• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Florida Dabbles in Foreign Diplomacy - F SB 264 Forbids Foreign Nationals from Owning Most Property in State

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,510
20,357
Finger Lakes
✟323,228.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Is this even legal?
The bill (Chapter 2023-33, L.O.F.) generally restricts the issuance of government contracts or economic development incentives to, or real property ownership by, foreign principals, which are certain individuals and entities associated with foreign countries of concern. Foreign countries of concern include the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the Republic of Cuba, the Venezuelan regime of Nicolás Maduro, and the Syrian Arab Republic.

With respect to conveyances of real property in this state, the bill generally:
  • Prohibits foreign principals from owning or acquiring agricultural land in the state.
  • Prohibits foreign principals from owning or acquiring any interest in real property within 10 miles of any military installation or critical infrastructure in the state.
  • Prohibits China, Chinese Communist Party or other Chinese political party officials or members, Chinese business organizations, and persons domiciled in China, but who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents of the U.S., from purchasing or acquiring any interest in real property in the state.
  • Provides limited exceptions from the ownership restrictions for the purchase of one residential property that is not on or within 5 miles of any military installation in the state.

That sentiment is echoed by many Chinese residents in the US as laws banning foreign property purchases, most targeting Chinese people, have proliferated around the nation. According to the advocacy group APA Justice, 33 states have proposed or enacted similar bans against ownership of real estate by people of specific national origins. As legislators have revised their bills to address arguments that they are bigoted, some have added exceptions for lawful permanent residents who hold green cards.

On 8 May, Governor Ron DeSantis signed SB 264 into law, a measure that bars almost all property ownership for people or entities from various “countries of concern” including China, Cuba, North Korea and Russia. Under the law, they can’t buy property with some exceptions; individuals who hold a non-tourist visa or have been granted asylum can buy a residence of less than 2 acres (0.8 hectares) if it is at least 5 miles (8km) away from a military base or “critical infrastructure”. The law singles out Chinese people with higher penalties for violation, but it does not apply to those who are naturalized US citizens or who have legal permanent “green card” residency.
 

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,775
17,348
Here
✟1,498,127.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
It would seem as if this bill had bipartisan support in Florida

1690413674966.png


There were only 17 "nays" from the house, despite having 35 democratic house members in their state legislature.

I guess I'm curious as to what the major concern here is. (apart from some people seeing this as a potential dog whistle for bigotry against people from China)

Florida isn't even "first to the dancefloor" on this one.

Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho and Oregon have similar laws preventing foreign entities (especially political ones) from acquiring certain types of property. (a few of which were done in response to the spy balloon incident)

A knee jerk reaction? Perhaps...but I wouldn't press the "racism alarm" button just yet.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
It is racist. There are no Florida laws against Russians owning property in Florida, so why target Chinese people?

Didn't read the whole OP?

It says, the Russian Federation.

It partly makes sense....if you don't trust the federal government. Foreign nationals can buy land and eminent domain can strip it from them if needed.
 
Upvote 0

Landon Caeli

I ♡ potato pancakes and applesauce
Site Supporter
Jan 8, 2016
17,638
6,784
48
North Bay
✟817,058.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What's wrong with the Chinese government flying spy balloons, opening Chinese police stations in the US, donating billions of dollars to our schools and buying large swaths of land here? Seems totally okay! :rolleyes:
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,775
17,348
Here
✟1,498,127.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I actually kind of agree with this law on principle. I would probably rather it not specify countries/entities, though.
I think you kinda have to though.

We obviously can't get rid of all of those types of foreign investments.

For instance, I would have zero issues with a Japanese, Canadian, or British entities being able to buy certain types of land. (even farm land)

The countries specified per the article are:
China, Cuba, North Korea and Russia

I would extend the list even further and include the following in the restriction: Saudi Arabia, Iran, Belarus, and Syria

Saudi Arabia is replete with human rights violations, I don't like the idea of us being chummy until they make some reforms. Iran goes without saying...they're in the same hostile category as North Korea, Belarus is a puppet of Russia, so allowing them to still buy would be the equivalent of a straw gun purchase, Putin would be able to easily convince a company in Belarus to make the purchase and let him pull the strings, and Syria is another ally of Putin so they'd be in the same category as Belarus.
 
Upvote 0

Arcangl86

Newbie
Dec 29, 2013
12,114
8,363
✟417,413.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
Didn't read the whole OP?

It says, the Russian Federation.

It partly makes sense....if you don't trust the federal government. Foreign nationals can buy land and eminent domain can strip it from them if needed.
Yes, the Russian Federation, as in the government of Russia. Nothing about individual Russians the way it is about individual Chinese residents.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,510
20,357
Finger Lakes
✟323,228.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The countries specified per the article are:
China, Cuba, North Korea and Russia

I would extend the list even further and include the following in the restriction: Saudi Arabia, Iran, Belarus, and Syria

Saudi Arabia is replete with human rights violations, I don't like the idea of us being chummy until they make some reforms. Iran goes without saying...they're in the same hostile category as North Korea, Belarus is a puppet of Russia, so allowing them to still buy would be the equivalent of a straw gun purchase, Putin would be able to easily convince a company in Belarus to make the purchase and let him pull the strings, and Syria is another ally of Putin so they'd be in the same category as Belarus.
The first paragraph of the OP includes: Foreign countries of concern include the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the Republic of Cuba, the Venezuelan regime of Nicolás Maduro, and the Syrian Arab Republic.

Saudis still have too much money and influence.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: ThatRobGuy
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,775
17,348
Here
✟1,498,127.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Prohibits China, Chinese Communist Party or other Chinese political party officials or members, Chinese business organizations, and persons domiciled in China, but who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents of the U.S., from purchasing or acquiring any interest in real property in the state.
For this particular part...

Is there any data showing what percentage of the "secret Chinese police" would fall into this category? (I'm sure most of us have heard about these secret police stations that have popped up all over the world) Basically, they're residing in other countries, but still doing the work of the CCP via intimidating Chinese Americans who still have relatives back in China.

There's a unique concern in that aspect with regards to China and Russia that we don't typically have to worry about with other nations of ill-repute.
 
Upvote 0

Blade

Veteran
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2002
8,175
4,001
USA
✟654,188.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well maybe look into what LAND any Foreign Nationals own. Its allot! Try to just buy land in say China.. try it. "Foreign investors are not allowed to buy land in China. The land in China".

The man in Florida loves believes in Jesus Christ that came in the flesh. Maybe we should be careful how we speak.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,775
17,348
Here
✟1,498,127.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Sounds like Florida is ruled by a totalitarian dictator--like most of the news I've heard about Florida in the past year.
The kind of totalitarianism where most people willingly voted a guy in a democratic election (including a lot of blue counties flipping red)? I don't think that's indicative of a totalitarian dictator.

Is anyone willing to consider the possibility that maybe, just maybe, some on the left have gone too far left on certain issues and more and more people see conservativism as the lesser of two evils? Or at the very least, saw DeSantis as a bulwark against the excesses of the left?
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,726
46,785
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,688.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

Ron DeSantis-backed law barring Chinese from owning land in Florida galvanizes Asian Americans

Wen Raiti, a Chinese American community leader in Jacksonville, Florida, has been a Republican for more than a decade. As a small business owner, she said, the party’s fiscal conservatism and small government ethos resonated with her.

But last May, when Gov. Ron DeSantis signed legislation banning Chinese citizens from buying property in Florida, Raiti changed her party affiliation and began campaigning for local and national Democratic candidates.

For Raiti, the law was the “last straw” after all the hostile rhetoric and scapegoating that Republicans have directed at Asian Americans during the Covid-19 pandemic. “It’s in our Constitution to treat everyone with equality and justice so that everyone can live here without fear,” she said. “The Republican Party has abandoned these principles.”

[The law itself is still being challenged in court. A judge ruled against an injunction, so I infer it is currently in effect.]
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,726
46,785
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,688.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
The first paragraph of the OP includes: Foreign countries of concern include the People’s Republic of China...

Florida college fires Chinese professor under state’s ‘countries of concern’ law

On Friday, Suncoast Searchlight reported the firing of Kevin Wang, a professor who has sought asylum in the US and is authorized to work in the country. According to the outlet, Wang had been teaching classes in Chinese language and culture for nearly two years when he was fired on 12 March.

According to his dismissal letter, which Suncoast Searchlight reviewed, the New College of Florida’s decision to terminate Wang’s contract was “not based on any misconduct and does not constitute a dismissal for cause or disciplinary action”.

Instead, the college cited state law SB 846 which states that schools “may not accept any grant from or participate in any agreement with any college or university based in a foreign country of concern” without the approval from the board of governors, Suncoast Searchlight reports.

The law, which went into effect in July 2023, also prevents state universities from entering into partnerships with “any person who is domiciled in a foreign country of concern and is not a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States”.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
41,748
16,842
Fort Smith
✟1,441,795.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I bet an awful lot of retired Canadians own winter condos in Florida. They're expensive now, but a few years ago you could get some really nice ones for under $150K.
Since there are plenty of seniors whose homes are paid off, a winter place with investment potential is probably tempting.
If I were a Canadian senior I'd just be concerned about health care. They probably get medevac plans.
 
Upvote 0