• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Would you marry a woman who was a former stripper or X-rated star if she turned into a Christian ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
22,293
18,874
USA
✟1,066,911.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Why shouldn't we generalize or normalize the idea of married women having and bearing children? Are you suggesting we should normalize infertility and make that the default standard of society? Why didn't Christians have this standard until modernity?

Why would we normalize infertility? How did you reach that conclusion based on my comment? My position isn’t a reflection of modernity. What you do in your marriage is none of my business as long as it isn’t illegal or unbiblical. I have no interest in standardizing your life or anyone else’s. That’s for you and your wife to decide.

~bella
 
Upvote 0

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
22,293
18,874
USA
✟1,066,911.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
That’s true. I just meant from a Christian perspective, children usually follow a marriage. Unfortunately the cost of living in most places is horrible.

There are many christians in that boat who would love to be otherwise. We have to make allowances in light of our circumstances. And we shouldn’t assume everyone is okay.

~bella
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
34,326
19,959
29
Nebraska
✟711,171.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
34,326
19,959
29
Nebraska
✟711,171.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
There are many christians in that boat who would love to be otherwise. We have to make allowances in light of our circumstances. And we shouldn’t assume everyone is okay.

~bella
Absolutely! It’s not black and white! Especially considering our economy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bèlla
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,753
4,672
✟352,903.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
That submission is mutual, compassionate, not abused by one or the other, and part of a balanced relationship of respect. It’s not a decree that one commands the other and the other obeys blindly.
Where does Saint Paul say the submission is mutual? He says wives submit to your husbands. This is headship and he nowhere implies men are to submit to their wives. Granted he doesn't say for husbands to abuse this privledge but you're attempting to read egalitarianism into a text where there is simply none. Christ is the head of man and man is the head of woman. This is hierarchal and something you suggested earlier which is wrong. You clearly think Saint Paul was wrong.
Be shocked, but my answer is the same this time as it was last time and will be the next time. The fact you want to talk about it so frequently is just odd. Literally every discussion is you hijacking the discussion to ask me about submission.
I am merely challenging your notion that there are things we can learn from modern relationships. You want to say we can learn egalitarianism from secular Atheists and abandon traditional Christian notions of marriage. This is entirely relevant.
Do I submit like I think the Bible asks? Yes. Do I submit like you think the Bible demands? No.

Well no, you don't submit like the bible asks. You submit according to your own egalitarian and modern feminist notions of equality. The bible does not teach this.

No, it’s what you think the Bible or Christian view is. However, your interpretation is an outlier interpretation. Since I’m a Christian, not a follower of you, your interpretation of the Bible doesn’t particularly matter to me.
My view is the historic view. You are representing the modern progressive view which you say we ought embrace over practices 2000 years old.
Most people interpret that passage very differently than you do, and not in a way that states that women giving birth is what “saves” them. Belief in God saves you. Having children does not impact it one way or the other.
Most people historically have not interpreted these verses differently. Only in modernity have been tried to force egalitarianism on to Saint Paul. (staff edit)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
22,293
18,874
USA
✟1,066,911.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Absolutely! It’s not black and white! Especially considering our economy.

Exactly, and it’s a sensitive subject for many. Thank you for understanding. :yellowheart:

~bella
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,753
4,672
✟352,903.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Why would we normalize infertility? How did you reach that conclusion based on my comment? My position isn’t a reflection of modernity. What you do in your marriage is none of my business as long as it isn’t illegal or unbiblical. I have no interest in standardizing your life or anyone else’s. That’s for you and your wife to decide.

~bella
As Christians we do have standards. Are you suggesting that it should not be a Christian standard to expect fertility and couples having children? You are making the assumption that having children doesn't matter and I maintain that this is at odds with what Christians have historically always done and expected. There has always been an expectation of fertility and that is the point of marriage. To continue on the human race.

This doesn't erase the value of women who can't have children but we cannot pretend equality here between the fertile and infertile. The norm is to be fruitful and multiply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
34,326
19,959
29
Nebraska
✟711,171.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Exactly, and it’s a sensitive subject for many. Thank you for understanding. :yellowheart:

~bella
You bet, my sister in Christ
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
34,326
19,959
29
Nebraska
✟711,171.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
As Christians we do have standards. Are you suggesting that it should not be a Christian standard to expect fertility and couples having children? You are making the assumption that having children doesn't matter and I maintain that this is at odds with what Christians have historically always done and expected. There has always been an expectation of fertility and that is the point of marriage. To continue on the human race.

This doesn't erase the value of women who can't have children but we cannot pretend equality here between the fertile and infertile. The norm is to be fruitful and multiply.
Amen! It’s been that way since the Garden of Eden. And people are expected to control their passions in a relationship per the writings of St. Paul. :)
 
Upvote 0

DragonFox91

Well-Known Member
Dec 20, 2020
6,127
3,728
33
Grand Rapids MI
✟272,802.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I don't think I'd have much in common w/ a person like that.

John says Jesus gave a woman who had slept w/ 7 different people eternal life. He doesn't hold it against her.

Jesus doesn't have the attitude of today's Purity Culture that Christians are promised 'their first' (tho he does stress purity)
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
34,326
19,959
29
Nebraska
✟711,171.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
I don't think I'd have much in common w/ a person like that.

John says Jesus gave a woman who had slept w/ 7 different people eternal life. He didn't hold it against her.

Jesus doesn't have the attitude of today's Purity Culture that Christians are promised 'their first'.
Are you referring to the woman at the well in John 4? The Samaritan woman?
 
Upvote 0

DragonFox91

Well-Known Member
Dec 20, 2020
6,127
3,728
33
Grand Rapids MI
✟272,802.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I don't think 'have children so we can continue on the human race' is Biblical. John says God could raise up the children of Abraham w/ stones. There are a lot of good reasons to have children. I don't think that's one of them.

Are you referring to the woman at the well in John 4? The Samaritan woman?
Yes, sir.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,753
4,672
✟352,903.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I don't think I'd have much in common w/ a person like that.

John says Jesus gave a woman who had slept w/ 7 different people eternal life. He doesn't hold it against her.

Jesus doesn't have the attitude of today's Purity Culture that Christians are promised 'their first' (tho he does stress purity)
There's a difference between marrying a woman and her being offered salvation for her sins. Just because someone has been forgiven doesn't mean they are entitled to marriage especially to a good man who waited.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
34,326
19,959
29
Nebraska
✟711,171.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
I don't think 'have children so we can continue on the human race' is Biblical. John says God could raise up the children of Abraham w/ stones. There are a lot of good reasons to have children. I don't think that's one of them.


Yes, sir.
Genesis 1:26-28. It most definitely is.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,753
4,672
✟352,903.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I don't think 'have children so we can continue on the human race' is Biblical. John says God could raise up the children of Abraham w/ stones.
So you're okay with human beings ceasing to exist?
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
41,879
22,526
US
✟1,709,333.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Are you saying we should use the exceptions within marriage as a standard and rule for what is good? Did God design marriage as an institution to be childfree predominately or result in children? Nothing I have said besmirches women who haven't had children but we cannot use them as the standard for most women to follow lest the human race perish.
Paul made a specific point to instruct that marriages that were childfree for the sake of promoting the gospel were just as acceptable as celibacy for the sake of promoting the gospel.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
34,326
19,959
29
Nebraska
✟711,171.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Paul made a specific point to instruct that marriages that were childfree for the sake of promoting the gospel were just as acceptable as celibacy for the sake of promoting the gospel.
He also said celibacy was better than marriage if one can live that way, because Paul was a celibate man, as was Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

DragonFox91

Well-Known Member
Dec 20, 2020
6,127
3,728
33
Grand Rapids MI
✟272,802.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Genesis 1:26-28. It most definitely is.
It doesn't say that. It says multiply It doesn't say continue on the human race.

Paul made a specific point to instruct that marriages that were childfree for the sake of promoting the gospel were just as acceptable as celibacy for the sake of promoting the gospel.
Where's it say that? Pardon my ignorance.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
8,753
4,672
✟352,903.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Paul made a specific point to instruct that marriages that were childfree for the sake of promoting the gospel were just as acceptable as celibacy for the sake of promoting the gospel.
So should we suggest celibate and infertile marriages? Take in mind Paul didn't have modern birth control in mind and he understood our nature will ultimately compel us to want to have sex within marriage which would lead to children.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.