Clinton's avoiding deposition

[BPPLEE]

I don't think Bill Clinton has assaulted anyone.

Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones and a dozen other women disagree

 

[rambot]

Trying to pretend that members of one party have a monopoly on that abhorrent behavior is just absurd.

Calm your jets. He was referring to one person not a party.

 

[NxNW]

Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones and a dozen other women disagree

No they don't.

 

[Always in His Presence]

No they don't.

yes - they do.

Bill Clinton 'rape' victim Juanita Broaddrick tells of lasting trauma of 1978 'attack' and claims another 'victim' has told her: 'There are more of us out there'​

• Juanita Broaddrick, now a 73-year-old grandmother, claims Bill Clinton, now 69, raped her in a Little Rock hotel room in 1978
• Clinton's lawyers have called Broaddrick's claim 'categorically false'
• Broaddrick has detailed the trauma she's faced since the alleged attack
• The Arkansas woman first made her claim that Clinton had raped her in 1999, more than two decades after it allegedly happened
• She says she remembers hoping 'that evil man' would die during his 2004 quadruple heart bypass surgery.
• She said she is happy to see Clinton looking 'so terrible, like death warmed over', as he campaigns for his wife

 

[Always in His Presence]

then there is this beauty:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/jones111498.htm

Clinton Settles Paula Jones Lawsuit for $850,000

President Clinton reached an out-of-court settlement with Paula Jones yesterday, agreeing to pay her $850,000 to drop the sexual harassment lawsuit that led to the worst political crisis of his career and only the third presidential impeachment inquiry in American history.

After more than 4 1/2 years of scorched-earth legal warfare, Clinton and Jones brought a sudden end to the case with a four-page deal in which he acknowledged no wrongdoing and offered no apology. The agreement, which will be filed with a federal appeals court considering whether the lawsuit should go forward, requires the president to pay within 60 days.

 

[HARK!]

MOD HAT ON

MOD HAT OFF​

 

[linux.poet]

MOD HAT ON​

This thread has had a cleanup to remove some off-topic posts.​

This thread is about Clinton's avoiding deposition for the Epstein case, it's not about discussing the reliability and proper use of A.I.

If you wish to discuss A.I., I suggest going down to the Technology sub-forum and either joining or starting a thread there.

This thread has been reopened.​

MOD HAT OFF​

 

[Always in His Presence]

December 22 and Bill continues to defy congress

 

[Pommer]

December 22 and Bill continues to defy congress

“Bill and Hillary Clinton were scheduled to give depositions this week on Capitol Hill about their ties to Jeffrey Epstein, but their appearances have been officially punted into January.”

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/12/15/congress/clintons-depositions-delayed-00692160

 

[Say it aint so]

December 22 and Bill continues to defy congress

Wouldn't the best people to bring in would be Donald J Trump, and the actual NY AG who prosecuted both Epstein and Maxwell?

 

[Always in His Presence]

Wouldn't the best people to bring in would be Donald J Trump, and the actual NY AG who prosecuted both Epstein and Maxwell?

You should open a thread on it -

This thread is about Bill and Hillary avoiding giving their testimonies

You remember Bill and Jeffrey?

Jeff seemed to have a close relationship - right down to his portrait in his home.

 

[Say it aint so]

You should open a thread on it -

This thread is about Bill and Hillary avoiding giving their testimonies

You remember Bill and Jeffrey?

Jeff seemed to have a close relationship - right down to his portrait in his home.

Yes it is.

So rather than Bill Clinton, wouldn't it be best to bring in people who not only know more, but are lying about their relationship with Epstein?

For example, "In 2024, Trump publicly denied ever flying on Epstein’s plane, writing on social media that he “was never on Epstein’s Plane, or at his ‘stupid’ Island”.

That of course is a flat out lie. So why is he lying?

**And btw, that Clinton picture is not one of adulation. It's mocking Clinton in a Monica Lewinsky blue dress.

 

[Larniavc]

ai;dr

Brilliant!

 

[Always in His Presence]

So rather than Bill Clinton, wouldn't it be best to bring in people who not only know more, but are lying about their relationship with Epstein?

That would be why you would open a thread on that subject

this one is about the Clintons - I thought you understood

 

[Say it aint so]

That would be why you would open a thread on that subject

this one is about the Clintons - I thought you understood

Why? Yes it's about Clinton as it pertains to a House Investigation regarding Epstein where a deposition of Trump would yield greater value specially since he lies about their relationship.

 

[The Barbarian]

If Bill Clinton and Donald Trump were involved with Epstein's activities, throw them both in prison. I don't care. If there is a Clinton base with Clinton hats and Clinton coins and Clinton cards and Clinton phones and ... too bad for them. I don't care who it catches, if they are guilty. Quit hiding the evidence, and take down the pedophiles.

 

[The Barbarian]

Sexually Harassed . I don't remember if he was accused of rape.

One woman did. Long time after, with no evidence. Doesn't mean it never happened. We just don't know. With Trump, we know it happened. Proven in court beyond a reasonable doubt. As far as the pedophila claims, Trump deserves the benefit of a doubt, just as Clinton does with that rape claim, unless and until evidence comes forth.

 

[Pommer]

Why? Yes it's about Clinton as it pertains to a House Investigation regarding Epstein where a deposition of Trump would yield greater value specially since he lies about their relationship.

How would a deposition from Trump…benefit Trump?

When we get to the point where it’s he didn’t say anything under oath, Greenland falls.

 

[Say it aint so]

How would a deposition from Trump…benefit Trump?

When we get to the point where it’s he didn’t say anything under oath, Greenland falls.

I meant it would benefit the house's effort to understand the Epstein files.
Sad to say the whole point of this pseudo house investigation is to run cover for Trump.

 

[Always in His Presence]

I meant it would benefit the house's effort to understand the Epstein files.
Sad to say the whole point of this pseudo house investigation is to run cover for Trump.

January 11, 2026 and still nothing from the Clintons - 5 months and counting.