No i do not consider myself like you wrongly portrait me. I simply speak what i have seen and heard and what God sends me for.
So are you saying you're prefect in all this? Are you saying you've never had occasion where you were mistaken in that.
If the scriptures I share cause tension with some, then that may be simply God working in them to reprove, rebuke, exhort or correct.
Could be. Or could be too the tension is caused unnecessarily for perhaps what one says is not spoken in love and with no diplomacy shown at all.
I do not seek to please men, but God.
And that's good but God said we're to speak the truth to saints in love Eph 4:15 says we're to do this so that the hearers can truly grow up into Christ. Hard truths are difficult to accept when one's defenses are up. Reading Eph 4:16 we see,
Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will (now remember that's ONLY when truth is spoken in LOVE) we will in all things grow up into Christ Himself, who is the head. From Him the whole body, fitted and held together by every supporting ligament, grows and builds itself up in love through the work of each individual part.
Consider Jesus words about the prophets that were all persecuted by Israel,
Christ rejecting, LIFE rejecting people are not dear beloved saints of God. Surely you know they don't need stern rebukes and reproofs the others did need? I'm not saying they don't ever need to be instructed. But the same manner?
“Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" (Galatians 4:16)
Paul however had a back ground and history with these people. He had established the churches in Galatia. You might find this interesting below,
Ligonier Ministries, founded by R.C. Sproul, exists to proclaim, teach, and defend the holiness of God in all its fullness to as many people as possible.
www.ligonier.org
Because Paul was an Apostle, the Corinthians were obligated to heed his words. However, they had in one sense an even greater obligation to Paul than to other teachers or Apostles, for it was through his work that many of them were converted and that the church at Corinth was planted (Acts 18:1–11). The Corinthians had many legitimate “guides” or teachers, including Peter (Cephas) and Apollos (1 Cor. 1:12), but they had only one father—Paul, through whose ministry the gospel took root in Corinth (4:15). As his children, they owed him their love and obedience. It would be a love and obedience well placed, for Paul had only the best interests of the Corinthians at heart, seeking to instruct them in the gospel and its ramifications.
It seems to me you walk into the work of other men and you want to be accepted as if you're their converts father...or they're to be subservient to your authority. . You haven't established any of those works.....can't you see what I'm saying? It would be like me walking into a Baptist church, standing up asking what's going on here. Interrupting the service or giving them reproofs or rebukes for not having the charismatic gifts functioning. I mean really. It just doesn't work that way.
But the other reason some might fight the things of scripture in these areas is because they do not want to change anything.
Of course. It's a new wineskin way of doing things. Not that it's new but it's new to this generation.
Many simply love to have the present order no matter what is shown or exhorted.
Sure. It's like admitting that they've been doing things in a misapplied way and doing it for years. And then there's if whatever is all true our leaders would have known about it years ago.
Many other think they are rich and increased with good and have need of nothing, yet Christ may be outside knocking wanting to come into them and sup with them.
And you can have that with house churches too.
Jesus, Paul Peter, John, and others were often misunderstood in their ministry and sometimes by other believers.
No doubt. The question is are YOU being misunderstood by your readers. They'll have to ascertain that themselves through prayer and study of the word. If however after doing that and they don't agree....maybe they're not misunderstanding you at all.
I present the truth as clearly as i can with scripture. yes, I will be bold against the things I see as false.
And you want to keep perspective about what you get so bold about AND how you share your truth. We already talked about the 2 Tim 2 :24 verse,
I have resolved to continue in this burning zeal and to despise the judgment of men, after the example of Christ, who in His zeal called His adversaries a generation of vipers, blind, hypocrites, children of the devil (Matt. 23:13; 17:33; John 8:44).
So you're quoting Martin Luther. To who was he referring to? Do you think he was referring to ANYONE who didn't agree with him on everything? That he'd call them hypocrites, vipers and children of the devil? If someone had a different view than you on the rapture.....are they the above? Or any number of other bible teachings?
And Paul calls the sorcerer a child of the devil full of all subtlety and all mischief (Acts 13:10); and some false apostles he calls dogs, deceivers, and adulterers of the Word (Phil. 3:2; 2 Cor. 11:13).
Sure. The man needed to know he was in league with the devil in an absolute sense. And false Apostles can mean those who are not even saved. One however that doesn't understand everything absolutely right or are confused about A, B or C you wouldn't call them dogs. Jm 3:1 says not all are to desire to be teachers knowing they'll receive greater scrutiny at the judgement. Not a heaven and hell judgement but rather even Christians teachers will have to give account to the Lord for what they taught. And i'll add HOW THEY TAUGHT IT. The proof of this is in 2 Tim 2:26
But nowadays, of course, our ears are made so sensitive by the mad multitude of flatterers that as soon as we find that we are not praised in all things, we cry out that people are vicious; and when we cannot ward off the truth under any other guise, we escape from it under the pretext of the snappishness, impatience, and immoderateness of its defenders.
Sure. Happens with many all the time. As for me I don't mind others telling me I'm way, way off. Doesn't upset me one bit. But I say OK well bring out on the table what you've got to say and I'll do my best to sincerely assess it.
What good does salt do if it does not bite?
Remember though. Another has the right to try to figure out what you're bringing is genuine salt too. You have to agree there can be many who would say what you just did but they're just genuinely obnoxious and out of line in what they're saying. Their "biting" is because they're of a wrong spirit.