- Oct 12, 2020
- 8,335
- 2,776
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
That doesn't help at all. Try again. You're not addressing what I said here.Perhaps a legal example would help:
Suppose an invalid borrowed money from you on the promise that he would repay you from his father's inheritance at his father's death.
The invalid has contracted a just debt, which he is responsible to pay.
But suppose when the invalid comes into the inheritance, a con artist cons him out of the whole inheritance before his debt is paid, and the con artist is no where to be found. The invalid is still responsible for his just debt, although he is unable to pay.
The principle here is that responsibility to pay is not based in ability to pay, but in what is justly owed.
The same is true spiritually. Responsibility to obey God is not based on man's ability to pay God, but on what man justly owes God.
God is the center of the universe, not man (Isa 45:9, Jer 18:6). He has a right to obedience from man (Lk 17:10) and, therefore, obedience is justly owed to him. Man's impotency does not release him from that just debt, because man's responsibility does not issue from his ability to pay, but from what he justly owes God.
I don't believe you are making any effort at all to see my point. You say people can't choose whether to glorify God and be thankful to Him or not? Why is it that no one has any excuse not to do so then (Romans 1:18-21)? That makes no sense. If someone is not able to do so, then that would be a great excuse for not doing so.They can't choose either one, but that impotency does not remove the obligation of their just debt to do so.
Upvote
0