Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The SDA church has very strict rules for identifying a prophet. That's why this is such a problem. She violates them. And then they won't admit that she's not what she says she is.Given that prophecy is an identifying mark of the remnant Church, what tests do SDA's use to identify a prophet?
Interesting! Do you know where I can find these rules that Adventists use?The SDA church has very strict rules for identifying a prophet. That's why this is such a problem. She violates them. And then they won't admit that she's not what she says she is.
Thanks for the information. Two observations:This is standard materiel. notice only one of them mentions Deut 18:20-21
1. 10 Tests Of A Prophet | Ellen G White Truth
2. The tests of a prophet
3. https://absg.adventist.org/pdf.php?file=2009:1Q:SE:PDFs:EAQ109_06.pdf
4. How Do You Tell a False Prophet From a True Prophet?
Thanks for the information. Two observations:
1) Frequent mention is made of prophecies about the future that come true.
But if some prophecies are conditional,
and if there's no way to know when a prophecy is conditional,
then this test has no practical application imo.
this happen a lot in Adventism. "But Mrs. White Says....." is the standard phrase you here. I was talking to John Lomacang about 15 years ago and telling him what I found and he said "Could Mrs. White be wrong?" I was like wow he sees it. Most don't they just dismiss it when it come into conflict with what they are taught.2) The idea of speaking according to the scriptures. Suppose a person believes they have found something in Ellen's writings that don't line up with the scriptures. Since those writings are "an inspired guide to Bible passages" and "correct inaccurate interpretations",
(see posts 1&3 on this thread)
the other person must be wrong. But that's a circular approach.
Very interesting! I hadn't heard of John Lomacang before reading your post, but I searched on the internet and found his website. Sounds like you know a lot of people in the Adventist movementthis happen a lot in Adventism. "But Mrs. White Says....." is the standard phrase you here. I was talking to John Lomacang about 15 years ago and telling him what I found and he said "Could Mrs. White be wrong?" I was like wow he sees it. Most don't they just dismiss it when it come into conflict with what they are taught.
yes i know quite a number of very famous SDA. I live 20+ years in an SDA college enviroment. Lomacang came out to CA in 1987 at a Doug Batchlor Seminar, at which I was baptized. I have spent a significant time in major SDA centers. Universities and Colleges, Hospitals. I used to work for the Head of Pacific Press, Dale Galusha, when he was a low level Evangelist. When I attended PUC a number of very famous SDA Admin were my advisors. So I know a lot of people. who are very famous. I love being and SDA and want to be part of the best that it had to offer..Very interesting! I hadn't heard of John Lomacang before reading your post, but I searched on the internet and found his website. Sounds like you know a lot of people in the Adventist movement![]()
Yes he does quote Ellen White quite a bit, that is not in dispute. John is also a very intelligent man and he's had a personal encounter with the Lord. John is the type of person that would become an Evangelical very easy if the Lord asked him to go that way. Same with elder Bachelor. Because both of them have personal relationships with the Lord. My conversation with elder Lomacang was a private conversation. John would not say something like that in public. You don't know these people you don't have a personal relationship with them they've never been friends of yours. I do. I know elder Lomacang from my time in Santa Rosa, redwood camp meeting when I spend time with him. Few times I actually sang with him publicly.Pastor Lomacang quotes EGW often, so doesn't seem to share in the sentiments people are claiming he does.
Private conversations are just that, private and should remain so - too easy to take things out of context and he is not here to defend himself.Yes he does quote Ellen White quite a bit, that is not in dispute. John is also a very intelligent man and he's had a personal encounter with the Lord. John is the type of person that would become an Evangelical very easy if the Lord asked him to go that way. Same with elder Bachelor. Because both of them have personal relationships with the Lord. My conversation with elder Lomacang was a private conversation. John would not say something like that in public. You don't know these people you don't have a personal relationship with them they've never been friends of yours. I do. I know elder Lomacang from my time in Santa Rosa, redwood camp meeting when I spend time with him. Few times I actually sang with him publicly.
You don't know pastor Lomacang. so don't speak for him. the private conversation was on a street corner with 5 other people around. Not some backroom conversation or private email. it was not from the pulpit or in a large group. It was not a secret meeting.It's best to let people speak for themselves. Private conversations should remain private, not to be shared one-sided on the internet- way too easy to take things out of context or hear what one wants to. I'm not sure how you would know who I am friends with or who I know since we don't know each other. I would never share this information on a public site, I have way too much respect for people, especially ones I call friends. A friend would never harm someone, loving our neighbor is to do no harm. Sharing private conversations on a public website, is not something I imagine Pastor Lomacang would be very happy about, which is why hearsay/gossip is not always to be believed
Old Jerusalem (literal Israel) is not New Jerusalem. The millennium is in heaven not Old Jerusalem, than God will bring the New Jerusalem down from heaven where He will forever dwell with His people.Ellen White said that Jerusalem would never be rebuilt again, “I also saw that Old Jerusalem never would be built up…” (Early Writings, p. 75).
Jerusalem is built up and will be the center of Christs Reign in Jerusalem for 1000 years. EGW wrong again.
Your short answer does not address the issue.Nope…..Old Jerusalem (literal Israel) is not New Jerusalem.
Rev 3:12 He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God, and he shall go out no more. I will write on him the name of My God and the name of the city of My God, the New Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God. And I will write on him My new name.
Now I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away. Also there was no more sea. 2 Then I, John, saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. 3 And I heard a loud voice from heaven saying, “Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and He will dwell with them, and they shall be His people. God Himself will be with them and be their God
You have no scripture that says the millennium is on earth, just your word- nothing you posted says that. There will be no more Mediator in the millennium because everyone will have already made their decision Revelation 22:11 so your timeline is off on the scripture you posted.Your short answer does not address the issue.
1. the real issue is where is the 1000 years. on heaven or on earth. Because of your View of EGW as a Prophet you get this wrong. it is ON EARTH. You say the 1000 years is in heaven. it is not the the New Jerusalem is always associated with heaven and the new heavens & new earth which is after the 1000 years.
New Jerusalem Hebrews 12:22
22 But you have come to Mount Zion, to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem. You have come to thousands upon thousands of angels in joyful assembly, 23 to the church of the firstborn, whose names are written in heaven. You have come to God, the Judge of all, to the spirits of the righteous made perfect, 24 to Jesus the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood that speaks a better word than the blood of Abel.
a. NJ in Heaven As he writes it.
b. 1000s of Angels - As He writes it.
c. church of first born of heaven - As He writes it.
d. God judge of spirits of righteous perfect -As He writes it.
e. Jesus mediator of New Covenat. - As He writes it.
f. writer of Hebrews is talking in the present. those things are happening as he writes them.
Rev 3:12 My God, the New Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God. And I will write on him My new name.
This happen after the 1000 years on earth. After Satan is unchained and let out of the Pit and is destroyed. has not happened yet
This post is talking about 2 things
1. a the prophetic regathering if Israel from the nations to Jerusalem as a sign of the Return of the Lord. This is currently being fulled as Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. Israel did not exist at the time of her statement. Jerusalem was not the Capital .EGW spoke against it. she said it would NEVER Happen. It did
2. a 1000 years of peace and prosperity ON THE EARTH. Is the correct view and the Sabbath is the sign of it. This teaching which is the dominate view outside of SDAism is not taught by EGW or the SDA Church. They rejected it in favor of EGW view. it was the cause of one of the first split in the SDA church. The Charge was that EGW was setting the doctrines of the Church not the Bible. it lead to the Bible Conference's of the 1850's where EGW endorsed the wrong view of salvation. which they had to change in 1888. and cause another split in the Church, which lead to D.M. Canwright leaving the SDA church.
You are incorrect here. it is on earth. and the Sabbath is the promise of that. He will restore all things. you mistakenly ascribe the New Jerusalem to the 1000 years in heaven, because of you mistaken view of the soul.The millennium is in heaven not Old Jerusalem,
Wrong again Sabbath Blessing, All scriptures say the 1000 years is on the earth. you just don't see it because you are being blinded by EGW.You have no scripture that says the millennium is on earth, just your word- nothing you posted says that.