Watch: CNN Cuts Tulsi Gabbard Off as She Lays Out the Inconvenient Facts of the Russia Hoax

[probinson]

OK, and the Republicans and their media tried to convince the American people that the Democrats had "hacked" the next election despite no credible evidence.

Yes, they made many baseless claims.

Sounds like they're even. Now what?

Now I guess we wait for the next election and the losing party to cry foul again.

 

[Say it aint so]

And I posted a video with a compilation of Democrats and media outlets talking about Russia hacking our elections. Hillary Clinton called the election a "cyber 9/11". I suppose you can claim that no one was making direct claims of vote tampering, but that's rather disingenuous, since the result of all of the claims of Russia "hacking" the election was that 67% of Democrats believing that Russia had tampered with vote tallies.

If they did hack into voting data, which they did. And voting data is used for elections, which it is. Then it can be said they did hack into our election systems. What I am asking is about is changing voting tallies. Who said that?

 

[GoldenBoy89]

The very fact we’re still talking about Russian interference in our elections a decade later is evidence of Russian interference in our elections.

 

[Vambram]

How is that a rebuttal?

If you don't know, then I cannot tell you.

 

[iluvatar5150]

The bottom line is the link I posted goes to the press release

Right, just like I said.

, which links to the report and the memo.

It links to a page with both of those, just like I said, which is not, as you put it "direct links to the content." It's indirect.

You, OTOH, had posted absolutely nothing when you accused people of not "reading and parsing sources".

Swing and a miss again. You're doing great here.

I had not posted much in this thread prior to that. But this is not the only ongoing thread on the matter. There are at least two others in which I had participated prior to that.

Obama referred to DOJ for criminal charges

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-receives-gabbards-criminal-referral-bombshell-claims-obama-admin-manufactured-russian-collusion-hoax.amp The Department of Justice confirmed Monday that it has received Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's criminal referral related to her...

www.christianforums.com

Director of National Intelligence Gabbard calls for prosecution of Obama

"Their egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic. No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure...

www.christianforums.com

 

[iluvatar5150]

If you don't know, then I cannot tell you.

Oh, I don't doubt that. If you were able to explain it to me, you would've crafted a more relevant response in the first place.

 

[Vambram]

Oh, I don't doubt that. If you were able to explain it to me, you would've crafted a more relevant response in the first place.

I did write a relevant response. It is not my fault that you are dismissing it.

 

[Postvieww]

And, BTW, Obama would have immunity.
Sorry to disappoint you. It applies to the good guys, too.

Maybe not . Is treason to be considered an official act by a sitting President? Treason should be handled by a military tribunal. The Supreme Court would have no say in that matter.BTW Obama is not a good guy!

 

[iluvatar5150]

I did write a relevant response.

No, you didn't.

Your original claim was:
"Unlike the majority of liberals in the mainstream media and the Democratic Party, conservatives have been telling the truth for many, many years."

To which I replied, "Oh, like how the 2020 election was stolen?"

My reply there was not addressing anything about the mainstream media or the Democratic party. Rather, it was addressing the second half of your sentence where you claimed that conservatives have been telling the truth for many years. I presented an example of a lie spread loudly and widely by a number of conservatives in government and media. An example of a lie by Democrats is not a rebuttal to that; it's irrelevant.

It is not my fault that you are dismissing it.

It's your fault for not understanding what I was talking about.

 

[Say it aint so]

Maybe not . Is treason to be considered an official act by a sitting President? Treason should be handled by a military tribunal. The Supreme Court would have no say in that matter.BTW Obama is not a good guy!

 

[Fantine]

Maybe not . Is treason to be considered an official act by a sitting President? Treason should be handled by a military tribunal. The Supreme Court would have no say in that matter.BTW Obama is not a good guy!

So you are acknowledging the 1/6 insurrection was treason? I agree.

 

[iluvatar5150]

So you are acknowledging the 1/6 insurrection was treason? I agree.

No, he thinks we were all lied to about what happened that day.

 

[rambot]

Unlike the majority of liberals in the mainstream media and the Democratic Party, conservatives have been telling the truth for many, many years.

I thank you for repeating my point but it isn't necessary.

 

[Vambram]

No, you didn't.

Your original claim was:
"Unlike the majority of liberals in the mainstream media and the Democratic Party, conservatives have been telling the truth for many, many years."

To which I replied, "Oh, like how the 2020 election was stolen?"

My reply there was not addressing anything about the mainstream media or the Democratic party. Rather, it was addressing the second half of your sentence where you claimed that conservatives have been telling the truth for many years. I presented an example of a lie spread loudly and widely by a number of conservatives in government and media. An example of a lie by Democrats is not a rebuttal to that; it's irrelevant.


It's your fault for not understanding what I was talking about.

I'm completely understanding what you are writing. But what is indeed relevant are the lies from the Democratic Party and the mainstream liberal media and also the real attacks and attempts by the Obama administration upon the presidency of Donald Trump. Those attacks were all based upon lies. Just like the lies foisted upon the American people about Joe Biden and his administration by the media and the Democratic Party.

 

[iluvatar5150]

I'm completely understanding what you are writing.

So you're just dodging my point then?

 

[Say it aint so]

I'm completely understanding what you are writing. But what is indeed relevant are the lies from the Democratic Party and the mainstream liberal media and also the real attacks and attempts by the Obama administration upon the presidency of Donald Trump. Those attacks were all based upon lies. Just like the lies foisted upon the American people about Joe Biden and his administration by the media and the Democratic Party.

Mmmm.....no. The US literally had countries they shared intel with raising the flag about Trump. So you're the US. What do you do? Ignore it and do as you do and dismiss it as lies. Or do you look into it and once you do you find Trump officials lying about their dealings with Russians. Then followed on with way too many Trump officials having interactions with Russians. What do you do? Ignore it and do as you do and dismiss it as lies. Or do you look into it?

 

[Postvieww]

So you are acknowledging the 1/6 insurrection was treason? I agree.

There was no insurrection on Jan 6. Just wait until it all comes out then we will be having a very different conversation.

 

[iluvatar5150]

There was no insurrection on Jan 6. Just wait until it all comes out then we will be having a very different conversation.

lol okay. When is it all going to come out? The same time as Trump’s tax returns, his infrastructure plan, his Obamacare replacement, and Epstein’s client list?

 

[Desk trauma]

lol okay. When is it all going to come out? The same time as Trump’s tax returns and Epstein’s client list?

The perpetual two weeks.

 

[FenderTL5]

The perpetual two weeks.

Ha! Yes, a GOP chronological oddity, 2 weeks from everything.

(with acknowledgmnt to Oh Brother Where Art Thou)