• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Modest Dress for Women.

LovebirdsFlying

My husband drew this cartoon of me.
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Aug 13, 2007
30,474
4,495
61
Washington (the state)
✟1,033,694.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I haven't experienced this.

I have.

I think you may be describing a Jenny that keeps company with the wrong crowd, or goes around places and people, without any useful purpose.

That's possible.

Have you actually witnessed a Christian get this abuse?
Was it from those in the church, or people on the street?

Yes. From the world; that's true. Not from within any church I have attended. Although a former in-law from a different church had me pegged as a loose, immoral, ungodly woman for reasons only she knew. I must admit I found it interesting to picture a woman wearing a miniskirt so short that she flashed her underpants if she moved wrong in her seat, calling a woman in long sleeves and a calf-length skirt loose and immoral and ungodly.

Got an appointment. Need to cut it off here. Thank you.
 
Upvote 0

CoreyD

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2023
3,135
624
64
Detroit
✟82,531.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
When I make an effort to help anyone - fellow believer or otherwise, to see something they may not be seeing, but which is important in Christian living, I make certain I have thoroughly addressed the issue, before I leave it.
It's just how I see, trying to adjust someone in love.

I hope @Sunflower39 hasn't taken offence at my sharing, in love. She hasn't responded to my last post to her, but there is something I wanted to find out from her.
Perhaps someone else can help.
@LovebirdsFlying I believe you really try to be honest. Would you mind helping me with this? It's important to the OP, since it appears modest dress doesn't seem to have a limit to many.

What I would like to know is, why the difference between the lengths of these dresses places one or other in the category of sexually provocative, and not the first one. What makes them differ?
The bottom is slightly transparent, so as to see where the legs meet.
Am I allowed to say that word?

dress1b.png

dress2b.png
dress3b.png
dress4b.png

I didn't want to get any shorter.
What is decent dress? 1 Timothy 2:9
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

CoreyD

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2023
3,135
624
64
Detroit
✟82,531.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Oh, okay.

That's possible.

Yes. From the world; that's true. Not from within any church I have attended. Although a former in-law from a different church had me pegged as a loose, immoral, ungodly woman for reasons only she knew. I must admit I found it interesting to picture a woman wearing a miniskirt so short that she flashed her underpants if she moved wrong in her seat, calling a woman in long sleeves and a calf-length skirt loose and immoral and ungodly.

Got an appointment. Need to cut it off here. Thank you.
Former in law. I hope you didn't get into anything. :)
 
Upvote 0

LovebirdsFlying

My husband drew this cartoon of me.
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Aug 13, 2007
30,474
4,495
61
Washington (the state)
✟1,033,694.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Oh, okay.


Former in law. I hope you didn't get into anything. :)
LOL, it was a disaster. Long behind me now, thank God.
 
Upvote 0

LovebirdsFlying

My husband drew this cartoon of me.
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Aug 13, 2007
30,474
4,495
61
Washington (the state)
✟1,033,694.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
On the dress in varying lengths, any of those lengths can be suggestive, and any of them can be modest. It depends more on the styling than on the length alone. By styling, I mean whatever else the woman is wearing with the dress. I actually do have one that's pretty short, but I treat it more as a long blouse than as a dress, and I would NEVER wear it outside the house without opague leggings under it.

That's the thing about the former in-law. Not only did she wear short mini skirts, as a married woman with two children, but she also plastered on the makeup and overstyled her hair with lots of product. Looking "sexy" was important to her. Compliments on her appearance, from men other than her husband, fed her ego and made her feel superior to other women. Worst of all, she encouraged her then eleven-year-old daughter to dress the same way. That's how both mother and daughter dressed for grandma's funeral. Mini skirt and tight crop top (in the middle of winter!), heavy makeup, and heels high enough that they had to thrust out their chests and rears to keep their balance when they walked. Again, the girl was ELEVEN years old! But I'm the one who's loose, immoral, and ungodly. Not her.

Now, without all of those other elements, the wiggly walk, the obsession with outward appearance, and the catty attitude, I can't make a statement on former in-law's clothing alone. Even her miniskirt would have been less questionable if she wore leggings under it, and/or had on lower heels so she wouldn't have to sway as she walked. But see, she *wanted* to sway. She, a married mother of two, wanted men to notice her. And that, I think, is what makes it truly immodest. Not merely the amount of coverage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paidiske
Upvote 0

CoreyD

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2023
3,135
624
64
Detroit
✟82,531.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
On the dress in varying lengths, any of those lengths can be suggestive, and any of them can be modest. It depends more on the styling than on the length alone. By styling, I mean whatever else the woman is wearing with the dress.
Underwear, as in panties - like your former in law.
Like the nighty the wife wears for her husband, or the lingerie.
1712270343163.png
1712270366710.png
1712270401461.png
1712270521976.png
1712270572279.png


Is that modest, and good for Christian women to dress in public, in your view?
Would this be in keeping with the apostle Paul's admonition at 1 Timothy 2:9, in your view?

I actually do have one that's pretty short, but I treat it more as a long blouse than as a dress, and I would NEVER wear it outside the house without opague leggings under it.
Why not?
What if you have a shorts under it?

That's the thing about the former in-law. Not only did she wear short mini skirts, as a married woman with two children, but she also plastered on the makeup and overstyled her hair with lots of product. Looking "sexy" was important to her. Compliments on her appearance, from men other than her husband, fed her ego and made her feel superior to other women. Worst of all, she encouraged her then eleven-year-old daughter to dress the same way. That's how both mother and daughter dressed for grandma's funeral. Mini skirt and tight crop top (in the middle of winter!), heavy makeup, and heels high enough that they had to thrust out their chests and rears to keep their balance when they walked. Again, the girl was ELEVEN years old! But I'm the one who's loose, immoral, and ungodly. Not her.
Do you find something wrong with that?
Are you saying their dress was inappropriate?

Now, without all of those other elements, the wiggly walk, the obsession with outward appearance, and the catty attitude, I can't make a statement on former in-law's clothing alone. Even her miniskirt would have been less questionable if she wore leggings under it, and/or had on lower heels so she wouldn't have to sway as she walked. But see, she *wanted* to sway. She, a married mother of two, wanted men to notice her. And that, I think, is what makes it truly immodest. Not merely the amount of coverage.
How a woman walks is immodest?
I know some women are, according to some men, shaped like a figure 8, and some can't help their rear end from swaying. Some have more than others, behind them - not because they did anything deliberate.

Did Paul address how the women walked, or how they dressed? It was how they dressed, wasn't it, and yes, it was about cleavage, nipples, thighs, crotch, and anything else that might draw attention to intimate body parts.
Isn't that so?

I was accused of being proud, because I walked with my head tilted up unawares, mind you.
However, being made aware of it, I tilted my head down, so that if by chance it was tilded upward, it might at least be level.
How we walk, may be a trait. We can adjust it, and yes, there are some women and men who deliberately walk like 'sexy gal', and 'sagga boy', but this is different to dress, which the apostle Paul addressed.
 
Upvote 0

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
22,377
18,924
USA
✟1,072,749.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Looking "sexy" was important to her. Compliments on her appearance, from men other than her husband, fed her ego and made her feel superior to other women.

What did her husband say?

Worst of all, she encouraged her then eleven-year-old daughter to dress the same way.

How did her husband react?

I ask for two reasons. The obvious of course. But there's another truth in relation to this which may or may not apply. There's a lot of men who want their women to look sexy. They want her to be admired and desirable and want the accolades from men. And a little jealousy doesn't hurt.

Sometimes they're buying the clothes and the woman won't admit it. Depending on your relationship she may tell you what influences her look. If she doesn't you can discern it by observing him.

We live in an aesthetically driven society deeply influenced by social media and the majority want to look good and it's being fed by both genders. Most plastic surgery is the result of a man's influence. When you talk about modesty you have to address the elephant in the room. There's no purchase without a buyer.

You have to address mindset from both perspectives. We have to be on the same page. And you can't ignore desirability. As long as you like it they'll do it. You have to reframe their attractions collectively.

~bella
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paidiske
Upvote 0

LovebirdsFlying

My husband drew this cartoon of me.
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Aug 13, 2007
30,474
4,495
61
Washington (the state)
✟1,033,694.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Underwear, as in panties - like your former in law.
Like the nighty the wife wears for her husband, or the lingerie.
View attachment 345247View attachment 345248View attachment 345249View attachment 345251View attachment 345252

Is that modest, and good for Christian women to dress in public, in your view?
Would this be in keeping with the apostle Paul's admonition at 1 Timothy 2:9, in your view?


Why not?
What if you have a shorts under it?


Do you find something wrong with that?
Are you saying their dress was inappropriate?


How a woman walks is immodest?
I know some women are, according to some men, shaped like a figure 8, and some can't help their rear end from swaying. Some have more than others, behind them - not because they did anything deliberate.

Did Paul address how the women walked, or how they dressed? It was how they dressed, wasn't it, and yes, it was about cleavage, nipples, thighs, crotch, and anything else that might draw attention to intimate body parts.
Isn't that so?

I was accused of being proud, because I walked with my head tilted up unawares, mind you.
However, being made aware of it, I tilted my head down, so that if by chance it was tilded upward, it might at least be level.
How we walk, may be a trait. We can adjust it, and yes, there are some women and men who deliberately walk like 'sexy gal', and 'sagga boy', but this is different to dress, which the apostle Paul addressed.
Yes, I do feel that these outfits are inappropriate to wear in public. Nightwear is for wearing at home. Underwear is for wearing under one's clothing. That's why it's called underwear.

Sometimes the fabric matters more than the length. How does it hang? Is it clingy and/or easily seen through? The dress I am referring to is about six inches above knee length, with a lined skirt, but I still wear something under it. I might wear it with shorts, but usually leggings. View of my legs is not the problem. The possible visibility of my underwear is.

Wearing a bathing suit at a public beach or pool is a different matter. I don't bare my midriff, but that's only because I'd look like the Pillsbury Doughboy if I did. A midriff in and of itself, I don't have a problem with, as long as the parts higher and lower are sufficiently covered. The thing is to make sure a bikini isn't too skimpy, and the fabric is thick and sturdy enough not to be seen through even when wet. Some embellishments and cutouts are meant to draw attention, and I think that's inappropriate. It's not wrong to wear a bathing suit, but it is in my opinion wrong to wear one that is designed to attract focus and direct the eye to where the woman darn well deliberately wants the eye to go. Ever see a woman in a bikini that covers only enough to keep her from being arrested, with strategically placed strings, rings, or netting to reveal as much skin as she can get away with? She knows what she's doing. It's a deliberate ego-stroking game of "I'm better than you because I'm younger and prettier and sexier. I can't help it if I look good in this, and you don't. You only disapprove because you're fat, old, ugly, and jealous." NOTE: This in no way gives anyone the right to go at a woman because "she's asking for it." Yes, as I suspect, she is drawing attention to herself on purpose. No, that doesn't mean anyone is entitled to answer her advertisement.

Romans 14:13 says not to put a stumbling block, of any kind, in someone else's path. This includes a woman using tantalizing body language to tempt a man. Women of course can't choose their hip structure, but they can and do choose their heel heights, well aware of how it's going to affect their walk. The higher the heel, the more the sway, and that's exactly what they're going for.

What did her husband say?



How did her husband react?

I ask for two reasons. The obvious of course. But there's another truth in relation to this which may or may not apply. There's a lot of men who want their women to look sexy. They want her to be admired and desirable and want the accolades from men. And a little jealousy doesn't hurt.

Sometimes they're buying the clothes and the woman won't admit it. Depending on your relationship she may tell you what influences her look. If she doesn't you can discern it by observing him.

We live in an aesthetically driven society deeply influenced by social media and the majority want to look good and it's being fed by both genders. Most plastic surgery is the result of a man's influence. When you talk about modesty you have to address the elephant in the room. There's no purchase without a buyer.

You have to address mindset from both perspectives. We have to be on the same page. And you can't ignore desirability. As long as you like it they'll do it. You have to reframe their attractions collectively.

~bella
I understand what you're saying about husbands possibly forcing their wives to be overtly sexy, for their own "hey, guys, look what *I* have and you don't" ego reasons. That Biff-and-Lorraine interaction in Back to the Future II rings true because it does happen in real life.

On my former in-law, I don't know everything that went on behind closed doors, but she pretty much ruled the family. Everything revolved around her and what she wanted. I was at their house overnight, the night before the funeral, and I noticed the daughter's nightgown had the words "hot stuff" written on it. It wasn't my place, since I was only an "in-law" and not "part of the family." But I did mention it, and her husband agreed with me with a low, grumbling, "She ain't hot stuff yet." The girl's mother was not in the room at the time.

He clearly didn't approve of sexualizing their preteen daughter, but he didn't do anything to stop it. I imagine it was because they'd been down this road before, so many times, and he had given up on trying to fight it. If he did try to speak up, he was shrieked back down and steamrolled over. He had a calm, quiet personality. She had anything but.

Oh, and at the funeral, numerous relatives were shaking their heads and clucking their tongues at the way mother and daughter were dressed, commenting with a sigh in their voices about how daughter is mother all over again. Nobody said anything to them directly, but behind their backs, the disapproval was strong. Why didn't they say anything to their faces? Again, former in-law had long ago crowned herself queen of the family, and her daughter was princess. I'm not qualified to diagnose narcissistic personality disorder, but given all kinds of other behaviors and what I've learned about it since, I would be surprised if this were not the case.
 
Upvote 0

Stephen3141

Well-Known Member
Mar 14, 2023
1,425
552
69
Southwest
✟100,195.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Asking a question in regard to 1 Timothy 2:9-10, which states:

"I also want the women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, adorning themselves, not with elaborate hairstyles or gold or pearls or expensive clothes, but with good deeds, appropriate for women who profess to worship God" (NIV).

How would you define the "dress code", if you will, described in this excerpt?

Do you think churches should have a defined dress code, such as guidance on neckline, skirt/pant length, sleeve length, etc., or do you think the interpretation should be left up to the individual?

Would you confront a woman who you thought may be pushing the boundaries with the way they were dressing in church? What about in public in general? If so, how? (I'm speaking of a fellow believer here, not just any random woman you think is dressed inappropriate.)

If a fellow believer approached you and said a woman in your church was dressing in a manner that caused them to either fall under temptation or to sin, how would you address this situation?

This is a different type of discussion, than "You shall not murder a human being."

The entire paragraph holds together, and it is in the context of worship.
It is also in the context of the roles of men and women (including authority,
and bearing children).

The interesting thing is that Paul does not separate these contexts. And, he
explains some of what he means by modest and decent dress for women, in
CONTRAST to the upper Roman class that flashed about its wealth (and at
this time, was also known for its promiscuity).

The paragraph is not about modest dress for women -- it is about appropriate
behavior for men and women in the congregation (in worship). This is a discussion
of what behavior is appropriate, BEFORE GOD, and is not particularly a discussion
of what we would call "modesty".
---------- ----------

I don't think that Paul's guidelines are minimal, or fixed. I think that Paul would add
many more instructions, for congregations that were in populations of pagans who
regularly engaged in all sorts of lavish and wild gatherings. (He does not mention women
covering their head, here.) It is curious that Paul would mention men praying, without
quarreling or anger, lifting holy hands in prayer. I would say that this is a basic instruction
that the worship of the Christian God is not done in wild parties and shouting, but in
order and peace.

This passage is not what modern American Christians want it to be.
It is not a simple formula for how modest and decent women are to dress.

Whatever behavior is not seemly, in the worshipping of God, should be understood
to be forbidden, in the congregation. Paul's teaching is certainly NOT the modern
American feminist assertion ("It's my body -- keep your laws off my body!"). For
Christians, our bodies are the temple of the Holy Spirit, and they DO NOT BELONG
TO US.

This also means that I cannot assert that part of my "identity" is to dress like....
Our identity is the children of God, and we must conform to God's standard of
modesty and decency, in all sorts of ways. There is no room in the People of God,
for those who identify as something other than a child of God. And this means that
our dress, and behavior, and hair styles, all need to conform to God's standards
of decency.

It's not a simplistic standard.

But, at certain points in the Bible, the biblical authors clearly state what
is NOT appropriate for godly worship, or godly behavior in the congregation.
 
Upvote 0

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
22,377
18,924
USA
✟1,072,749.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
The higher the heel, the more the sway, and that's exactly what they're going for.

Heels don't make you sway. Swaying is the result of build and flesh. If you have a fuller bottom, hips or thighs you'll have more movement. Excess weight creates a similar problem. It can also be the result of a poor gait which can be corrected. The Princess of Wales lives in heels and never sways. Her body type and training maintain her gait and minimize movement.

Every portion of a woman's body can be camouflaged. The majority don't dress for their body type and there's limitations to premade clothes. It won't address everything. You have to go to a tailor or work with someone who sews who knows how to draft a pattern and let them make you a dress and stand in a 4-way mirror and take a photo and then you'll see the difference.

The industry standard is an hourglass and dress forms look like Barbie. That's what they're sizing from. But there's a number of companies who've created sewing patterns based on different body shapes. Only 8% of women are hourglasses. The majority are something else. When you wear clothes suited for your body type there's a better fit. Many women learn to sew for that reason.

He clearly didn't approve of sexualizing their preteen daughter, but he didn't do anything to stop it. I imagine it was because they'd been down this road before, so many times, and he had given up on trying to fight it. If he did try to speak up, he was shrieked back down and steamrolled over. He had a calm, quiet personality. She had anything but.

There's your problem. The misalignment has opened the door for other issues. I don't know why he married a strong-willed woman if he couldn't handle her. You don't wake up with that personality. She needs a firmer hand and he needs a less combative spouse. Change is needed in both. The child is the unfortunate victim of their behavior.

She's creating a mini me. Some do it innocently. They dress alike and do girly things together. Some are living vicariously through their children. Desiring them to do the things they couldn't and have opportunities they lacked. There's a fine line between exposure and co-opting their childhood.

I don't know why you'd want a child to be sexy. She'll attract the wrong attention. It's an unfortunate situation and it's the father's responsibility to put his foot down. She's wrong but she isn't the lone adult in the home.

Oh, and at the funeral, numerous relatives were shaking their heads and clucking their tongues at the way mother and daughter were dressed, commenting with a sigh in their voices about how daughter is mother all over again. Nobody said anything to them directly, but behind their backs, the disapproval was strong. Why didn't they say anything to their faces?

Few people are willing to confront someone about their attire in light of their response. You don't know how they'll react and it could ugly fast.

Most women aren't confrontational that's why they whisper. But I tell them to be quiet. I don't want to hear it and if they feel that strongly tell the person. That ends the conversation every time.

Again, former in-law had long ago crowned herself queen of the family, and her daughter was princess. I'm not qualified to diagnose narcissistic personality disorder, but given all kinds of other behaviors and what I've learned about it since, I would be surprised if this were not the case.

That isn't always the result of narcissism or ego. Some people have big dreams or want to have certain experiences. When you hear terms like queen and princess that's a woman who wants to be esteemed. They require a companion whose position allows them to stand out. They're not wallflowers and the majority are social butterflies.

I understand it because I have similar qualities. But unlike her, I'd marry someone who complemented my personality. I wouldn't choose someone quiet or shy. I'd overwhelm him. I prefer strong leaders who are no nonsense. You're not going to run over him and he isn't threatened by my strength. He considers it an asset. That's what she needed. When she pushed against him he wouldn't budge and his force is greater than hers. She'd calm down eventually.

~bella
 
Upvote 0

Sunflower39

Anglican
Aug 23, 2023
255
205
UK
✟42,357.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Ok, so distractions only count if it's a woman complaining about it. Men are just perverts. Glad you cleared up that particular scripture for us.
I didn’t say ALL men are perverts but some are…and no, I didn’t draw on scripture to come to that conclusion because it’s an obvious observation. You don’t need scripture to figure out the obvious sometimes…you should try it.
 
Upvote 0

LovebirdsFlying

My husband drew this cartoon of me.
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Aug 13, 2007
30,474
4,495
61
Washington (the state)
✟1,033,694.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I missed this part:

Do you find something wrong with that?
Are you saying their dress was inappropriate?

Tight mini skirts and crop tops at a funeral? Especially in the middle of winter? Of course I thought it was inappropriate, and so did most people in attendance. Even not considering modesty, it was 20 F degrees, -6 C for those outside the US. The teetering high heels are further inappropriate for an eleven-year-old girl, whose skeletal system is still forming. Many women can attribute their current foot problems to the overwearing of high heels in their younger years. It at least shouldn't be done until the skeletal system is completely developed and has stopped growing.

I do believe their outfits would have also been inappropriate in summer, as this was a religious service conducted by an ordained minister. The outfits they wore were better suited to a night club than to a funeral. In the case of this particular mother and daughter, however, the way they dressed for the funeral was the same way they usually dressed for any church service, and I for one don't think it's right. Although I suppose it's better to see them go to church dressed for a night club than to not go to church at all.
 
Upvote 0

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
35,808
20,101
45
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,702,742.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The outfits they wore were better suited to a night club than to a funeral.
For what it's worth, I see quite a lot of this at funerals, especially young women. I have a hunch that some people know they're supposed to "dress up" for a funeral, and have no other mental conception of that, than the way they might "dress up" for an evening out. But I agree, making an issue of people's dress at a funeral, is probably to miss the point even more than misunderstanding the (implied) dress code.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: bèlla
Upvote 0

LovebirdsFlying

My husband drew this cartoon of me.
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Aug 13, 2007
30,474
4,495
61
Washington (the state)
✟1,033,694.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
For what it's worth, I see quite a lot of this at funerals, especially young women. I have a hunch that some people know they're supposed to "dress up" for a funeral, and have no other mental conception of that, than the way they might "dress up" for an evening out. But I agree, making an issue of people's dress at a funeral, is probably to miss the point even more than misunderstanding the (implied) dress code.
When I was in college majoring in business, the same misunderstanding was common. Every Wednesday was professional dress day, and we were supposed to dress according to our major. Those studying culinary arts wore their chef uniform, etc. This was the 1980s, so for me as a business major, that meant wearing a skirt suit, or a knee length dress with a blazer, plus hose and pumps. Men were supposed to wear a suit.

A lot of incoming female freshmen made the same mistake you’re describing, and came to school wearing cocktail dresses because that’s what “dressing up” meant to them. They didn’t know the difference between “dressy” and “business formal.”
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Paidiske
Upvote 0

Sunflower39

Anglican
Aug 23, 2023
255
205
UK
✟42,357.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
God is only concerned about your heart. Your soul. Clothing is non important to God..
I agree with you. Too many people here who are overly-focused on what other people wear when they should be focusing on their own relationship with God. Plus, they shouldn’t be judging others either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost4words
Upvote 0

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
22,377
18,924
USA
✟1,072,749.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
We should be careful about lying on the Lord. There's enough video footage depicting the inappropriate attire that has entered the House of God to silence any suggestion that He wouldn't mind.

Perhaps you're unbothered.
Maybe you haven't seen the same.
Or you don't like the subject.

That's cool. But what isn't okay is when you apply your thinking to the Most High. Because He's holy with a capital H.

“For My thoughts are not your thoughts, Nor are your ways My ways,” declares the LORD.

~bella
 
  • Winner
Reactions: CoreyD
Upvote 0

CoreyD

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2023
3,135
624
64
Detroit
✟82,531.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
What did her husband say?


How did her husband react?

I ask for two reasons. The obvious of course. But there's another truth in relation to this which may or may not apply. There's a lot of men who want their women to look sexy. They want her to be admired and desirable and want the accolades from men. And a little jealousy doesn't hurt.

Sometimes they're buying the clothes and the woman won't admit it. Depending on your relationship she may tell you what influences her look. If she doesn't you can discern it by observing him.

We live in an aesthetically driven society deeply influenced by social media and the majority want to look good and it's being fed by both genders. Most plastic surgery is the result of a man's influence. When you talk about modesty you have to address the elephant in the room. There's no purchase without a buyer.

You have to address mindset from both perspectives. We have to be on the same page. And you can't ignore desirability. As long as you like it they'll do it. You have to reframe their attractions collectively.

~bella
How did her husband get in?
What does this have to do with him?
I ask, because if the woman is a Christian, her husband has nothing to do with her decision, to demonstrate reverence to God.
We aren't gossiping now, are we. Sometimes women tend to do that, a lot, bella.

We need to be careful, including men like me. :D LOL
Seriously though... "Girl. What did her husband think? Sometimes these men..." ...and we are off, and running.
It's common to hear this kind conversation, when it's not necessary.
I'd be thanking you, if you were the one telling me this.
 
Upvote 0