We see just fine. We understand perfectly that this is revenge, and the end game is to level the playing field by dragging Biden through the same mud that some other guy operates in.
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
House releases overview of evidence against Biden
- Thread starter Always in His Presence
- Start date
- Jun 26, 2015
- 26,638
- 15,691
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
They need to show where money was transferred to Joe Biden. Have they found where funds were transferred to Joe?
You say that Hunter said he had to give his dad half? Half of what? Half the utilities, mortgage payment, food, etc. when he lived on his parent's property? But he had to pay all of his alimony they wouldn't help him with that, he told Uncle Jim.
I don't have the answers to those questions, do you?
I suggest that they audit the bank statements that they have and trace all those funds until they find funds going to Joe.
Comer, Jordon, etc. probably don't have the skills to do that. They should ask Katy Porter, I'm positive she could sort it out, and quickly too.
Upvote
0
NxNW
Well-Known Member
Heather Cox Richardson's column pretty much sums up the inquiry thus far:
Neil Cavuto of the Fox News Channel was unimpressed. He said that although Comer had promised to present “a mountain of evidence” against President Biden, “none of the expert witnesses today presented…any proof for impeachment…. The way this was built up, ‘where there’s smoke there would be fire,’... but where’s there’s smoke today, we just got a lot more smoke.”
The Republicans on the committee repeatedly talked about the volume of evidence they have uncovered, but they were never able to link their piles of evidence to the president. Under questioning, their own witnesses said there was not enough evidence to impeach President Biden.
Most notably, the Democrats called out the places where witnesses or committee members had deleted words in quotations that changed their meanings. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) emphasized that the four Republican witnesses said they had not presented any first-hand witness accounts of crimes committed by President Biden, while the committee was blocking the testimony of witnesses who could testify to actual facts.
Most dramatically, Representative Greg Cesar (D-TX) asked the members of the Oversight Committee to raise their hands if they believe that both Hunter and Trump should be held accountable if they are found guilty on any of their indictments. The Democrats all raised their hands. The Republicans did not.
One senior republican aide told CNN’s Melanie Zanona: “This is an unmitigated disaster.”
Comer’s accusation that money was wired to Joe Biden’s Delaware address did not note that the money was a loan, and it went to Hunter Biden’s bank account. Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH) claimed that documents released Wednesday from 2020 showed that the Department of Justice was protecting President Biden. But in 2020 Trump, not Biden, was president.
And on it went.
Charlie Sykes of The Bulwark wrote: “The charitable view is that the first hearing was a dumpster fire inside a clown car wrapped in a fiasco. To put it mildly, the GOP did not bring their best.”
I disagree. This is the GOP's best.
Neil Cavuto of the Fox News Channel was unimpressed. He said that although Comer had promised to present “a mountain of evidence” against President Biden, “none of the expert witnesses today presented…any proof for impeachment…. The way this was built up, ‘where there’s smoke there would be fire,’... but where’s there’s smoke today, we just got a lot more smoke.”
The Republicans on the committee repeatedly talked about the volume of evidence they have uncovered, but they were never able to link their piles of evidence to the president. Under questioning, their own witnesses said there was not enough evidence to impeach President Biden.
Most notably, the Democrats called out the places where witnesses or committee members had deleted words in quotations that changed their meanings. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) emphasized that the four Republican witnesses said they had not presented any first-hand witness accounts of crimes committed by President Biden, while the committee was blocking the testimony of witnesses who could testify to actual facts.
Most dramatically, Representative Greg Cesar (D-TX) asked the members of the Oversight Committee to raise their hands if they believe that both Hunter and Trump should be held accountable if they are found guilty on any of their indictments. The Democrats all raised their hands. The Republicans did not.
One senior republican aide told CNN’s Melanie Zanona: “This is an unmitigated disaster.”
Comer’s accusation that money was wired to Joe Biden’s Delaware address did not note that the money was a loan, and it went to Hunter Biden’s bank account. Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH) claimed that documents released Wednesday from 2020 showed that the Department of Justice was protecting President Biden. But in 2020 Trump, not Biden, was president.
And on it went.
Charlie Sykes of The Bulwark wrote: “The charitable view is that the first hearing was a dumpster fire inside a clown car wrapped in a fiasco. To put it mildly, the GOP did not bring their best.”
I disagree. This is the GOP's best.
Upvote
0
But, but Executive privilege! The claim that the President claimed Executive privilege 'of records' is unfounded because it never happened.
Upvote
0
Petros2015
Well-Known Member
- Jun 23, 2016
- 5,201
- 4,423
- 53
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Bradskii
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
- Aug 19, 2018
- 22,812
- 15,462
- 72
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
The reality is that the so called star witnesses said that there was no evidence. The reality is that some people think evidence is money wired to an actual house. The reality is that this is nothing but smoke and mirrors. That's all there is to smell. The smoke. You are being conned by the Republicans. In the most foolproof way imaginable: they are telling you what you want to hear.
Upvote
0
BPPLEE
Well-Known Member
- Apr 13, 2022
- 15,816
- 7,361
- 61
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
You can spin it that way but the alternative is that Biden is so unaware of what’s going on that he was used in an influence peddling scheme without being aware of it. Not once or twice but at least 20 times that we know of. Corrupt politician or naive and incompetent are your choices.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Yttrium
Mad Scientist
- May 19, 2019
- 4,449
- 4,936
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Skeptic
- Marital Status
- Single
What influence peddling? We still have no evidence that Joe provided anything for Hunter's business buddies.
(But I'll go with naive and incompetent anyway. He should have been wary of Hunter's shenanigans.)
Upvote
0
Similar threads
