• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Woke is Marxism Evolved to Take on the West

Whyayeman

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2018
4,626
3,133
Worcestershire
✟204,301.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Xi Van Fleet on Twitter: "I am deeply thankful. Today 35 yr ago, my dream came true. I was granted a student visa to come to USA. I no longer feel this is the America that I arrived in."
Is there a suggestion here that USA has somehow become more like China? You have to look through a particularly distorted lens to see the comparison.

'Woke' America versus actual Marxism. Xi does not anywhere suggest that she might like to return from the cultural life of the 'Land of the Free' to the most repressive regime on Earth. At least she can use Twitter to express critical opinions of her new homeland. She might well want to remain just where she is, and do her best to make allowance for people she dislikes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,664
46,721
Los Angeles Area
✟1,043,315.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Is there a suggestion here that USA has somehow become more like China?

I seem to remember an earlier version where conservatives were claiming that the Marxists were using propaganda to promote these ideas to weaken America's precious bodily fluids. In this version, the Marxists didn't believe it. They were just using it as a tool to bring down the West.
Now it's mutated so that it actually is Marxism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

Whyayeman

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2018
4,626
3,133
Worcestershire
✟204,301.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
... the Marxists were using propaganda to promote these ideas to weaken America's precious bodily fluids.
MIne are OK, I think. No complaints, anyway.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Beardo
Mar 11, 2017
22,586
16,917
55
USA
✟427,180.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I seem to remember an earlier version where conservatives were claiming that the Marxists were using propaganda to promote these ideas to weaken America's precious bodily fluids. In this version, the Marxists didn't believe it. They were just using it as a tool to bring down the West.
Now it's mutated so that it actually is Marxism.

You've got to protect your Purity of Essence.
 
Upvote 0

PsaltiChrysostom

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2018
1,047
1,005
Virginia
✟79,486.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
You've got to protect your Purity of Essence.
Gen. Ripper- I can assure you it has not recurred, Mandrake. Women uh... women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh... I do not avoid women, Mandrake. But I... I do deny them my essence.
 
Upvote 0

George95

CF Tech Master
Christian Forums Staff
Administrator
Community Manager
Site Supporter
Oct 31, 2012
19,106
2,042
30
✟1,585,636.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
threadmoved1-png.331195

MOD HAT ON

This thread has been moved from News & Current Events (Articles Required) to The Kitchen Sink.

MOD HAT OFF
 
Upvote 0

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,441
2,688
United States
✟216,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Woke is Marxism Evolved to Take on the West


This article is a nicely formatted transcript of a speech by James Lindsay about cultural Marxism. It was recently given at a conference:

"Conference organized in the European Parliament by the Identity and Democracy Foundation."

You can read the article because an article is required, or you can watch the video. In the video, James starts at 4:30 and goes to 32:55. I've put excerpts below.

I'm bringing this up because if you are sleeping then you are in trouble. There is no stopping this, and this is "Woke."

I call Woke the religion of equality, aka Church of Woke. Note that Woke is replacing Christianity and IMO it is the dominate religion in the West today. Woke is suppose to advance equity across the West:

Equity: “An administered political economy in which shares are adjusted so that citizens are made equal.”

Effectively, everybody ends up at the same economic level.

James explains the various species of Marxism. Genus is the umbrella that various species are under.

Cat: lion, tiger, leopard, house cat, ... .

Marxism: classical Marxism, radical feminism, critical race theory, queer theory and others.

Woke seems to cover many of the species under Marxism but not classical Marxism. James says Woke is Marxism with American characteristics.

Classical Marxism didn't work in the West, so they (professors and other influencers) shifted to cultural Marxism which we know as Woke. Instead of a fight between economic classes, now it's a fight between races. And Critical Race Theory falls out of that fight. Whiteness is a form of private property.

"Systemic racism is enforced by an ideology of white supremacy instead of capitalism. If you think of whiteness as a form of cultural capital, white supremacy, as they define, is identical to capitalism. It’s not believing that white people are superior. It’s believing that white people have access to the control of society and should maintain that, even if you don’t actually believe that. If you merely support that you have adopted the ideology of white supremacy into your mind."

...

"I wrote a book called Race Marxism and I defined Critical Race Theory as it really is in that book on the first page. I said that"



Moving on to queer theory:



Postcolonial theory:


The goal is the same as in Marxism. Seize the control of:

1. Means of production.
2. History.
3. Society.

Marx thought this would happen via economic means. In the West this is happening via socio-cultural means.

The various Marx species have divided themselves into peoples - folk. LGBTQ is a folk as is the black community. They act like nations and as colonizers:



"Don’t they put them on your buildings like colonizers? Don’t they hang them in your streets?"

"They think of themselves as occupying nations,"

China's Mao used identity politics to gain power. Woke is Maoism with American characteristics.



"Because the goal is to make us into what they call global citizens."

What is a global citizen?

"It’s somebody who supports the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations Agenda 2030."

"It’s more about global responsibilities. In other words, slavery."

"This is a pivotal moment in the history of the Western world."
I agree! Equality is a pipe dream. I’m better than everyone else by virtue of my spawn point and society should reflect that fact both culturally and legally. People who wish to fight this are jealous losers who live off of food stamps, and I loosely associate them with the bad guys from the Cold War. Filthy povoes, all of them.
 
Upvote 0

Akita Suggagaki

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2018
10,413
7,473
70
Midwest
✟379,363.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
There is no stopping this, and this is "Woke."
"Woke" is all about tolerance and acceptance. It is a call to all who expect these virtues to also practice them.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
43,396
13,729
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟895,029.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
"Woke" is all about tolerance and acceptance. It is a call to all who expect these virtues to also practice them.
And to force others who don't agree to "practice them" when tolerance and acceptance is redefined to mean embracing and celebrating.
 
Upvote 0

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,441
2,688
United States
✟216,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
And to force others who don't agree to "practice them" when tolerance and acceptance is redefined to mean embracing and celebrating.
The paradox of tolerance disappears when you view it not as a principle, but as a contract. Tolerate me and I’ll tolerate you. You’re not entitled to unconditional tolerance by the very people you won’t tolerate ^_^
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
43,396
13,729
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟895,029.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
The paradox of tolerance disappears when you view it not as a principle, but as a contract. Tolerate me and I’ll tolerate you. You’re not entitled to unconditional tolerance by the very people you won’t tolerate ^_^
I'll keep that in mind the next time an LGBT individual refers to Christians by a derogatory term.
 
Upvote 0

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,441
2,688
United States
✟216,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'll keep that in mind the next time an LGBT individual refers to Christians by a derogatory term.
You do that. Now you’ll understand why.
 
Upvote 0

Akita Suggagaki

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2018
10,413
7,473
70
Midwest
✟379,363.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
And to force others who don't agree to "practice them" when tolerance and acceptance is redefined to mean embracing and celebrating.
How have you been forced to embrace and celebrate?
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
43,396
13,729
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟895,029.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
You do that. Now you’ll understand why.

I already do. It's because those who speak the most about tolerance are the ones least likely to possess it.
 
Upvote 0

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
7,738
3,878
✟304,501.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
The paradox of tolerance disappears when you view it not as a principle, but as a contract. Tolerate me and I’ll tolerate you. You’re not entitled to unconditional tolerance by the very people you won’t tolerate
I'm not sure how it would help if it is a "social construct" rather than a "moral construct." The difficulty is self-contradiction, and the self-contradiction will presumably apply to social contracts just as it applies to moral constructs. Social contract theorists aren't any happier with self-contradiction than moral theorists.
 
Upvote 0

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
7,738
3,878
✟304,501.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
"Woke" is all about tolerance and acceptance. It is a call to all who expect these virtues to also practice them.
There are no more intolerant individuals than 'woke' individuals. There are no more hypocritical individuals than 'woke' individuals.
 
Upvote 0

Akita Suggagaki

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2018
10,413
7,473
70
Midwest
✟379,363.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
There are no more intolerant individuals than 'woke' individuals. There are no more hypocritical individuals than 'woke' individuals.
Thanks for your opinion but I do not share it.
 
Upvote 0

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
7,738
3,878
✟304,501.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
@zippy2006 I don’t follow. Are social contracts not conditional? What is contradictory about conditional tolerance?
I think it's a cop-out when those on the left try to make that principle/contradict distinction. I think it's a management strategy for cognitive dissonance. But maybe this deserves its own thread?

The first thing to ask is: Is the tolerant person no more tolerant of contract-breaking than the intolerant person is? It seems like saying, "I will be tolerant of everything. Except contract-breaking. That is magically different from all other things."

A second thing to ask would be: How is breach of contract objectively gauged? Is the 'contract' idea anything more than a thin justification for intolerance?

Third, principles or moral constructs are not unconditional. Infraction has always brought punishment, and punishment in kind. Property is demanded of a thief, life is demanded from a mass murderer, etc. So if the leftist was really laboring under the assumption that unconditional tolerance is desirable or virtuous, then perhaps the principle/contract distinction could help them. But in that case all the distinction is doing is addressing an irrational assumption, for principles are not generally unconditional or limitless.

Fourth, the merit of tolerance is not compatible with contractual categories. A key claim of the left is that they are tolerant even of the intolerant (at least up to a point - they are more graciously tolerant of intolerance than others are). The idea behind this seems to be that tolerance ought to be a societal value which is not stingy and which is not limited to certain spheres. Of course this doesn't mean that there is no limit, but it does tend to mean that a contractual limit is inapplicable. Such would be like trying to enforce generosity by contract.

(So I think that the principle/contract distinction is a rather superficial distinction that gets nowhere near the heart of the issue, and is probably more a way to assuage a troubled conscience than an attempt to get to the heart of the issue. Or, at best, it is the way that the left invites retributive justice back in through the backdoor after making a scene, tossing it out the front. Surely vindictive, tit-for-tat contract enforcement goes against the left's notion of tolerance.)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,883
16,414
72
Bondi
✟387,189.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I think it's a cop-out when those on the left try to make that principle/contradict distinction. I think it's a management strategy for cognitive dissonance. But maybe this deserves its own thread?

The first thing to ask is: Is the tolerant person no more tolerant of contract-breaking than the intolerant person is? It seems like saying, "I will be tolerant of everything. Except contract-breaking. That is magically different from all other things."
Tolerance is a two way contract. If you say you will be tolerant of certain behaviours then that is a contract between you and the rest of society. Which obviously includes me. So it is a contract between you and me. I will accept that you don't like the behaviour but you will tolerate it for our mutual benefit.

If someone breaks a contract then there will be consequences. If you break that contract then expect those consequences. If you don't enter into that contract (if you reserve the right to be intolerant) then expect the same. You will be judged by others on whichever position you take.
 
Upvote 0