Conviction Ensures Trump Victory

[BPPLEE]

LOL! So what? A Man of Action who thinks he doesn't need to ask God for forgiveness because he has never done anything wrong.

I'm curious:
Do you think Trump has to pray to ask forgiveness from God for anything?



How does it improve the life of the average American for the capital to be moved to Jerusalem? There is no Christian expectation of any such thing and yo ucharacterizing that way appears just desperate to find SOMETHING worthy of a christian label.

Someone has really pressed your buttons.

 

[DaisyDay]

It's kinda deceptive. Is there some reason why when debating US news and politics, you don't want people to know you're Canadian?

No, it's not deceptive at all 1) it is one of the choices allowed by this site, 2) the world is far more than America and why shouldn't posters here be Canadian without wearing a maple leaf tag?

 

[Whyayeman]

Does anyone think Donald will see the inside of a jail or prison cell for this?

I think he should. Justice must be seen as well as done.

 

[DaisyDay]

Yea, the Democrats would just embrace him with open arms if only he expounded on all his mistakes and sins. Yea, right!

No one believes what the Left says and know it’s all a trap.

Trump himself declared that he had done nothing for Christ to forgive in answer to an interview question.

 

[ozso]

No, it's not deceptive at all 1) it is one of the choices allowed by this site, 2) the world is far more than America and why shouldn't posters here be Canadian without wearing a maple leaf tag?

It helps to know when debating US news and politics, that the person you're debating with isn't from the US.

 

[BPPLEE]

I think he should. Justice must be seen as well as done.

Yeah 130 years for a bookkeeping discrepancy seems reasonable don’t you think?

 

[Foamhead]

This was a fair trial, except …

1. There Was No Crime.
   1. Paying someone not to talk is not a crime.
2. Statute Of Limitations Expired.
   1. Even if there was a crime.
3. Prosecutorial Abuse of Power/Overcharging.
   1. The allegation of business misrepresentations is, at most, a mistake. It should be handled in a civil case, if not merely a misdemeanor.
   2. The rationalization of multiple counts (34) is based on campaign financing reporting, not repeated incidents of a crime.
4. Prosecutorial Abuse of Power/Undercharging.
   1. Campaign finance reporting was made, in part, due to Prosecutors Witness, (Cohen) who testified he stole $50,000.00 from Defendant.
   2. Not only, was he not charged, this makes Defendant the victim in the proceeding.
5. Judge Refused Change Of Venue.
   1. Defendant is political opponent and the district the prosecutor filed charges had the highest % of votes against him in the 2020 election.
   2. It is not reasonable to expect a fair trial with a jury of his peers.
6. Judge Refused To Recuse Himself.
   1. Judge and daughter of judge were donors to the Defendant’s political opponent.
7. Violation of 1st Amendment. Gag Order
   1. Defendant was repeatedly punished for publicly pointing out the political motivations of the officers of the court.
   2. His 1st Amendment rights were deprived when he needed them most – when he was at risk of losing life, liberty and property at the hands of a tyrannical State.
8. Violation of 6th Amendment:
   1. Charge was not specified. It is impossible to defend against an unspecified charge.
9. Violation of 8th Amendment:
   1. Excessive punishment. 4 years in jail per count is a life sentence for a non-crime, a misdemeanor, at most. Such punishment is not merely cruel and unusual, it’s unheard of and unprecedented.
10. Defense Not Allowed To Bring Witnesses.
    1. FEC Commissioner would have explained what a campaign contribution is and what it is not. This expert witness would destroy one of the elements of the complaint.
    2. Another witness would have not corroborated lying witnesses’ testimony.
11. Judge Failed To Dismiss Case With Grounds.
    1. Prosecutions witness lied, leaving Defendant with no credible witnesses against him.
12. Improper Jury Instructions
    1. Normally, jury instructions are about 5 pages and written copies given to the jury.
    2. In this case, the jury instructions were 54 pages and only provided to the jury verbally.
    3. Judge specifically told jury that certain pieces of evidence could be considered sufficient to convict.
    4. The instructions included not having to agree that a crime was committed, which is another 6th Amendment violation.
    5. The instructions included not having to be unanimous on counts for the judge to deem the verdict as unanimous.

I really haven’t been paying attention. If I had and I were a professional attorney, I might be able to compile more arguments why this will be vacated upon appeal. Those involved should be disbarred and convicted themselves.

Lol

"I'm not a lawyer and admit I haven't been paying close attention, but I just know Trump is the victim of a conspiracy".

 

[DaisyDay]

It helps to know when debating US news and politics, that the person you're debating with isn't from the US.

It does say clearly CA - Green. It's not his fault you don't know that CA means Canada. My label says US - Other. US is not a state anymore than CA is for these political labels. It's one thing to be ignorant - aren't we all - but another to blame others for your own fault - do we all?

 

[ozso]

Yeah 130 years for a bookkeeping discrepancy seems reasonable don’t you think?

Plus a $500 million fine.

 

[Pommer]

I know you cannot agree. It’s OK. I love you anyway. And when the Trump train pulls into the station, you’ll be made great too.

The alliterative metaphor is apt, it’s YUGE, it’s slow, it can only follow the track that others have set down already, and it’s antiquated.

 

[Whyayeman]

Yeah 130 years for a bookkeeping discrepancy seems reasonable don’t you think?

Of course not, that was a ridiculous suggestion but I think a custodial sentence is appropriate for 34 felonies. He narrowly escaped a (brief) trip to the cells for contempt of court.

Now it just a book-keeping discrepancy. Nice one!

 

[BPPLEE]

Of course not, that was a ridiculous suggestion but I think a custodial sentence is appropriate for 34 felonies. He narrowly escaped a (brief) trip to the cells for contempt of court.

Now it just a book-keeping discrepancy. Nice one!

It’s actually a misdemeanor. The “crime “ that was allegedly covered up (making it a felony) was never specified

 

[ozso]

It does say clearly CA - Green. It's not his fault you don't know that CA means Canada. My label says US - Other. US is not a state anymore than CA is for these political labels. It's one thing to be ignorant - aren't we all - but another to blame others for your own fault - do we all?

When I Googled "CA-Greens" I got "California Green Party". Here in the US "CA" is far more associated with California than Canada. I've been though long derails with you in the past, when you got in on something said to someone else. So this is the last I have to say to you about what I said to someone else.

 

[Pommer]

It helps to know when debating US news and politics, that the person you're debating with isn't from the US.

Oh? Does the validity of their arguments change if they’re not from the USA?

 

[rambot]

Yea, the Democrats would just embrace him with open arms if only he expounded on all his mistakes and sins. Yea, right!

No one believes what the Left says and know it’s all a trap.

Dude. What are you talking about?

I don't want to know his lascivious and terrible sins. He needs to confess them to God, not me.

I'm not talking about "democrats". I'm not talking g about left or right.

I'm talking about his relationship with God and understanding of what it means to be a Christian.

He doesn't have one.

 

[ozso]

Oh? Does the validity of their arguments change if they’re not from the USA?

It helps to understand their perspective.

 

[Pommer]

It helps to understand their perspective.

This is true, but seeing as she’s been here for 18+ years, I think she’s got a handle on how best to convey her own thoughts, here.

 

[ralliann]

You mean like were there's lots of crime, drugs and people living in squalor?

Not a good start to the argument.

Seems it is what the trial was based off of. A non disclosure agreement .

 

[ToddNotTodd]

I don't know how people who call themselves Christians cannot support Trump. What has Biden done in his 50 year career? He made schools a soft target, ended the task force fighting child sex trafficking, raised taxes, got us into 2 wars, and is taking down the biggest Christian college in America.

Trump is the greatest President since the Founding Fathers. Trump accomplishments:

1. Defeated the Witch
2. Recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
3. Biggest tax cuts in history
4. Cut more regulations than any other POTUS
5. Passed more laws than any POTUS in 1st year besides Truman.
6. Appointed more judges than any POTUS since Washington.
7. Greatest economy ever, including
8. Lowest unemployment ever for Blacks
9. Lowest unemployment ever for Women.
10. Replaced NAFTA with USMCA
11. Deserved Noble Peace Prize for passing the Abraham Accords.
12. Needed a wheel barrow to cary his balls as he walked across the 38th parallel - by himself! No US President had to balls to do this.
13. Made America energy independent
14. Got Roe v Wade overturned, which killed more Americans than anything else over the last 50 years.
15. Helped the Vets tremendously! (per my wife)
16. Kept America out of war.

The cherry on top for me was how Trump made Liberal heads explode. Every day was like Christmas for me and I cannot wait for his second term. It will be glorious!!

presidential scholars rank him dead last…

 

[rambot]

It's kinda deceptive. Is there some reason why when debating US news and politics, you don't want people to know you're Canadian?

1. I've mentioned my nationality many times on here. I'm pretty sure in an earlier conversation I've mentioned it to you too.
2."deceptive? My profile also has a picture depicting fan death but I bet you've never thought I was Korean.
3. I try my damned to nor include myself in ways that indicate I'm American (ie..."maybe we need to build a wall". I say you. Little clues like that indicate my outsider status.

For some people my nationality may be unimportant and they are just inflamed or curious by what I say.

Should I begin my post saying " I'm canadian but..."?