• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Icons of Evolution

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
8,721
4,386
82
Goldsboro NC
✟262,180.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Oh, so tell me, how do you know that every kind of organism that ever existed left fossilised remains and is represented in the fossil record?
We can't know that. Science is based on inductive logic, not deductive logic. We can't even know that we've found all the fossils. Even so, we do know that some creatures are so constructed that they are unlikely to be fossilized.
And how do you know that those organisms existed only in the time periods apparent in the fossil record?
We don't. All we know about are the fossils we actually find.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,773
52,551
Guam
✟5,134,846.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The Book of Common Prayer is not Scripture, but it contains scriptural passages to be read during religious services. An Anglican must take them seriously as the Word of God, but not necessarily literally.

If a person doesn't believe the Bible, then he wouldn't believe the BCP either -- right?
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
8,721
4,386
82
Goldsboro NC
✟262,180.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Which I thought wasn't allowed here.
Still, it goes on. But it really is off topic here and we needn't belabor it. The bottom line is that we need not tolerate accusations of apostasy based on our rejection of the literal inerrancy of Scripture.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,773
52,551
Guam
✟5,134,846.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It's a conundrum. A person who believed the Bible could not possibly believe the BCP.

Okay.

One more question, please; then I'll drop it.

Can a person believe the BCP, but not the Bible?
 
Upvote 0

River Jordan

Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2024
741
296
37
Pacific NW
✟26,319.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Still, it goes on.
That's too bad, because it was one of the main reasons I joined here. The last time I joined a Christian forum and tried to defend my profession and coworkers from the fundamentalists, I was accused of some of the worst things a Christian can be accused of. It was constant and awful, and I vowed not to do it again.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
8,721
4,386
82
Goldsboro NC
✟262,180.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
That's too bad, because it was one of the main reasons I joined here. The last time I joined a Christian forum and tried to defend my profession and coworkers from the fundamentalists, I was accused of some of the worst things a Christian can be accused of. It was constant and awful, and I vowed not to do it again.
No, the situation is reasonably well moderated by forum staff. And we have a decent "gotcha" if we care to use it. Some of these fundamentalists have begun to show open scorn for the Nicene Creed as a statement of the Christian faith.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: River Jordan
Upvote 0

Buzzard3

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2022
1,526
229
64
Forster
✟52,601.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Liberals
If it is, it is up to someone (you, someone else?) to demonstrate that to be the case, until then what is proposed w/o evidence can be dismissed.
What terrible logic.
 
Upvote 0

Buzzard3

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2022
1,526
229
64
Forster
✟52,601.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Liberals
We can't know that. Science is based on inductive logic, not deductive logic. We can't even know that we've found all the fossils. Even so, we do know that some creatures are so constructed that they are unlikely to be fossilized.

We don't. All we know about are the fossils we actually find.
Agreed.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

On August Recess
Mar 11, 2017
21,824
16,447
55
USA
✟413,847.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
What terrible logic.
You are claiming something with a large bunch of evidence supporting it might just not be true (because of something not known yet? It was not clear). If you want to refute it you need to do the work to demonstrate it is wrong. Just saying you disagree is not an argument.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
8,721
4,386
82
Goldsboro NC
✟262,180.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Okay.

One more question, please; then I'll drop it.

Can a person believe the BCP, but not the Bible?
Yes, that was my point. If you are an Anglican you believe the BCP is the proper liturgy to use for divine services. It is not really about doctrine. Elizabeth took over the Church of England from her father Henry who had just created it as the established church it and was faced with a problem. This was during the Reformation period and as you know there were many different ideas floating around about what Christianity should be and there was much contention about it. What she said boiled down to "I don't care what you believe but if you are going to run a church service in my country you must use this service book." That's why it is called the Book of Common Prayer, because everybody had to use it. In the event, it was beautifully written and has the same literary quality which endears us both to the KJV. Consequently, what you think about the scriptural passages in it is up to you, but an Anglican need not take them literally (i.e. "believe the Bible.")
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

River Jordan

Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2024
741
296
37
Pacific NW
✟26,319.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Upvote 0

Shemjaza

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2006
6,473
4,011
47
✟1,117,896.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
Oh, so tell me, how do you know that every kind of organism that ever existed left fossilised remains and is represented in the fossil record?

And how do you know that those organisms existed only in the time periods apparent in the fossil record?

We can't and we don't have to.

Accepting things because you have evidence for them is logical.
Making inferences, based on demonstrable patterns and principles is logical.


If it is, it is up to someone (you, someone else?) to demonstrate that to be the case, until then what is proposed w/o evidence can be dismissed.
What terrible logic.

You keep referencing logic and rationality, but your usage seems to be counter to any normal accepted version... can you please how you interpret these ideas?
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,167
7,485
31
Wales
✟426,840.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Did I say they were?

If you didn't, then you wouldn't have titled the thread "Icons of Evolution", which heavily implies if not outright says that these are evolution's icons.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,773
52,551
Guam
✟5,134,846.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0