A Harris-Walz administration would be a nightmare for free speech

[mourningdove~]

A Harris-Walz administration would be a nightmare for free speech​

by Jonathan Turley, Opinion Contributor - 08/10/24 10:30 AM ET

The selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) as the running mate for Vice President Kamala Harris has led to intense debates over crime policy, war claims, gender identity policies and other issues.

Some attacks have, in my view, been inaccurate or overwrought. However, the greatest danger from this ticket is neither speculative nor sensational. A Harris-Walz administration would be a nightmare for free speech.

For over three years, the Biden-Harris administration has sustained an unrelenting attack on the freedom of speech, from supporting a massive censorship system (described by a federal court as an “Orwellian Ministry of Truth“) to funding blacklisting operations targeting groups and individuals with opposing views.
President Biden made censorship a central part of his legacy, even accusing social media companies of “killing people” for failing to increase levels of censorship. Democrats in Congress pushed that agenda by demanding censorship on subjects ranging from climate change to gender identity — even to banking policy — in the name of combatting “disinformation.”

The administration also created offices like the Disinformation Governance Board before it was shut down after public outcry. But it quickly shifted this censorship work to other offices and groups.

As vice president, Harris has long supported these anti-free speech policies. The addition of Walz completes a perfect nightmare for free speech advocates. Walz has shown not only a shocking disregard for free speech values but an equally shocking lack of understanding of the First Amendment.

Walz went on MSNBC to support censoring disinformation and declared, “There’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech, and especially around our democracy.”

Ironically, this false claim, repeated by many Democrats, constitutes one of the most dangerous forms of disinformation. It is being used to convince a free people to give up some of their freedom with a “nothing to see here” pitch.

https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/4820490-harris-walz-administration-free-speech/

 

[Fantine]

They're not banning books.
Mandating whitewashed inaccurate history.
Threatening to jail journalists.
You're attacking the wrong party.
Attacking disinformation when foreign hackers are flooding the internet with if isn't a problem.
It's only a problem because one unnamed candidate speaks lies instead of truth in a roughly 10 to 1 ratio.

 

[BobRyan]

A Harris-Walz administration would be a nightmare for free speech​

by Jonathan Turley, Opinion Contributor - 08/10/24 10:30 AM ET

The selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) as the running mate for Vice President Kamala Harris has led to intense debates over crime policy, war claims, gender identity policies and other issues.

Some attacks have, in my view, been inaccurate or overwrought. However, the greatest danger from this ticket is neither speculative nor sensational. A Harris-Walz administration would be a nightmare for free speech.

For over three years, the Biden-Harris administration has sustained an unrelenting attack on the freedom of speech, from supporting a massive censorship system (described by a federal court as an “Orwellian Ministry of Truth“) to funding blacklisting operations targeting groups and individuals with opposing views.
President Biden made censorship a central part of his legacy, even accusing social media companies of “killing people” for failing to increase levels of censorship. Democrats in Congress pushed that agenda by demanding censorship on subjects ranging from climate change to gender identity — even to banking policy — in the name of combatting “disinformation.”

The administration also created offices like the Disinformation Governance Board before it was shut down after public outcry. But it quickly shifted this censorship work to other offices and groups.

As vice president, Harris has long supported these anti-free speech policies. The addition of Walz completes a perfect nightmare for free speech advocates. Walz has shown not only a shocking disregard for free speech values but an equally shocking lack of understanding of the First Amendment.

Walz went on MSNBC to support censoring disinformation and declared, “There’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech, and especially around our democracy.”

Ironically, this false claim, repeated by many Democrats, constitutes one of the most dangerous forms of disinformation. It is being used to convince a free people to give up some of their freedom with a “nothing to see here” pitch.

https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/4820490-harris-walz-administration-free-speech/

WOW

 

[Tuur]

None of this is new. And yes, a Harris-Walz Administration will be hard on freedom of speech. But what's missed is that Harris-Walz wouldn't be taking these positions if they had no support. And if you'll look through through this site, you'll find support not only for Harris-Walz but for government restricting freedom of speech.

 

[mourningdove~]

But what's missed is that Harris-Walz wouldn't be taking these positions if they had no support. And if you'll look through through this site, you'll find support not only for Harris-Walz but for government restricting freedom of speech.

Good point that you make.

 

[FireDragon76]

They're not banning books.
Mandating whitewashed inaccurate history.
Threatening to jail journalists.
You're attacking the wrong party.
Attacking disinformation when foreign hackers are flooding the internet with if isn't a problem.
It's only a problem because one unnamed candidate speaks lies instead of truth in a roughly 10 to 1 ratio.

JD Vance has been outspoken in his desire to ban all sorts of things.

The idea that Republicans are the party of personal freedom seems a difficult case to make.