
Wednesday morning, Texas Scorecard, a conservative outlet, posted a recording of the history professor discussing the importance of organized resistance, saying "without organization, how can anyone expect to overthrow the most bloodthirsty, profit-driven, mad organization in the history of the world, that of the U.S. government?"
Your reference point is a blog article from 16 years ago by who knows, showing signs from who knows where that people had 18-22 years ago about the person who was elected president 24 years ago, in an era where people were mad about the largest terrorist attack to have ever occured on US soil…?The big difference is that the pure hatred coming out of these college students and many other people on the Democrat liberal left have been documented and seen by millions of people to be using terroristic speech. So, the statement that Democrats support terrorism is believable. I have not seen ANY evidence that Zaha Torte has made any form of terroristic threats to anyone. So, your claim that Zaha Torte makes terroristic claims is false and falls on deaf ears.
Here are some real examples of the liberal left and their threats:
Death Threats Against Bush at Protests Ignored for Years · zomblog
the zombietime blogwww.zombietime.com
The majority you don’t like is on one side. Not quite the same. As I pointed out earlier, you’re not exactly a “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander” kind of guy.No one said it was only on one side. But the majority of it is on one side…
Sorry, wanting to kill someone is the same now as it was back then - evil and wrong. The liberal left has just taken hatred to a new height in recent years because they have lost everything good about themselves and now, they want someone to pay since they can't compete in the moral debating ring.Your reference point is a blog article from 16 years ago by who knows, showing signs from who knows where that people had 18-22 years ago about the person who was elected president 24 years ago, in an era where people were mad about the largest terrorist attack to have ever occured on US soil…?
That is an unsupported claim. Name names.If you dont know then you are receiving some highly "curated" information from your media feeds.
But if it was true - it wouldn't be defamation - nor would it be hate or violence.there ya go
I’m not denying it’s wrong. Those signs are disgusting.Sorry, wanting to kill someone is the same now as it was back then - evil and wrong. The liberal left has just taken hatred to a new height in recent years because they have lost everything good about themselves and now, they want someone to pay since they can't compete in the moral debating ring.
I agree. Did you think I didn't?This is what Charley was about. He helped young people to realize they were not alone in their thoughts. He taught them, and gave them the courage to speak their mind. Not to be intimidated into silence in our schools. Freedom of speech, and debate were encouraged, and what he did. This is what higher education had always been, he brought that back. That was Charley....The silencers will not silence him or what he started. Charlty did not "hate", he encouraged disgreement in debate. Using words, and ideas, not violence. May he rest in the Lord, and the Lord bring comfort to his wife and to his children in the coming days, months and years knowing who he really was.