Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The remark "lying dog-faced pony soldier" is from an old western movie, similar in meaning to "white man speak with forked tongue". Biden is implying in his own playful way that he was not convinced about the girls claim. This girl later admitted Biden was correct and in fact she had never been to a caucus.
I posted that as a matter of humor. It was too silly of a statement to be taken seriously. And from what I just read about it, no one can substantiate that it was ever a line in a movie.
That would not excuse slander. But that's beside the point since Trump is outright lying (see Bannon tape). Please note "Believe" is not the same as "Know", just as "Opinion" is not the same as "Fact". So also note, that Trump's words are slanderous because he does NOT indicate any intention that he is expressing his personal opinion/belief that the election was stolen, on the contrary Trump expresses that HE KNOWS FOR A FACT the election was stolen.
If it helps I think many here aren't good Christians because of their brazen hypocrisy, indifference to anything Jesus or the bible teaches and gross distortion of the bible in general. That all started long before Trump.
Slander is something I take very seriously, as sure as I care about my soul.
Just an FYI: Trump's MO is to lose in the lower courts and win in the higher courts. There has been a lot of obvious bias in the lower courts. They are simply of lower character. Here is some good analysis to open a few people's eyes (no need for me to re-invent the wheel):
Agreed. However, we're "discussing/arguing" things that folks much more qualified than us have chimed in on, in detail. See my post above this one. It includes the thoughts of Dershowitz.
He's getting record donations. I suspect plenty of people see this as guaranteeing his election. I remember several months ago some pundit said, "Trump is just one indictment away of guaranteeing his election." Too many see this trial (and others) as pure banana republic stuff. Remember "russia, russia, russia"? Nothing. It was all baloney. And as I've said over and over, his MO is to lose in lower courts and win in higher courts. There is obviously a lot of bias in the lower courts. The requirements for filling judgeships in higher courts is a bit more demanding.
Yes, that’s what gets me. This same man is only a friend to those who agree with him…..and aren’t disabled, unattractive, overweight, older than him etc. He would insult and mock any number of people who stick up for him and support him if he met them IRL And wouldn’t think a thing about it.
Regarding the first one: Srsly?
Make it great like when? When good ol' Ron Regan begin running up trillion in debt? The days of Jim Crow? Or the days of slavery when whites were king by natural law and the law of the land? What time do you want to go back to? Perhaps when 90% of the native population of this land was exterminated? Take your pick on the time in the past when America was great.
I was just repeating what was in the post I was replying to, so ask them.
Thaks for the clarification.....I will go back and challenge the post. Apologies for the misunderstanding
This is an old and childish game that you're playing because you can't come up with anything beyond vague complaints like "moral failings". It seems obvious you don't know what you're talking about over there in Worcestershire, UK.
