Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Its not splitting hairs.If you want to split hair like that, alright then
Its not splitting hairs.
they were filled with wrath because Jesus indirectly told them: there was not one righteous person in the time of elisha. except a syrian!If all his listeners understood Luke 4:27 as only applying to the time of Elisha, they won't be wrathful enough at Jesus to want to throw him off the cliff.
And since the OLD COVENANT is over , I believe that MARK 16:17 and I believe that will happen in theI can see your points. A good teaching that takes a different perspective I read is here. Divine Healing: Is It In The Atonement? | Moody Church Media | Articles | Moody Church Media
Here is a decent Assembly of God article on relating healing to the atonement. file:///C:/Users/Erin/Downloads/HealingandAtonement.pdf
Some too look at healing in communion.
I won't say that things are perfectly clear. I can see how some might take one side or the other on this. However, when i look at the great healing ministers of the past. Nearly all taught God not only had the ability to heal and that he was willing to heal. Sure some went away sick at their meetings, but many were healed as well. Healing may not be instant but it is included. Jehovah Rapha's name is still the same today as it was back then. So I would still look at a lack of healing as being something on our end. However, if one has decided that it is for God's glory, such as Corrie Ten Boom, then Amen for that person.
It seems in context he is talking to his disciples but then he goes on to say "them that believe." But if I may ask how does that jump to the tribulation? It should be noted too that some believe Mark 16 ends at verse 8, since many earlier manuscripts of Mark end there. Should Mark 16:9-20 be in the Bible? | GotQuestions.orgAnd since the OLD COVENANT is over , I believe that MARK 16:17 and I believe that will happen in the
GREAT TRIBULATION .
dan p
Im still wondering how a person who doesnt believe any leppers were cured between elijah and Jesus could argue the old covenant for israel was better than the new for us.. and i suppose by deffinition such a person would not believe the old covenant is over. (at least for the jews... hmm.. they cured leprosy.. through vaccines? no more curses?"And since the OLD COVENANT is over , I believe that MARK 16:17 and I believe that will happen in the
GREAT TRIBULATION .
dan p
But if I may ask how does that jump to the tribulation?
Since no one could follow the law it was a mere tutor to show your need for Jesus. Salvation comes from the faith in Jesus. For the OT, it was for the coming Messiah, for the NT it is now the past Messiah. The law could not save then and it does not save now. I admit the law now is simpler, but again no one is perfect. Fruits are important but absolute obedience is never required. The man who sinned with his father's wife in immorality. He was turned over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh so that his spirit could be saved. He repented and was restored most think but nonetheless, his salvation was not in doubt. Of course this is an old theological argument and I lean toward a more Arminianism approach and you probably do not. That too might explain differences in our views on healings. By all means elaborate as I do think it is related to the topic of healing.
Yes, I believe we are in agreement on this.The main point that answers your question was
Daniel's 70th week will begin soon for Israel, since the Messiah will be "cut off" in week 69th.
Daniel's prophetic timetable, that the Messiah was cut off/crucified at the end of week 69th, that means Israel has an upcoming 7 years of Tribulation (the 70th week) that can take place anytime starting from Acts 1
That is an interesting interpretation. I am taught it links with the sin unto death. That gross sin may open the door for physical death. This is extremely rare.i tend to think its a euphemism for handing someone over to the roman authorities for punishment.
Since no one could follow the law it was a mere tutor to show your need for Jesus. Salvation comes from the faith in Jesus. For the OT, it was for the coming Messiah, for the NT it is now the past Messiah. The law could not save then and it does not save now.
Yes, I believe we are in agreement on this.
I couldn't understand that verse for a long time and then one day I heard a different interpretation:That is an interesting interpretation. I am taught it links with the sin unto death. That gross sin may open the door for physical death. This is extremely rare.
1 John 5:16-17 (KJV)
16 If any man see his brother sin a sin which is not unto death, he shall ask, and he shall give him life for them that sin not unto death. There is a sin unto death: I do not say that he shall pray for it.
17 All unrighteousness is sin: and there is a sin not unto death.
Ananias, and Sapphira might also attest to this interpretation though one would have to assume they went to heaven.