The article obviously was extremely biased. It has all the hallmarks of it and the rhetoric. I read the whole thing. And if I had to judge the site based on the article I would have come away with this is a far left pro LGBTQ activist site.We rate Foreign Policy Least Biased due to balanced reporting with a very slight lean right and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.
Editorially, they are reasonably balanced and factual. In general, Foreign Policy leans slightly right in its news coverage but is balanced in reporting and well-sourced.
Since 2003, Foreign Policy has been nominated for eight National Magazine Awards, winning six – three for its print publication and three for its digital publication at ForeignPolicy.com. FP is the only independent magazine that has won consecutive digital national magazine awards every year since being established in 2009.
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
![]()
Foreign Policy - Bias and Credibility
LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion ormediabiasfactcheck.com
Its the first time I've been on the site and the first article I read from the site. That was my first introduction and my first impression.
So while the site as a whole may not be leftist and have a pro light bias, the article sure did.
Upvote
0