• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The One Big Beautiful Bill

Akita Suggagaki

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2018
9,711
6,966
70
Midwest
✟358,339.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

CHA Opposes H.R.1, The One Big Beautiful Bill​

"H.R. 1 would harm critical health and social safety-net programs that millions of Americans rely on to live with health, dignity, and security.

 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
7,450
5,418
60
Saint James, Missouri
✟324,738.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

The bill seeks to permanently extend Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) while also implementing newer Trump campaign promises like eliminating taxes on tips and overtime pay, and giving senior citizens a higher tax deduction for a period of four years.
The legislation also included new funding for the border and defense, including more money for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations and $25 billion to kick-start construction of a "Golden Dome" defense system over the U.S.

Cuts include new work requirements for able-bodied Medicaid recipients, as well as putting more of the cost-sharing burden on states that took advantage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s expanded Medicaid enrollment by giving illegal immigrants access to the healthcare program.

The legislation would also roll back a host of green energy tax credits awarded in former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) – which Trump vowed to repeal in its entirety on the campaign trail.

It also would cut the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by roughly 20% by introducing some cost-sharing burdens on the states and increasing the amount of able-bodied Americans facing work requirements to be eligible for food stamps.

All House Democrats rejected the bill, accusing Republicans of disproportionately favoring the wealthy at the expense of critical programs for working Americans. Republicans, on the other hand, have contended that they are preserving tax cuts that prevent a 22% tax increase on Americans next year if TCJA was allowed to expire, as well as streamlining programs like Medicaid and SNAP for vulnerable Americans who need it most.

Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, chair of the House's 189 member-strong Republican Study Committee, told Fox News Digital, "This transformational legislation permanently extends President Trump's historic tax cuts, provides unprecedented funding for border security, and obliterates the last four years of catastrophic Democratic policies."

And while most GOP lawmakers united on the final bill, divisions appeared to persist until the final moments. Conservatives had pushed for more aggressive targeting of Medicaid waste and Biden green energy subsidies, while blue state Republicans pushed for tax relief for Americans in high-cost-of-living areas.

To resolve outstanding differences, House Republican leaders released a list of eleventh-hour changes to President Donald Trump's "one big, beautiful bill," hours before their full chamber is expected to consider the legislation.
New provisions in the bill include a ban on federal funding for transgender adults' medical care, and $12 billion in new funding to reimburse states for money they spent countering the former Biden administration's border policies.
A key request from fiscal conservatives was also honored, with House GOP leaders apparently agreeing to speed up the implementation of work requirements for certain able-bodied recipients of Medicaid.
The legislative update also included a victory for blue state Republicans who have been pushing for a higher state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap – the current $10,000 cap would be quadrupled to roughly $40,000, but only for people making less than $500,000 per year. The $10,000 cap was first instituted in TCJA.

"This is what real leadership looks like. President Trump and House Republicans made a promise to the American people to secure our border, protect seniors, cut taxes on tips and overtime, and shut off the spigot of benefits for illegal immigrants," first-term Rep. Mike Haridopolos, R-Fla., told Fox News Digital.
 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
7,450
5,418
60
Saint James, Missouri
✟324,738.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The House of Representatives passed the most critical bill of Trump’s legislative agenda earlier this morning.

The vote was 215-214. Two Republicans, Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Warren Davidson of Ohio, voted no, along with all the Democrats.

One Republican, Rep. Andrew Garbarino of New York, fell ASLEEP and missed the vote. He would have voted yes on the bill.
“He fell asleep in the back, no kidding,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters following the vote.
“I’m going to just strangle him,” Johnson jokingly added. “But he’s my dear friend.”

One other GOPer, David Schweikert of Arizona, arrived late to the House Chamber, and the vote closed before his vote could be counted. He would have voted yes on the bill as well.

 
Upvote 0

SimplyMe

Senior Veteran
Jul 19, 2003
10,501
10,276
the Great Basin
✟385,991.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Inheritance has already been taxed. Why does the government get to double dip?

This logic bothers me. The company you (or at least most people) work for has already paid taxes on the money they use to pay a salary. By this logic, income taxes should also be abolished because it is a "double dip." Almost all taxes are some form of "double dip."

I'm not saying that we should have inheritance taxes, or at least that there should be a few million dollar ceiling before taxes are collected, just saying that reasoning for getting rid of an inheritance tax isn't very strong.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
7,038
3,562
82
Goldsboro NC
✟243,848.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
This logic bothers me. The company you (or at least most people) work for has already paid taxes on the money they use to pay a salary. By this logic, income taxes should also be abolished because it is a "double dip." Almost all taxes are some form of "double dip."

I'm not saying that we should have inheritance taxes, or at least that there should be a few million dollar ceiling before taxes are collected, just saying that reasoning for getting rid of an inheritance tax isn't very strong.
They're the same reasons they've always been: A clownish attempt to convince people that "they hurt the little guy more."
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
22,601
15,253
72
Bondi
✟358,517.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
The most tax you would pay then is twenty percent capital gains.
Any political party that suggested anything like that in Australia would be voted out of office at the first opportunity.
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
15,588
7,253
61
Montgomery
✟241,950.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
They're the same reasons they've always been: A clownish attempt to convince people that "they hurt the little guy more."
The threshold is $14 million and tax is only paid on anything above that amount so they don't hurt the little guy as much as the wealthy.
But all of y'all seem to want to pay more taxes, I would be happy to let you pay mine
 
Upvote 0

Beth77

Active Member
May 11, 2025
239
106
47
Oaxaca
✟3,666.00
Country
Mexico
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
1000028976.jpg
 
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
6,533
4,525
NW
✟243,135.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Inheritance has already been taxed. Why does the government get to double dip?
Conservatives believe that people should earn their money, and not have it handed to them. Conservatives oppose Inherited money.
 
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
6,533
4,525
NW
✟243,135.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Based on remarks like this I don't believe that honest discussion is possible with you.
Based on the false claims in your recent post that I pointed out, I was thinking that the feeling is mutual.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
22,601
15,253
72
Bondi
✟358,517.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Some screenshot of something....
Here's a tip. If you want to persuade people that your point of view is worth the bandwidth then it would be a good idea to put forward your point of view rather than screen shots of random comments by random people that take up the whole page and which I am pretty sure no-one reads.
 
Upvote 0

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
9,449
3,607
Massachusetts
✟159,502.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Conservatives believe that people should earn their money, and not have it handed to them. Conservatives oppose Inherited money.
Unless, of course, they're the ones who inherit it. That's okay.

-- A2SG, for....reasons.....
 
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
2,867
1,847
traveling Asia
✟125,398.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Any political party that suggested anything like that in Australia would be voted out of office at the first opportunity.
Yes, in the USA you can earn billions from investments and have no job and the most tax you will pay is 20%. That though is about the same rate of federal tax paid for a single person making 250,000. So taxes in general are pretty low in the USA, hence the high debt levels.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
22,601
15,253
72
Bondi
✟358,517.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Yes, in the USA you can earn billions from investments..
I'm not arguing for no tax on investments. As I said earlier, if we leave our house to our children, no-one pays any tax. But if they hold onto the property as an investment and it increases in value then the increase in value is taxed.

I've no problem with that.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Belk
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
2,867
1,847
traveling Asia
✟125,398.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I'm not arguing for no tax on investments. As I said earlier, if we leave our house to our children, no-one pays any tax. But if they hold onto the property as an investment and it increases in value then the increase in value is taxed.

I've no problem with that.
 
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
2,867
1,847
traveling Asia
✟125,398.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I was suggesting that the taxes in the USA are rather light given the budget concerns. I would never suggest to tax a family out of a house especially upon death. If the home was an investment though it should not get much preference over other stuff.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Belk
Upvote 0