The King of the North (Not Russia)

Barraco

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,626
56
41
Minot, ND
Visit site
✟24,846.00
Faith
Christian
The war going on in Israel has caused many to revisit end-time prophecies and ponder if this is a sign the Times of the Gentiles is coming to a close. While I was pondering the idea of Gog of Magog and the king of the North being Russia, the evidence seemed to point to Turkey instead. This seems more plausible knowing that:

1) Turkey was the seat of the Roman Empire before the Ottoman Empire took Constantinople
2) The Ottoman rulers considered themselves Caesars of the Roman Empire
3) There is a stronger opposition of the existence of Israel among Muslims than among Russians
4) Turkey is trying to be a superpower in Middle Eastern affairs, with Erdogan even espousing desires to restore the Ottoman Empire

I find it highly feasible that Turkey, who rules the territory ruled by the Seleucids, is the king of the North in Daniel 11:40-45. Daniel 9:27 suggests that a covenant will be confirmed or strengthen for one seven, or seven years. I see this being the nations surrounding Israel, as called out in Psalm 83. These would be the ten horns of the beast of Revelation 17, or the ten toes of the image in Daniel 2. Could this war be the catalyst for that covenant, nearby kicking off the last seven years of the Times of the Gentiles?

Looking forward to your thoughts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Berean Tim

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
10,832
4,770
59
Mississippi
✟253,396.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
-​

Gog and Magog happens at the end of the 1000 year rule of The Messiah, when satan is released.

The king of the north, is the same person as Pauls man of sin and the beast out of the sea. The king of the north will be Assyrian and will not worship the god of his fathers (muslim) but will worship a new god (satan).
 
Upvote 0

Barraco

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,626
56
41
Minot, ND
Visit site
✟24,846.00
Faith
Christian
I believe you may be right about Gog and Magog. I don’t agree with you on the deity the king of the North worships. It’s clear the king rules over Muslims, who are currently divided on who has the right to rule. It would be that much harder to convince them to follow him if he doesn’t even worship Allah.
 
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
10,832
4,770
59
Mississippi
✟253,396.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
I believe you may be right about Gog and Magog. I don’t agree with you on the deity the king of the North worships. It’s clear the king rules over Muslims, who are currently divided on who has the right to rule. It would be that much harder to convince them to follow him if he doesn’t even worship Allah.
-​

“The king will do as he pleases. He will exalt and magnify himself above every god and will say unheard-of things against the God of gods. He will be successful until the time of wrath is completed, for what has been determined must take place. He will show no regard for the gods of his ancestors or for the one desired by women, nor will he regard any god, but will exalt himself above them all. Instead of them, he will honor a god of fortresses; a god unknown to his ancestors he will honor with gold and silver, with precious stones and costly gifts.
 
Upvote 0

Barraco

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,626
56
41
Minot, ND
Visit site
✟24,846.00
Faith
Christian
-​

“The king will do as he pleases. He will exalt and magnify himself above every god and will say unheard-of things against the God of gods. He will be successful until the time of wrath is completed, for what has been determined must take place. He will show no regard for the gods of his ancestors or for the one desired by women, nor will he regard any god, but will exalt himself above them all. Instead of them, he will honor a god of fortresses; a god unknown to his ancestors he will honor with gold and silver, with precious stones and costly gifts.
Those things resemble the Caesars, both Roman and Ottoman.
 
Upvote 0

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
10,832
4,770
59
Mississippi
✟253,396.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Those things resemble the Caesars, both Roman and Ottoman.
verse 40 states this happens at the time of the end

“At the time of the end the king of the South shall attack him; and the king of the North shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots,horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter the countries, overwhelm them, and pass through.
 
Upvote 0

anetazo

Well-Known Member
Feb 19, 2023
522
122
51
Meriden
✟27,471.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Gods Elect, Zadok.

Daniel chapter 11:21 . The vile one is satan as antichrist. He comes 6th, peacefully. This chapter is politics and religion. Antichrist has 5 month period, revelation chapter 9.

Time was shortened from 7 years to 5 month period.

Chittim are the hidden ones. They are kenites and the election..

Antichrist takes over all nations by lies and deception.

Those who are biblically illiterate don't have prayer of chance against antichrist near future.

Ephesians chapter 6. Gospel armour is knowledge and wisdom of God's word. Majority of people are biblically illiterate. Revelation is 13 confers with Daniel 11 21 to 11:45.

Many shepherds have failed to prepare their flocks for antichrist.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
11,297
5,759
49
The Wild West
✟482,329.00
Country
United States
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
sign the Times of the Gentiles is coming to a close.

The what now? In Galatians, St. Paul instructs us that in Christ Jesus, there is neither Jew or Gentile, for all are one in him.

Also, according to a literal reading of 2 Peter 1:11, the Kingdom of Christ shall last forever, not a thousand years, and this, combined with the realization that scripture commonly uses large numbers (for example, we are clearly obliged to forgive our neighbors for the same offense more than 490 times) to convey the concept of the infinite to a civilization without widespread knowledge of even rudimentary mathematics, and the Chiliasm associated with the Apollinarianist sect, persuaded the Council of Constantinople to add the confession that the Kingdom of Christ shall have no end to the revised Nicene Creed, in 381, although many contemporary pre-millenarians seem to be unaware of the fact that the Symbol of the Faith was expressly written to contradict their teachings. What is more, the second epistle of St. Peter warns that no prophecy is of any private exposition in vs. 1:20.

It should also be stressed regarding Russia that however bleak the present circumstances may appear, we are talking about a country where the largest religion is Christianity, and that Christianity, which consists of several different Orthodox churches (the largest being the Moscow Patriarchate, two Old Rite Orthodox churches, also known as “Russian Old Believers”, and the Armenian Apostolic Church), and where Ukrainians are the largest ethnic minority (and conversely, Russians are the largest ethnic minority in Ukraine and the ethnic majority in the disputed territories), endured, together with their Ukrainian brethren, extreme persecution at the hands of the KGB and its precursors the NKVD, etc, going back to the Cheka, since the overthrow of the Czarist monarchy, and furthermore, the Russian Orthodox Church during the reign of Czar “Peter the Great” was denied the right to elect a Patriarch, and its legitimate Holy Synod which ordinarily comprises the greater portion of bishops, or all of them, depending on the Orthodox church, was replaced by a “Holy Synod” consisting of just three bishops and an “Imperial Procurator” appointed by the Czar, who had immense power, and these Procurators actively interfered with the church until the end of the 19th century, and a new Patriarch was not elected until the collapse of the Czarist regime in 1917, during the Provisional Government (St. Tikhon, who had been the Metropolitan of New York City and of North America, and who together with his Antiochian colleague St. Rafael Hawaheeny had among other things been working with the Episcopalians, who came close to merging with the Russian Orthodox, which would have been splendid, but the rise of the Soviet Union and the subversion of the Anglo Catholic movement by the “Liberal Catholic” movement which consisted of people who would be Roman Catholic but objected to their moral teachings, so instead sought to modify those of the Episcopal Church to be more lax, and interference by the “Low Church” movement which resented the idea of the Protestant Episcopal Church as a sacramental traditional church and desired it to rather be more like the Church of England in the early 18th century, scuppered that. Additionally, the Georgian Orthodox Church was forcibly merged into the Russian Orthodox Church when Georgia became a protectorate, and then a formal part, of the Russian Empire, due to the threat of imminent invasion from the Turks, and this forcible merger resulted in some loss of Georgian cultural heritage (fortunately the merger was undone and the Georgian church is independent once more, but in full communion with the Russian church and most other canonical Eastern Orthodox churches).

Thus during the Soviet Union, there were five separate Orthodox churches, the Armenian Apostolic Church, which is Oriental Orthodox, and the Russian Orthodox, the two Old Believer jurisdictions, which had also been persecuted under the Czars and were forbidden until 1901 from even ringing their church bells, and the Georgian Orthodox, and also several Eastern Catholic churches such as the Ukrainian Greek Catholics, the Russian Greek Catholics, the Georgian Catholics, the Armenian Catholics, and the Roman-Rite Catholics who also have a population in Russia and the former Russian empire to this day, and the Ukrainian Lutheran Church and the Lutheran churches of the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) were all enduring persecution from the Soviet regime, and the Finnish Orthodox and Finnish Lutherans were displaced from Karelia when they were displaced from that territory in the aftermath of the Continuation War in 1944. This was a result of the ill-advised decision of Mannerheim to align himself to a certain extent with Hitler, which some argue was necessary as otherwise Finland would have been re-annexed by Russia (which had ruled it as a Grand Duchy after capturing it from Sweden in the 18th century), but the consequence of this decision was the country, unbeknownst to most, was compelled to follow the lead of the Soviet Union with regards to foreign relations, and effectively served as a capitalist buffer state, but one that lacked true self-determination even to the extent enjoyed by Austria. Hence the verb “Finlandization”.

It seems therefore unlikely that a country where Christianity has been the largest and simultaneously the most persecuted religion, in all of its different varieties, could be regarded as Gog and Magog.

Of course Turkey is much worse, but until 1915 and the massive genocide, it had an enormous Christian population. Unfortunately most of those who would otherwise be living in what is now Turkey were either killed, foced to emigrate during the population exchange with Greece in 1920, or otherwise intimidated into leaving in the following decades, with emigration continuing even now under Erdogan (for example, the Metropolis of Bursa, once known as Chalcedon, had its last small church with around 18 ethnic Greek parishioners succumb to political pressure to close around 2014). However, the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople remains in the Phanar district of Istanbul, and also there is still an Armenian Patriarchate of Constantinople, and barely enough Armenians to sustain it, although the Turks continue to deny the genocide and were also supporters of Azerbaijan in the recent ethnic cleansing of Nagorno-Karabakh including the ancient Christian city of Artsakh, and we still don’t know the status of those Armenians who did not flee into Armenia. Previoulsy Azerbaijan occupied some Armenian claimed territory, and Armenia occupied Nagorno-Karabakh, which was historically Armenia but was assigned to the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic by a caprice of the Politburo, but now the Azeris control all of this. Additionally, the Syriac Orthodox historically had a major population center in Tur Abdin, where there were 20 monasteries, a few of which still have monks, and some Syriacs remain, but the majority left for Syria long ago, including the Patriarch, who moved from there to Damascus in the aftermath of the 1915 genocide, known as Sayfo among the Syriac Orthodox.

However, it is the case that a very large number of churches mentioned in the New Testament were what is now Turkey, including, but not limited to the churches of Antioch, Ephesus, Laodicea, Philadelphia, and also several important cities in the early church, including Edessa and Nisibis, all fell within the borders of what is now Turkey, unfortunately, because the ethnic cleansing of the 1920s has left them without Christians in most cases, however, it still seems unlikely that Gog and Magog would be countries so historically important to, and in the case of Russia, heavily populated by, Christians.


Also there is hope for Christianization in Turkey. The crackdowns of Erdogan have not been well-received, and he was nearly overthrown a few years previously. Oddly it seems like Russia intervened to prop up Erdogan despite having previously been opposed to him. On a political level I am baffled by the fact that Turkey is still part of NATO, given that the raison d’etre for having them seems scarcely relevant given modern war-fighting technology and the membership in NATO of Romania and Bulgaria, providing alternative access to the Black Sea.

I don’t think we have enough information to say which countries will ultimately prove to be Gog and Magog. If we were to speculate merely about countries that have a hostility to Christianity and an increasingly authoritarian regime, I feel I would be forced to include Canada (and my Canadian friends on CF I think would agree with me) on such a list along with Turkey, and Scandinavia for that matter, given how recent legislation in the Canadian and Nordic countries has had the effect of interfering with the ability of the churches there to clearly articulate the traditional Christian position on issues like homosexuality without fear of reprisal for “hate speech”, and given the extreme interference churches experienced during the pandemic, when other institutions were allowed to remain open, and other gatherings were permitted.

There is also the issue of China and North Korea, which are extremely hostile to the Christian religion. In Central Asia, ironically, the most Christian-friendly nation is in fact Iran, where after some initial instability, the Armenian and Assyrian churches have continued to benefit from a level of tolerance and safety which greatly exceeds that recently experienced elsewhere in the Middle East. Indeed, one could argue that for whatever reason, the otherwise horrible Iranian regime has been better to Christisns on legal terms than any other Islalmist countries, with only Syria and Lebanon, the former of which is ruled by a Sufi Muslim of the mysterious Alawi sect and which in majority Alawi areas not exposed to the severe fighting of the civil war, for example, the area of Latakia, has been quite safe, with most of the danger in the civil war coming from ISIS, Al Qaeda, and so on, and the latter of which is jointly ruled by Christians, who comprise over a third of the population, and under the Lebanese constitution, the President is required to be a Christian, being consistently as friendly to Christianity in terms of their official government. Egypt at present has a popularly installed military dictatorship which is very supportive of the Coptic Christians, who represent 10% of the population, and the other Christians such as the Greek Orthodox Churches of Alexandria and Sinai, although one cannot forget how eleven years ago Christianity was intimidated by the hostile government of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was popularly elected after the corrupt dictator Mubarak was deposed, only to itself be deposed after angering both the Christians and the Muslims. In Egypt there does not appear to be a significant hostility between the majority of the Muslims and their Christian brethren, but the government has been unable to prevent periodic terrorist attacks against Christians, primarily targeting the Coptic Orthodox church, such as the bombing of a major Coptic Orthodox parish adjacent to their main cathedral in Cairo, and of a bus carrying young pilgrims on a visit to St. Anthony’s Monastery, which is one of the oldest Christian monasteries in the world, Christian monasticism having originated among the pious Coptic Christians of Egypt in the fourth century AD, after they had endured severe martyrdom under Diocletian.

In terms of safety from terror attacks or reprisals, the only places in the Middle East which seem safer than Iran for Christians for the time being appear to be the Gulf States other than Saudi Arabia (such as Oman, the UAE and even Qatar), where Christianity is completely illegal, and the interior of the Kurdistan region of Iraq, for example, Erbil, which is quite safe, as the Kurds and Christians seem to get along very well (the Kurdish ethnoreligious minority the Yazidis, who experienced a genocide, with all the men of their historic city of Sinjar in the Nineveh Plains being killed, and all the women and children sold into slavery, at the hands of ISIS in 2015, had, a century earlier, sheltered Armenians during the Turkish genocide against the Christians, and thus were permitted to settle in the Armenian state, and remain the largest ethnic minority therein). Indeed Dubai, the crown jewell of the United Arab Emirates, is particularly friendly and welcoming to Christians, with churches from virtually every denomination present. This is logical since Dubai’s long-term, post-oil economic strategy presently rests to a large extent on becoming a hub for transportation and commerce between Asia and Europe, and that requires the Christians to feel safe, and other cities in the Gulf such as the UAE capital of Abu Dhabi, and the country of Qatar, and to a lesser extent Oman, are following the same strategy so their economy remains viable when oil runs out.

If we look at central Asia, however, the situation becomes much more bleak. Aside from Azerbaijan, which is actively opposed to Christianity, the other former soviet Socialist Republics still have sizable Christian populations, but these consist primarily of ethnic Russians, Ukrainians, and also Germans who were relocated forcibly to Kazakhstan after WWII (the pious traditionalist German Catholic bishop Athanasius Schneider is from Central Asia), and these Orthodox and Catholic Christians are in a situation where there are some local members of their churches, but the majority of the Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Tajiks, Turkmen, and Kyrgyz remain Muslims, albeit perhaps not extremely fanatical Muslims; in Turkmenistan, for example, the cult of personality surrounding the head of state seems to be a more important religion than Islam. But we should not forget that in Uzbekistan there is the mausoleum and shrine to Tamerlane, who was the 12th century equivalent of Hitler, one of the most genocidal men who ever lived; unlike most Mongols, he was hostile to Christians, and he initiated a genocide, continued by his sons, that exterminated most of the Church of the East, which prior to that time had been in geographic terms the largest Christian church, extending from Aleppo and Nisibis in as its northwest corner, down to Socorro off the coast of Yemen in its southwest corner, stretching right across Asia to Mongolia, China and Tibet; after Tamerlane, all of its population outside of the Fertile Crescent in modern day Iraq, Iran, Syria and Turkey, and the Malabar Coast of India, which were the two historic centers (indeed, Seleucia-Cstesiphon, the precursor to Baghdad, was the seat of its Patriarch, and its presence in Kerala, India, had been established by St. Thomas the Apostle, who was martyred there in 53 AD).

Speaking of India, persecution of Christians there is intensifying, particularly from Hindu nationalists, and has included the rape of a nun. In Pakistan, the persecution of Christians is becoming dire and approaching the level of a genocide. And Afghanistan, which has always been a place of extreme danger for Christians, is once more subject to the tyranny of the Taliban, which is spending most of its time trying to avoid being overthrown by the even more horrifying remnants of the Islamic State. The thought of ISIS ruling Afghanistan is dreadful, and not just for the Afghan people.

Given all of this, I don’t see any country that could stand out as being Gog or Magog, since frankly every country in the Northern Hemisphere seems a bit hostile to Christians at the moment in various ways, with a few exceptions such as Hungary*. I also do not see any basis for assuming we don’t have to worry about Gog and Magog considering that view rests on a premillenial interpretation which is contradicted by the Second Epistle of the Holy Apostle Peter.
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
11,297
5,759
49
The Wild West
✟482,329.00
Country
United States
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
*Hungary of late seems to be the one country standing up for Christian values in a manner that is not also intimately connected with a preferred sect; the country has a Roman Catholic majority but I have not heard of any complaints from the sizable minorities of Protestant and Orthodox Christians. In general, Eastern Europe seems to value Christianity more than Western Europe, but in several cases there is a sectarian component that makes one uneasy, for example, the polarization between the Serbian Orthodox and Roman Catholics in the former Yugoslavia which became openly violent in a three-way clash also involving the Muslims in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Also, this rule has some exceptions, for example, Estonia, which despite having a devout Lutheran and a devout Eastern Orthodox population, is also the most atheistic country in Europe, moreso than Belgium and the Netherlands, although perhaps the increase in piety in those countries is due to an influx of persecuted Christians from the Middle East and Africa. The Syriac Orthodox, for example, have emigrated in very large numbers to the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland, with those countries now having seminaries and monasteries, which is not yet the case in North America (although the Coptic Orthodox Church, which is in full communion with the Syriac Orthodox and in many respects its closest relation in that both churches, while retaining Syriac and Coptic as their liturgical language, have populations that predominantly speak Arabic in the vernacular, does have two monasteries in North America).

So in summary, Turkey does not stand out to me as being a uniquely plausible candidate for Gog or Magog, and furthermore, based on 2 Peter, I don’t think we can usefully identify Gog and Magog until such time as they actually exist in the form prophesized, and furthermore, the exact meaning of the prophecy is not for us to simply guess about as the laity, but is rather something that must be studied from a Patristic perspective, as it is an area that can only be understood by the entire Christian Church writ large, as opposed to being something that an individual member could reliably ascertain on their own, apart from the centuries of knowledge and prayerful reflection on the subject by the early church and by subsequent generations of Christians. To be a Christian is to be grafted onto the Body of Christ, the Church, as defined by St. Paul in 1 Corinthians, and elsewhere, for we are saved together as Christians in the church, and it is in and through the church, whether you define this using an Orthodox ecclesiology based on apostolic succession, or a Roman Catholic ecclesiology based on communion with the Pope of Rome, or a Protestant ecclesiology such as the Invisible Church model or the Local Church model which is particularly favored by Congregationalists and Baptists, or via the qualitative model espoused by Martin Luther, it is that conception of the church which has to make the determination.

Speaking of which, given the extent to which I have discussed Eastern and Oriental Orthodox, Roman Catholics and Lutherans in this post, I feel obliged to mention it to my friends @prodromos @dzheremi @Lukaris @chevyontheriver @concretecamper @Michie @ViaCrucis and @MarkRohfrietsch because I would be very interested if there is some Patristic or otherwise traditional theological aspect to Gog and Magog that I am omitting.

Also lamentably we do not at present, as far as I am aware, have any members from the Assyrian Church of the East, and I haven’t seen our Syriac Orthodox member from India, @coorilose , online recently, and I greatly enjoyed his post.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,470
5,318
✟833,259.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
*Hungary of late seems to be the one country standing up for Christian values in a manner that is not also intimately connected with a preferred sect; the country has a Roman Catholic majority but I have not heard of any complaints from the sizable minorities of Protestant and Orthodox Christians. In general, Eastern Europe seems to value Christianity more than Western Europe, but in several cases there is a sectarian component that makes one uneasy, for example, the polarization between the Serbian Orthodox and Roman Catholics in the former Yugoslavia which became openly violent in a three-way clash also involving the Muslims in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Also, this rule has some exceptions, for example, Estonia, which despite having a devout Lutheran and a devout Eastern Orthodox population, is also the most atheistic country in Europe, moreso than Belgium and the Netherlands, although perhaps the increase in piety in those countries is due to an influx of persecuted Christians from the Middle East and Africa. The Syriac Orthodox, for example, have emigrated in very large numbers to the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland, with those countries now having seminaries and monasteries, which is not yet the case in North America (although the Coptic Orthodox Church, which is in full communion with the Syriac Orthodox and in many respects its closest relation in that both churches, while retaining Syriac and Coptic as their liturgical language, have populations that predominantly speak Arabic in the vernacular, does have two monasteries in North America).

So in summary, Turkey does not stand out to me as being a uniquely plausible candidate for Gog or Magog, and furthermore, based on 2 Peter, I don’t think we can usefully identify Gog and Magog until such time as they actually exist in the form prophesized, and furthermore, the exact meaning of the prophecy is not for us to simply guess about as the laity, but is rather something that must be studied from a Patristic perspective, as it is an area that can only be understood by the entire Christian Church writ large, as opposed to being something that an individual member could reliably ascertain on their own, apart from the centuries of knowledge and prayerful reflection on the subject by the early church and by subsequent generations of Christians. To be a Christian is to be grafted onto the Body of Christ, the Church, as defined by St. Paul in 1 Corinthians, and elsewhere, for we are saved together as Christians in the church, and it is in and through the church, whether you define this using an Orthodox ecclesiology based on apostolic succession, or a Roman Catholic ecclesiology based on communion with the Pope of Rome, or a Protestant ecclesiology such as the Invisible Church model or the Local Church model which is particularly favored by Congregationalists and Baptists, or via the qualitative model espoused by Martin Luther, it is that conception of the church which has to make the determination.

Speaking of which, given the extent to which I have discussed Eastern and Oriental Orthodox, Roman Catholics and Lutherans in this post, I feel obliged to mention it to my friends @prodromos @dzheremi @Lukaris @chevyontheriver @concretecamper @Michie @ViaCrucis and @MarkRohfrietsch because I would be very interested if there is some Patristic or otherwise traditional theological aspect to Gog and Magog that I am omitting.

Also lamentably we do not at present, as far as I am aware, have any members from the Assyrian Church of the East, and I haven’t seen our Syriac Orthodox member from India, @coorilose , online recently, and I greatly enjoyed his post.
Since we know God's plan, the general view of Confessional Lutherans regarding this is: 1. to praise God that he has a plan and 2. to ask that He comes quickly to fulfil that plan and 3. to do so with our eyes fixed firmly on His cross, and our hearts filled with His gospel promises.

If these things are so hard for us to understand, it is my presumption that the details are among those things that I don't need to know, and most likely God does not want me to know. It is enough for me to trust Him, His Word, and His Sacraments.

Come quickly Lord!!!
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
11,297
5,759
49
The Wild West
✟482,329.00
Country
United States
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
Since we know God's plan, the general view of Confessional Lutherans regarding this is: 1. to praise God that he has a plan and 2. to ask that He comes quickly to fulfil that plan and 3. to do so with our eyes fixed firmly on His cross, and our hearts filled with His gospel promises.

If these things are so hard for us to understand, it is my presumption that the details are among those things that I don't need to know, and most likely God does not want me to know. It is enough for me to trust Him, His Word, and His Sacraments.

Come quickly Lord!!!

Exactly. And I have confidence that God will come as quickly as possible given His desire to maximize the extent of our salvation, and there is nothing that we humans can or should be doing or attempting to do other than what we are instructed to do in the New Testament, which is to preach the Gospel to all nations, baptizing in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, celebrating the Eucharist, caring for the sick and the poor and showing mercy and loving our neighbors as ourselves.

In particular, actions intended to somehow accelerate the second coming, for example, by supporting proposals for rebuilding the Jewish Temple, I am entirely opposed to, as we are not told to do anything of the sort in the New Testament, and indeed where the Dome of the Rock is now, there had been a Christian church, and if we were to dare to mess with the Temple Mount at all, and my inclination is in the interests of peace to preserve the current status quo where the Muslims control the top, but there is a route for Jews who want to see it, provided they do not provoke the Muslims, but the Jews in turn have access to the Western Wall for use as an open air synagogue, which is how it has been used for many centuries, as this arrangement seems equitable, and in any case the focus of Christian worship in Jerusalem should be at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre and other important sites, such as the Monastery of St. Mark the Evangelist, which is one of the two possible locations of the Cenacle (the other being a Gothic church built by the Crusaders, but on a site the Jews claim was the tomb of King David, and the Muslims also claim it; in that case I think the Jews are probably right, since the Syriac Orthodox building is of a size and location that seems more realistic to me).
 
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
28,791
3,423
Non-dispensationalist
✟361,123.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The war going on in Israel has caused many to revisit end-time prophecies and ponder if this is a sign the Times of the Gentiles is coming to a close. While I was pondering the idea of Gog of Magog and the king of the North being Russia, the evidence seemed to point to Turkey instead. This seems more plausible knowing that:

1) Turkey was the seat of the Roman Empire before the Ottoman Empire took Constantinople
2) The Ottoman rulers considered themselves Caesars of the Roman Empire
3) There is a stronger opposition of the existence of Israel among Muslims than among Russians
4) Turkey is trying to be a superpower in Middle Eastern affairs, with Erdogan even espousing desires to restore the Ottoman Empire

I find it highly feasible that Turkey, who rules the territory ruled by the Seleucids, is the king of the North in Daniel 11:40-45. Daniel 9:27 suggests that a covenant will be confirmed or strengthen for one seven, or seven years. I see this being the nations surrounding Israel, as called out in Psalm 83. These would be the ten horns of the beast of Revelation 17, or the ten toes of the image in Daniel 2. Could this war be the catalyst for that covenant, nearby kicking off the last seven years of the Times of the Gentiles?

Looking forward to your thoughts.
In the Daniel 11:40-45 verses, those are near the very end of the 7 years. End times. A prelude to Armageddon, to bring all the nations of the world into the middle east area. The king of the North will be leader of Russia, it's armies retooled after the Gog/Magog event.

Russia's army will be decimated in the Gog/Magog event. It will take 7 years to reload with the next group of military age men.

Gog/Magog > then the seven years > then the prelude to Armageddon (Daniel 40-45) > then the sign of the Son of Man, Jesus, in heaven > then Armageddon to make war on Jesus > then Jesus descending down to earth and executing judgment.


The prelude to Armageddon will be a three way group attack on the beast-king, King of the West, "the he and him" in Daniel 11:40-45. It does not give the reason, but likely because he will be directing all of the middle east oil to the Western alliance of nations, under the EU main leadership. The beast-king will be the dictator of the EU.

As the fighting is going on - suddenly, the cosmos will part, and the world sees Jesus, above, in the third heaven, sickle in hand. That over-riding threat will cause the kings of the earth to unite, and to prepare to make war on Jesus, gathering their armies at Armageddon, and taking half the population of Jerusalem as hostages.

Here are the three stages right at the end of the seven years. 1. the prelude to Armageddon (Daniel 11:40-44) 2. the beast king's last stand, between the seas (Daniel 11:45) 3. the sign of the Son of Man in heaven (Matthew 24:30a)



prelu to armageddon.jpg





between the seas.jpg


The sign of the son of man in heaven.jpg
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
37,510
26,945
Pacific Northwest
✟734,252.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
The following isn't "the Lutheran view", though Luther himself IIRC spoke favorably of 1 Maccabees as an important historical work that explains some of the prophecies in Daniel.

Instead, this is just a common understanding among exegetes, historians, and biblical scholars:

Daniel's reference to the conflicts between the king of the north and king of the south is likely a reference to the Seleucids and Ptolemies, specifically as it pertains to the reign of the Seleucid ruler Antiochus IV Epiphanes (the Ptolemaic king at the time of the sixth war was Ptolemy VI Philometer). Antiochus' war against the Ptolemaic Egypt resulted in the capture of Judea, and the attempts at forced Hellenization of the Jews--including banning Jews to circumcise, observe the Sabbath, and the most damning thing: A total desecration of the Holy Temple when a pig was sacrificed in honor of Zeus in the Holy of Holies. These things led to the Maccabean Revolt and the independence of Judea until the Roman conquest of the region.

One does not need to regard 1 Maccabees as Scripture to recognize the value and importance of the text historically--providing important insights into a critical period of Jewish history that offers deeply important historical context for the Gospels in addition to offering us important insight into some of the things we read in Daniel.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
11,297
5,759
49
The Wild West
✟482,329.00
Country
United States
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
The following isn't "the Lutheran view", though Luther himself IIRC spoke favorably of 1 Maccabees as an important historical work that explains some of the prophecies in Daniel.

Instead, this is just a common understanding among exegetes, historians, and biblical scholars:

Daniel's reference to the conflicts between the king of the north and king of the south is likely a reference to the Seleucids and Ptolemies, specifically as it pertains to the reign of the Seleucid ruler Antiochus IV Epiphanes (the Ptolemaic king at the time of the sixth war was Ptolemy VI Philometer). Antiochus' war against the Ptolemaic Egypt resulted in the capture of Judea, and the attempts at forced Hellenization of the Jews--including banning Jews to circumcise, observe the Sabbath, and the most damning thing: A total desecration of the Holy Temple when a pig was sacrificed in honor of Zeus in the Holy of Holies. These things led to the Maccabean Revolt and the independence of Judea until the Roman conquest of the region.

One does not need to regard 1 Maccabees as Scripture to recognize the value and importance of the text historically--providing important insights into a critical period of Jewish history that offers deeply important historical context for the Gospels in addition to offering us important insight into some of the things we read in Daniel.

-CryptoLutheran

Well I do regard all four books of the Maccabees not only as Scripture but as Protocanon. 2 Maccabees in particular I regard as having great doctrinal importance. And 2 Wisdom I think is one of the most important chapters of the Bible, in that it, along with St. Isaiah’s Songs of the Suffering Servant, presents a lucid prophecy of the Passion of our Lord, God and Savior Jesus Christ, and what is amazing is that it was written or compiled around 60 AD, making it the most immediate prophecy of the Passion of our Lord. And Tobit is also of extreme importance. Indeed they all are. For example, the Wisdom of Sirach. Indeed in the Eastern Orthodox Church, I have seen it argued that some of these books which some people dismiss as apocrypha because they are not included in the Masoretic Text, are liturgically more important than, for instance, Numbers or Leviticus (although these are important books; I particularly love Leviticus, both as a historical record of the ancient Jewish liturgy, and, via Alexandrian exegesis, as an expression of the Gospel. Indeed, the immensely talented presbyter of Park Street Church in Boston, which is the last traditional Congregational church in the city, did a brilliant Alexandrian typological exegesis on Leviticus last Advent, which persuaded a young woman who was visiting the church who had been exploring Christianity to make the decision to convert. It was really superb work.

Also the historical view you have presented makes perfect sense to me; indeed I am embarrassed because I vaguely recall coming across that in seminary or in church some aeons ago, but you know with the mainline churches, once one starts to mistrust the politics driving them, it becomes very easy to tune out otherwise good and correct scholarship for fear of contamination with heterodox ideas, and then I simply never had the occasion to revisit the issue simply because it was evident to me after my formation in the Orthodox Church that the issue of Gog and Magog was not of immediate relevance, since it does not change what we have to do in order to prepare for the end times.

Of course my preference is to look for both a literal-historical message in the Old Testament, and an Alexandrian typological-Christological-prophetic message, but it becomes more complex when dealing with prophetic texts in the Old Testament.

That said, I do agree with the exegesis you presented as representing the likely literal-historical reality of the interpretation of that prophecy. What remains of interest is what might be a Christological interpretation.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

The Liturgist

Traditional Liturgical Christian
Site Supporter
Nov 26, 2019
11,297
5,759
49
The Wild West
✟482,329.00
Country
United States
Faith
Generic Orthodox Christian
Marital Status
Celibate
The following isn't "the Lutheran view", though Luther himself IIRC spoke favorably of 1 Maccabees as an important historical work that explains some of the prophecies in Daniel.

Instead, this is just a common understanding among exegetes, historians, and biblical scholars:

Daniel's reference to the conflicts between the king of the north and king of the south is likely a reference to the Seleucids and Ptolemies, specifically as it pertains to the reign of the Seleucid ruler Antiochus IV Epiphanes (the Ptolemaic king at the time of the sixth war was Ptolemy VI Philometer). Antiochus' war against the Ptolemaic Egypt resulted in the capture of Judea, and the attempts at forced Hellenization of the Jews--including banning Jews to circumcise, observe the Sabbath, and the most damning thing: A total desecration of the Holy Temple when a pig was sacrificed in honor of Zeus in the Holy of Holies. These things led to the Maccabean Revolt and the independence of Judea until the Roman conquest of the region.

One does not need to regard 1 Maccabees as Scripture to recognize the value and importance of the text historically--providing important insights into a critical period of Jewish history that offers deeply important historical context for the Gospels in addition to offering us important insight into some of the things we read in Daniel.

-CryptoLutheran

By the way, I want to thank you again for this very useful reply. I have to confess I wanted your opinion as much as I wanted the Lutheran one. You have a way of expressing orthodox doctrine in a manner which is clear and concise.
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Heretic

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,047
456
Parts Unknown
✟374,086.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
how do you view Daniel 2, 7,8, 9 10-12 should be consistent with what comes before. Hebrew has a way of repeating itself and amplifying it with more detail. have you considered that it might be symbolic at the time of the ends
 
Upvote 0

Barraco

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,626
56
41
Minot, ND
Visit site
✟24,846.00
Faith
Christian
verse 40 states this happens at the time of the end

“At the time of the end the king of the South shall attack him; and the king of the North shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots,horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter the countries, overwhelm them, and pass through.
I’m beginning to get the feeling now that the king of the North is Iran. Revelation 16 and 19 mention a false prophet, who is not mentioned before chapter 16. Iran is controlled by a Shi’ite Muslim religious teacher that calls for the destruction of America and the death of all Jews. The king of the South, in this case, is most likely Saudi Arabia, who was likely attacked by Hamas just before forming an economic alliance with Israel. Saudi Arabia and Iran are both religious governments seeking to unite the Middle East. Daniel 9:27 says the king (likely king of the North) will form an alliance with many to kickstart the 70th week of years. The many mentioned here are most likely the ten kings of Revelation 17, which I believe are the nations surrounding Israel (Psalm 83).

Thoughts?
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Heretic

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,047
456
Parts Unknown
✟374,086.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
verse 40 states this happens at the time of the end

“At the time of the end the king of the South shall attack him; and the king of the North shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots,horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter the countries, overwhelm them, and pass through.
This Historicist view is that the Time of the End started at the termination of the 1260 prophecy of Daniel 7:25. This happened in 1798 when the Chruch/State Alliance (Divine Right of Kings) ended when Napoleon General took the pope captive. The time of the end begins with the Chruch/State Alliance (King of the North) defeated and under attack, by Godless men of Reason, no God, only Science and Reason (King of the South). This battle would continue until the king of the South was Defeated. In this view, there are 2 major powers that are No God, Science, and Reason. Atheism in Russia & China. There are minor atheistic players who are mentioned as well. Vs 40, is a symbolic representation of Atheism, which began in France and spread to Russia and other places, vs the Catholic Church with the Catholic Church gaining the upper hand and defeating Russia. This view holds that when the Papacy made an Alliance with Ronald Regan to bring down Communism vs. 40 was completed. "with chariots, horsemen, and with many ships" the military arms race, the troop movements, and the trade blockades. was the end of the Cold War. 1 major Atheistic power was gone. the other is dealt with in vs. 42,43 and has not happened yet.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,470
5,318
✟833,259.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
This Historicist view is that the Time of the End started at the termination of the 1260 prophecy of Daniel 7:25. This happened in 1798 when the Chruch/State Alliance (Divine Right of Kings) ended when Napoleon General took the pope captive. The time of the end begins with the Chruch/State Alliance (King of the North) defeated and under attack, by Godless men of Reason, no God, only Science and Reason (King of the South). This battle would continue until the king of the South was Defeated. In this view, there are 2 major powers that are No God, Science, and Reason. Atheism in Russia & China. There are minor atheistic players who are mentioned as well. Vs 40, is a symbolic representation of Atheism, which began in France and spread to Russia and other places, vs the Catholic Church with the Catholic Church gaining the upper hand and defeating Russia. This view holds that when the Papacy made an Alliance with Ronald Regan to bring down Communism vs. 40 was completed. "with chariots, horsemen, and with many ships" the military arms race, the troop movements, and the trade blockades. was the end of the Cold War. 1 major Atheistic power was gone. the other is dealt with in vs. 42,43 and has not happened yet.
The Bool of Danie, while directed at those in a different time and location, still holds lessons to be learned, but what it revealed is now past.

Look also at the context of the Revelation. It is simply this: 7 letters written to 7 Churches in Asia Minor (present day turkey), written with a lot of symbolism that would have been much easier for those contemporary to John could understand. I these letters he praises each Church for it's special gifts, admonishes them for their failings, and cautions them about their futures.

Here we are in present day; and while not written specifically for us, it still speaks to us directly regarding successes and short comings, and the same warnings apply to us today (our sinful nature keeps repeating the same mistakes over and over again).

When we look to it for predictive prophecy (since just about everything in The Revelation has come to pass for those seven Churches (BTW, there is only one of the seven that still exists, that is the Church a Mira (Ismir Turkey; St. Nicholals' Church The same Bishop Nicholas who punched Arius at the Nicene council. Even then Jolly old St. Nick knew who was naughty and who was nice). The prophases already came to pass for 6 of the seven Churches.

For those who become distracted by trying to decipher meaning to predict the future, Daniel and Revelation are working just as the devil wants it to; to distract attention away from the Law, Gospel, and Sacraments.

If you want to know God's will regarding knowledge of the sequence of events, look to Scripture and it is abundantly evident that God is keeping that to Himself; and flatly tells us that no one will know, and that it will be both a shot and a surprise when it does happen.

Using these books and other "Apocalyptic" texts to predict future events is, IMO, no different than using a crystal ball, Oji board, tarot cards, or a lucky 8-Ball to discern God's Will and his plan for this world and mankind.

Scripture tells us that we all are to be ready at all times; we therefore, despite our predisposition to sin must work to have our souls and our lives set right with God.

Spread the Gospel, and stop being lead and leading others away from it using the greatest tool the devil has; fear, and chaos.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: The Liturgist
Upvote 0