• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The fascinating reformed theology paradox of Hebrew 6:4-6

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,818.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That seems rather obvious, though it isn't evil to be a goat nor is it good to be a sheep, they are but animals used in a simile. What is evil is to show no compassion to Christ in the poor and needy, and what is good is to show compassion and generosity to Christ in the poor and needy.
And in the Biblical simile, goats are the damned and sheep are the saved.
And so in the Biblical simile, it is evil to be a goat, and salvific to be a sheep.
And goats don't become sheep.

And that salvation is only by faith in the person and atoning work of Jesus Christ (Ro 3:25),
which genuine faith obeys, or it is not genuine saving faith.

What is evil is not to believe in the person and atoning work of Jesus Christ, which is effective for the sheep, not so much for the goats.
 
Last edited:
  • Useful
Reactions: Danthemailman
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,369
2,326
Perth
✟199,904.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
And in the Biblical simile, goats are the damned and sheep are the saved.
And so in the Biblical simile, it is evil to be a goat, and salvific to be a sheep.
And salvation is only by faith in the person and atoning work of Jesus Christ (Ro 3:25),
which genuine faith obeys, or it is not genuine saving faith.

Jesus came for his sheep, not the goats.
then pray for 4 legs, no hands, wool, and horns.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,818.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The passage is about individuals, not nations because only the unbelieving Jews were cut off and blinded, not all Jews.
Actually Paul refers to it as a national cutting off, with only a remnant being saved.
Paul is writing to both Jews and Gentiles in Rome in that epistle. There were still Jews joining the church after Christ’s ministry and there always has been Jews converting to Christianity. Furthermore God isn’t going to cut off all Gentiles for being arrogant, He will only cut off the individuals who are arrogant. So the cutting off and grafting in isn’t about the nations, it’s about individuals within each nation.
All mankind is born cut off, by nature objects of wrath (Eph 2:3).

Only those in Christ are grafted in.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,376
Dallas
✟1,087,415.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Professing Christians, who are Gentiles, are corporately in outward covenant with Christ so, it would appear that Romans 11 is speaking about the question of collective ecclesiology and not individual soteriology. I see the warning to this collective body, which is corporately joined to Christ and is in a covenant relationship, but how could this mean that every individual in it is in saving union with Christ? Hence the "cut off." Union with Christ applies to the elect, and only for the elect are, "the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable." (verse 29) But since non-elect covenant members are mixed in, Christ clearly appears to have non-elect branches, like Judas Iscariot (John 15:1-8) and while they may be joined outwardly in covenant with Christ, since they have professed faith in Jesus, the faith of some of them is spurious because they were never truly saved to begin with, even though they were among genuine believers. (1 John 2:19)
You should really read what the covenant was between God and the Jews.

“Then Moses came and recounted to the people all the words of the Lord and all the ordinances; and all the people answered with one voice and said, “All the words which the Lord has spoken we will do!” Moses wrote down all the words of the Lord. Then he arose early in the morning, and built an altar at the foot of the mountain with twelve pillars for the twelve tribes of Israel. He sent young men of the sons of Israel, and they offered burnt offerings and sacrificed young bulls as peace offerings to the Lord. Moses took half of the blood and put it in basins, and the other half of the blood he sprinkled on the altar. Then he took the book of the covenant and read it in the hearing of the people; and they said, “All that the Lord has spoken we will do, and we will be obedient!” So Moses took the blood and sprinkled it on the people, and said, “Behold the blood of the covenant, which the Lord has made with you in accordance with all these words.””
‭‭Exodus‬ ‭24‬:‭3‬-‭8‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

This was the covenant with the Jews. So not every Jew was saved because not every Jew kept their part of the covenant. Being grafted into the covenant with God didn’t mean that someone was saved, it meant that they were given the opportunity to be saved if they held up their end of the agreement, which no one could keep the covenant that was given to the Jews. That’s why God had to make a new covenant, one which man can actually keep. Unfortunately some still refuse to comply. So being grafted into the covenant doesn’t guarantee salvation but being cut off from it does result in condemnation if the person doesn’t repent and get grafted back into it. A covenant is an agreement, if you fail to keep your part of the agreement it can be nullified, and if you have no agreement with God you have no assurance of salvation, but if you keep your part of the agreement, then you do have an assurance of salvation.

And again you keep quoting 1 John 2:19 out of context. He said “THEY WENT OUT FROM US”. He didn’t say “if anyone goes out from us”. John was talking about a SPECIFIC GROUP OF PEOPLE. The word “THEY” never implies everyone or anyone, it’s always used in reference to a specific group of people. Furthermore the word “WENT” is used in the past tense which is another indication that he’s talking about a specific group of people who at some point in the past left the church. NOTHING IN THAT PASSAGE GIVES ANY INDICATION THAT HE IS REFERRING TO ANYONE IN THE PRESENT OR FUTURE OR ANYONE OTHER THAN WHO HE IS SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO. He said these people left the church because they were not “OF US” and you extrapolate that statement into saying that “if anyone leaves the church they were never of us” when that’s not what he wrote at all. And you also have to make an assumption of what he meant by the words “OF US”. Maybe they were never professing believers, maybe they were Judaizers, maybe they were false professors, maybe they were not sent from the apostles, or maybe they were not of those who persevere and endure to the end. There are really a huge number of possibilities the term “OF US” could mean, not that it really matters because he isn’t talking about anyone in the present or future or anyone other than that specific group of people. And on top of all that the way you’re applying that passage directly contradicts James 5:19-20. There are so many problems with your usage of that passage. You’re adding to it things that John never said, there’s no was of defining what he meant by “of us”, you’re ignoring who the passage refers to and when it referred to them, and your interpretation of the passage directly contradicts what James wrote. James’ statement is very clear about who he is referring to. His statement cannot refer to anyone other than a true believer because only a true believer’s soul can be saved from death by turning BACK from apostasy. NO ONE ELSE CAN POSSIBLY BE SAVED BY TURNING BACK. And it’s not a reference to a physical death because EVERYONE DIES PERIOD. It doesn’t matter if they’re a believer or not EVERYBODY DIES A PHYSICAL DEATH. The only death anyone can be saved from is a spiritual death and that can ONLY HAPPEN IF SOMEONE BELIEVES IN CHRIST. What James wrote in James 5:19-20 can only refer to one specific group of people and your usage of 1 John 2:19 directly contradicts what James wrote in those verses.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,376
Dallas
✟1,087,415.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Actually Paul refers to it as a national cutting off, with only a remnant being saved.

All mankind is born cut off, by nature objects of wrath (Eph 2:3).

Only those in Christ are grafted in.
Ephesians 2:3 says absolutely nothing about God’s covenant. You’re a Calvinist, your theology restricts you from even being able to comprehend the idea of what a covenant actually is. In your theology there is no covenant, there’s only election and that’s it. The concept of a legal agreement with God completely alludes Calvinists.
 
Upvote 0

Eternally Grateful

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2018
1,060
322
60
Columbus, Ohio
✟50,728.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Actually Paul refers to it as a national cutting off, with only a remnant being saved.

All mankind is born cut off, by nature objects of wrath (Eph 2:3).

Only those in Christ are grafted in.
romans 11 is about national Israel. Gentiles are not included.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,818.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Ephesians 2:3 says absolutely nothing about God’s covenant. You’re a Calvinist, your theology restricts you from even being able to comprehend the idea of what a covenant actually is. In your theology there is no covenant, there’s only election and that’s it. The concept of a legal agreement with God completely alludes Calvinists.
I don't know about you, but I have a new covenant in my Bible.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,818.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
romans 11 is about national Israel. Gentiles are not included.
Seems you are unfamiliar with the one olive tree of God's people, from which unbelieving Israel has been cut off and believing Gentiles are grafted in (Ro 11:17-23).
 
Upvote 0

armchairscholar

Active Member
Jun 18, 2024
62
51
51
Berlin
✟18,455.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Every believes physically dies but some physically die prematurely based on their actions. 1 Corinthians 11:29 - For he who eats and drinks, eats and drinks judgment to himself if he does not judge the body rightly. 30 For this reason many among you are weak and sick, and a number sleep. 31 But if we judged ourselves rightly, we would not be judged. 32 But when we are judged, we are disciplined by the Lord so that we will not be condemned along with the world.

Paul knows that the judgment of God can take on the form of physical illness and even physical death. The word "sleep" when referring to death, refers to the physical death of believers, not spiritual death or soul sleep. (John 11:11-12; Acts 7:60; 1 Corinthians 15:6,18,20,51; 1 Thessalonians 4:13-15; 2 Peter 3:4)

1 John 5:16 - If anyone sees his brother sinning a sin which does not lead to death, he will ask, and He will give him life for those who commit sin not leading to death. Is this referring to physical death or spiritual death?

Some people jump to the conclusion that John is talking about believers committing certain sins that lead them to spiritual death (loss of salvation) but that does not seem to fit the context. 1 John 5:16 - If anyone sees his brother sinning a sin which does not lead to death, he will ask, and He will give him life for those who commit sin not leading to death. There is sin leading to death. I do not say that he should pray about that. 17 All unrighteousness is sin, and there is sin not leading to death. 18 We know that whoever is born of God does not sin; but he who has been born of God keeps himself, and the wicked one does not touch him.

1 John 5:18 (AMPC) - We know [absolutely] that anyone born of God does not [deliberately and knowingly] practice committing sin, but the One Who was begotten of God carefully watches over and protects him [Christ’s divine presence within him preserves him against the evil], and the wicked one does not lay hold (get a grip) on him or touch [him].
I find this discussion fascinating. The interpretation of "death" in these passages has been debated for centuries. From my own studies, I've seen that early Christian communities often understood these warnings about death on multiple levels - both physical and spiritual.

Looking at James and the other passages mentioned, they're using death imagery to communicate complex ideas about consequences. Think of it like a parent warning a child about "killing their future" through bad choices - it's both metaphorical and can have real physical implications.

The Corinthians passage is particularly interesting because it shows early Christians recognized a connection between spiritual and physical wellbeing - something we're still exploring in modern psychology through studies on religious coping and health outcomes.

These texts seem to reflect a sophisticated understanding of how behavior, beliefs, and physical/spiritual consequences all intertwine. The early church wasn't making simple either/or distinctions between physical and spiritual death - they saw them as connected.

Just my two cents based on both historical context and psychological patterns I've observed. What do you all think?
 
Upvote 0

Eternally Grateful

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2018
1,060
322
60
Columbus, Ohio
✟50,728.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Seems you are unfamiliar with the one olive tree of God's people, from which unbelieving Israel has been cut off and believing Gentiles are grafted in (Ro 11:17-23).
I am completely familiar

they are the natural branches. we are the unnatural branches.

don't boast.. (pauls reasoning for the whole chapter) Its all about Israel
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,376
Dallas
✟1,087,415.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I don't know about you, but I have a new covenant in my Bible.
I don’t even know how a covenant works in Calvinist theology according to their interpretation of “not according to he who wills or he who runs”. In Calvinism a covenant is completely useless and irrelevant.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,376
Dallas
✟1,087,415.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I find this discussion fascinating. The interpretation of "death" in these passages has been debated for centuries. From my own studies, I've seen that early Christian communities often understood these warnings about death on multiple levels - both physical and spiritual.

Looking at James and the other passages mentioned, they're using death imagery to communicate complex ideas about consequences. Think of it like a parent warning a child about "killing their future" through bad choices - it's both metaphorical and can have real physical implications.

The Corinthians passage is particularly interesting because it shows early Christians recognized a connection between spiritual and physical wellbeing - something we're still exploring in modern psychology through studies on religious coping and health outcomes.

These texts seem to reflect a sophisticated understanding of how behavior, beliefs, and physical/spiritual consequences all intertwine. The early church wasn't making simple either/or distinctions between physical and spiritual death - they saw them as connected.

Just my two cents based on both historical context and psychological patterns I've observed. What do you all think?
If you’re taking historical context into consideration I would expect that you’re probably aware that none of the early church writers taught eternal security.
 
Upvote 0

Danthemailman

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2017
4,083
3,102
Midwest
✟373,381.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You should really read what the covenant was between God and the Jews.

“Then Moses came and recounted to the people all the words of the Lord and all the ordinances; and all the people answered with one voice and said, “All the words which the Lord has spoken we will do!” Moses wrote down all the words of the Lord. Then he arose early in the morning, and built an altar at the foot of the mountain with twelve pillars for the twelve tribes of Israel. He sent young men of the sons of Israel, and they offered burnt offerings and sacrificed young bulls as peace offerings to the Lord. Moses took half of the blood and put it in basins, and the other half of the blood he sprinkled on the altar. Then he took the book of the covenant and read it in the hearing of the people; and they said, “All that the Lord has spoken we will do, and we will be obedient!” So Moses took the blood and sprinkled it on the people, and said, “Behold the blood of the covenant, which the Lord has made with you in accordance with all these words.””
‭‭Exodus‬ ‭24‬:‭3‬-‭8‬ ‭NASB1995‬‬

This was the covenant with the Jews. So not every Jew was saved because not every Jew kept their part of the covenant. Being grafted into the covenant with God didn’t mean that someone was saved, it meant that they were given the opportunity to be saved if they held up their end of the agreement, which no one could keep the covenant that was given to the Jews.
So, you acknowledge that the Israelites were in the olive tree to begin with because they were the "natural branches" and not because they were all saved. Good. Romans 11:1 - I say then, has God cast away His people? Certainly not! For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. 2 God has not cast away His people whom He foreknew .. 24 For if you were cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and were grafted contrary to nature into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these, who are natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree? 25 For I do not desire, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own opinion, that blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. 26 And so all Israel will be saved.. When did this cutting out of the olive tree happen for the "natural branches" (Israelites) happen and when will these "natural branches" be grafted back in and all Israel will be saved? Can you place the timing of these events?
That’s why God had to make a new covenant, one which man can actually keep. Unfortunately, some still refuse to comply. So being grafted into the covenant doesn’t guarantee salvation but being cut off from it does result in condemnation if the person doesn’t repent and get grafted back into it. A covenant is an agreement, if you fail to keep your part of the agreement it can be nullified, and if you have no agreement with God you have no assurance of salvation, but if you keep your part of the agreement, then you do have an assurance of salvation.
The new covenant is a ministry of righteousness that exceeds much more in glory. (2 Corinthians 3:6-9) Assurance of salvation is found only in Christ. (John 1:12; 10:9; 14:6; Acts 10:1-4; Philippians 3:9; 1 John 5:13)
And again you keep quoting 1 John 2:19 out of context. He said “THEY WENT OUT FROM US”. He didn’t say “if anyone goes out from us”. John was talking about a SPECIFIC GROUP OF PEOPLE. The word “THEY” never implies everyone or anyone, it’s always used in reference to a specific group of people. Furthermore the word “WENT” is used in the past tense which is another indication that he’s talking about a specific group of people who at some point in the past left the church. NOTHING IN THAT PASSAGE GIVES ANY INDICATION THAT HE IS REFERRING TO ANYONE IN THE PRESENT OR FUTURE OR ANYONE OTHER THAN WHO HE IS SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO.
Specific group or not, the key here in 1 John 2:19 is - for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us. So, OSAS is true IF you are truly of us (saved) to begin with. (Psalm 37:28; Jude 1:1 - preservation of God) (John 6:39-40 - Jesus loses none) (John 10:27-28 - Jesus' sheep hear his voice, follow Him, He gives them eternal life and they shall never perish or be snatched from His hand) (John 10:26 - in contrast with those who do not believe) (Romans 8:30 - those He justified He also glorified, ALL of them) (Ephesians 1:13-14 - those who believe the gospel are sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promises who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession) (Philippians 1:6 - God finishes what He started)
He said these people left the church because they were not “OF US” and you extrapolate that statement into saying that “if anyone leaves the church they were never of us” when that’s not what he wrote at all. And you also have to make an assumption of what he meant by the words “OF US”. Maybe they were never professing believers, maybe they were Judaizers, maybe they were false professors, maybe they were not sent from the apostles, or maybe they were not of those who persevere and endure to the end. There are really a huge number of possibilities the term “OF US” could mean, not that it really matters because he isn’t talking about anyone in the present or future or anyone other than that specific group of people.
That's a lot of maybe. You need to look no further than, "for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us." That settles it for me.
And on top of all that the way you’re applying that passage directly contradicts James 5:19-20. There are so many problems with your usage of that passage. You’re adding to it things that John never said, there’s no was of defining what he meant by “of us”, you’re ignoring who the passage refers to and when it referred to them, and your interpretation of the passage directly contradicts what James wrote.
I ignored nothing and I properly harmonized Scripture with Scripture before reaching my conclusion. No contradiction with James.
James’ statement is very clear about who he is referring to. His statement cannot refer to anyone other than a true believer because only a true believer’s soul can be saved from death by turning BACK from apostasy. NO ONE ELSE CAN POSSIBLY BE SAVED BY TURNING BACK.
If this wanderer was a true believer, then the death spoken of here is in James 5:20 is physical death. (1 Corinthians 11:29-32; 1 John 5:16)
The only death anyone can be saved from is a spiritual death and that can ONLY HAPPEN IF SOMEONE BELIEVES IN CHRIST.
Not according to Scripture. (1 Corinthians 11:29-32; 1 John 5:16) Be sure to go back and read post #367.
What James wrote in James 5:19-20 can only refer to one specific group of people and your usage of 1 John 2:19 directly contradicts what James wrote in those verses.
Once again, if this wanderer a professing Christian, whose faith is not genuine, or a sinning Christian, who needs to be restored? For the former, the death spoken of in vs. 20 is the "second death" (Revelation 21:8); for the latter, it is physical death. (1 Corinthians 11:29-32; 1 John 5:16) That is in perfect harmony with 1 John 2:19 - for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us.
 
Upvote 0

Eternally Grateful

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2018
1,060
322
60
Columbus, Ohio
✟50,728.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
If you’re taking historical context into consideration I would expect that you’re probably aware that none of the early church writers taught eternal security.
Jesus did..As did paul and John

aren't these not the true early church fathers?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Danthemailman
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
25,846
8,376
Dallas
✟1,087,415.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I did not ignore the context. Especially not verse 10 - I have confidence in you in the Lord that you will adopt no other view [contrary to mine on the matter]; but the one who is disturbing you, whoever he is, will have to bear the penalty. (AMP) Paul would not have confidence in them if they "lost their salvation" and that specific term is found nowhere in the Bible. Again, Paul's harsh words simply drive home the point that justification by the law and justification by faith are incompatible. "You who are seeking to be justified by the law." Was this their final answer? Not according to Paul.
Ok so being severed from Christ and fallen from grace doesn’t mean that they lost their salvation because you require it to be said in a specific terminology? The term “no one can lose their salvation” isn’t written anywhere in the Bible either, and yet you have no problem believing it. You know full well that the word “confident” is an encouraging assurance, not an actual guarantee of anything. So you’re willing to dismiss what Paul specifically said about their current connection to Christ and their reception of grace based on Paul’s assumption, not a guarantee, that they will repent and be saved?
 
Upvote 0

Eternally Grateful

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2018
1,060
322
60
Columbus, Ohio
✟50,728.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Ok so being severed from Christ and fallen from grace doesn’t mean that they lost their salvation because you require it to be said in a specific terminology?
No it means they had salvation in their hands. and let it go and lost the possibility of being saved.
The term “no one can lose their salvation” isn’t written anywhere in the Bible either,
Eternal life. Never die. Live forever. Can never be lost, Will never leave nor forsake us

its all over the word of God.
and yet you have no problem believing it.
Yes. We place faith in Christ. Not self. why is this so bad?
You know full well that the word “confident” is an encouraging assurance, not an actual guarantee of anything. So you’re willing to dismiss what Paul specifically said about their current connection to Christ and their reception of grace based on Paul’s assumption, not a guarantee, that they will repent and be saved?
So they lose eternal life. Fall away, yet even though the word says if we could fall away, we can never be renewed. You have us being saved again?

this does not make sense
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,818.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I am completely familiar

they are the natural branches. we are the unnatural branches.

don't boast.. (pauls reasoning for the whole chapter) Its all about Israel
It's not about natural or unnatural branches, it's about being part of or not part of the tree.

don't boast.. (pauls reasoning for the whole chapter) Its all about Israel
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,102
7,515
North Carolina
✟343,818.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I don’t even know how a covenant works in Calvinist theology according to their interpretation of “not according to he who wills or he who runs”. In Calvinism a covenant is completely useless and irrelevant.
Relevance?

If you're labeling me a "Calvinist," you got it wrong.

I am a Paulist.
 
Upvote 0