Hey look, ignoring what I wrote and making empty accusations instead. It's just a transparent attempt to try and make the conversation about me personally instead of addressing the content of my posts. No one's going to fall for it.
I understand why there's a need to do this given how strong the comparisons are between racial discrimination and the current fad of discriminating against gay people. But that doesn't make it any less obvious of a concession that there's nothing of substance that can be said to dispute what I wrote.
It's right where I said it was when it was ignored in my previous post
Loving v. Virginia: A unanimous Court struck down state laws banning marriage between individuals of different races, holding that these anti-miscegenation statutes violated both the Due Process and the Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.
supreme.justia.com
On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge, and were sentenced to one year in jail; however, the trial judge suspended the sentence for a period of 25 years on the condition that the Lovings leave the State and not return to Virginia together for 25 years. He stated in an opinion that:
"Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And, but for the interference with his arrangement, there would be no cause for such marriage. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix."
Or more generally, this sort of thing that the church found a need to renounce :
On Renouncing The Doctrine Of The “curse Of Ham” As A Justification For Racism - SBC.net
