Donald Trump indicted by Manhattan grand jury

[DaisyDay]

He is a liberal and said he would be voting against Trump for the third time if he is nominated.

More of a contrarian than a liberal. And even if he were, so what?

 

[BPPLEE]

Great. He also thought Trump didn't do anything wrong while Trump et al conspired to steal election.

Nothing you can prosecute him for.

 

[Say it aint so]

Nothing you can prosecute him for.

It was the impeachment, and yes Trump is subject to prosecution. Re: Special counsel.

 

[BPPLEE]

More of a contrarian than a liberal. And even if he were, so what?

He is an expert in legal matters

 

[BPPLEE]

It was the impeachment, and yes Trump is subject to prosecution. Re: Special counsel.

We are all subject to prosecution.

 

[Say it aint so]

We are all subject to prosecution.

When there are allegations and evidence of wrong, till then, not so much. Don't want to get prosecuted? It would be helpful not to do wrong. Trump has never learned that lesson.

 

[BPPLEE]

When there are allegations and evidence of wrong, till then, not so much. Don't want to get prosecuted? It would be helpful not to do wrong. Trump has never learned that lesson.

How many times has he been prosecuted so that he could learn that lesson?

 

[Say it aint so]

How many times has he been prosecuted so that he could learn that lesson?

Wrong doing leads to investigations. Investigations lead to prosecutions. Trump has never learned that lesson. As I have said before, if situations arise where Trump sees it as a benefit to him, but it means chosing to do the right thing, the wrong thing, or nothing, he way too often chooses the wrong thing.

 

[BPPLEE]

Wrong doing leads to investigations. Investigations lead to prosecutions. Trump has never learned that lesson. As I have said before, if situations arise where Trump sees it as a benefit to him, but it means chosing to do the right thing, the wrong thing, or nothing, he way too often chooses the wrong thing.

So no answer

 

[Say it aint so]

So no answer

To quote myself, "Don't want to get prosecuted? It would be helpful not to do wrong." Trump hasn't learned that lesson.

 

[BPPLEE]

To quote myself, "Don't want to get prosecuted? It would be helpful not to do wrong." Trump hasn't learned that lesson.

To quote my question “How many times has he been prosecuted?”

 

[Say it aint so]

To quote my question “How many times has he been prosecuted?”

Irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. You brought it up, it wasn't my contention.

 

[BPPLEE]

Irrelevant as far as I'm concerned. You brought it up, it wasn't my contention.

You said he was subject to prosecution and hadn’t learned his lesson. How can he learn from something that’s never happened?

 

[DaisyDay]

He is an expert in legal matters

Yeah, but he's fond of testing the waters with novel theories that often don't fly.

 

[DaisyDay]

You said he was subject to prosecution and hadn’t learned his lesson. How can he learn from something that’s never happened?

Same as most people who don't need to be prosecuted to understand that breaking the law can get you in trouble.

 

[BPPLEE]

Same as most people who don't need to be prosecuted to understand that breaking the law can get you in trouble.

It depends on who you are.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Do you blame him? I would do the same.

I doubt you have the money for lawyers to paper the trial like Trump will do. It's really a rich man's privileged to do what he is about to do.

 

[A2SG]

Trump does seem to have hired a couple good NY white collar criminal attorneys just before the case opened.

I hope they got paid up front.

-- A2SG, for their sakes.....

 

[Postvieww]

FEC: Trump-Stormy case ‘not a campaign finance violation’ - Washington Examiner

A key member of the Federal Election Commission today rejected the Manhattan district attorney’s indictment of former President Donald Trump as a violation of federal election laws.“It's not a campaign finance violation. It's not a reporting violation of any kind,” said FEC Commissioner James E...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

From the above article:

“Second, the paperwork violation in question came well after Trump’s 2016 election, so it couldn’t have been done to help his election.

Third, it is not obvious that the reason for the payment and the reimbursement to Cohen was to influence the election, thus failing the “objective standard” of law. “It has to be something that anybody on the street can look at and say the only reason you did that was to influence the campaign,” said Trainor. “There's a lot of reasons that he could have done it that aren't related to him being a candidate for president, and so therefore, it wouldn't have met the standard as campaign expenditure under federal law,” he added.”


Not to mention the FEC has jurisdiction over Federal election violations NOT BRAGG!

The attempt to use an election violation is how Bragg is trying to make a felony out of a misdemeanor. This case will blow up in his face this not justice at work it is a POLITiCAL PERSECUTION!

 

[Postvieww]

"Mr. Trump, who pleaded not guilty to all charges on Tuesday, is the 30th defendant to be indicted on false records charges by Mr. Bragg since he took office just over a year ago."

Can you provide evidence of this without an article that requires a paid subscription?