• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Pregnant Teenager Nevaeh Crain Died After Trying to Get Care in Three Visits to Texas Emergency Rooms

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
35,197
20,389
29
Nebraska
✟738,438.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
It makes sure they receive the emergency services they need.
I just hope the laws are implemented correctly, so women's lives are saved, speaking as a pro-life person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrsKoala
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Perhaps doctors should just do their job because the law doesn't prevent that.
It is weird how acutal doctors listening to actual lawyers of their actual employers have come to a different conclusion.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,402
20,706
Orlando, Florida
✟1,503,190.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Just another total failure of the medical profession. I'm not a doctor, but I know good and well that sepsis is a life threatening issue. She might have died anyway due to the sepsis. But there was a chance she could have been saved.

No, the failure is due to politicians telling doctors how to perform medicine.

The root of the sepsis was a dead or dying fetus. If you can't remove a large amount of diseased tissue like that from the body, then all the treatment in the world won't save the patient.

Apparently there was NO REASON not to address this immediately. The first time she was there they MISDIAGNOSED her. The second time there was NO REASON to withhold care.

I don't blame doctors for being scared for their personal safety, when the State threatens them with 99 years in prison. These stupid anti-abortion laws compromise the doctors' ability to deliver medical care.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Innsmuthbride
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
28,061
9,032
65
✟429,080.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
I just hope the laws are implemented correctly, so women's lives are saved, speaking as a pro-life person.
Totally agree. I wish the doctors would do their jobs correctly and save these women's lives. Apparently some have decided to. Others aren't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
28,061
9,032
65
✟429,080.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
It is weird how acutal doctors listening to actual layers of their actual employers have come to a different conclusion.
It's weird that others are actually following the law and saving women. Wonder why others can't figure it out. Makes me think the medecal.prof3ssion in some places are playing politics with women's lives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
28,061
9,032
65
✟429,080.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
No, the failure is due to politicians telling doctors how to perform medicine.
Nope, the doctors are refusing to perform the medicine.
The root of the sepsis was a dead or dying fetus. If you can't remove a large amount of diseased tissue like that from the body, then all the treatment in the world won't save the patient.
Every doctor know that sepsis is an emergency and WILL cause the death of someone if not immediately treated.

The law against abortion absolutely does not apply in this situation. Saving the mothers life is part and parcel of the law.
don't blame doctors for being scared for their personal safety, when the State threatens them with 99 years in prison. These stupid anti-abortion laws compromise the doctors' ability to deliver medical care.
No they don't. They law is clear. Save the womans life and you are fine. Thats what they are supposed to do.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,189
15,905
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟445,256.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
1000004505.png



Heres a letter that was signed by 150 obgyns in texas (i disnt bother downloading rhe other 2 pages of names).


So is it;
1) politicians in Texas
2) Randoms on the internet
3) doctors in Texas
who will provide the most informed opinions on the usefulness and appropriateness of Health related laws and their impact on their patients?
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
24,832
20,920
✟1,731,393.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Just another total failure of the medical profession. I'm not a doctor, but I know good and well that sepsis is a life threatening issue.

....nor are YOU responsible for the decisions maed in this case.

I think it's clear enough. If I was a doctor there i would have saved the girl. What kind of idiot doesn't know that sepsis is deadly if not treated immediately.

I think it's clear that you refuse to hold the Texas legislature accountable for writing poor legislation. Instead, you blame the medical professsion.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
28,061
9,032
65
✟429,080.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
View attachment 356682


Heres a letter that was signed by 150 obgyns in texas (i disnt bother downloading rhe other 2 pages of names).


So is it;
1) politicians in Texas
2) Randoms on the internet
3) doctors in Texas
who will provide the most informed opinions on the usefulness and appropriateness of Health related laws and their impact on their patients?
150 obgyns that probably perform regular abortions and don't want to take responsibility for their actions.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
28,189
15,905
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟445,256.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
150 obgyns that probably perform regular abortions and don't want to take responsibility for their actions.
If only laws were written so they would know what the heck that even meant.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
150 obgyns that probably perform regular abortions and don't want to take responsibility for their actions.
Looks like a post is guessing at the imagined motives of the experts explaining the problem in hopes of avoiding the obvious conclusion here - the GOP legislature screwed up creating the law in question.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
28,061
9,032
65
✟429,080.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Looks like a post is guessing at the imagined motives of the experts explaining the problem in hopes of avoiding the obvious conclusion here - the GOP legislature screwed up creating the law in question.
Doesn't seen so since 119 women had abortion treatments to save their lives and no one was prosecuted for it. I guess it can be figured out.
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
No state has done more to fight this interpretation than Texas, which has warned doctors that its abortion ban supersedes the administration’s guidance on federal law, and that they can face up to 99 years in prison for violating it.
And anyone who would believe that (if it was actually said) is a complete and total idiot.
Federal law dictates that all patients coming to an emergency room for treatment is given proper and appropriate medical care. Failure to do so puts the hospital at risk of a lawsuit (not the physician unless they refuse to treat the patient) and possible sanctions/fines/or even loss of Medicare/Medicaid funds.

This story sounds more like progressive leftist trash; something you might find in the National Enquirer or hear on Judge Judy.

Supremacy Clause​


Primary tabs​


The Supremacy Clause refers to the foundational principle that, in general, federal law takes precedence over any conflicting state law. Established under Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution, the Supremacy Clause enables the federal government to enforce treaties, create a central bank, and enact legislation without interference from the states. It does not, however, allow the federal government to review or veto state laws before they take effect.
The Supremacy Clause underpins the broader doctrine of preemption, where if laws are in conflict, the law of a higher authority can preempt the law of a lower authority if the superiority of the former is stated expressly or implied. Traditionally, when it is not indicated, federal law does not preempt state law in areas traditionally regulated by states, unless Congress’s intent to preempt is clear. In areas where the federal government has historically significant regulatory involvement, preemption is less likely to apply. Today, disputes usually involve statutory interpretation rather than its scope of application.

 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,832
44,945
Los Angeles Area
✟1,001,253.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
And anyone who would believe that (if it was actually said) is a complete and total idiot.
Supremacy Clause
Take it up with the judges of the 5th Circuit and SCOTUS in the other thread.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0