DOGE NEWS

[HARK!]

Doge Responds to Cat Lady's Ambitions

MTG wants to use her subcommittee perch to target U.S. funding for foreign wars​

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said she’s planning to use her new perch as chair of a government efficiency oversight subcommittee next Congress to target U.S. funding for foreign wars.


Beginning in the new year, Ms. Greene, Georgia Republican and a top ally of President-elect Donald Trump, will be heading up the Department of Government Efficiency’s subcommittee under the House Oversight and Accountability Committee.

The congressional panel is tasked with helping the DOGE office to identify ways to cut spending and reduce the federal bureaucracy.

MTG wants to use her subcommittee perch to target U.S. funding for foreign wars

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said she’s planning to use her new perch as chair of a government efficiency oversight subcommittee next Congress to target U.S. funding for foreign wars.

www.washingtontimes.com

 

[HARK!]

As Trump Drains the Swamp, Which Alphabet Agencies Should Go First?

 

[HARK!]

Trump could slash deficit $1.4T by reversing these Biden executive actions on day one: report

 

[Fantine]

View attachment 357740

Doge Responds to Cat Lady's Ambitions

MTG wants to use her subcommittee perch to target U.S. funding for foreign wars​

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said she’s planning to use her new perch as chair of a government efficiency oversight subcommittee next Congress to target U.S. funding for foreign wars.


Beginning in the new year, Ms. Greene, Georgia Republican and a top ally of President-elect Donald Trump, will be heading up the Department of Government Efficiency’s subcommittee under the House Oversight and Accountability Committee.

The congressional panel is tasked with helping the DOGE office to identify ways to cut spending and reduce the federal bureaucracy.

MTG wants to use her subcommittee perch to target U.S. funding for foreign wars

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said she’s planning to use her new perch as chair of a government efficiency oversight subcommittee next Congress to target U.S. funding for foreign wars.

www.washingtontimes.com

If she is talking Netanyahu's genocide I will support the issue.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

If she is talking Netanyahu's genocide I will support the issue.

What genocide are you talking about?

 

[Canuckster]

What genocide are you talking about?

The one reported by Canadian doctors who visited Gaza
x.com

 

[Yeshua HaDerekh]

If she is talking Netanyahu's genocide I will support the issue.

Uh huh...

 

[Oompa Loompa]

The one reported by Canadian doctors who visited Gaza
x.com

It is called war when an enemy hides behind civilians. That isn't genocide. Genocide is what hamas intended to do to Israel.

 

[DaisyDay]

It is called war when an enemy hides behind civilians. That isn't genocide. Genocide is what hamas intended to do to Israel.

Genocide is what Israel is doing to Gaza.

The one reported by Canadian doctors who visited Gaza
x.com

As well as every other humanitarian group that has visited Gaza.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

Genocide is what Israel is doing to Gaza.

No it is not.

As well as every other humanitarian group that has visited Gaza.

So? All that means is every other humanitarian group that has visited Gaza is objectively wrong.

 

[HARK!]

Genocide is what Israel is doing to Gaza.

Why does Biden keep funding it, and keep sending more weapons?

 

[Chesterton]

The one reported by Canadian doctors who visited Gaza
x.com

Genocide is a legal matter, not a medical issue.

 

[Yeshua HaDerekh]

Genocide is what Israel is doing to Gaza.

Killing Hamas is not genocide...do you even know the definition? The Gazan civilians HATE Hamas now and want Israel to eradicate them.

 

[Say it aint so]

Genocide is a legal matter, not a medical issue.

Death and being there to witness the manner of death is a medical issue. Genocide is the death and the manner death.

 

[DaisyDay]

Why does Biden keep funding it, and keep sending more weapons?

I don't know why, but this makes him and us, by extension, accomplices in the massacre. His participation in no way makes the genocide not a genocide.

 

[DaisyDay]

Killing Hamas is not genocide...do you even know the definition? The Gazan civilians HATE Hamas now and want Israel to eradicate them.

Starving, shooting and bombing a people into oblivionis genocide. Slaughtering the innocents in the hopes of getting a few Hamas is genocide, Endlösung.

I'm pretty sure that the civilians are not trilled with Gaza turned into an Israeli abattoir with children as the primary sacrifice.

 

[HARK!]

I don't know why, but this makes him and us, by extension, accomplices in the massacre. His participation in no way makes the genocide not a genocide.

..But the slaughter of Ukrainians in Biden's proxy war with Russia is A-OK; amiright?

It seems to be OK if it's White people who are being slaughtered; and he's pushing us into a nuclear war that could potentially annihilate hundreds of millions of them.

Why does Biden need to have wars on multiple fronts?

 

[Nithavela]

Uh huh...

For a beautiful moment, I thought that the youtube button hid an R.

 

[DaisyDay]

..But the slaughter of Ukrainians in Biden's proxy war with Russia is A-OK; amiright?

Biden is not responsible for Russia invading Ukraine, but the slaughter of Ukrainians by Putin is A-OK, amiright?

It seems to be OK if it's White people who are being slaughtered; and he's pushing us into a nuclear war that could potentially annihilate hundreds of millions of them.

NATO is defending Ukraine as is the US as part of NATO. The alternative seems to be to allow Russia to expand like the old Soviet Union in its glory days. I don't see what race has to do with this, but I'm not a racist.

Why does Biden need to have wars on multiple fronts?

Perhaps because the US is the world's largest, richest, most powerful superpower, currently, and we are a part of the world, not isolationists?

 

[HARK!]

Biden is not responsible for Russia invading Ukraine

Russia has not invaded Ukraine

but the slaughter of Ukrainians by Putin is A-OK, amiright?

The Slaughter of Russians in Donbas by the US' puppet regime should go unanswered, amiright?

NATO is defending Ukraine as is the US as part of NATO.

US leads NATO. NATO is a joke outside of the US' lead.

The alternative seems to be to allow Russia to expand like the old Soviet Union in its glory days.

Hyperbolic propaganda. Russia has no such ambitions.

Perhaps because the US is the world's largest,

Inda

richest

China

most powerful superpower

Russia

currently, and we are a part of the world, not isolationists?

So is Russia; but wasn't A-OK with the slaughter of innocent Russian civilians and journalists in Donbas.

Let's face it, the current administration could care less how many people die in the process of defending its' hegemony; as it exploits weaker nations of their resources. If the US actually cares about justice and human lives; why does in not respond to all of the suffering in Africa, people being slaughtered, children picking up lithium and cobalt, by hand, in mines, dying early deaths from exposure, as they serve our interests?