Please show me where in Scripture it says that the Angels and Cain and Abel were given the Law as it was given to Moses on Mt. Sinai. I have read the Scriptures, and do not see anywhere that it says that they received the Law until Mt Sinai.
By the way, a lie is a falsehood told while knowing the truth. A person can be mistaken and (if they do not know the truth) not be telling a lie. One should keep that in mind when making accusations as you did here. It is possible that I am mistaken. But as I said, I have not found anywhere in Scripture that it says the Law was given before Mt Sinai.
I continue saying the same thing, the
wages of Sin is Death (Romans 6:23). Cain Killed Abel, if it wasn't a law, not to kill, then it would of been ok to kill. Satan got kick out of heaven because of iniquity (Sin). The lord burned Sodom and Gomorrha because of sin. In (1John 3:4)
Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. Now we have just read the biblical definition of sin, the transgression (breaking) of the law (commandments.) In the days of Abraham there was a high priest, let's go to Genesis 14: 18 And
Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. 19 And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the
most high God, possessor of heaven and earth: We also see the bread and wine didn't start in the new testament, that's old.
Let's take a look at another situation in Genesis 12: 7 And the LORD plagued Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai Abram's wife. 18 And Pharaoh called Abram, and said, What is this that thou hast done unto me? why didst thou not tell me that she was thy wife? 19 Why saidst thou, She is my sister? so I might have taken her to me to wife: now therefore behold thy wife, take her, and go thy way. 20 And Pharaoh commanded his men concerning him: and they sent him away, and his wife, and all that he had. This is thou shall not commit adultery.
You not going to find them written like the ten Commandments, but if you understand God, he not going to allow his creation to have no laws.
No man has ever kept the Law of God perfectly except Jesus. It is impossible for man to keep the Law of God perfectly. So, while we must strive to keep the Law of God, it is not in keeping the Law that our salvation rests. It is in remaining in Christ that our salvation rests. For it is Christ's righteousness that in imputed to us who are in Him in exchange for our unrighteousness.
To repent means to turn from our sinful ways and start obeying God's law. The water baptism signifies the washing away of our past sins. After repenting and being baptized in the name of Jesus it would be foolish for us to turn around and willingly break God's commandments. If we make an honest mistake Jesus can help us, but
if we sin willingly, look out! "...
there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, but a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation..." (Hebrews 10:26-27). When Jesus died only the sacrificial law was done away with, alone with Leviticus priesthood.
Your statement (highlighted in blue above) directly contradicts Scripture. There is no level of keeping of the Law (except 100% perfection) by which we can maintain our position of grace. Any sin, even the smallest violation, makes you a Law breaker (James 2:10). And there is only one punishment given in Scripture for being a Law breaker: death. Yet Jesus took on our punishment of death so that He could give us His righteousness and thus His life, if we are and remain in Him. And we remain in Him, not by keeping the Law, but by walking in the Light. We walk in the Light by keeping the New Covenant commands, not the Old Covenant.
Your opinion has been noted, but since it is contradictory to Scripture it is discarded as irrelevant. The school master to bring us to Christ was not just the sacrificial law, but the entirety of the Law.
Again, there is no distinction in Scripture between these laws and the whole of the Law. You are dividing the Law into pieces that Scripture does not.
The whole of the Law, not just pieces.
It signified the end of the whole law, of which the animal sacrifice was just as part. There is no division here.
But God's commandments under the first covenant are not all the same as the commandments of the second covenant.
And please quit putting your own commentary into the Scriptures. The Law is not just the law of animal sacrifices, but the whole entirety of what was given at Mt Sinai (Gal 4:24).
The law we must keep today is significantly different from the Law of the Old Covenant. You are correct that there are no more sacrifices for sin outside of the blood of Christ. Even under the Old Covenant the blood of animals could not actually take the sin away, but simply postponed the punishment for that sin until Christ's blood could remove it entirely. But the moral law of the Old Covenant are not binding on us today, because the moral law of God to which we are subject is the law of the New Covenant. Only what is stated as binding on us in the New Covenant is binding on us today. And nowhere in the New Covenant is there a command to keep the sabbath, or the dietary laws of the Old Covenant, or the sacrificial system, or the "high holy days" of the Old Covenant, etc. If we must keep any part of the Old Covenant, then we must keep the whole of the Old Covenant, and you just said that the Old Covenant (the first) has ended.
The book say in 2 John 1: 6 And this is love, that
we walk after his commandments. This is the commandment, That, as
ye have heard from the beginning, ye should walk in it.
